Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Development of Prospective Secondary Biology Teachers PCK

  • Published:
Journal of Science Teacher Education

Abstract

In order to understand how prospective teachers develop knowledge for teaching, researchers must identify the types of knowledge that are integral to effective science teaching. This case study investigated how 4 prospective secondary biology teachers’ science teaching orientations, knowledge of science learners, and knowledge of instructional sequence, developed during a post-baccalaureate teacher education program. Data sources included a lesson planning task and two interview-observation cycles during the participants’ year-long internship. Over the course of a year, the participants’ science teaching orientations were based primarily on their K-16 learning experiences, and were robust and highly resistant to change. The prospective teachers became more aware of student learning difficulties, and therefore, developed more elaborated knowledge of the requirements of learning. They consistently sequenced instruction in ways that gave priority to transmitting information to students. Prospective teachers’ development of knowledge of student understanding of science and instructional sequence were congruent with their science teaching orientations. Implications are given for teacher education and future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abraham, M. R. (1992). Instructional strategies designed to teach science. In F. Lawrenz, K. Cochran, J. Krajcik & P. Simpson (Eds.), Research matters…to the science teacher (pp. 41–50). Manhattan, KS: NARST Monograph #5.

  • Abraham, M. R., & Renner, J. W. (1986). The sequence of learning cycle activities in high school chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23, 21–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, P. E., & Krockover, G. H. (1997). Beginning teacher cognition and its origins in the preservice secondary teacher program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 633–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L. (1991). Teaching mathematics for understanding: What do teachers need to know about subject matter? In M. M. Kennedy (Ed.), Teaching academic subjects to diverse learners (pp. 63–83). New York: Teacher College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borko, H., & Putnam, R. (1996). Learning to teach. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 673–708). New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, L. M., & Atwater, M. M. (2002). Teacher beliefs and cultural models: A Challenge for science teacher preparation programs. Science Education, 86, 821–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Educational Books, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., et al. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: origins, effectiveness, and applications. Colorado Springs: BSCS. Retrieved February 15, 2011 from www.bscs.org/curriculumdevelopment/features/bscs5es.html.

  • Calderhead, J. (1986). Teachers: Beliefs and knowledge. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Chaffee (Eds.), Handbook of education psychology (pp. 709–725). New York: Simon and Schuster Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsen, W. S. (1991). Effects of new biology teachers’ subject-matter knowledge on curricular planning. Science Education, 75, 631–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Da-Silva, C., Mellado, V., Ruiz, C., & Porlan, R. (2006). Evolution of the conceptions of a secondary education biology teacher: Longitudinal analysis using cognitive maps. Science Education, 6, 37–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E. A., Petish, D., & Smithey, J. (2006). Challenges new science teachers face. Review of Educational Research, 76, 607–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, O. (2000). The teacher trainer as researcher: Exploring the initial pedagogical content concerns of prospective teachers. European Journal of Teacher Education, 23(2), 127–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, O., Ahtee, M., Goodwin, A., Hatzinikita, V., & Koulaidis, V. (1999). An international study of prospective teachers’ initial teaching conceptions and concerns: The case of teaching ‘combustion’. European Journal of Teacher Education, 22, 45–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, O., & Van Driel, J. (2001). The development of prospective teachers’ concerns about teaching chemistry topics at a macro-micro-symbolic interface. In H. Behrednt, H. Dahncke, R. Duit, W. Graber, M. Komorek, A. Kross & P. Reiska (Eds.), Research in science education: Past, present, and future (pp. 271–276). Dordrecht, The Neatherlands: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demir, A. (2006). Alternative certification science teachers’ understanding and implementation of inquiry-based instruction in their beginning years of teaching. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University Missouri, Columbia, MO.

  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duran, L. B., McArthur, J., & Van Hook, S. (2004). Undergraduate students’ perceptions of an inquiry-based physics course. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17, 155–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederik, I. E., Van de Valk, A. E., Leite, L. S. F., & Thoren, I. (1999). Pre-service physics teachers and conceptual difficulties on temperature and heat. European Journal of Teacher Education, 22, 61–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichsen, P., Abell, S., Pareja, E., Brown, P., Lankford, D., & Volkmann, M. (2009). Does teaching experience matter? Examining biology teachers' prior knowledge for teaching in an alternative certification program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(4), 357–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichsen, P. M., & Dana, T. M. (2005). Substantive-level theory of highly regarded secondary biology teachers’ science teaching orientations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 218–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichsen, P., Van Driel, J., & Abell, S. (2011). Taking a closer look at science teaching orientations. Science Education.

  • Geddis, A. N., & Roberts, D. A. (1998). As science students become science teachers: A perspective on learning orientations. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 9(4), 271–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halim, L., & Meerah, S. M. (2002). Science trainee teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and its influence on physics teaching. Research in Science and Technology Education, 20, 215–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. A., & Lawson, A. E. (1998). What are the relative effects of reasoning ability and prior knowledge on biology achievement in expository and inquiry classes? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 89–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, D. M. (1992). Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 62(2), 129–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karplus, R., & Thier, H. D. (1967). A new look at elementary school science. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koballa, T. R., Glynn, S. M., Upson, L., & Coleman, D. C. (2005). Conceptions of teaching science held by novice teachers in an alternative certification program. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16, 287–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemberger, J., Hewson, P. W., & Park, H. (1999). Relationship between prospective secondary teachers’ classroom practice and their conceptions of biology and of teaching science. Science Education, 83, 347–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J. J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2004). In search of pedagogical content knowledge in science: Developing ways of articulating and documenting professional practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 370–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95–132). Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marek, E. A., & Methven, S. B. (1991). Effects of the learning cycle upon student and classroom teacher performance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marion, R., Hewson, P. W., Tabachnick, R., & Blomker, K. B. (1999). Teaching for conceptual change in elementary and secondary science methods courses. Science Education, 83, 275–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(4), 317–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odom, A. L., & Settlage, J. (1996). Teachers’ understanding of the learning cycle as assessed with a two-tier test. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 7, 123–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purser, R. K., & Renner, J. W. (1983). Results of two tenth-grade biology teaching procedures. Science Education, 67, 85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renner, J. W., Abraham, M. R., & Birnie, H. H. (1988). The necessity of each phase of the learning cycle in teaching high school physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 39–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, T., & Martin, A. K. (2007). Learning to teach science. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1151–1178). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, L. S., & Renner, J. W. (1980). Concrete and formal teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 17, 503–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Temple Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, I. (1998). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social science. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Settlage, J. (2000). Understanding the learning cycle: Influences on abilities to embrace the approach by preservice elementary teachers. Science Education, 84, 43–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. R., & Zeichner, K. M. (1999). Idea and action: Action research and the development of conceptual change teaching of science. Science Education, 83, 309–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Valk, A. E., & Broekman, H. G. B. (1999). The lesson preparation method: A way to investigate preservice teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. European Journal of Teacher Education, 21(2), 11–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Driel, J. H., De Jong, O., & Verloop, N. (2002). The development of preservice chemistry teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Science Education, 86, 572–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & de Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 673–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veal, W., & MaKinster, J. (1999). Pedagogical Content knowledge taxonomies. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3(4) Article Two. Retrieved from http://unr.edu/homepage/crowther/ejse/vealmak.html.

  • Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeichner, K. M. (1993). Traditions of practice in U.S. preservice teacher education programs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. DuBray Middle School, Fort Zumwalt School District, St. Charles, MO, USA

    Patrick Brown

  2. Science Education Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA

    Patricia Friedrichsen & Sandra Abell

Authors
  1. Patrick Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Patricia Friedrichsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sandra Abell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Brown.

About this article

Cite this article

Brown, P., Friedrichsen, P. & Abell, S. The Development of Prospective Secondary Biology Teachers PCK. J Sci Teacher Educ 24, 133–155 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9312-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9312-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation