This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Abrams, E., Southerland, S. A., & Silva, P. (2007). Inquiry in the classroom: Challenges and possibilities. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Allen, M. (2003). Eight questions on teacher preparation. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
Amaral, O. M., Garrison, L., & Klentschy, M. (2002). Helping English learners increase achievement through inquiry-based science instruction. Bilingual Research Journal, 26, 213-239
Craig, G. S. (1958). Science for the elementary-school teacher. Boston: Ginn and Company.
Etheredge, S., & Rudnitsky, A. (2003). Introducing students to scientific inquiry: How do we know what we know. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Gold, N. (2006). The high schools English learners need. Santa Barbara, CA: The University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute.
Goodlad, J. I. (1997). In praise of education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Holliday, W. G. (2001). Critically considering inquiry teaching. Science Scope, 24(7), 54–57.
Kleinfeld, J. S. (2002). The small world problem. Society, 39(2), 61–66.
Lee, O., & Luykx, A. (2006). Science education and student diversity: Synthesis and research agenda. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Martin-Hansen, L. (2002). Defining inquiry. The Science Teacher, 69(2), 34–37.
Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (1992). Science for students with disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 62, 377–411.
McComas, W. F. (1996). Ten myths of science: Reexamining what we thing about the nature of science. School Science and Mathematics, 96, 10–16.
McComas, W. F. (1998). The principal elements of the nature of science: Dispelling the myths. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 53–70). Boston: Kluwer.
Meier, D. (2002). In schools we trust. Boston: Beacon Press.
Milgram, S. (1967). The small-world problem. Psychology Today, 2, 60–67.
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Rhodes, G. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 199–226.
Rowbottom, D. P., & Aiston, S. J. (2006). The myth of scientific method in contemporary educational research. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 40(2), 137–156.
Rudolph, J. L. (2002) From World War to Woods Hole: The use of wartime research models for curriculum reform. Teachers College Record, 104(2), 212–241.
Schwab, J. J. (1960). Inquiry, the science teacher, and the educator. The School Review, 68(2), 176–195.
Shulman, L. S., & Tamir, P. (1973). Research on teaching in the natural sciences. In R. M. W. Travers (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (pp. 1098–1148). Chicago: Rand McNally.
Snider, V. E. (2006). Myths and misconceptions about teaching: What really happens in classrooms. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
Songer, N. B., Lee, H. S., & McDonald, S. (2003). Research towards an expanded understanding of inquiry science beyond one idealized standard. Science Education, 87, 490–516.
Welner, K. G. (2006). K–12 Race-conscious student assignment policies: Law, social science, and diversity. Review of Educational Research, 76, 349–382.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Settlage, J. Demythologizing Science Teacher Education: Conquering the False Ideal of Open Inquiry. J Sci Teacher Educ 18, 461–467 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-007-9060-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-007-9060-9