Skip to main content
Log in

Activity concentration of polonium-210 and lead-210 in tobacco products and annual committed effective dose to tobacco users in Tiruchirappalli District (Tamil Nadu, India)

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study has carried out with an objective of determining the activity concentrations of two radionuclides namely polonium-210 (210Po) and lead-210 (210Pb) in smoke tobacco products (cigarette, bidi and cigar) and smokeless tobacco products (chewing tobacco and snuff) consumed in Tiruchirappalli District, Tamil Nadu (India) and their annual committed effective dose to tobacco consumers. The concentration of 210Po was always higher than that of 210Pb in all the analyzed tobacco products. It also revealed that 79% of Annual committed effective dose comes from 210Po and about 21% from 210Pb. Maximum concentration (13.2 mBq g−1) of 210Po recorded in cigarette and lowest concentration was observed in snuff (6.4 mBq g−1). The highest mean committed effective dose of 210Po and 210Pb in various tobacco products were found in cigarette followed by bidi, cigar, chewing tobacco and snuff. The study revealed that the tobacco products available in Tiruchirappalli District contain a relatively lower concentration of radionuclides when compared to other regional studies. Since this kind of study in India is fragmentary, the present study has generated a base data for the first time for entire Tiruchirappalli District.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. IARC (2004) Tobacco smoke and involuntary smoking. IARC monographs Programme on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans. Technical report, IARC, Lyon

  2. Desideri D, Meli MA, Feduzi L, Roselli C (2007) 210Po and 210Pb inhalation by cigarette smoking in Italy. Health Phys 92:58–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Skwarzec B, Ulatowski J, Struminska DI, Borylo A (2001) Inhalation of 210Po and 210Pb from cigarette smoking in Poland. J Environ Radioact 57:221–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Winters TH, Franza JR (1982) Radioactivity in cigarette smoke. N Engl J Med 306(6):364–365

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. WHO (2005) Tobacco free initiative (TFI). Tobacco facts [internet].cited 2014 Aug 10. Available from: http://www.who.int/tobacco/mpower/tobacco_facts/en/

  6. CDCP (2010) National center for chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (US), office on smoking and Health (US). Nicotine addiction: past and present in. How Tobacco smoke cause disease: the biology and behavioral basis for smoking—Attributable Disease; a report of the Surgen General. Atlanta, USA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)

  7. Rodgman A, Perfetti T (2013) The chemical components of tobacco and tobacco smoke, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton. ISBN 978-1-4665-1548-2

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Karagueuzian HS, White C, Sayre J, Norman A (2011) Cigarette smoke radioactivity and lung cancer risk. Nicotine Tob Res 14(1):79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Haugen A, Mollerup S (2008) Etiology of lung cancer. In: Hansen H (ed) Textbook of lung cancer. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 17–25

    Google Scholar 

  10. Satheeshkumar G, Hameed PS, Meeramaideen M, Kannan V (2011) A post-tsunami study on the distribution and bioaccumulation of natural radionuclides in Pichavaram mangrove environment (South East Coast of India) and dose to local human population. Radiat Prot Environ 34(2):96–103

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tran TN, Le CH, Chau VT (2014) 210Po and 210Pb activity concentrations in cigarettes produced in Vietnam and their estimated dose contribution due to smoking. In: Proceedings of the 12th Asia Pacific physics conference, JPS conference proceedings vol 1, 019002

  12. Savidou A, Kehagia K, Eleftheriadis K (2006) Concentration levels of 210Pb and 210Po in dry tobacco leaves in Greece. J Environ Radioact 85:94–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kelecom A, Gouvea RCS, Santos PL (2002) Levels of 210Po and 210Pb in cigars. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 253(1):129–133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Manu A, Thualsi Brindha J, Rajaram S, Venkataraman S, Hegde AG (2011) Assessment of radiation dose from 210Pb and 210Po due to chewing tobacco leaves and smoking cigarettes an Indian Scenario. IJEP 31(2):164–169

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Godwin WS, Subha VR, Feroz KM (2010) 210Po radiation dose due to cigarette smoking. Curr Sci 98(5):681–686

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Syed UF, Bari A, Husain L (2009) Leaching of 210Po in human saliva from smokeless tobacco. J Radional Nucl Chem 281:541–546

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sankaranarayanan R, Ramadas K, Amarasinghe H, Subramanian S, Johnson N (2015) Oral cancer: prevention, early detection, and treatment. In: Gelband H, Jha P, Sankaranarayanan R et al (eds) Cancer: disease control priorities, 3rd edn. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rao SP, Bhowate RR (2008) Community based oral precancerous lesions/conditions: an analysis of associated factors. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 50(3):261–265

    Google Scholar 

  19. Panchamukhi PR, Woolery T, Nayantara SN (2008) Economics of bidis in India. In: Gupta PC, Asma S (eds) Bidi smoking and public health. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Government of India, New Delhi, pp 167–195

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sankaran Pillai G, Satheeshkumar G, Shahul Hameed P (2018) Distribution and bioaccumulation Of 210Po and 210Pb in abiotic and biotic components of the Bay of Bengal. Radiat Prot Dosim 182(2):273–284

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. UNSCEAR (2000) United Nations. Scientific Committee on the effects of atomic radiation. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation: sources, vol 1. United Nations Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kubalek D, Sersa G, Strok M, Benedik L, Jeran Z (2016) Radioactivity of cigarettes and the importance of 210Po thorium isotopes for radiation dose assessment due to smoking. J Environ Radioact 155–156:97–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Taroni M, Zaga V, Bartolomei P, Gattavecchia E, Pacifici R, Zuccaro P, Esposito M (2014) 210Pb and 210Po concentrations in Italian cigarettes and effective dose evaluation. Health Phys 107(3):195–199

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tokonami S, Kovacs T, Yoshinaga S, Kobayashi Y, Ishikawa T (2008) 210Po and 210Pb inhalation dose by cigarette smoking in Gansu and Yunnan Province, China. Jpn J Health Phys 43(2):131–134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Peres AC, Hiromoto G (2002) Evaluation of 210 Pb and 210Po in cigarette tobacco produced in Brazil. J Environ Radioact 62:115–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kovács T, Somlai J, Nagy K, Szeiler G (2007) 210Po and 210Pb concentration of cigarettes traded in Hungary and their estimated dose contribution due to smoking. Radiat Meas 42(10):1737–1741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tahir SNA, Alaamer AS (2008) Pb-210 concentrations in cigarettes tobaccos and radiation doses to the smokers. Radiat Prot Dosim 130:389–391

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zaga V, Lygidakis C, Chaouachi K, Gattavecchia E (2011) Polonium and Lung Cancer. J Oncol 2011:860103. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/860103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Khater AEM (2004) Polonium-210 budget in cigarettes. J Environ Radioact 71:33–41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sakoda A, Fukao K, Kawabe A, Kataoka T, Hanamoto K, Yamaoka K (2012) Radioactivity of 210Pb in Japanese cigarettes and radiation dose from smoking inhalation. Radiat Prot Dosim 150(1):109–113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhou H, Suzuki M, Randers-Pehrson G, Vannais D, Chen G, Trosko JE, Waldren CA, Hei TK (2001) Radiation risk to low fluences of alpha particles may be greater than we thought. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(25):14410–14415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.251524798

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors were thankful to Dr. A. K. Khaja Nazeemudeen Sahib, Secretary and Correspondent, Dr. S. Ismail Mohideen, Principal and Dr. I. Joseph A. Jerald, Head, PG and Research Department of Zoology, Jamal Mohamed College (Autonomous), Tiruchirappalli for their constant support and guidance throughout the research work. Authors also thank University Grants Commission (UGC), New Delhi for their financial support in the form of a Major Research Project [F. No. 41-96/2012(SR)].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Christobher.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Christobher, S., Periyasamy, M., Athif, P. et al. Activity concentration of polonium-210 and lead-210 in tobacco products and annual committed effective dose to tobacco users in Tiruchirappalli District (Tamil Nadu, India). J Radioanal Nucl Chem 323, 1425–1429 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-019-06879-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-019-06879-x

Keywords

Navigation