Skip to main content
Log in

Measurement of non-separated U/Pu samples: optimization of TIMS procedures for safeguards purposes at Rokkasho on-site laboratory

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The on-site laboratory (OSL) at Rokkasho Reprocessing Plant (RRP) is jointly operated by the Japanese authority Nuclear Material Control Centre and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and provides, together with the Nuclear Material Laboratory (NML) at Seibersdorf, analytical services to the IAEA’s inspectorate. OSL deals with a variety of samples typical to a reprocessing plant including pure product solutions of uranium and plutonium but also mixed U/Pu solutions originating from various stages of the chemical process. For a significant proportion of the samples, the requirement on measurement accuracy and precision from the Inspectorate makes the use of thermal ionization mass spectrometry (TIMS) indispensible. Until recently, all samples intended for TIMS had to undergo time-consuming U/Pu separation before isotope dilution measurement. The need for rapid reporting of analytical results for certain safeguards samples evoked the idea of performing TIMS measurements without prior U/Pu separation for mixed U/Pu products as they are obtained from the PUREX process at RRP. For this purpose, a systematic study was initiated to probe the figure of merits and limitations of conducting TIMS analyses on mixed U/Pu samples and, in particular, whether the accuracy and precision of the main ratios of interest, n(235U)/n(238U) and n(240Pu)/n(239Pu), are influenced by the presence of larger amounts of the other element. A series of synthetic mixtures with U/Pu ratios ranging from 1:10 up to 100:1 were prepared and measured in both laboratories—OSL and NML—using ThermoFisher TRITON multi-collector TIMS instruments. For the n(235U)/n(238U) ratio, interference due to 238Pu was observed which can be significant depending on the U/Pu ratio and the 238Pu abundance. However, for the n(240Pu)/n(239Pu) ratio, which is of premier importance for safeguarding RRP, no significant interference arising from the concomitant U was detected independently of enrichment. Even in samples with an excess of U (U/Pu ratio of 100:1), compliance with International Target Values (ITV2010) was demonstrated for n(240Pu)/n(239Pu) results with a relative difference to certified not exceeding 0.01 %.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. International Atomic Energy Agency (1992) Report of the LASCAR forum: large scale reprocessing plant safeguards. IAEA, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  2. International Atomic Energy Agency (2006) Working paper for the on-site laboratory at Rokkasho Reprocessing Plant. IAEA, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  3. Raptis K, Duhamel G, Ludwig R, Balsley SD, Bürger S, Mayorov V, Hara S, Sato Y, Itoh Y, Hayakawa T (2011) IAEA on-site laboratory: experience in establishing an internal verification regime based on method inter-comparison with ID/TIMS, ESARDA Conference Proceedings, Budapest, May 2011

  4. Raptis K, Ludwig R, Mayorov V, Duhamel G, Nagy K (2010) Thermal ionization mass spectrometry, a strategic analytical technique for safeguards on-site laboratories, IAEA symposium on international safeguards. IAEA-CN-184/261, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ludwig R, Duhamel G, Mayorov V, Nagy K, Raptis K, Hayakawa T, Midorikawa M, Sato Y, Hara S, Itoh T, Itoh Y, Suto T (2010) ESARDA Bulletin 44:40–47

    Google Scholar 

  6. International Atomic Energy Agency (2010) International target values 2010 for measurement uncertainties in safeguarding nuclear materials, IAEA STR-368, Vienna

  7. Duinslaeger L, Van Belle P, Mayer K, Abousahl S, Casteleyn K, Daures P, Eberle H, Enright T, Guiot A, Hild M, Horta Domenech J, Lajarge P, Laurent P, Le Terrier A, Lynch B, Marucci M, Millet S, Ottmar H, Richir P, Street S, Vallet P, Zuleger E (2004) Atw 49, Heft 6, 426–432

  8. Bürger S, Balsley SD, Baumann S, Berger J, Boulyga SF, Cunningham JA, Kappel S, Koepf A, Poths J (2012) Int J Mass Spectrom 311:40–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bürger S, Riciputi LR, Bostick DA, Turgeon S, McBay EH, Lavelle M (2009) Int J Mass Spectrom 286:70–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Saito-Kokubu Y et al (2012) Int J Mass Spectrom 310:52–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Aggarwal SK, Alamelu D (2005) Int J Mass Spectrom 241:83–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ramakumar KL, Rao RM, Gnanayyan L, Jain HC (1994) Int J Mass Spectrom Ion Process 134:183–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen JH, Edwards RL, Wasserburg GJ (1986) Earth Planet Sci Lett 80:241–251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Callis EL, Abernathu RM (1991) Int J Mass Spectrom 103:93–105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fiedler R (1995) Int J Mass Spectrom 146(147):91–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Richter S, Goldberg SA (2003) Int J Mass Spectrom 229:181–197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pereira De Oliveira O, De Bolle W, Richter S, Alonso A, Kühn H, Sarkis JES, Wellum R (2005) Int J Mass Spectrom 246:35–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Part of this work was conducted using Safeguards subsidy granted from the Office of Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Safeguards (JSGO), Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), as one of the designated works of the Nuclear Material Control Centre (NMCC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Raptis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raptis, K., Duhamel, G., Ludwig, R. et al. Measurement of non-separated U/Pu samples: optimization of TIMS procedures for safeguards purposes at Rokkasho on-site laboratory. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 296, 585–592 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-012-2081-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-012-2081-7

Keywords

Navigation