Skip to main content
Log in

Social Media Social Comparison of Ability (but not Opinion) Predicts Lower Identity Clarity: Identity Processing Style as a Mediator

  • Empirical Research
  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social comparison on social media has received increasing attention, but most research has focused on one type of social comparison and its psycho-emotional implications. Little is known about how different types of social comparison influence youth’s identity development. Drawing on the theories of identity processing styles and social comparison, we examined how two different forms of social comparison on social media related to three identity processing styles, which in turn predicted youth’s global self-esteem and identity clarity. We surveyed 219 college freshmen (Mage = 18.29; 74% female) once in the Fall and once in the Spring. Social comparison of ability on social media was related to concurrent diffuse-avoidant identity processing style, which predicted lower identity clarity months later. In contrast, social comparison of opinion on social media did not influence college freshmen’s global self-esteem and identity clarity through identity processing styles. The findings clarified the implications of online social comparison for youth’s identity development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Although some scholars emphasize the distinction between self and identity, others suggest that such differentiation is artificial (see a review in Vignoles et al. 2011). In this study, we use the terms of “self” and “identity” interchangeably, both referring to a person’s organized knowledge related to himself or herself (e.g., traits, beliefs, values, worth, etc.; Berzonsky 2011; Campbell et al. 1996; Erikson 1968; Rosenberg et al. 1989).

  2. Identity clarity, identity integration, and self-concept clarity can be considered synonymous, as they primarily vary semantically in terms of the intended breadth of focus (Campbell et al. 1996). These constructs also overlap with identity commitment to a large degree (Crocetti et al. 2016).

References

Download references

Authors’ Contributions

C-cY conceptualized the study, conceived of the design, collected data, performed the statistical analyses, interpreted the results, and composed the manuscript; SMH participated in developing hypotheses, interpreting results, and drafting the manuscript; MDKC participated in recruiting participants and drafting the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Data Sharing Declaration

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chia-chen Yang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The Institutional Review Board at the University of Memphis approved this research. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Appendix

Appendix

Social Media Social Comparison Scale

Most people compare themselves from time to time with others. For example, they may compare the way they feel, their opinions, their abilities, and/or their situation with those of other people. There is nothing particularly “good” or “bad” about such comparison, and some people do it more than others. In this set of questions, we would like to find out the extent to which you compare yourself with other people when using social media. How well do these statements apply to you?

 

T1 factor loading

T2 factor loading

Social media social comparison of ability

1. When using social media, I compare how my loved ones (romantic partner, family members, etc.) are doing with how others are doing

.70

.69

2. When using social media, I compare how I do things with how others do things

.80

.86

3. On social media, I compare what I have done with others as a way to find out how well I have done something

.85

.86

4. On social media, I compare how I am doing socially with other people

.82

.78

5. I don’t really use social media to compare with others to see how well I’m doing (reversely coded)

.43

.43

Social media social comparison of opinion

  

6. On social media, I talk with others about mutual opinions and experiences

.72

.60

7. On social media, I try to find out what others think who face similar problems as I face

.88

.83

8. On social media, I try to know what others in a similar situation would do

.82

.90

9. When using social media, I try to find out what others think about something that I want to learn more about

.75

.79

χ2

53.23**

51.15**

RMSEA

.07

.08

CFI

.96

.95

TLI

.94

.93

  1. These are results of confirmatory factor analysis obtained from Mplus, with maximum likelihood robust being the estimator
  2. **p < .01

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Cc., Holden, S.M. & Carter, M.D.K. Social Media Social Comparison of Ability (but not Opinion) Predicts Lower Identity Clarity: Identity Processing Style as a Mediator. J Youth Adolescence 47, 2114–2128 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0801-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0801-6

Keywords

Navigation