Abstract
Gay–Straight Alliances (GSAs) may promote wellbeing for sexual minority youth (e.g., lesbian, gay, bisexual, or questioning youth) and heterosexual youth. We considered this potential benefit of GSAs in the current study by examining whether three GSA functions—support/socializing, information/resource provision, and advocacy—contributed to sense of agency among GSA members while controlling for two major covariates, family support and the broader school LGBT climate. The sample included 295 youth in 33 Massachusetts GSAs (69 % LGBQ, 68 % cisgender female, 68 % white; M age = 16.06 years). Based on multilevel models, as hypothesized, youth who received more support/socializing, information/resources, and did more advocacy in their GSA reported greater agency. Support/socializing and advocacy distinctly contributed to agency even while accounting for the contribution of family support and positive LGBT school climate. Further, advocacy was associated with agency for sexual minority youth but not heterosexual youth. Greater organizational structure enhanced the association between support/socializing and agency; it also enhanced the association between advocacy and agency for sexual minority youth. These findings begin to provide empirical support for specific functions of GSAs that could promote wellbeing and suggest conditions under which their effects may be enhanced.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berndt, T. J. (2002). Friendship quality and social development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 7–10.
Catalano, R. F., Berglund, M. L., Ryan, J. A. M., Lonczak, H. S., & Hawkins, J. D. (2004). Positive youth development in the United States: Research findings on evaluations of positive youth development programs. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591, 98–124.
Davis, B., Stafford, M. B. R., & Pullig, C. (2014). How Gay–Straight Alliance groups mitigate the relationship between gay-bias victimization and adolescent suicide attempts. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 53, 1271–1278.
Dawes, N. P., & Larson, R. (2011). How youth get engaged: Grounded-theory research on motivational development in organized youth programs. Developmental Psychology, 47, 259–269.
Eccles, J., & Gootman, J. A. (2002). Community programs to promote youth development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Feldman, A. F., & Matjasko, J. L. (2005). The role of school-based extracurricular activities in adolescent development: A comprehensive review and future directions. Review of Educational Research, 75, 159–210.
Fergus, S., & Zimmerman, M. A. (2005). Adolescent resilience: A framework for understanding healthy development in the face of risk. Annual Review of Public Health, 26, 399–419.
Fields, J., & Russell, S. T. (2005). Queer, sexuality, and gender activism. In L. R. Sherrod, C. A. Flanagan, & R. Kassimir (Eds.), Youth activism: An international encyclopedia (Vol. 2, pp. 512–514). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
Fredricks, J. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2005). Developmental benefits of extracurricular involvement: Do peer characteristics mediate the link between activities and youth outcomes? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34, 507–520.
Ginwright, S. (2007). Black youth activism and the role of critical social capital in Black community organizations. The American Behavioral Scientist, 51, 403–418.
GLSEN. (2015). About gay-straight alliances. Retrieved from http://www.glsen.org.
Greenberg, M. T., Weissberg, R. P., O’Brien, M. U., Zins, J. E., Fredericks, L., Resnik, H., & Elias, M. J. (2003). Enhancing school-based prevention and youth development through coordinated social, emotional, and academic learning. American Psychologist, 58, 466–474.
Griffin, P., Lee, C., Waugh, J., & Beyer, C. (2004). Describing roles that Gay–Straight Alliances play in schools: From individual support to social change. Journal of Gay and Lesbian Issues in Education, 1, 7–22.
Grossman, J. B., & Tierney, J. P. (1998). Does mentoring work? An impact study of the Big Brothers Big Sisters program. Evaluation Review, 22, 403–426.
GSA Network. (2015). National directory. Retrieved from http://www.gsanetwork.org.
Heck, N. C., Flentje, A., & Cochran, B. N. (2011). Offsetting risks: High school Gay–Straight Alliances and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) youth. School Psychology Quarterly, 26, 161–174.
Heck, N. C., Lindquist, L. M., Stewart, B. T., Brennan, C., & Cochran, B. N. (2013). To join or not to join: Gay–Straight Student Alliances and the high school experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youths. Journal of Gay and Lesbian Social Services, 25, 77–101.
Heck, N. C., Livingston, N. A., Flentje, A., Oost, K., Stewart, B. T., & Cochran, B. N. (2014). Reducing risk for illicit drug use and prescription drug misuse: High school Gay–Straight alliances and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth. Addictive Behaviors, 39, 824–828.
Inkelas, K. K. (2004). Does participation in ethnic cocurricular activities facilitate a sense of ethnic awareness and understanding? A study of Asian Pacific American undergraduates. Journal of College Student Development, 45, 285–301.
Koepke, S., & Denissen, J. J. A. (2012). Dynamics of identity development and separation-individuation in parent–child relationships during adolescence and emerging adulthood—A conceptual integration. Developmental Review, 32, 67–88.
Larson, R. W. (2000). Toward a psychology of positive youth development. American Psychologist, 55, 170–183.
Larson, R. (2006). Positive youth development, willful adolescents, and mentoring. Journal of Community Psychology, 34, 677–689.
Larson, R., & Angus, R. M. (2011). Adolescents’ development of skills for agency in youth programs: Learning to think strategically. Child Development, 82, 277–294.
Mahoney, J. L., Harris, A. L., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Organized activity participation, positive youth development, and the over-scheduling hypothesis. SRCD Social Policy Report, 20, 3–31.
Mayo, C. (2008). Obscene associations: Gay-straight alliances, the Equal Access Act, and abstinence-only policy. Sexuality Research and Social Policy: A Journal of the NSRC, 5, 45–55.
Miceli, M. (2005). Standing out, standing together: The social and political impact of Gay–Straight Alliances. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
Mustanski, B. (2011). Ethical and regulatory issues with conducting sexuality research with LGBT adolescents: A call to action for a scientifically informed approach. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 673–686.
Pearce, N. J., & Larson, R. W. (2006). How teens become engaged in youth development programs: The process of motivational change in a civic activism organization. Applied Developmental Science, 10, 121–131.
Poteat, V. P., Sinclair, K. O., DiGiovanni, C. D., Koenig, B. W., & Russell, S. T. (2013). Gay–Straight Alliances are associated with student health: A multi-school comparison of LGBTQ and heterosexual youth. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 319–330.
Poteat, V. P., Yoshikawa, H., Calzo, J. P., Gray, M. L., DiGiovanni, C. D., Lipkin, A., et al. (2015). Contextualizing Gay–Straight Alliances: Student, advisor, and structural factors related to positive youth development among members. Child Development, 86, 176–193.
Ramey, H. L., & Rose-Krasnor, L. (2012). Contexts of structured youth activities and positive youth development. Child Development Perspectives, 6, 85–91.
Russell, S. T. (2005). Beyond risk: Resilience in the lives of sexual minority youth. Journal of Gay and Lesbian Issues in Education, 2, 5–18.
Russell, S. T., Muraco, A., Subramaniam, A., & Laub, C. (2009). Youth empowerment and high school Gay–Straight Alliances. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, 891–903.
Russell, S. T., Kosciw, J., Horn, S., & Saewyc, E. (2010). Safe schools policy for LGBTQ students. Society for Research in Child Development Social Policy Report, 24(4), 3–17.
Saewyc, E. M. (2011). Research on adolescent sexual orientation: Development, health disparities, stigma, and resilience. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 256–272.
Snyder, C. R., Sympson, S. C., Ybasco, F. C., Borders, T. F., Babyak, M. A., & Higgins, R. L. (1996). Development and validation of the State Hope Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 321–335.
Taines, C. (2012). Intervening in alienation: The outcomes for urban youth of participating in school activism. American Educational Research Journal, 49, 53–86.
Toomey, R. B., & Russell, S. T. (2013). Gay–Straight Alliances, social justice involvement, and school victimization of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer youth: Implications for school well-being and plans to vote. Youth & Society, 45, 500–522.
Walls, N. E., Kane, S. B., & Wisneski, H. (2010). Gay–Straight Alliances and school experiences of sexual minority youth. Youth & Society, 41, 307–332.
Watson, L. B., Varjas, K., Meyers, J., & Graybill, E. C. (2010). Gay–Straight Alliance advisors: Negotiating multiple ecological systems when advocating for LGBTQ youth. Journal of LGBT Youth, 7, 100–128.
Wood, D., Larson, R. W., & Brown, J. R. (2009). How adolescents come to see themselves as more responsible through participation in youth programs. Child Development, 80, 295–309.
Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 30–41.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the participating GSAs, the Massachusetts Commission on LGBTQ Youth, Jeff Perrotti, and Arthur Lipkin for their roles in and support of the Massachusetts GSA Network project.
Authors’ Contributions
All authors contributed to the conceptualization and writing of the manuscript, as well as to the interpretation of the statistical analyses. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
Support for the writing of this manuscript was partially based on funding awarded from the National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD), 1R01MD009458-01, to Poteat (Principal Investigator) and Calzo and Yoshikawa (Co-Investigators). Additional support for the second author (Calzo) was provided by funding from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), K01DA034753.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors report no conflict of interests.
Ethical Approval
Approval for secondary data analysis was granted by the Boston College Institutional Review Board.
Informed Consent
GSA advisors granted adult consent for all youth who participated in completing the survey.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Poteat, V.P., Calzo, J.P. & Yoshikawa, H. Promoting Youth Agency Through Dimensions of Gay–Straight Alliance Involvement and Conditions that Maximize Associations. J Youth Adolescence 45, 1438–1451 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0421-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0421-6