Skip to main content
Log in

Involving Youth in Program Decision-Making: How Common and What Might it Do for Youth?

  • Empirical Research
  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The strategy of sharing program decision-making with youth in youth programs, a specific form of youth-adult partnership, is widely recommended in practitioner literature; however, empirical study is relatively limited. We investigated the prevalence and correlates of youth program decision-making practices (e.g., asking youth to help decide what activities are offered), using single-level and multilevel methods with a cross-sectional dataset of 979 youth attending 63 multipurpose after-school programs (average age of youth = 11.4, 53 % female). The prevalence of such practices was relatively high, particularly for forms that involved low power sharing such as involving youth in selecting the activities a program offers. Hierarchical linear modeling revealed positive associations between youth program decision-making practices and youth motivation to attend programs. We also found positive correlations between decision-making practices and youth problem-solving efficacy, expression efficacy, and empathy. Significant interactions with age suggest that correlations with problem solving and empathy are more pronounced for older youth. Overall, the findings suggest that involving youth in program decision-making is a promising strategy for promoting youth motivation and skill building, and in some cases this is particularly the case for older (high school-age) youth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akiva, T., Cortina, K. S., Eccles, J. S., & Smith, C. (2013). Youth belonging and cognitive engagement in organized activities: A large-scale field study. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 34, 208–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35, 216–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, T., & LaVelle, K. B. (2013). Comparing socioemotional outcomes for early adolescents who join after school for internal or external reasons. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 33(1), 77–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blakemore, S., & Choudhury, S. (2006). Development of the adolescent brain: Implications for executive function and social cognition. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 296–312.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bohnert, A., Fredricks, J., & Randall, E. (2010). Capturing unique dimensions of youth organized activity involvement: Theoretical and methodological considerations. Review of Educational Research, 80, 576–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp. 793–828). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, S., Thompson, S., Bird, G., & Blakemore, S. (2011). Pubertal development of the understanding of social emotions: Implications for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 681–689.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Camino, Linda A. (2000). Youth-adult partnerships: Entering new territory in community work and research. Applied Developmental Science, 4, 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkoway, B. (2011). What is youth participation? Children and Youth Services Review, 33, 340–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeAngelis, S. (2003). Noncognitive predictors of academic performance: Going beyond the traditional measures. Journal of Allied Health, 32, 52–57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Denault, A., & Poulin, F. (2009). Intensity and breadth of participation in organized activities during the adolescent years: Multiple associations with youth outcomes. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, 1199–1213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deschenes, S. N., Arbreton, A., Little, P. M., Herrera, C., Grossman, J. B., Weiss, H. B., et al. (2010). Engaging older youth: Program and city-level strategies to support sustained participation in out-of-school time. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Family Research Project and Public/Private Ventures, Commissioned by the Wallace Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S. (2004). Schools, academic motivation, and stage-environment fit. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (2nd ed., pp. 125–154). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., & Midgley, C. (1989). Stage/Environment Fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for young adolescents. In R. E. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation and education (Vol. 33, pp. 139–186). New York, NY: Academic Press.

  • Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., et al. (1993). Development during adolescence. American Psychologist, 48(2), 90–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., & Byrnes, J. (2005). Cognitive development in adolescence. In R. M. Lerner, M. A. Easterbrooks, & J. Mistry (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (Vol. 6). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., & Lennon, R. (1983). Sex differences in empathy and related capacities. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 100–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, C. A., Roderick, M., Allensworth, E., Nagaoka, J., Keyes, T. S., Johnson, D. W., et al. (2012). Teaching adolescents to become learners: The role of noncognitive factors in shaping school performance: A critical literature review. Chicago: University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, A. (2008). Ladder of young people’s participation. Retrieved February 26, 2012, from http://www.freechild.org/ladder.htm.

  • Guay, F., Ratelle, C. F., & Chanal, J. (2008). Optimal learning in optimal contexts: The role of self-determination in education. Canadian Psychology, 49, 233–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, Roger. (1993). Children’s participation: From tokenism to citizenship. Florence, Italy: UNICEF International Child Development Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havinghurst, R. J. (1972). Developmental tasks and education. New York: D. McKay Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heppner, P. P., & Petersen, C. H. (1982). The development and implications of a personal problem-solving inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 29, 66–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honaker, J., King, G., & Blackwell, M. (2010). Documentation for Amelia II: A program for missing data, from http://gking.harvard.edu/amelia/.

  • Jones, K. R., & Perkins, D. F. (2007). Youth-adult partnerships. In C. B. Fisher & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Encyclopedia of applied developmental science (pp. 1160–1164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L., Rhine, T., & Bratton, S. (2002). High school students as therapeutic agents with young children experiencing school adjustment difficulties: The effectiveness of a filial therapy training model. International Journal of Play Therapy, 11, 43–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaFleur, J., Russell, C. A., Low, M., & Romash, R. (2011). The Beacon Community Centers Middle School Initiative: Final report on implementation and youth experience in the iniative. Washington, DC: Policy Studies Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R. W., & Angus, R. M. (2011). Adolescents’ development of skills for agency in youth programs: Learning to think strategically. Child Development, 82, 277–294.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R. W., Walker, K., & Pearce, N. (2005). A comparison of youth-driven and adult-driven youth programs: Balancing inputs from youth and adults. Journal of Community Psychology, 33(1), 57–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, R. M. (2005). Promoting postitive youth development through community and after-school programs. In J. L. Mahoney, R. W. Larson, & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Organized activities as contexts of development: Extracurricular activities, after-school and community programs (p. 4). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, R. M. (2006). Developmental science, developmental systems, and contemporary theories. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 1–17)., Theoretical models of human development Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, R. M., Lerner, J. V., & Benson, J. B. (2011). Positive youth development: Research and applications for promoting thriving in adolescence. In R. M. Lerner, J. V. Lerner, & J. B. Benson (Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 41, pp. 1–17). New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeus, W. (2011). The study of adolescent identity formation 2000-2010: A review of longitudinal research. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 75–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, D. (2004). The significance of students: Can increasing “student voice” in schools lead to gains in youth development? Teachers College Record, 106(4), 651–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, J. W., & Hilton, M. L. (Eds.). (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. D., & Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Empowerment theory, research, and application. American Journal Community Psychology, 23, 569–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pittman, K., Tolman, J., & Yohalem, N. (2005). Developing a comprehensive agenda for the out-of-school hours: Lessons and challenges across cities. In J. L. Mahoney, R. W. Larson, & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Organized activities as contexts of development: Extracurricular activities, after-school and community programs. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. B. (1986). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C., Akiva, T., Lo, Y.-J., Sugar, S., Frank, K. A., Peck, S. C., et al. (2012). Continuous quality improvement in afterschool settings: Impact findings from the Youth Program Quality Intervention study. Washington, DC: The Forum for Youth Investment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spear, L. (2007). The developing brain and adolescent-typical behavior patterns: An evolutionary approach. In D. Romer & E. F. Walker (Eds.), Adolescent psychopathology and the developing brain: Integrating brain and prevention science (pp. 9–30). New York: Oxford.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: The synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 246–260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D., Larson, R., & Brown, J. R. (2009). How adolescents come to see themselves as more responsible through participation in youth programs. Child Development, 50, 295–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeldin, S. (2004). Youth as agents of adults and community development: Mapping the processes and outcomes of youth engaged in organizational governance. Applied Developmental Science, 8(2), 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeldin, S., Christens, B. D., & Powers, J. L. (2012). The psychology and practice of youth-adult partnership: Bridging generations for youth development and community change. American Journal Community Psychology, 51, 385–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeldin, S., Petrokubi, J., & MacNeil, C. (2008). Youth-adult partnerships in decision making: Disseminating and implementing an innovative idea into established organizations and communities. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 262–277.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M. A. (2000). Empowerment theory: Psychological, organizational and community levels of analysis. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors contributions

TA conceived of the study, conducted all statistical analyses, and drafted the manuscript; KC supported and collaborated with all aspects of study design, analysis, and writing; CS carried out the intervention study for which the data were originally collected and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Akiva.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akiva, T., Cortina, K.S. & Smith, C. Involving Youth in Program Decision-Making: How Common and What Might it Do for Youth?. J Youth Adolescence 43, 1844–1860 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-014-0183-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-014-0183-y

Keywords

Navigation