Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

What are the Unique and Interacting Contributions of School and Family Factors to Early Adolescents’ Empathic Concern and Perspective Taking?

  • Empirical Research
  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Empathy in children has received considerable attention in the literature, but limited research has investigated the contributions of various socializing factors on both affective (e.g., empathic concern) and cognitive (e.g., perspective taking) components of empathy in early adolescents. Guided by socialization theories, this study examined the unique and interacting contributions of school connectedness and parent–child conflict to subsequent levels of both components of empathy across a 1-year period of time. Participants were 487 10- to 14- year old middle school students (54 % female; 76 % European-American) involved in two waves of a study with 1 year between each wave. Hierarchical regression analyses indicated that, among girls, reports of parent–child conflict contributed to a decrease in empathic concern one year later, whereas school connectedness was a protective factor that offset the negative impact of parent–child conflict on girls’ subsequent perspective taking. Alternatively, only boys’ reports of school connectedness contributed to subsequent increases in both empathic concern and perspective taking 1 year later. Findings indicate that school connectedness and conflict with parents play different socializing roles for girls’ and boys’ empathic concern and perspective taking. The current study calls for further research and youth programs to consider the important contributions that socializing agents can make on both components of empathy for early adolescent girls and boys.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, PA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderman, E. M. (2002). School effects on psychological outcomes during adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 795–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderman, L. H., & Freeman, T. M. (2004). Students’ sense of belonging in school. In P. R. Pintrich & M. L. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 13, pp. 27–63). Oxford, England: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, J., & D’Alessandro, A. (2009). How adolescent empathy and prosocial behavior change in the context of school culture: A two-year longitudinal study. Adolescence, 44(176), 751–752.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Batanova, M., & Loukas, A. (2011). Social anxiety and aggression in early adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(11), 1534–1543.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Battistich, V., Schaps, E., & Wilson, N. (2004). Effects of an elementary school intervention on students’ ‘‘connectedness’’ to school and social adjustment during middle school. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 24, 243–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, E., Stice, E., & Seeley, J. R. (2004). A prospective test of the stress-buffering model of depression in adolescent girls: No support once again. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 689–697.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carlo, G., Mestre, M. V., Samper, P., Tur, A., & Armenta, B. E. (2010). The longitudinal relations among parenting styles, sympathy, prosocial moral reasoning, and prosocial behaviors. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(2), 116–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaplin, W. F. (1991). The next generation of moderator research in personality psychology. Journal of Personality, 59, 143–178.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, W. A., Maccoby, E. E., Steinberg, L., Hetherington, E. M., & Bornstein, M. H. (2000). Contemporary research on parenting: The case of nature and nurture. American Psychologist, 55, 218–232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. H. (1994). Empathy: A social psychological approach. Social psychology series. Boulder, CO, US: Westview Press.

  • Diamond, L. M., Fagundes, C. P., & Butterworth, M. R. (2011). Attachment styles, vagal tone, and empathy during mother-adolescent interactions. Journal of Research on Adolescence. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00762.x.

  • Eisenberg, N. (2000). Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 665–697.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1990). Empathy: Conceptualization, measurement, and relation to prosocial behavior. Motivation & Emotion, 14, 131–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Guthrie, I. K., & Reiser, M. (2000). Dispositional emotionality and regulation: Their role in predicting quality of social functioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(1), 136–157.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R.A., & Spinrad, T.L. (2006). Prosocial development. In W. Damon, & R. M. Lerner (Series Eds.) & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 3: Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., pp. 646–718). New York, NY: John Wiley.

  • Eisenberg, N., Zhou, Q., & Koller, S. (2001). Brazilian adolescents’ prosocial moral judgment and behavior: Relations to sympathy, perspective taking, gender-role orientation, and demographic characteristics. Child Development, 72, 518–534.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Espelage, D. L., Mebane, S. E., & Adams, R. S. (2004). Empathy, caring and bullying: Toward an understanding of complex associations. In D. L. Espelage & S. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in American Schools (pp. 37–61). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feshbach, N. (1997). Empathy: The formative years. Implications for clinical practice. In A. C. Bohart & L. S. Grenberg (Eds.), Empathy reconsidered: Directions for psychotherapy (pp. 33–59). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Findlay, L., Girardi, A., & Coplan, R. J. (2006). Links between empathy, social behavior, and social understanding in early childhood. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21, 347–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frawley, F. T. (2005). Gender bias in the classroom: Current controversies and implications for teachers. Child Education, 81, 221–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grusec, J. E., & Hastings, P. D. (2007). Handbook of socialization: Theory and research. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastings, P. D., Utendale, W. T., & Sullivan, C. (2007). The socialization of prosocial development. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (pp. 638–664). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. (1975). Developmental synthesis of affect and cognition and its implications for altruistic motivation. Developmental Psychology, 11, 607–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L., & Higgins, A. (1987). School democracy and social interaction. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Moral development through social interaction (pp. 102–130). New York: Wiley, Wiley-Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laible, D. J., Carlo, G., & Roesch, S. C. (2004). Pathways to self-esteem in late adolescence: The role of parent and peer attachment, empathy, and social behaviors. Journal of Adolescence, 27(6), 703–716.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laible, D., Eye, J., & Carlo, G. (2008). Dimensions of conscience in mid-adolescence: Links with social behavior, parenting, and temperament. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 875–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laible, D. J., & Thompson, R. A. (2002). Mother-child conflict in the toddler years: Lessons in emotion, morality, and relationships. Child Development, 73(4), 1187–1203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, B. & Collins, W. A. (2009). Parent-child relationships during adolescence. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (3 rd ed.). Vol. 2: Contextual influences on adolescent development (pp. 3–42). New York: Wiley.

  • Loukas, A., Roalson, L. A., & Herrera, D. E. (2010). School connectedness buffers the effects of negative family relations and poor effortful control on early adolescent conduct problems. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(1), 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71, 543–562.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E. (1998). The two sexes: Growing up apart, coming together. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayberry, M. L., & Espelage, D. L. (2007). Associations among empathy, social competence, and reactive/proactive aggression subtypes. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 787–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHale, S. M., Crouter, A. C., & Whiteman, S. D. (2003). The family contexts of gender development. Social Development, 12(1).

  • McNeely, C. A., Nonnemaker, J. M., & Blum, R. W. (2002). Promoting school connectedness: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Journal of School Health, 72, 138–146.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Metzler, C. W., Biglan, A., Ary, D. V., & Li, F. (1998). The stability and validity of early adolescents’ reports of parenting constructs. Journal of Family Psychology, 12, 600–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalik, N. M., Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., Ladd, B., Thompson, M., & Valiente, C. (2007). Longitudinal relations among parental emotional expressivity and sympathy and prosocial behavior in adolescence. Social Development, 16(2), 286–309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, C. J., & Hastings, P. D. (2007). Socialization in the context of family diversity. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (pp. 328–354). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, R. J., Foster, S., Kent, R. N., & O’Leary, K. D. (1979). Multivariate assessment of conflict in distressed and nondistressed mother-adolescent dyads. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 691–700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, M. D., Bearman, P. S., Blum, R. W., Bauman, K. E., Harris, K. M., Jones, J., et al. (1997). Protecting adolescents from harm. Findings from the national longitudinal study on adolescent health. Journal of the American Medical Association, 278, 823–832.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roeser, R. W., Eccles, J. S., & Sameroff, A. J. (2000). School as a context of early adolescents’ academic and social-emotional development: A summary of research findings. Elementary School Journal, 100, 443–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, A. J., & Rudolph, K. D. (2006). A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: Potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 98–131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, K. D. (2002). Gender differences in emotional responses to interpersonal stress during adolescence. Journal of Adolescent Health, 30S, 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shek, D., & Ma, H. K. (2001). Parent–adolescent conflict and adolescent antisocial and prosocial behavior: A longitudinal study in a Chinese context. Adolescence, 36, 545–555.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shochet, I. M., Dadds, M. R., Ham, D., & Montague, R. (2006). School connectedness is an underemphasized parameter in adolescent mental health: Results of a community prediction study. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 35, 170–179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soenens, B., Duriez, B., Vansteenkiste, M., & Goosens, L. (2007). The intergenerational transmission of empathy-related responding in adolescence: The role of maternal support. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 299–311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L. (2001). We know some things: Parent-adolescent relationships in retrospect and prospect. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 11(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strayer, J., & Roberts, W. (2004). Empathy and observed anger and aggression in five-year-olds. Social Development, 13, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valiente, C., Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Shepard, S. A., Cumberland, A., & Losoya, S. H. (2004). Prediction of children’s empathy-related responding from their effortful control and parent’s expressivity. Developmental Psychology, 40(6), 911–926.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van der Graaff, J., Branje, S., Hawk, S. T., de Wied, M., & Meeus, W. (2011). Empathy development in adolescence: Age trends and sex differences. Poster presentation at the Society for Research in Child Development, Montreal, Canada.

  • Warden, D., & MacKinnon, S. (2003). Prosocial children, bullies, and victims: An investigation of their sociometric status, empathy, and social problem solving skills. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21, 367–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wentzel, K., & Looney, L. (2007). Socialization in school settings. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (pp. 382–403). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitlock, J. L. (2006). Youth perceptions of life at school: Contextual correlates of school connectedness in adolescence. Applied Developmental Science, 10, 13–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, K. H. (2011). Mediating effects of negative emotions in parent–child conflict on adolescent problem behavior. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 14(4), 236–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Q., Eisenberg, N., Losoya, S. H., Fabes, R. A., Reiser, M., Guthrie, I. K., et al. (2002). The relations of parental warmth and positive expressiveness to children’s empathy-related responding and social functioning: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 73, 893–915.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Q., Valiente, C., & Eisenberg, N. (2003). Empathy and its measurement. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Positive psychological assessment: The handbook of models and measures (pp. 269–284). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA

    Milena D. Batanova & Alexandra Loukas

Authors
  1. Milena D. Batanova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alexandra Loukas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandra Loukas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Batanova, M.D., Loukas, A. What are the Unique and Interacting Contributions of School and Family Factors to Early Adolescents’ Empathic Concern and Perspective Taking?. J Youth Adolescence 41, 1382–1391 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9768-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9768-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation