Skip to main content
Log in

Early Adolescent Peer Ecologies in Rural Communities: Bullying in Schools That Do and Do not Have a Transition During the Middle Grades

  • Empirical Research
  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The transition to middle school is considered to be a heightened period for involvement in bullying because the lack of a defined dominance hierarchy is thought to promote jockeying for social positions among students. Accordingly, this study examined bullying in peer ecologies at the beginning of the middle grade years in rural schools that did and did not have a transition to middle school. Thirty-six schools (20 with transitions, 16 without transitions) participated in this research with a sample of 1,800 participants (52% female) who were in sixth grade during the second year of data collection. Overall, 67% were White, 19% African American, 7% Latino, 2% Native American, and 5% other (multi-racial, Asian, unknown). Compared to schools without a transition, schools with a transition had fewer bullies following the move from fifth to sixth grade and the social dynamics in schools with a transition appeared to be less supportive of bullying. Further, students in schools with a transition reported being bullied less frequently in sixth grade and they perceived the sixth grade peer ecology as being more protective against bullying than did students in schools without a transition. In addition, proportionally more youth had controversial sociometric status in schools without a transition during sixth grade than in schools with a transition. Collectively, these findings suggest that risk for involvement in bullying may be elevated in schools that do not have a transition to middle school. They also bring into question the conventional view of the small K-8 or K-12 rural school as a peaceful and supportive peer community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (1998). Peer power: Preadolescent culture and identity. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bard, J., Gardener, C., & Wieland, R. (2006). National rural education association report: Rural school consolidation: History, research summary, conclusions, and recommendations. The Rural Educator, 27(2), 40–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, L. A., & Habel, J. (1998). Cliques, clans, community, and competence: The experiences of students with behavioral disorders in rural school systems. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 14, 95–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, C. P., Sawyer, A. L., & O’Brennan, L. M. (2009). A social disorganization perspective on bullying-related attitudes and behaviors: The influence of school context. American Journal of Community Psychology, 43, 204–220.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, R. B., Cairns, B. D., Neckerman, H. J., Gest, S., & Gariépy, J. L. (1988). Social networks and aggressive behavior: Peer support or peer rejection? Developmental Psychology, 24, 815–823. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.24.6.815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantrell, V. L., & Prinz, R. J. (1985). Multiple perspectives of rejected, neglected, and accepted children: Relation between sociometric status and behavioral characteristics. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 884–889. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.53.6.884.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557–570. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.18.4.557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Bruyn, E. H., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2006). Popularity in early adolescence: Prosocial and antisocial subtypes. Journal of Adolescent Research, 21, 607–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Bruyn, E. H., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Wissink, I. B. (2010). Associations of peer acceptance and perceived popularity with bullying and victimization in early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 30, 543–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, J. K., Lindenberg, S., & Veenstra, R. (2008). Beyond the class norm: Bullying behavior of popular adolescents and its relation to peer acceptance rejection. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 1289–1299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S. (1999). The development of children ages 6 to 14. The Future of Children, 9, 30–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eder, D., & Kinney, D. A. (1995). The effect of middle school extracurricular activities on adolescents’ popularity and peer status. Youth & Society, 26, 298–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estell, D. B., Farmer, T. W., & Cairns, B. D. (2007). Bullies and victims in rural African American youth: Individual characteristics and social network placement. Aggressive Behavior, 33, 145–159. doi:10.1002/ab.20176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Estell, D. B., Farmer, T. W., Irvin, M. J., Crowther, A., Akos, P., & Boudah, D. J. (2009). Students with exceptionalities and the peer group context of bullying and victimization in late elementary school. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 18, 136–150. doi:10.1007/s10826-008-9214-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, C., & Eder, D. (1993). “No exit”: Processes of social isolation in the middle school. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 22, 139–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, T. W., Estell, D. B., Bishop, J. L., O’Neal, K., & Cairns, B. D. (2003). Rejected bullies or popular leaders? The social relations of aggressive subtypes of rural African-American early adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 39, 992–1004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, T. W., Farmer, E. M. Z., Estell, D., & Hutchins, B. C. (2007). The developmental dynamics of aggression and the prevention of school violence. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 15, 197–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, T. W., Hamm, J. V., Petrin, R. A., Robertson, D., Murray, R. A., Meece, J. L., et al. (2010a). Supporting early adolescent learning and social strengths: Promoting productive contexts for students at-risk for EBD during the transition to middle school. Exceptionality, 18, 94–106. doi:10.1080/09362831003673192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, T. W., Irvin, M. J., Leung, M.-C., Hall, C. M., Hutchins, B. C., & McDonough, E. (2010b). Social preference, social prominence, and group membership in late elementary school: Homophilic concentration and peer affiliation configurations. Social Psychology of Education, 13, 271–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, T. W., Irvin, M. J., Sgammato, A., Dadisman, K., & Thompson, J. H. (2009). Interpersonal competence configurations in rural Appalachian fifth graders: Academic achievement and associated adjustment factors. Elementary School Journal, 109, 301–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, T. W., Van Acker, R., Pearl, R., & Rodkin, P. C. (1999). Social networks and peer-assessed problem behavior in elementary classrooms: Students with and without disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 244–256. doi:10.1177/074193259902000408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, B. J., & Glascock, C. H. (1998). The relationship between grade configuration and student performance in rural schools. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 14, 149–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulemetova, M., Drury, D., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2011). Findings from the National Education Association’s nationwide study of bullying. The White House conference on bullying. Washington, DC. Retrieved from www.stopbullying.gov.

  • Hamm, J. V., Farmer, T. W., Robertson, D., Dadisman, K., Murray, A. R., Meece, J., et al. (2010). Effects of a developmentally-based intervention with teachers on Native American and White early adolescents’ schooling adjustment in rural settings. Journal of Experimental Education, 78, 343–377. doi:10.1080/00220970903548038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, M. J. R., & Pittman, R. B. (1995). Home, family, and community: Ingredients in the rural education equation. Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 113–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iserhagen, J., & Harris, S. (2004). A comparison of bullying in four rural middle and high schools. Rural Educator, 25, 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juvonen, J., & Ho, A. Y. (2008). Social motives underlying antisocial behavior across middle school grades. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 747–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J., & Cornell, D. (2010). Is the link between large high schools and student victimization an illusion? Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 933–946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulig, J. C., Hall, B. L., & Kalischuk, R. G. (2008). Bullying perspectives among rural youth: A mixed methods approach. Rural and Remote Health, 8, 923.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, X. (2001). Bullying and being bullied: To what extent are bullies also victims? American Educational Research Journal, 38, 351–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masten, A. S., Morison, P., & Pellegrini, D. S. (1985). A revised class play method of peer assessment. Developmental Psychology, 21, 523–533. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.21.3.523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merten, D. E. (1997). The meaning of meanness: Popularity, competition, and conflict among junior high school girls. Sociology of Education, 70, 175–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merten, D. E. (2005). Transitions and “trouble”: Rites of passage for suburban girls. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 36, 132–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nansel, T. R., Haynie, D. L., & Simons-Morton, B. G. (2003). The association of bullying and victimization with middle school adjustment. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19, 45–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nansel, T. R., Overpeck, M., Pilla, R. S., Ruan, W. J., Simons-Morton, B., & Scheidt, P. (2001). Bullying behaviors among US youth: Prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 2094–2100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, K. S. (2004). Rampage: The social roots of school shootings. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, R., Hoover, J. H., & Hazler, R. (1994). The perceived role of bullying in small town Midwestern schools. Journal of Counseling & Development, 72, 416–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini, A. D., & Bartini, M. (2000). A longitudinal study of bullying, victimization, and peer affiliation during the transition from primary school to middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 699–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini, A. D., & Long, J. D. (2002). A longitudinal study of bullying, dominance, and victimization during the transition from primary school through secondary school. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 259–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sijtsema, J. J., Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., & Salmivalli, C. (2009). Empirical test of bullies’ status goals: Assessing direct goals, aggression, and prestige. Aggressive Behavior, 35, 57–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, S. Y. (2005). Protective peer ecology scale—Middle school. Yale Child Study Center: Unpublished measure.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, E. A. (2003). School social bonds, school climate, and school misbehavior: A multilevel analysis. Justice Quarterly, 20, 575–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strange, M., & Malhoit, G. (2005). Bigger isn’t always better: Why we should preserve small rural schools. Leadership Insider, October, 2–4.

  • Theobald, P., & Nachtigal, P. (1995). Culture, community, and the promise of rural education. Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 132–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomlison, R. J., Thomlison, B., Sowers, K. M., Theriot, M. T., & Dulmus, C. N. (2004). School personnel’s observations of bullying and victimization among rural elementary and middle school children. In C. N. Dumlus & K. M. Sowers (Eds.), Kids and violence: The invisible school experience (pp. 25–43). Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaillancourt, T., & Hymel, S. (2006). Aggression and social status: The moderating roles of sex and peer-valued characteristics. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 396–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaillancourt, T., Hymel, S., & McDougall, P. (2003). Bullying is power: Implications for school-based intervention strategies. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19, 157–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by grant #R305A04056 from the Institute of Education Sciences. The views expressed in this article are ours and do not represent the granting agency.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas W. Farmer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Farmer, T.W., Hamm, J.V., Leung, MC. et al. Early Adolescent Peer Ecologies in Rural Communities: Bullying in Schools That Do and Do not Have a Transition During the Middle Grades. J Youth Adolescence 40, 1106–1117 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-011-9684-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-011-9684-0

Keywords

Navigation