Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Family Transitions and Later Delinquency and Drug Use

  • Empirical Research
  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Changes in the family structure can be very disruptive to adolescents who live in those families. This article examines the impact of the number of family transitions on delinquent and drug-using behavior. Specifically, the effect of family transitions is hypothesized to be mediated by problems within the family, school, and peer settings. A sample of 646 boys (73%) and girls (27%) taken from a longitudinal panel study of high-risk adolescents are used to examine these hypotheses. For girls, little support is found for the direct or the indirect effect of family transitions on delinquent behavior or drug use. For boys, however, both forms of problem behavior are influenced by family transitions directly and indirectly through changes in, and problems with, peer associations. The findings suggest that during times of family turmoil, the friendship network of adolescent male children is also disrupted, leading to an increase in associations with delinquent others and, in turn, an increase in problematic behaviors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agnew, R. (2006). Pressured into crime: An overview of general strain theory. Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akers, R. L. (1998). Social theory and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akers, R. L., & Sellers, C. S. (2007). Criminological theories: Introduction, evaluation and application (5th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amato, P. R. (2000). The consequences of divorce for adults and children. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1269–1287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aquilino, W. S. (1996). The life course of children born to unmarried mothers: Childhood living arrangements and young adult outcomes. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 293–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Roth, J. A., & Visher, C. A. (Eds.). (1986). Criminal careers and “career criminals (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1989). Ecological systems theory. Annals of Child Development, 6, 187–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. (2006). Family structure transitions and adolescent well-being. Demography, 42, 447–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butters, J. E. (2002). Family stressors and adolescent cannabis use: A pathway to problem use. Journal of Adolescence, 25, 645–654.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, M. J., & Corcoran, M. E. (2001). Family structure and children’s behavioral and cognitive outcomes. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63, 779–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, L. A., & Novak, K. B. (2008). Parent-child relations and peer associations as mediators of the family structure-substance use relationship. Journal of Family Issues, 29, 155–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demuth, S., & Brown, S. L. (2004). Family structure, family processes, and adolescent delinquency: The significance of parental absence versus parental gender. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 41, 58–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D. S., Huizinga, D. H., & Menard, S. (1989). Multiple problem youth: Delinquency, substance use, and mental health problems. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P. (2005). Introduction to integrated developmental and life-course theories of offending. In D. P. Farrington (Ed.), Advances in criminological theory: Vol. 14. Integrated developmental and life-course theories of offending (pp. 1–14). New Brunswick: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fergusson, D. M., Horwood, L. J., & Lynskey, M. T. (1992). Family change, parental discord, and early offending. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 33, 1059–1075.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, D. C. (2001). Schools and delinquency. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, H., Farrington, D. P., Killias, M., & Sattar, G. (2004). The impact of different family configurations on delinquency. British Journal of Criminology, 44, 520–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, J. D., & Weis, J. G. (1985). The social development model: An integrated approach to delinquency prevention. Journal of Primary Prevention, 6, 73–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heard, H. E. (2007). Fathers, mothers and family structure: Family trajectories, parent gender, and adolescent schooling. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 435–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, E. M., Bridges, M., & Insabella, G. M. (1998). What matters? What does not? Five perspectives on the association between marital transitions and children’s adjustment. American Psychologist, 53, 167–184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, E. M., Stanley-Hagan, M., & Anderson, E. R. (1989). Marital transitions: A child’s perspective. American Psychologist, 44, 303–312.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huizinga, D., Morse, B. J., & Elliott, D. S. (1992). National Youth Survey: An overview and description of recent findings. Boulder, CO: Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeynes, W. H. (2006). The impact of parental remarriage on children: A meta-analysis. Marriage and Family Review, 40(4), 75–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juby, H., & Farrington, D. P. (2001). Disentangling the link between disrupted families and delinquency. The British Journal of Criminology, 41, 22–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, H. B. (1986). Social psychology and self-referent behavior. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, T. E., Catalano, R. F., Haggerty, K. P., & Fleming, C. B. (2002). Parent figure transitions and delinquency and drug use among early adolescent children of substance abusers. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 28, 399–427.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, J. B. (2006). From single-parent families to stepfamilies: Is the transition associated with adolescent alcohol initiation? Journal of Family Issues, 27, 685–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krohn, M. D., &Thornberry, T. P. (1993). Network theory: A model for understanding drug abuse among African-American and Hispanic youth. In M. De La Rosa & J. L. Recio Adrados (Eds.), Drug abuse among minority youth: Advances in research methodology (pp. 102–128). NIDA Research Monograph 130, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

  • Krohn, M. D., & Thornberry, T. P. (1999). Retention of minority populations in panel studies of drug use drugs and society. A Journal of Contemporary Issues, 14(1/2), 185–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krohn, M. D., Thornberry, T. P., Rivera, C., & LeBlanc, M. (2001). Later delinquency careers. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Child delinquents: Development, intervention, and service needs (pp. 67–93). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, R. (2007). School crime and juvenile justice. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, C. R., Jr., & Forgatch, M. S. (2002). Adjusting to change: Linking family structure transitions with parenting and boys’ adjustment. Journal of Family Psychology, 16, 107–117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, T. E. (1993). “Life-course persistent” and “adolescence-limited” antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Rutter, M., & Silva, P. A. (2001). Sex differences in antisocial behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagini, L., Tremblay, R. E., Vitaro, F., Kerr, M., & McDuff, P. (1998). The impact of family transition on the development of delinquency in adolescent boys: A 9-year longitudinal study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 489–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, G. R., Forgatch, M. S., Yoerger, K. L., & Stoolmiller, M. (1998). Variables that initiate and maintain an early-onset trajectory for juvenile offending. Development and Psychopathology, 10, 531–547.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pryor, J., & Rodgers, B. (2001). Children in changing families. Life after parental separation. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ram, B., & Hou, F. (2003). Changes in family structure and child outcomes: Roles of economic and familial resources. Policy Studies Journal, 31, 309–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebellon, C. (2002). Reconsidering the broken homes/delinquency relationship and exploring its mediating mechanism(s). Criminology, 40, 103–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruschena, E., Prior, M., Sanson, A., & Smart, D. (2005). A longitudinal study of adolescent adjustment following family transitions. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 353–363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M. (1978). Family area and school influence in the genesis of conduct disorder. In L. Hersov (Ed.), Aggressive and antisocial behavior in childhood and adolescence. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, R. L., Simons, L. G., & Wallace, L. E. (2004). Families, delinquency and crime. Los Angeles: Roxbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storksen, I., Roysamb, E., Moum, T., & Tambs, K. (2005). Adolescents with a childhood experience of parental divorce: A longitudinal study of mental health and adjustment. Journal of Adolescence, 28, 725–739.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., & Steinmetz, S. K. (1980). Behind closed doors: Violence in the American family. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornberry, T. P., & Krohn, M. D. (1997). Peers, drug use and delinquency. In D. M. Stoff, J. Breiling, & J. D. Maser (Eds.), Handbook of antisocial behavior (pp. 218–233). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornberry, T. P., & Krohn, M. D. (2005). Applying interactional theory to the explanation of continuity and change in antisocial behavior. In D. P. Farrington (Ed.), Integrated developmental and life-course theories of offending (pp. 183–209). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadsworth, M. E. J., & McCord, J. (1979). Roots of delinquency: Infancy, adolescence and crime. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warr, M. (2002). Companions in crime: The social aspects of criminal conduct. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widom, C. S. (1989). Child abuse, neglect, and violent behavior. Criminology, 27, 251–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfgang, M. E., Thornberry, T. P., & Figlio, R. M. (1987). From boy to man, from delinquency to crime: Follow-up to the Philadelphia Birth Cohort of 1945. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, L. L., & Thomson, B. (2001). Race differences in family experience and early sexual initiation: Dynamic models of family structure and family change. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63, 682–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Support for this work was provided by the National Institute of Mental Health (5 R01 MH56486), the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, U.S. Department of Justice (96-MU-FX-0014), the National Institute on Drug Abuse (5 R01 DA05512-07), and the National Science Foundation (SES-8912274), and was aided by grants to the Center for Social and Demographic Analysis at the University at Albany from NICHD (P30 HD32041) and NSF (SBR-9512290). Points of view or opinions in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the funding agencies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gina Penly Hall.

Appendices

Appendix A

Since we interviewed you last time, have you…

General Delinquency

  1. 1.

    Run away from home?

  2. 2.

    Skipped classes without an excuse?

  3. 3.

    Lied about your age to get into some place or to buy something? (for example, lying about your age to get into a movie or buy alcohol)

  4. 4.

    Hitchhiked a ride with a stranger?

  5. 5.

    Carried a hidden weapon?

  6. 6.

    Been loud or rowdy in a public place where someone complained and you got in trouble?

  7. 7.

    Begged for money or things from strangers?

  8. 8.

    Been drunk in a public place?

  9. 9.

    Damaged, destroyed, marked up, or tagged somebody else’s property on purpose?

  10. 10.

    Set fire on purpose or tried to set fire to a house, building, or car?

  11. 11.

    Avoided paying for things, like a movie, taking bus rides, using a computer, or anything else?

  12. 12.

    Gone into or tried to go into a building to steal or damage something?

  13. 13.

    Tried to steal or actually stolen money or things worth $5 or less?

  14. 14.

    Tried to steal or actually stolen money or things worth $5-$50?

  15. 15.

    Tried to steal or actually stolen money or things worth between $50 and $100?

  16. 16.

    Tried to steal or actually stolen money or things worth more than $100?

  17. 17.

    Tried to buy or sell things that were stolen?

  18. 18.

    Taken someone else’s car or motorcycle for a ride without the owner’s permission?

  19. 19.

    Stolen or tried to steal a car or other motor vehicle?

  20. 20.

    Forged a check or used fake money to pay for something?

  21. 21.

    Used or tried to use a credit card, bank card, or automatic teller card without permission?

  22. 22.

    Tried to cheat someone by selling them something that was not what you said it was or that was worthless?

  23. 23.

    Attacked someone with a weapon or with the idea of seriously hurting or killing them?

  24. 24.

    Hit someone with the idea of hurting them?

  25. 25.

    Been involved in gang or posse fights?

  26. 26.

    Thrown objects such as rocks or bottles at people?

  27. 27.

    Used a weapon or force to make someone give you money or things?

  28. 28.

    Made obscene phone calls?

  29. 29.

    Been paid for having sexual relations with someone?

  30. 30.

    Physically hurt or threatened to hurt someone to get them to have sex with you?

  31. 31.

    Sold marijuana, reefer or pot?

  32. 32.

    Sold hard drugs such as crack, heroin, cocaine, LSD or acid?

Drug Use

  1. 1.

    Used marijuana, reefer or pot?

  2. 2.

    Inhaled things, other than cigarettes, like glue to get high?

  3. 3.

    Tried LSD, acid, or cubes?

  4. 4.

    Tried cocaine, coke or snow, other than crack?

  5. 5.

    Tried crack?

  6. 6.

    Tried heroin or smack?

  7. 7.

    Tried angel dust or PCP?

  8. 8.

    Tried tranquilizers, ludes or valium?

  9. 9.

    Tried downers, yellow jackets or red or blue devils?

  10. 10.

    Tried uppers, speed, bennies or black beauties?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krohn, M.D., Hall, G.P. & Lizotte, A.J. Family Transitions and Later Delinquency and Drug Use. J Youth Adolescence 38, 466–480 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9366-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9366-8

Keywords

Navigation