Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cross-National Adolescent Multidimensional Life Satisfaction Reports: Analyses of Mean Scores and Response Style Differences

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although numerous cross-national studies have assessed life satisfaction among adults, similar studies using adolescent samples have been rare. To address this shortage of research, a total of 1338 youth adolescents from two individualistic nations (Ireland, USA) and two collectivistic nations (China, South Korea) were administered the Multidimensional Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale (MSLSS: Huebner, 1994) to assesses general life satisfaction and satisfaction with family, friends, school, self, and living environment. Responses were analyzed to assess potential cross-national differences in (a) mean levels of life satisfaction, and (b) response styles, specifically acquiescence and extreme responding. Mean scores revealed positive ratings by adolescents from all four nations across all domains, with the exceptions of satisfaction with school experiences (Ireland, South Korean, USA), living environment (China, South Korea), self (South Korea), and general life satisfaction (South Korea). Results also revealed significant response style differences across all MSLSS domains. Significant gender and gender-by-nation effects were observed for both mean score and response style differences, although the effect sizes were small. The implications of these findings were discussed, particularly with respect to “individualistic” vs. “collectivistic” cultural differences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abudabbeh N, Aseel HA (1999) Transcultural counseling and Arab Americans. In McFadden J (ed) Transcultural counseling, 2nd edn. American Counseling Association, Alexandria, VA, pp 283–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderman EM (2002) School effects on psychological outcomes during adolescence. J Educ Psychol 94:795–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbuckle JL (2003) Analysis of moment structures, version 5 (AMOS 5.0). Smallwaters Corp, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Arce-Ferrer AJ, Ketterer JJ (2003) The effect of scale tailoring for cross-cultural application on scale reliability and construct validity. Educ Psychol Meas 63:484–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachman JD, O’Malley PM (1984) Yea-saying, nay-saying, and going to extremes: Black-White differences in response style. Public Opin Q 48:491–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandalos DL (2002) The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling. Struct Equ Model 9:78–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basabe N, Paez D, Valencia J, Gonzalez JL, Rime B, Diener E (2002) Cultural dimensions, socioeconomic development, climate, and emotional hedonic level. Cogn Emotion 16:103–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas-Diener R, Diener E (2001) Making the best of a bad situation: Satisfaction in the slums of Calcutta. Soc Indicators Res 55:329–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas-Diener R, Vitterso J, Diener E (2005) Most people are pretty happy, but there is cultural variation: The Inughuit, the Amish, and the Maasai. J Happiness Stud 6:205–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne BM (1996) Measuring self-concept across the life span: Issues and instrumentation, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen C (2003) Revisiting the disengagement theory with differentials in the determinants of life satisfaction. Soc Indicators Res 64:209–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C, Lee S-Y, Stevenson HW (1995) Response style and cross-cultural comparisons of rating scales among East Asian and North American students. Psychol Sci 6:170–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chirkov VI, Lynch M, Niwa S (2005) Application of the scenario questionnaire of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism to the assessment of cultural distance and cultural fit. Int J Intercultural Relati 29:467–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung GW, Rensvold RB (2000) Assessing extreme and acquiescence response sets in cross-cultural research using structural equations modeling. J Cross-Cult Psychol 31:187–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christoph B, Noll HH (2003) Subjective well-being in the European Union during the 90s. Soc Indicators Res 64:521–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke I (2000) Extreme response style in cross-cultural research: An empirical investigation. J Soc Behav Pers 15:137–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Coon HM, Kemmelmeier M (2001) Cultural orientations in the United States: (Re)examining differences among ethnic groups. J Cross-Cult Psychol 32:348–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crandall JE (1982) Social interest, Extreme Response Style, and implications for adjustment. J Res Pers 16:82–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dear K, Henderson S, Korten A (2002) Well-being in Australia: Findings from the National Survey of Mental Health and Well-being. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 37:503–509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diener E (2000) Subjective well-being the science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. Am Psychol 55:34–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diener E, Lucas RE, Scollon CN (2006) Beyond the Hedonic Treadmill: Revising the adaptation theory of well-being. Am Psychol 61:305–314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diener E, Oishi S, Lucas E (2003) Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annu Rev Psychol 54:403–425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diener E, Suh EM, Lucas RE, Smith HL (1999) Subjective well-being three decades of progress. Psychol Bull 125:276–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener E, Suh EM, Smith HL, Shao L (1995) National differences in reported subjective well-being: Why do they occur? Soc Indicators Res 34:7–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas SP, Nijssen EJ (2003) On the use of “borrowed” scales in cross-national research: A cautionary note. Int Mark Rev 20:621–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilman R, Barry J (2003) Life satisfaction and social desirability among adolescents in a residential treatment setting: Changes across time. Residential Treat Child Youth 21:19–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilman R, Huebner ES (2003) A review of life satisfaction research with children and adolescents. Sch Psychol Q 18:192–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilman R, Huebner ES, Laughlin EJ (2000) A first study of the Multidimensional Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale with adolescents. Soc Indicators Res 52:135–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilman R, Ashby JS, Sverko D, Florell D, Varjas K (2005) The relationship between perfectionism and multidimensional life satisfaction among Croatian and American youth. Pers Individ Differences 39:155–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green DP, Goldman SL, Salovey P (1993) Measurement error masks bipolarity of affect. J Pers Soc Psychol 76:856–867

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenleaf EA (1992) Improving rating scale measures by detecting and correcting bias components in some response styles. J Mark Res 29:176–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigorenko EL, O’Keefe PA (2004) What do children do when they cannot go to school? In Sternberg RJ, Grigorenko EL (eds) Culture and competence: Contexts of life success, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp 23–53

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G (1980) Culture's consequences, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G (2001) Culture's consequences, 2nd edn. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Huebner ES (1994) Preliminary development and validation of a multidimensional life satisfaction scale for children. Psychol Assess 6:149–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huebner ES (2004) Research on assessment of life satisfaction of children and adolescents. Soc Indicators Res 66:3–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huebner ES, Gilman R (2002) An introduction to the multidimensional students’ life satisfaction scale. Soc Indicators Res 60:115–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huebner ES, Suldo SM, Gilman R (2006) Life satisfaction. In Bear G, Minke K (eds) Children's Needs III, National Association of School Psychologists, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui CH, Triandis HC (1989) Effects of culture and response format on extreme response set. J Cross-Cult Psychol 20:296–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang S-M, Shaver PR, Sue S, Min K-H, Jing H (2003) Culture specific patterns in the prediction of life satisfaction: Roles of emotion, relationship quality, and self-esteem. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 29:1596–1608

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keys CLM (2006) Mental health in adolescence: Is America's youth flourishing? Am J Orthopsychiatry 76:395–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewinsohn P, Redner J, Seeley J (1991) The relationship between life satisfaction and psychosocial variables: New perspectives. In Strack F, Argyle M, Schwartz N (eds) Subjective well-being, Plenum Press, New York, pp 193–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao P, Fu Y, Yi C (2005) Perceived quality of life in Taiwan and Hong Kong: An intra-culture comparison. J Happiness Stud 6:43–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu L, Gilmour R (2004) Culture and conceptions of happiness: individual oriented and social oriented SWB. J Happiness Stud 5:269–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marin G, Gamba RJ, Marin BV (1992) Extreme response style and acquiescence among Hispanics. J Cross-Cult Psychol 23:498–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markova I (1997) The individual and the community: A post-communist perspective. J Community Appl Soc Psychol 7:3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus H, Katayama S (1991) Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychol Rev 98:224–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh HW, Hau K-T, Balla JR, Grayson D (1998) Is more ever too much? The number of indicators per factor in confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariate Behav Res 33:181–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin K (2007) Life satisfaction predicts adolescent peer victimization. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC

  • Nasser F, Wisenbaker J (2003) A Monte Carlo study investigating the impact of item parceling on measures of fit in confirmatory factor analysis. Educ Psychol Meas 63:729–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oishi S (2006) The concept of life satisfaction across cultures: An IRT analysis. J Res Pers 40:411–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oishi S, Diener E, Suh E, Lucas RE (1999) Value as a moderator in subjective well-being. J Pers 67:157–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oyserman D, Coon HM, Kemmelmeier M (2002) Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychol Bull 128:3–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Park N (2005) Life satisfaction among Korean children and youth: A developmental perspective. Sch Psychol Int 36:209–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park N, Huebner ES (2005) A cross-cultural study of the levels and correlates of life satisfaction among adolescents. J Cross-Cult Psychol 36:444–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothbaum F, Rosen K, Ujiie T, Uchida N (2002) Family systems theory, attachment theory and culture. Fam Process 41:328–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sam DL (2000) Psychological adaptation of adolescents with immigrant backgrounds. J Soc Psychol 140:5–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schimmack U, Oishi S, Diener E (2005) Individualism: A valid and important dimension of cultural differences between nations. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 9:17–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shin DC, Rutkowski CP, Park C-M (2003) The quality of life in Korea: Comparative and dynamic perspectives. Soc Indicators Res 62–63:3–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiomi K, Loo R (1999) Cross-cultural response styles on the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory. Soc Behav Pers 27:413–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith PB (2004) Acquiescent response bias as an aspect of cultural communication style. J Cross-Cult Psychol 35:50–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suldo SM, Huebner ES (2006) Is extremely high life satisfaction during adolescence advantageous? Soc Indicators Res 78:179–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachinick BG, Fidell LS (1996) Using multivariate statistics, 4th edn. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis HC (1989) The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychol Rev 96:506–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triandis HC (1995) Individualism & collectivism, Westview Press, Boulder, CO

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker KL, Ozer DJ, Lyubomirsky S, Boehm JK (2006) Testing for measurement invariance in the Satisfaction with Life Scale: A comparison of Russians and North Americans. Soc Indicators Res 78:341–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Kloot WA, Kroonenberg PM, Bakker D (1985) Implicit theories of personality: Further evidence of extreme response style. Multivariate Behav Res 20:369–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van de Vijver FJR, Leung K (2000) Methodological issues in psychological research on culture. J Cross-Cult Psychol 31:33–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Herk H, Poortinga YH, Verhallen TMM (2004) Response styles in rating scales: Evidence of method bias in data from six EU countries. J Cross Cult Psychol 35:346–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven R (2005) Return of inequality in modern society? Test by dispersion of life satisfaction across time and nations. J Happiness Stud 6:457–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins D, Cheung S (1995) Culture, gender, and response bias: An analysis of responses to the Self-Description Questionnaire. J Cross Cult Psychol 26:490–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welkenhuysen-Gybels J, Billiet J, Cambre B (2003) Adjustment for acquiescence in the assessment of the construct equivalence of Likert-type score items. J Cross-Cult Psychol 34:702–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Educational and Counseling Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, 40506-0017, USA

    Rich Gilman

  2. Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA

    E. Scott Huebner

  3. Department of Psychology, South China Normal University, 510631, Guangzhou, P.R. China

    Lili Tian

  4. Department of Psychology, University of Rhode Island, Chafee Bldg., Kingston, RI, 02881, USA

    Nansook Park

  5. Dublin Business School, 13/14 Aungier Street, Dublin 2, Ireland

    Jenny O’Byrne

  6. The Paul Baerwald School of Social Work and Social Welfare, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel

    Miriam Schiff

  7. Department of Psychology, University of Zagreb, Trg maršala Tita 14, 10000, Zagreb, HR, Croatia

    Dina Sverko

  8. Psychological Services, Virginia Beach Public Schools, Virginia Beach, VA, 23456-0038, USA

    Heather Langknecht

Authors
  1. Rich Gilman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. Scott Huebner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lili Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nansook Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jenny O’Byrne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Miriam Schiff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Dina Sverko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Heather Langknecht
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rich Gilman.

Additional information

Rich Gilman is Associate Professor in the Department of Educational and Counseling Psychology at the University of Kentucky. His research interests include positive well-being among youth, perfectionism, and socially ostracized adolescents.

Scott Huebner is Professor in the Department of Psychology at the University of South Carolina. His research interests involve the conceptualization, measurement, and implications of positive psychological well-being constructs among youth. He is a fellow of Division 16 of the APA and the International Society for Quality of Life Studies.

Lili Tian is Associate Professor at South China Normal University. She received her Ph.D. in psychology from Beijing Normal University. Her major research interests include adolescent's school well-being, acculturation of immigrant children and personality assessment.

Nansook Park is Associate Professor at the University of Rhode Island. She received her Ph.D. from University of South Carolina. Her major research interests among youth include character strengths and virtues, positive experience and life satisfaction and how they are related to well-being, family functioning, health and education.

Jenny O’Byrne received her BA in the Department of Counselling & Psychotherapy from the Dublin Business School. Recent research interests focus on child and adolescent development, and she recently completed her pre-clinical training in psychoanalytic psychotherapy with the Lincoln Centre in London.

Dina Sverko is a research assistant at the University of Zagreb (Croatia). She received her Ph.D. in psychology from the University of Triest (Italy). Her major research interests include personality assessment and health psychology.

Miriam Schiff is lecturer (equivalent to Assistant Professor) at the Hebrew University School of Social Work and Social Welfare in Jerusalem. Her major research interests include trauma and substance use, and general mental health among adolescents in clinic settings.

Heather Langknecht received her Ed.S. from the University of Kentucky in 2004. She currently works as a school psychologist at Virginia Beach Public Schools (Virginia). Her primary research interests are cross-national quality of life issues among children and youth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilman, R., Huebner, E.S., Tian, L. et al. Cross-National Adolescent Multidimensional Life Satisfaction Reports: Analyses of Mean Scores and Response Style Differences. J Youth Adolescence 37, 142–154 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-007-9172-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-007-9172-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation