Abstract
Four identity dimensions (Commitment Making, Identification with Commitment, Exploration in Depth, and Exploration in Breadth) were used to derive identity statuses by means of cluster analysis in a sample of late adolescents. This strategy resulted in both a qualitative refinement and a quantitative extension of Marcia's (1966) model. Five clusters were retained. Four of those (the Achievement, Moratorium, Foreclosure, and Diffused Diffusion Cluster) bore a striking resemblance to Marcia's original identity statuses in terms of their definition and their associations with criterion variables. Adolescents in the fifth cluster, the Carefree Diffusion Cluster (low to moderate on both commitment dimensions and low on both exploration dimensions), scored as high as the 2 high Commitment Making clusters (i.e., the Achievement and Foreclosure Cluster) on several indicators of adjustment. Personality characteristics further differentiated these clusters in accordance with theory. The advantages of expanding the identity status paradigm, through additional distinctions that pertain to both commitment and exploration, are discussed and practical implications are outlined.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Archer, S. L. (1992). A feminist's approach to identity research. In Adams, G. R., Gullotta, T. P., and Montemayor, R. (eds.), Adolescent Identity Formation. Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 25–49.
Archer, S. L., and Waterman, A. S. (1990). Varieties of identity diffusions and foreclosures: An exploration of subcategories of the identity statuses. J. Adolesc. Res. 5: 96–111.
Baker, R. W., and Siryk, B. (1984). Measuring adjustment to college. J. Counsel. Psychol. 31: 179–189.
Balistreri, E., Busch-Rossnagel, N. A., and Geisinger, K. F. (1995). Development and preliminary validation of the Ego Identity Process Questionnaire. J. Adolesc. 18: 179–192.
Berzonsky, M. D. (1985). Diffusion within Marcia's identity-status paradigm: Does it foreshadow academic problems? J. Youth Adolesc. 14: 527–538.
Berzonsky, M. D. (1990). Self-construction over the life-span: A process perspective on identity formation. Adv. Personal Construct Psychol. 1: 155–186.
Bosma, H. A. (1985). Identity Development in Adolescents: Coping with Commitments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
Calinski, R. B., and Harabasz, J. (1974). A dendrite method for cluster analysis. Commun. Stat. 3: 1–27.
Clancy, S. M., and Dollinger, S. J. (1993). Identity, self, and personality: I. Identity status and the five-factor model of personality. J. Res. Adolesc. 3: 227–245.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analyses for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NY.
Costa, P. T., Jr., and McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and the Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources Inc., Odessa, Florida.
Cramer, P. (2000). Development of identity: Gender makes a difference. J. Res. Personal. 34: 42–72.
Dollinger, S. J., Leong, F. T. L., and Ulicni, S. K. (1996). On traits and values: With special reference to openness to experience. J. Res. Personal. 30: 23–41.
Dollinger, S. J., and Orf, L. A. (1991). Personality and performance in “personality”: Conscientiousness and openness. J. Res. Personal. 25: 276–284.
Erikson, E. (1968). Identity, Youth and Crisis. Norton, New York.
Goossens, L. (1995). Identity status development and students' perception of the university environment: A cohort-sequential study. In Oosterwegel, A., and Wicklund, R. A. (eds.), The Self in European and North American Culture: Development and Processes. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 19–32.
Goossens, L. (2001). Global versus domain-specific statuses in identity research: A comparison of two self-report measures. J. Adolesc. 24: 681–699.
Goossens, L., and Luyckx, K. (in press). Belgium. In Arnett, J. J. (ed.), Routledge International Encyclopedia of Adolescence. Routledge, New York.
Gore, P. A., Jr. (2000). Cluster analysis. In Tinsley, H. E. A. and Brown, S. D. (eds.), Handbook of Applied Multivariate Statistics and Mathematical Modeling. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 297–321.
Grotevant, H. D. (1987). Toward a process model of identity formation. J. Adolesc. Res. 2: 203–222.
Grotevant, H. D., and Cooper, C. R. (1985). Patterns of interaction in family relationships and the development of identity exploration in adolescence. Child Dev. 56: 415–428.
Hoekstra, H. A., Ormel, J., and de Fruyt, F (1996). NEO Persoonlijkheids Vragenlijsten: NEO-PI-R, NEO-FFI. Handleiding. Swets& Zeitlinger, The Netherlands, Lisse.
Kroger, J. (1995). The differentiation of “firm” and “developmental” foreclosure identity statuses: A longitudinal study. J. Adolesc. Res. 10: 317–337.
Kroger, J., and Green, K. E. (1996). Events associated with identity status change. J. Adolesc. 19: 477–490.
Luyckx, K., Goossens, L., Beyers, W., and Soenens, B. (in press a). The Ego Identity Process Questionnaire: Factor structure, reliability, and convergent validity in Dutch-speaking late adolescents. J. Adolesc.
Luyckx, K., Goossens, L., Soenens, B., and Beyers, W. (in press b). Unpacking commitment and exploration: Validation of an integrative model of adolescent identity formation. J. Adolesc.
Luyckx, K., Soenens, B., and Goossens, L. (in press c). The personality-identity interplay in emerging adult women: Convergent findings from complementary analyses. European J. Personality.
MacCallum, R. C., Zhang, S., Preacher, K. J., and Rucker, D. D. (2002). On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychol. Methods 7: 19–40.
Marcia, J. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego-identity status. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 3: 551–558.
Marcia, J. E. (1976). Identity six years after: A follow-up study. J. Youth Adolesc. 5: 145–160.
Marcia, J. E. (1980). Identity in adolescence. In Adelson, J. (ed.), Handbook of Adolescent Psychology. Wiley, New York, pp. 159–187.
Marcia, J. E. (1982). Identiteitsstatus in de late adolescentie: Beschrijving en enkele klinische implicaties [Identity status in late adolescence: Description and some clinical implications]. In Bosma, H. A., and Graafsma, T. L. G. (eds.), De ontwikkeling van Identiteit in de Adolescentie. Dekker& Van De Vegt, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, pp. 50–64.
Marcia, J. E. (1987). The identity status approach to the study of ego identity development. In Honess, T., and Yardley, K. (eds.), Self and Identity: Perspectives Across the Lifespan. Routledge& Kegan Paul, London, pp. 161–171.
Marcia, J. E. (1989). Identity diffusion differentiated. In Luszcz, M. A., and Nettelbeck, T. (eds.), Psyhcological Development: Perspectives Across the Life-span. Elsevier, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 123–137.
Marcia, J. E. (1993). The status of the statuses: Research review. In Marcia, J. E., Waterman, A. S., Matteson, D. R., Archer, S. L., and Orlofsky, J. L. (eds.), Identity: A Handbook for Psychosocial Research. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 22–41.
Marcia, J. E. (2001). A commentary on Seth Schwartz's review of identity theory and research. Identity 1: 59–65.
Marcia, J. E., and Archer, S. L. (1993). Identity status in late adolescence: Scoring criteria. In Marcia, J. E., Waterman, A. S., Matteson, D. R., Archer, S. L., and Orlofsky, J. L. (eds.), Identity: A Handbook for Psychosocial Research. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 205–240.
Matteson, D. R. (1977). Exploration and commitment: Sex differences and methodological problems in the use of identity status categories. J. Youth Adolesc. 6: 353–374.
McCrae, R. R. (1994). Openness to experience: Expanding the boundaries of Factor V. Eur. J. Personal. 8: 251–272.
McCrae, R. R., and Costa, P. T., Jr. (1990). Personality in Adulthood. Guilford, New York.
Meeus, W. (1996). Studies on identity development in adolescence: An overview of research and some new data. J. Youth Adolesc. 25: 569–598.
Meeus, W., and Dekovic, M. (1995). Identity development, parental and peer support in adolescence: Results of a national, Dutch survey. Adolescence 30: 931–944.
Meeus, W., Iedema, J., and Maassen, G. H. (2002). Commitment and exploration as mechanisms of identity formation. Psychol. Rep. 90: 771–785.
Milligan, G. W., and Cooper, M. C. (1985). An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set. Psychometrika 50: 159–179.
Radloff, L. S. (1977). The Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. J. Appl. Psychol. Measur. 1: 185–401.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the Adolescent Self-image. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Schwartz, S. J. (2001). The evolution of Eriksonian and Neo-Eriksonian identity theory and research: A review and integration. Identity 1: 7–58.
Soenens, B., Duriez, B., and Goossens, L. (2005). Social-psychological profiles of identity styles: Attitudinal and social-cognitive correlates in late adolescence. J. Adolesc. 28: 107–125.
Stephen, J., Fraser, E., and Marcia, J. E. (1992). Moratorium-achievement (Mama) cycles in lifespan identity development: Value orientations and reasoning system correlates. J. Adolesc. 15: 283–300.
Valde, G. A. (1996). Identity closure: A fifth identity status. J. Genet. Psychol. 157: 245–254.
Waterman, A. S. (1992). Identity as an aspect of optimal psychological functioning. In Adams, G. R., Gullotta, T. P., and Montemayor, R. (eds.), Adolescent Identity Formation. Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 50–72.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Doctoral Researcher for the Special Research Fund (B.O.F.)—Flanders (Belgium). Current research focuses on adolescent identity formation and development.
Assistant Professor of Developmental Psychology, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium. Received PhD in developmental psychology from the Catholic University Leuven, Belgium, 1988. Current research interests include adolescent identity, autonomy, and loneliness.
Doctoral Researcher for the Fund of Scientific Research (F.W.O.)—Flanders (Belgium) at the Catholic University Leuven, Belgium. Research interests include parent–adolescent relationships, identity processes, and acculturation orientations of ethnic minority members.
Postdoctoral Researcher for the Fund of Scientific Research (F.W.O.)—Flanders (Belgium). Received PhD in developmental psychology from the Catholic University Leuven, Belgium, 2001. Current research focuses on adolescent autonomy, parenting and mediators of parenting effects on individuation and identity.
Doctoral Researcher for the Fund of Scientific Research (F.W.O.)—Flanders (Belgium) at the Catholic University Leuven, Belgium. Research interests include motivational processes, self-determination theory, parent–adolescent relationships, and identity processes.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Luyckx, K., Goossens, L., Soenens, B. et al. Identity Statuses Based on 4 Rather Than 2 Identity Dimensions: Extending and Refining Marcia's Paradigm. J Youth Adolescence 34, 605–618 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-005-8949-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-005-8949-x