Abstract
Following Boyes and Chandler (1992), it is investigated how adolescents’ epistemic understanding relates to the process of identity formation. In a cross-sectional as well as longitudinal study, identity status scores of diffusion, foreclosure, moratorium and identity achievement as assessed by the Extended Objective Measure of Ego Identity Status were analyzed as a function of adolescents’ epistemic stance, while simultaneously taking into account individual differences in identity processing styles. The cross-sectional sample was composed of 200 German adolescents from Grades 7, 9, 11, and 13 (mean age: 16.2 years, SD = 2.41). The longitudinal study consisted of 134 participants (mean age at retest: 16.5 years, SD = 1.7) and covered a time interval of 18 months. Findings confirmed the view that the development of epistemic cognition contributes to adolescent identity formation. Specifically, the development of a multiplistic epistemic stance predicted higher moratorium scores, whereas the more advanced evaluativist epistemic position contributed to identity achievement over time. These effects were not due to individual differences in identity processing style.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, G. (1998). Objective Measure of Ego Identity Status: A Reference Manual. University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Berzonsky, M. D., Weiner, A. S., and Raphael, D. (1975). Interdependece of formal reasoning. Devel. Psychol. 11: 258.
Berzonsky, M. D. (1989). Identity style: Conceptualization and measurement. J. Adol. Res. 4: 268–282.
Berzonsky, M. D. (1992). Identity Style Inventory (ISI3). State University of New York at Cortland, Cortland, New Yok.
Berzonsky, M. D. (1994). Individual differences in self-construction: The role of constructivist epistemological assumptions. J. Const. Psychol. 7: 263–281.
Berzonsky, M. D. (1999). Identity styles and hypothesis-testing strategies. J. Soc. Psychol. 139: 184–789.
Berzonsky, M. D., and Adams, G. R. (1999). Reevaluating the identity status paradigm: Still useful after 35 years. Devel. Rev. 19: 557–590.
Berzonsky, M. D., and Neimeyer, G. J. (1994). Ego identity status and identity processing orientation: The moderating role of commitment. J. Res. Personality 28: 425–435.
Blasi, A. (1988). Identity and the development of the self. In Lapsley, D. K., and Power, F. C. (eds.), Self, Ego, and Identity. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 226–242.
Bosma, H. A., and Kunnen, E. S. (2001). Determinants and mechanisms in identity development: A review and synthesis. Devel. Rev. 21: 39–66.
Boyes, M. C., and Chandler, M. (1992). Cognitive development, epistemic doubt, and identity formation in adolescence. J. Youth Adolescence 21: 737–763.
Cauble, M. A. (1976). Formal operations, ego identity, and principled morality: Are they related?. Devel. Psychol. 12: 363–364.
Chandler, M. (1987). The Othello effect. Human Devel. 18: 171–180.
Chandler, M. J., Boyes, M., and Ball, L. (1990). Relativism and stations of epistemic doubt. J. Exper. Child Psychol. 50: 370–395.
Côté, J. E., and Levine, C. (1988). A critical examination of the ego identity status paradigm. Devel. Rev. 8: 147–184.
Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Ray, V., and Heier, H. (1996). Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. J. Personality Soc. Psychol. 71: 390–405.
Erikson, E. (1959). Identity: Youth and Crises. Norton, New York.
Hallett, D., Chandler, M. J., and Krettenauer, T. (2002). Disentangling the course of epistemic development: Parsing knowledge by epistemic content. New Ideas Psychol. 20: 285–307.
Hofer, B. K., and Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Rev. Educational Res. 67: 88–140.
King, P. M., and Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing Reflective Judgment. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Kitchener, R. F. (2002). Folk epistemology: An introduction. New Ideas Psychol. 20: 89–105.
Klaczynski, P. A., Fauth, J. M., and Swanger, A. (1998). Adolescent identity: Rational vs. experiential processsing, formal operations, and critical thinking beliefs. J. Youth Adolescence 27: 185–207.
Kramer, D. A. (1983). Post-formal operations? A need for further conceptualization. Human Devel. 26: 91–105.
Krettenauer, T. (2005). Die Erfassung des Entwicklungsniveaus epistemologischer Überzeugungen und das Problem der Übertragbarkeit von Interviewverfahren in standardisierte Fragebogenmethoden [Measuring the developmental level of epistemological beliefs and the problem of transfering interview procedures to standardized questionnaire methods]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 37: 69–79.
Kuhn, D. (1991). The Skills of Argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Kuhn, D., Cheney, R., and Weinstock, M. (2000). The development of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Devel. 15: 309–328.
Kuhn, D. and Udell, W. (2003). The development of argument skills. Child Devel. 74: 1245–1260.
Leadbeater, B. J., and Dionne, J. P. (1981). The adolescent’s use of formal operational thinking in solving problems related to identity resolution. Adolescence 16: 111–121.
Marcia, J. E., Waterman, A. S., Matteson, D. R., Archer, S. L., and Orlofsky, J. L. (1993). Ego identity. Springer, New York.
Meuus, W., Iedema, J., Helsen, M., and Vollebergh, W. (1999). Patterns of adolescent identity development: Review of literature and longitudinal analysis. Devel. Rev. 19: 419–461.
Moshman, D. (1994). Reason, reasons and reasoning: A constructivist account of human rationality. Theory Psychol. 4: 245–260.
Moshman, D. (1999). Adolescent Psychological Development. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York.
Peterson, D. M., Marcia, J. E., and Carpendale, J. I. M. (2004). Identity: Does thinking make it so? In Lightfoot, C., Lalonde, C., and Chandler, M. (eds.), Changing conceptions of psychological life. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Piaget, J., and Inhelder, B. (1977). Von der Logik des Kindes zur Logik des Heranwachsenden (From the logic of the child to the logic of the adolescent). Olten, Freiburg.
Rest, J., Thoma, S., and Edwards, L. (1997). Designing and validating a measure of moral judgment. J. Edu. Psychol. 89: 5–28.
Rowe, I., and Marcia, J. (1980). Ego identity status, formal operations, and moral development. J. Youth Adolescence 9: 87– 99.
Schneider, W. (1989). Problems of longitudinal studies with children: Practical, conceptual, and methodological issues. In Brambring, M., Lösel, F., and Skowronek, H. (eds.), Children at Risk: Assessement, Longitudinal Research and Internvenion, Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 313–335.
Stephen, J., Fraser, E., and Marcia, J. E. (1992). Moratorium-achievement (MAMA) cycles in life span identity development: Value orientations and reasoning systems. J. Adolescence 15: 283–300.
Treiman, D. J. (1977). Occupational Prestige in Comparative Perspective. Academic Press, New York.
van Hoof, A. (1999). The identity status field re-reviewed: An update of unresolved and neglected issues with a view on some alternative approaches. Devel. Rev. 497–556.
Waterman, A. S. (1999). Issues of identity formation revisited: United States and The Netherlands. Devel. Rev. 19: 462– 479.
Wolf, C. (1995). Sozio-ökonomischer Status und berufliches Prestige (Socio-economic status and occupational prestige). ZUMA-Nachrichten 19: 102–136.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krettenauer, T. The Role of Epistemic Cognition in Adolescent Identity Formation: Further Evidence. J Youth Adolescence 34, 185–198 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-005-4300-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-005-4300-9