Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The productivity impact of R&D and FDI spillovers: characterising regional path development

  • Published:
The Journal of Technology Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

R&D activities by indigenous firms create new knowledge and technology in a region, while foreign-owned firms bring advanced knowledge and technologies from their home countries. This paper analyses the spillover effects of R&D-active or foreign-owned firms on total factor productivity of domestic non-R&D active firms. It combines two sets of literature: the one on spillover effects of intra-industry and inter-industry linkages and the other on the regional context in which these linkages occur. As measured through input-output tables, industry linkages reveal that R&D or FDI spillovers take on diverse roles in regions. Focusing on productivity spillover effects on domestic non-R&D active firms in three regions in Belgium between 2000 and 2017, we conclude that R&D spillovers generally occur more frequently than FDI spillovers. By focussing on two sources of spillovers, the paper offers a more nuanced picture of industrial transformation and regional path development. Region-specific analyses show that the effects on the productivity of domestic non-R&D active firms originate from different spillover sources. The impact of spillovers and their contribution to industrial transformation differs according to the regional development path characterised by the varying degrees of organisational thickness and specialisation of the regional innovation system. Linkages of R&D active or foreign-owned firms with domestic non-R&D active firms exert a heterogeneous impact on their productivity. Therefore, an adapted regional innovation policy, such as smart specialisation, should consider these region-specific spillover effects on productivity when establishing future regional development paths.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For the years 2015–2017 we use the IO-table of 2014.

References

  • Acharya, R. C. (2015). Revisiting measure of R&D spillovers: Empirical evidence on OECD countries and industries. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 24(4), 360–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ackerberg, D. A., Caves, K., & Frazer, G. (2015). Identification properties of recent production function estimators. Econometrica, 83(6), 2411–2451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, A., & Cockburn, I. (2003). The anchor tenant hypothesis: Exploring the role of large, local, R&D intensive firms in regional innovation systems. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 1227–1253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alfaro, L., Chanda, A., Kalemli-Ozcan, S., & Sayek, S. (2004). FDI and economic growth: The role of local financial markets. Journal of International Economics, 64(1), 89–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annoni, P., & Dijkstra, L. (2019). The EU regional competitiveness index 2019. Publications Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asheim, B. T. (2019). Smart specialisation, innovation policy and regional innovation systems: What about new path development in less innovative regions? Innovation. The European Journal of Social Science Research, 32(1), 8–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asheim, B. T., Grillitsch, M., & Trippl, M. (2016). Regional innovation systems: Past—presence—future. In D. Doloreux, R. Shearmur, & C. Carrincazeaux (Eds.), Handbook on the geography of innovation (pp. 45–62). Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Asheim, B., Boschma, R., & Cooke, P. (2011). Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional Studies, 45(7), 893–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asheim, B. T., & Isaksen, A. (2002). Regional innovation systems: The integration of local “sticky” and global “ubiquitous” knowledge. Journal of Technology Transfer, 27, 77–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atallah, G. (2002). Vertical R&D spillovers, cooperation, market structure, and innovation. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 11(3), 179–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. (1996). Spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 86, 630–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balland, P. A., Boschma, R., Crespo, J., & Rigby, D. L. (2019). Smart specialization policy in the European Union: Relatedness, knowledge complexity and regional diversification. Regional Studies, 53(9), 1252–1268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barge-Gil, A., López, A., & Núñez-Sánchez, R. (2020). Technological spillovers from multinational firms. The World Economy, 43(12), 3184–3202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 31–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belspo. (2010). Belgian report on science and technology indicators. Belgian Science Policy Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belspo. (2019). Government budget allocations for R&D: All authorities in Belgium. https://www.belspo.be/belspo/stat/b32_en.stm.

  • Ben Hassine, H., Boudier, F., & Mathieu, C. (2017). The two ways of FDI R&D spillovers: Evidence from the French manufacturing industry. Applied Economics, 49(25), 2395–2408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berchicci, L., de Jong, J. P. J., & Freel, M. (2016). Remote collaboration and innovative performance: The moderating role of R&D intensity. Industrial and Corporate Change, 25, 429–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billiet, J., Maddens, B., & Frognier, A. P. (2006). Does Belgium (still) exist? Differences in political culture between Flemings and Walloons. West European Politics, 29(5), 912–932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binz, C., Truffer, B., & Coenen, L. (2016). Path creation as a process of resource alignment and anchoring: Industry formation for on-site water recycling in Beijing. Economic Geography, 92(2), 172–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boschma, R. (2014). Constructing regional advantage and smart specialization: Comparisons of two European policy concepts. Italian Journal of Regional Science (scienze Regionali), 13(1), 51–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boschma, R. (2015). Towards an evolutionary perspective on regional resilience. Regional Studies, 49(5), 733–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boschma, R., & Capone, G. (2015). Institutions and diversification: Related versus unrelated diversification in a varieties of capitalism framework. Research Policy, 44(10), 1902–1914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2011). Technological relatedness and regional branching. In H. Bathelt, M. Feldman, & D. Kogler (Eds.), Beyond territory: Dynamic geographies of knowledge creation, diffusion, and innovation (pp. 64–81). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boschma, R., & Giannelle, C. (2014). Regional Branching and Smart Specialisation Policy, JRC Technical Reports, S3 Policy Briefings No. 06/2014, European Commission

  • Boschma, R., & Iammarino, S. (2009). Related variety, trade linkages, and regional growth in Italy. Economic Geography, 85(3), 289–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caniëls, M. C., & Romijn, H. A. (2005). What drives innovativeness in industrial clusters? Transcending the debate. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 29(4), 497–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capron, H. (2000). The sources of Belgian prosperity. In H. Capron & W. Meeusen (Eds.), The national innovation system of Belgium (pp. 21–41). Physica-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R. (1974). Multinational firms, competition, and productivity in host-country markets. Economica, 41(162), 176–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerqua, A., & Pellegrini, G. (2020). Local multipliers at work. Industrial and Corporate Change, 29(4), 959–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charron, N., Lapuente, V., & Annoni, P. (2019). Measuring quality of government in EU regions across space and time. Papers in Regional Science, 98(5), 1925–1953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 128–152.

  • Content, J., & Frenken, K. (2016). Related variety and economic development: A literature review. European Planning Studies, 24(12), 2097–2112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P., Uranga, M. G., & Etxebarria, G. (1997). Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research Policy, 26, 475–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crespo, N., Fontoura, M. P., & Proença, I. (2009). FDI spillovers at regional level: Evidence from Portugal. Papers in Regional Science, 88(3), 591–s607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doloreux, D., & Parto, S. (2005). Regional innovation systems: Current discourse and unresolved issues. Technology in Society, 27(2), 133–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dotti, N. F., Lazzeri, G., & Bramanti, A. (2018). Smart timing and specialised spaces: Reflections on the implementation of smart specialisation strategies in Milan and Brussels. Public Policy Portuguese Journal, 3(1), 44–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fløysand, A., Njøs, R., Nilsen, T., & Nygaard, V. (2017). Foreign direct investment and renewal of industries: Framing the reciprocity between materiality and discourse. European Planning Studies, 25(3), 462–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foray, D. (2015). Smart specialisation. Opportunities and challenges for regional innovation policy. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foray, D., David, P.A., & Hall, B. H. (2009). Smart specialisation—the concept. Knowledge economists policy brief, 9. Brussels, European Commission—DG Research, pp. 20–24

  • Freeman, C., & Louça, F. (2001). As time goes by: The information revolution and the industrial revolutions in historical perspective. Oxford University Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frenken, K. V., Oort, F. G., & Verburg, T. (2007). Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies, 41(5), 685–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonçalves, E., Perobelli, F. S., & de Araújo, I. F. (2017). Estimating intersectoral technology spillovers for Brazil. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(6), 1377–1406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B. H., Mairesse, J., & Mohnen, P. (2010). Measuring the returns to R&D. In B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation (Vol. 2, pp. 1033–1082). Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassink, R. (2010). Locked in decline? On the role of regional lock-ins in old industrial areas. In R. Boschma & R. Martin (Eds.), The handbook of evolutionary economic geography (pp. 450–468). Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassink, R., Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2019). Towards a comprehensive understanding of new regional industrial path development. Regional Studies, 53(11), 1636–1645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havránek, T., & Irsová, Z. (2011). Estimating vertical spillovers from FDI: Why results vary and what the true effect is. Journal of International Economics, 85(2), 234–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irsova, Z., & Havránek, T. (2013). Determinants of horizontal spillovers from FDI: Evidence from a large meta-analysis. World Development, 42(C), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollanders, H., Es-Sadki N., & Merkelbach, I. (2019). Regional innovation scoreboard 2019. Luxemburg, European Union.

  • Howell, A. (2020). Industry relatedness, FDI liberalization and the indigenous innovation process in China. Regional Studies, 54(2), 229–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaksen, A., & Karlsen, J. (2013). Can small regions construct regional advantages? The case of four Norwegian regions. European Urban and Regional Studies, 20(2), 243–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2016). Path development in different regional innovation systems: A conceptual analysis. In M. D. Parrilli, R. D. Fitjar, & A. Rodríguez-Pose (Eds.), Innovation drivers and regional innovation strategies (pp. 66–84). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2017). Exogenously led and policy-supported new path development in peripheral regions: Analytical and synthetic routes. Economic Geography, 93(5), 436–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Javorcik, B. S. (2004). Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms? In search of spillovers through backward linkages. American Economic Review, 94(3), 605–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallio, A., Harmaakorpi, V., & Pihkala, T. (2010). Absorptive capacity and social capital in regional innovation systems: The case of the Lahti region in Finland. Urban Studies, 47(2), 303–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katayama, H., Lu, S., & Tybout, J. (2003). Why plant-level productivity studies are often misleading, and an alternative approach to interference. NBER Working Paper 9617.

  • Kelchtermans, S., & Robledo-Böttcher, N. (2018). RIO country report 2017: Belgium. Luxemburg, European Union.

  • Levinsohn, J., & Petrin, A. (2003). Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. Review of Economic Studies, 70(2), 317–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, C., & Tanna, S. (2018). FDI spillover effects in China’s manufacturing sector: New evidence from forward and backward linkages. In N. Tsounis & A. Vlachvei (Eds.), Advances in panel data analysis in applied economic research (pp. 203–222). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., & Bosworth, D. (2020). R&D spillovers in a supply chain and productivity performance in British firms. Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(1), 177–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, F. H. (2017). Does foreign direct investment improve the productivity of domestic firms? Technology spillovers, industry linkages, and firm capabilities. Research Policy, 446(1), 138–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Z. (2008). Foreign direct investment and technology spillovers: Theory and evidence. Journal of Development Economics, 85(1), 176–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorentzen, J., & Barnes, J. (2004). Learning, upgrading, and innovation in the South African automotive industry. The European Journal of Development Research, 16(3), 465–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Y., Tao, Z., & Zhu, L. (2017). Identifying FDI spillovers. Journal of International Economics, 107, 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucking, B., Bloom, N., & Van Reenen, J. (2019). Have R&D spillovers declined in the 21st century? Fiscal Studies, 40(4), 561–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lychagin, S., Pinkse, J., Slade, M. E., & Van Reenen, J. (2016). Spillovers in space: Does geography matter? Journal of Industrial Economics, 64(2), 295–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D. (2012). Beyond strategic coupling: Reassessing the firm-region nexus in global production networks. Journal of Economic Geography, 12(1), 227–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsan, G. A., & Maguire, K. (2011). Categorisation of OECD regions using innovation-related variables. OECD Regional Development Working Papers 2011/03.

  • Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(4), 395–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R., & Simmie, J. (2008). Path dependence and local innovation systems in city-regions. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 10(23), 183–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2015). Smart specialization, regional growth and applications to European Union Cohesion policy. Regional Studies, 49(8), 1291–1302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merlevede, B., Schoors, K., & Spatareanu, M. (2014). FDI spillovers and time since foreign entry. World Development, 56, 108–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merlevede, B., & Purice, V. (2016). Distance, time since foreign entry, and productivity spillovers from foreign direct investment. Papers in Regional Science, 95(4), 775–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merlevede, B. A. (2020). Foreign direct investment and productivity spillover effects. In M. Spatareanu (Ed.), Encyclopedia of international economics and global trade: Foreign direct investment and the multinational enterprise (Vol. 1, pp. 259–284). World Scientific.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Miguélez, E., & Moreno, R. (2015). Knowledge flows and the absorptive capacity of regions. Research Policy, 44, 833–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neffke, F., Henning, M., & Boschma, R. (2011). How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography, 87(3), 237–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, E., & O’Gorman, C. (2001). Competitive advantage in the Irish indigenous software industry and the role of inward foreign direct investment. European Planning Studies, 9, 303–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2013). Innovation-driven growth in regions: The role of smart specialisation. OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2015). Frascati manual 2015. Guidelines for collecting and reporting data on research and experimental development. OECD.

  • Olley, G. S., & Pakes, A. (1996). The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica, 64(6), 1263–1297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padilla-Pérez, R., & Gaudin, Y. (2014). Science, technology and innovation policies in small and developing economies: The case of Central America. Research Policy, 43(4), 749–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rissola, G., & Sörvik, J. (2018). Digital innovation hubs in smart specialisation strategies. Publications Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Crescenzi, R. (2008). Research and development, spillovers, innovation systems, and the genesis of regional growth in Europe. Regional Studies, 42(1), 51–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Garcilazo, E. (2015). Quality of government and the returns of investment: Examining the impact of cohesion expenditure in European regions. Regional Studies, 49(8), 1274–1290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sotarauta, M., Suvinen, N., Jolly, S., & Hansen, T. (2021). The many roles of change agency in the game of green path development in the North. European Urban and Regional Studies, 28(2), 92–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmer, M. P., Los, B., Stehrer, R., & de Vries, G. J. (2016). An anatomy of the global trade slowdown based on the WIOD 2016 release. Technical report, Groningen Growth and Development Centre, University of Groningen.

  • Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2013). Transformation of regional innovation systems: From old legacies to new development paths. In P. Cooke (Ed.), Reframing regional development (pp. 297–317). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trippl, M., Grillitsch, M., & Isaksen, A. (2018). Exogenous sources of regional industrial change: Attraction and absorption of non-local knowledge for new path development. Progress in Human Geography, 42(5), 687–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ugur, M., Awaworyi Churchill, S., & Luong, H. M. (2020). What do we know about R&D spillovers and productivity? Meta-analysis evidence on heterogeneity and statistical power. Research Policy, 49(1), 103866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uyarra, E., & Flanagan, K. (2010). From regional systems of innovation to regions as innovation policy spaces. Environment and Planning c: Government and Policy, 28(4), 681–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. C., & Wu, A. (2016). Geographical FDI knowledge spillover and innovation of indigenous firms in China. International Business Review, 25(4), 895–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2009). On estimating firm-level production functions using proxy variables to control for unobservables. Economics Letters, 104(3), 112–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universiteit Gent, Tweekerkenstraat 2, 9000, Gent, Belgium

    André Spithoven & Bruno Merlevede

  2. Belgian Science Policy Office, Boulevard Simon Bolivar 30 bte 7, 1000, Brussels, Belgium

    André Spithoven

  3. Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussel, Belgium

    André Spithoven

Authors
  1. André Spithoven
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bruno Merlevede
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to André Spithoven.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10.

Table 6 Annual evolution of the presence of firm category in an industry (averaged over 56 industry-level data, 1,008 observations)
Full size table
Table 7 Productivity spillovers to domestic non-R&D active firms of R&D active and foreign-owned firms: Robustness checks
Full size table
Table 8 Correlation among spillover variables
Full size table
Table 9 Spillover effects in the sample of domestic R&D active firms, foreign non-R&D active firms, and foreign R&D active firms
Full size table
Table 10 WIOD & NACE revision 2 classification correspondence for the business economy
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Spithoven, A., Merlevede, B. The productivity impact of R&D and FDI spillovers: characterising regional path development. J Technol Transf 48, 560–590 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-022-09918-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-022-09918-0

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation