Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How to acquire legitimacy and become a player in a regional innovation ecosystem? The case of a young university

  • Published:
The Journal of Technology Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Universities are recognized as a particular type of public organization. Due to the important role they are acquiring in the development of regional economies, universities are facing significant pressures to become more entrepreneurial and similar to private sector organizations. This new role requires universities to engage in substantial change activities in order to get legitimacy from their ecosystem. Change management literature has mainly assumed that changes in public-sector organizations are the result of top-down initiatives as well as the exercise of political clout. Instead, the role of agency and bottom-up dynamics in explaining change in public-sector organizations is still overlooked. Based on a longitudinal case study of a young university in Italy, this research explores its bottom-up process of internal transformation to become more entrepreneurial and fully legitimized in its local innovation ecosystem. In doing so, we contribute to existing literature in several ways. First, we add a process lens for understanding the transformation of a public actor not from the perspective of environmentally imposed changes processes, but through proactive interactions, role definition and activities. Second, we demonstrate that the entry of a key actor in a regional system unfreezes the existing equilibrium, by changing the distribution of competences and the awareness of other actors’ activity. Third, we show that bottom-up processes favouring bandwagon effects are particularly appropriate for change processes of public institutions that are not affected by a substantial crisis (as usual trigger for change processes).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adner, R. (2012). The wide lens: A new strategy for innovation. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Askim, J., Christensen, T., Fimreite, A. L., & Lægreid, P. (2009). How to carry Out joined-Up government reforms: Lessons from the 2001–2006 Norwegian welfare reform. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(12), 1006–1025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton Cunningham, J. B., & Kempling, J. S. (2009). Implementing change in public sector organizations. Management Decision, 47(2), 330–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battaglio, R. P., Jr., & Condrey, S. E. (2009). Reforming public management: Analyzing the impact of public service reform on organizational and managerial trust. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(4), 689–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battilana, J., & Casciaro, T. (2012). Change agents, networks, and institutions: A contingency theory of organizational change. Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), 381–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). 2 How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, H., Hundt, C., & Sternberg, R. (2016). What makes student entrepreneurs? On the relevance (and irrelevance) of the university and the regional context for student start-ups. Small Business Economics, 47(1), 53–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (2009). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cesaroni, F., & Piccaluga, A. (2016). The activities of university knowledge transfer offices: Towards the third mission in Italy. International Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(4), 753–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Issues in higher education. New York, NY: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Bruneel, J., & Mahajan, A. (2014). Creating value in ecosystems: Crossing the chasm between knowledge and business ecosystems. Research Policy, 43(7), 1164–1176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P., Gomez Uranga, M., & Etxebarria, G. (1997). Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research Policy, 26, 475–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2004). Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 173–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boer, H. F., Endersand, J., & Leisyte, L. (2007). Public sector reform in Dutch Higher Education: The organizational transformation of the university. Public Administration, 85(1), 27–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Massis, A., Di Minin, A., & Frattini, F. (2015). Family-driven innovation. California Management Review, 58(1), 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse, D., & Suchman, M. (2008). Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. (1997). Power of incentives in private versus public organizations. The American Economic Review, 87(2), 378–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorado, S. (2005). Institutional entrepreneurship, partaking, and convening. Organization studies, 26(3), 385–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferlie, E., Fitzgerald, L., & Pettigrew, A. (1996). The new public management in action. Oxford: OUP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1978). Threshold models of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 83(6), 1420–1443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., & Hinings, C. R. (2002). Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 58–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R., Puranam, P., & Tushman, M. (2012). Meta-organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts. Strategic Management Journal, 33(6), 571–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, J. R., & Jacobsen, C. B. (2016). Changing strategy processes and strategy content in public sector organizations? A longitudinal case study of npm reforms’ influence on strategic management. British Journal of Management, 27(2), 373–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendriks, F., & Tops, P. (2003). Local public management reforms in the Netherlands: Fads, fashions and winds of change. Public Administration, 81(2), 301–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgs, M. J., & Rowland, D. (2011). What does it take to implement change successfully? A study of the behaviors of successful change leaders. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47(3), 309–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinings, C. R., Greenwood, R., Reay, T., & Suddaby, R. (2003). The dynamics of change in organizational fields. In M. S. Poole & A. Van de Ven (Eds.), Handbook of organizational change and innovation (pp. 304–323). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, A. J., & Ventresca, M. J. (2002). Organizations, policy and the natural environment: Institutional and strategic perspectives. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karp, T., & Helgø, T. I. T. (2008). From change management to change leadership: Embracing chaotic change in public service organizations. Journal of Change Management, 8(1), 85–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, M., Mowery, D., & Patton, D. (2014). Electrical engineering and computer science at UC Berkeley and Silicon Valley: Modes of regional engagement. In M. Kenney & D. Mowery (Eds.), Public universities and regional development: Insights from the University of California. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuipers, B. S., Higgs, M., Kickert, W., Tummers, L., Grandia, J., & Van der Voet, J. (2014). The management of change in public organizations: A literature review. Public Administration, 92(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24, 691–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry (Vol. 75). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack, E., & Mayer, H. (2016). The evolutionary dynamics of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Urban Studies, 53, 2118–2133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macy, M. W. (1991). Chains of cooperation: Threshold effects in collective action. American Sociological Review, 56, 730–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. A. (2008). Designing a qualitative study. The SAGE handbook of applied social research methods, 2, 214–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNulty, T., & Ferlie, E. (2004). Process transformation: Limitations to radical organizational change within public service organizations. Organization Studies, 25(8), 1389–1412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercan, B., & Goktas, D. (2011). Components of innovation ecosystems: A cross-country study. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 76(16), 102–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padgett, J. F., & Powell, W. W. (2012). The emergence of organizations and markets. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., et al. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J. L., & Porter, L. W. (1982). Factors affecting the context for motivation in public organizations. Academy of Management Review, 7(1), 89–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reay, T., Golden-Biddle, K., & Germann, K. (2006). Legitimizing a new role: Small wins and microprocesses of change. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 977–998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraeder, M., Tears, R. S., & Jordan, M. H. (2005). Organizational culture in public sector organizations: Promoting change through training and leading by example. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 26(6), 492–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sminia, H., & Van Nistelrooij, A. (2006). Strategic management and organization development: Planned change in a public sector organization. Journal of Change Management, 6(1), 99–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spigel, B. (2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stouten, J., Rousseau, D. M., & De Cremer, D. (2018). Successful organizational change: Integrating the management practice and scholarly literatures. Academy of Management Annals, 12(2), 752–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, T. A., Purdy, J. M., & Ventresca, M. J. (2018). How entrepreneurial ecosystems take form: Evidence from social impact initiatives in Seattle. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 96–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H., & Papoulias, D. (2005). Managing third-order change: The case of the public power corporation (Greece). Long Range Planning, 38(1), 79–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valente, T. W. (1996). Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations. Social Networks, 18(1), 69–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Voet, J. (2014). The effectiveness and specificity of change management in a public organization: Transformational leadership and a bureaucratic organizational structure. European Management Journal, 32(3), 373–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Voet, J., Kuipers, B. S., & Groeneveld, S. (2016). Implementing change in public organizations: The relationship between leadership and affective commitment to change in a public sector context. Public Management Review, 18(6), 842–865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ventresca, M. J., & Kaghan, W. N. (2008). Routines, “going concerns”, and innovation: Towards an evolutionary economic sociology. In M. C. Becker (Ed.), Handbook of organizational routines (pp. 52–86). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissert, C. S., & Goggin, M. L. (2002). Nonincremental policy change: Lessons from Michigan’s medicaid managed care initiative. Public Administration Review, 62(2), 206–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooten, M., & Hoffman, A. J. (2008). Organizational fields: Past, present and future. SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism, 1, 130–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, University of Bologna, Via Capo di Lucca, 34, 40126, Bologna, Italy

    Elisa Villani

  2. Department of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Imperial College Business School, South Kensington Campus, London, SW7 2AZ, UK

    Elisa Villani

  3. Faculty of Economics and Management, Free University of Bolzano, Piazza Università, 1, 39100, Bolzano, Italy

    Christian Lechner

Authors
  1. Elisa Villani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christian Lechner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisa Villani.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Villani, E., Lechner, C. How to acquire legitimacy and become a player in a regional innovation ecosystem? The case of a young university. J Technol Transf 46, 1017–1045 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-020-09803-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-020-09803-8

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation