Skip to main content
Log in

Inside the university technology transfer office: mission statement analysis

  • Published:
The Journal of Technology Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The focus of our paper is to qualitatively explore the mission statements components of university TTOs using Pearce and David’s (Acad Manag Exec 1(2):109–115, 1987) eight components. Mission statements are the organization’s central defining purpose and focus. In essence an organizations’ raison d’etre. Given the growing importance of the role TTOs now play, understanding components of mission statements is timely, particularly during the first phase of TTO developments. To provide insights concerning these issues our study is set in the Republic of Ireland, which has one of the top performing university and public research organization technology transfer system within the European Union. Using Pearce and David (1987) well established eight mission statement components we analyzed seven Irish university TTO mission statements. We also conducted quantitative analysis on the number of mission statement components and selected variables. We found that university TTO mission statements focused primarily on two mission components—target customers and markets and principal services. From our quantitative analysis we found moderate positive correlations between patents granted and number of mission statement components. Furthermore we found there was a positive correlation between grants granted outside of Ireland and the number of mission components. Our results, albeit they are tempered by a small sample of data, have pertinent implications for TTOs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, T. (1983). Managing the flow of technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baetz, M. C., & Bart, C. K. (1996). Developing mission statements which work. Long Range Planning, 29(4), 526–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bart, C. K. (1996a). High-tech firms: Does mission matter. Journal of High Technology Management, 7(2), 209–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bart, C. K. (1996b). The impact of mission statements on firm innovativeness. International Journal of Technology Management, 11 (3/4), 479–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bart, C. K. (1997). Industrial firms and the power of mission. Industrial Marketing Management, 25, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byars, L. L., & Neil, T. C. (1987). Organizational philosophy and mission statements. Strategy & Leadership, 15(4), 32–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capat, G., & Sandelin, J. (2004). Models of, and missions for, transfer offices from public research organizations. http://otl.stanford.edu/documents/JSMissionsModelsPaper-1.pdf.

  • Cunningham, J., & Harney, B. (2006). The strategic management of technology transfer: The challenge on campus. Cork: Oak Tree Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, F. R., & David, F. R. (2003). It’s time to redraft your mission statement. Journal of Business Strategy, 24(1), 11–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strategy for Science Technology and Innovation. (2006–2013). Department of Jobs Enterprise and Innovation. Dublin.

  • DETI. (2006). Strategy for science technology and innovation. Dublin: Department of Enterprise, Trade and Innovation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enterprise Ireland. (2014). A review of the performance of the Irish technology transfer system 20072012. Dublin: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2013). Knowledge transfer study 20102012, final report. Brussels: Author.

  • Falsey, T. A. (1989). Corporate philosophies and mission statements. New York: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J., & Silberman, J. (2003). University technology transfer: Do incentives, management, and location matter? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), 17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geoghegan, W., & Pontikakis, D. (2008). From invory tower to factory floor? How universities are changing to meet the needs of industry. Science and Public Policy, 35(7), 462–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jongbloed, B., Enders, J., & Salerno, C. (2008). Higher education and its communities: Interconnections, interdependencies and a research agenda. Higher Education, 56(3), 303–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledford, G. E. Jr., Wendenhof, J. R., & Strahley, J. T. (1995). Realizing a corporate philosophy. Organizational Dynamics, 23, 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leuthesser, L., & Kohli, C. (1997). Corporate identity: The role of mission statements. Business Horizons, 40(3), 59–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markman, G. D., Gianiodis, P. T., & Phan, P. (2005). Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 241–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montesinos, P., Carot, J. M., Martinez, J. M., & Mora, F. (2008). Third mission ranking for world class universities: Beyond teaching and research. Higher Education in Europe, 33(2), 259–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Gorman, C., & Doran, R. (1999). Mission statements in small and medium-sized businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 37(1), 85–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, T., & Short, J. (2008). Mission statements in U.S. colleges of business: An empirical examination of their content with linkages to configurations and performance. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7(4), 454–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, J., & David, F. (1987). Corporate mission statements: The bottom line. Academy of Management Executive, 1(2), 109–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., & Link, A. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study. Research Policy, 32(1), 27–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. E. (2000). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Want, J. H. (1986). Corporate mission. Management Review, 75, 46–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, A., Hanke, R., & Trotzer, D. (2008). Models for university technology transfer: Resolving conflicts between mission and methods and the dependency on geographic location. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 1, 219–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whelan, E., Teigland, R., Donnellan, B., & Golden, W. (2010). How internet technologies impact information flows in R&D: Reconsidering the technological gatekeeper. R&D Management, 4(4), 400–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Brendan Dolan for his research support for this paper. The authors wish to thank Al Link for his constructive comments and feedback that has help shaped this paper. The authors would like to acknowledge the funding support from the Irish Social Sciences Platform as part of the Programme for Research in Third Level Cycle 4 administered by the Higher Education Authority and co-funding from the European Regional Development Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ciara Fitzgerald.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fitzgerald, C., Cunningham, J.A. Inside the university technology transfer office: mission statement analysis. J Technol Transf 41, 1235–1246 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9419-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9419-6

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation