Skip to main content
Log in

Spinouts from academic institutions: a literature review with suggestions for further research

  • Published:
The Journal of Technology Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper provides a comprehensive literature review of the phenomenon of spinouts from academic institutions. We systematically identified spinout papers in key management journals, categorised the literature and critically synthesised the findings. We present the findings of each literature stream in turn and also identify inconsistencies and directions for further research. We conclude that while the early literature has been mainly atheoretical and focused on describing the phenomenon, a core group of recent studies were theory-driven.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The main keywords we have used to screen the articles were: universit* start*, universit* spin*, academic spin*, academic start*, academic start*, entrepreneur* universit*, universit* commercialisation, universit* ntbf, academic* ntbf. The asterisk stands for finding all combinations of a word or word fragment. E.g. spin* finds spinouts as well as spinoffs.

References

  • Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., & Ray S. (2003). A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(1), 105–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E. (2000). Growth of technology-based new firms. In: Sexton, D. L., & Landstrom, H. (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of entrepreneurship (pp. 329–347). Oxford: Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • AUTM (Association of University Technology Managers) (2002). AUTM licensing survey. Northbrook, Ill: AUTM

    Google Scholar 

  • Birley, S. (1985). The role of networks in the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(1), 107–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birley, S. (2002). Universities, academics, and spinout companies: Lessons from imperial. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 1(1), 1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B. (2000). Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory. Research Policy, 29(4–5), 627–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray, M. J., & Lee, J. N. (2000). University revenues from technology transfer: licensing fees vs. equity positions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5/6), 385–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. S. (1985). A proposed mechanism for commercializing university technology. Technovation, 3(1), 19–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E. G., Rogers, E. M., Kurihara, K., & Allbritton, M. M. (1998). High-technology spin-offs from government R&D laboratories and research universities. Technovation, 18(1), 1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman, J. J., Hynes, T., & Fraser, S. (1995). Faculty entrepreneurship and economic development: The case of the University of Calgary. Journal of Business Venturing, 10, 267–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarysse, B., & Moray, N. (2004). A process study of entrepreneurial team formation: The case of a research-based spin-off. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(1), 55–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarysse, B., Heirman, A., & Degroof, J. J. (2000). An Institutional and resource based explanation of growth patterns of research based spin-offs in Europe. In: Reynolds, P. D., Autio, E., Brush, C. G., Bygrave, W. D., Anigart, S., Sapienza, H. J., & Shaver, K. G. (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research (pp. 545–559). Babson College

  • Cooper, A. (1984). Contrasts in the role of incubator organizations in the founding of growth-oriented firms Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Wellesley, MA: Babson College

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P., & David, P. A. (1994). Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23(5), 487–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Degroof, J. J., & Roberts, E. B. (2004). Overcoming weak entrepreneurial infrastructures for academic spin-off ventures. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(3–4), 327–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Gregorio, D., & Shane, S. (2003). Why do some universities generate more startups than others?. Research Policy, 32(2), 209–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doutriaux, J. (1987). Growth pattern of academic entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(4), 285–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Druilhe, C., & Garnsey, E. (2004). Do academic spin-outs differ and does it matter?. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(3–4), 269–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ensley, M. D., & Hmieleski, K. M. (2005). A comparative study of new venture top management team composition, dynamics and performance between university based start-ups and independent start-ups. Research Policy, 34(7), 1091–1105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R.C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (1996). The first action plan for innovation in Europe: Innovation for growth and employment, COM (96) 589

  • Feldman, M., Feller, I., Bercovitz, J., & Burton, R. (2002). Equity and the technology transfer strategies of American Research Universities. Management Science, 48(1), 105–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldfarb, B., & Henrekson, M. (2003). Bottom-up versus top-down policies towards the commercialization of university intellectual property. Research Policy, 32(4), 639–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandi, W., & Grimaldi, M. (2003). Exploring the networking characteristics of new venture founding teams. Small Business Economics, 21(4), 329–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, B., Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., Elder, T., Leuthold, J., Parshall, J., Raghian, M., & Smith, D. (1997). Mapping the university technology transfer process. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(5), 423–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrekson, M., & Rosenberg, N. (2001). Designing efficient institutions for science-based entrepreneurship: Lesson from the US and Sweden. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(3), 207–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoang, H., & Antoncic, B. (2003). Network-based research in entrepreneurship. A critical review. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 165–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, R., & Thursby, M. (2001). Proofs and prototypes for sale: The tale of university licensing. American Economic Review, 91(1), 240–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, M., Jacob, M., & Hellstrom, T. (2005). The strength of strong ties: University spin-offs and the significance of historical relations. Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(3), 271–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klofsten, M., & Dylan, J. E. (2000). Comparing academic entrepreneurship in Europe—The Case of Sweden and Ireland. Small Business Economics, 14(4), 299–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan, V., & Ulrich, K. (2001). Product development decisions: A review of the literature. Management Science, 47(1), 1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, P., Lee, K., & Pennings, J. M. (2001). Internal Capabilities, external networks, and performance: A study on technology based ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 615–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. S. (1996). Technology transfer and the research university: a search for the boundaries of university industry collaboration. Research Policy, 25(6), 843–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindelöf P., & Löfsten H. (2004). Proximity as a resource base for competitive advantage: University-industry links for technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(3–4), 311–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link, A. N., & Scott J. T. (2005). Opening the ivory tower’s door: An analysis of the determinants of the formation of U.S. university spin-off companies. Research Policy, 34(7), 1106–1112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockett, A., Wright, M., & Franklin, S. (2003). Technology transfer and universities’ spinout strategies. Small Business Economics, 20, 185–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockett, A., Siegel, D., Wright, M., & Ensley, M. (2005). The creation of spin-off firms at public research institutions: Managerial and policy implications. Research Policy, 34(7), 981–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockett, A., Wright, M. (2005). Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies. Research Policy, 34(7), 1043–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, J. (1993). Commercialization of university research: A policy perspective. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 5(1), 27–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, S. (1987). British science parks: Reflections on the politics of high technology. R&D Management, 17(1), 25–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D., Quintas, P., & Wield, D. (1992). High-tech fantasies: Science parks in society science and space. London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzoleni, R., & Nelson, R. (1998). The benefits and costs of strong patent protection: a contribution to the current debate. Research Policy, 27(3), 273–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McQueen, D. H., & Wallmark, J. T. (1982). Spin-off companies from Chalmers University of Technology. Technovation, 1(4), 305–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. (2003). Academic entrepreneurs or entrepreneurial academics? Research based ventures and public support mechanisms. R&D Management, 33(2), 107–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mian, S. A. (1997). Assessing and managing the university technology incubator: An integrative framework. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(4), 251–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R., & Cote, M. (1987). Growing the next Silicon Valley. Massachusetts: Lexington Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Monck, C. S. P., Porter, R. P., Quintas, P. R., & Storey, D. J. (1988). Science parks and the growth of high technology firms. Kent: Peat McLintock

    Google Scholar 

  • Motohashi, K. (2005). University-industry collaborations in Japan: The role of new technology-based firms in transforming the National Innovation System. Research Policy, 34(5), 583–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustar, P. (1997). Spin-off enterprises. How French academics create high-tech companies: The conditions for success or failure. Science and Public Policy, 24(1), 37–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Ndonzuau, F. N., Pirnay, F., & Surlemont, B. (2002). A stage model of academic spin-off creation. Technovation, 22(5), 281–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolaou, N., & Birley, S. (2003a). Academic networks in a trichotomous categorisation of university spinouts. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 333–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolaou, N., & Birley, S. (2003b). Social networks in organizational emergence: The university spinout phenomenon. Management Science, 49(12), 1702–1726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Shea, R., Alle, T. J., Chevalier, A., & Roche, F. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities. Research Policy, 34(7), 994–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olofson, C., & Wahlbin, C. (1984). Technology-based new ventures from technical universities: A Swedish case. Frontiers of entrepreneurship research. Wellesley, MA: Babson College

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez, M. P., & Sanchez, A. M. (2003). The development of university spin-offs: Early dynamics of technology transfer and networking. Technovation, 23(10), 823–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phan, P. H., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2005). Science parks and incubators: Observations, synthesis and future research. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 165–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirnay, F., Surlemont, B., & Nlemvo, F. (2003). Toward a typology of university spin-offs. Small Business Economics, 21(4), 355–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. London: Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, J. B., & McDougall, P. P. (2005). University start-up formation and technology licensing with firms that go public: A resource-based view of academic entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(3), 291–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radosevich, R. (1995). A model for entrepreneurial spin-offs from public technology sources. International Journal of Technology Management, 10(7–8), 879–893

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappert, B., Webster, A., & Charles, D. (1999). Making sense of diversity and reluctance: academic–industrial relations and intellectual property. Research Policy, 28(8), 873–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, E. B. (1991a). Entrepreneurs in High Technology: Lessons from MIT and beyond. New York: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, E. B. (1991b). The technological base of the new enterprise. Research Policy, 20(4), 283–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, E. B., & Hauptman, O. (1986). The process of technology transfer to the new biomedical and pharmaceutical firm. Research Policy, 15(3), 107–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, E. B., & Malone, D. E. (1996). Policies and structures for spinning out new companies from research and development organizations. R&D Management, 26(1), l7–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1986). The role of the research university in the spin-off of high-technology companies. Technovation, 4(3), 169–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M., Takegami, S., & Yin, J. (2001). Lessons learned about technology transfer. Technovation, 21(4), 253–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothaermel, F. T., & Thursby, M. (2005). Incubator firm failure or graduation?: The role of university linkages. Research Policy, 34(7), 1076–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, R., & Dodgson, M. (1992). European technology policy evolution: Convergence towards SMEs and regional technology transfer. Technovation, 12(4), 223–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (2001). Technology regimes and new firm formation. Management Science, 47(9), 1173–1190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (2002a). Selling university technology: Patterns from MIT. Management Science, 48(1), 122–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane S. (2002b). University technology transfer to entrepreneurial companies. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(6), 537–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., & Stuart, T. (2002). Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Science, 48(1), 154–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (2004). Encouraging university entrepreneurship? The effect of the Bayh–Dole Act on university patenting in the United States. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(1), 127–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., & Link, A. N. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the productivity of University Technology Transfer Offices: An exploratory study. Research Policy, 32(1), 27–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smilor, R. W., Gibson, D. V., & Dietrich, G. B. (1990). University spin-out companies: Technology start-ups from UT Austin. Journal of Business Venturing, 5(1), 63–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffensen, M., Rogers, E., & Speakman, K. (2000). Spin-offs from research centers at a research university. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(1), 93–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNICO (2001). Annual Survey on University Technology Transfer Activities, NUBS

  • Van de Ven, A. H., Hudson, R., & Schroeder, D. (1984). Designing new business start-ups: Entrepreneurial, organizational, and ecological considerations. Journal of Management, 10(1), 87–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Looy, B. V., Debackere, K., & Andries, P. (2003). Policies to stimulate regional innovation capabilities via university-industry collaboration: An analysis and an assessment. R&D Management, 33(2), 209–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vohora, A., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2004). Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies. Research Policy, 33(1), 147–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the helpful suggestions of the two anonymous reviewers and would like to thank Gerard George and Nicos Nicolaou for their comments on earlier drafts of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vangelis Souitaris.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Djokovic, D., Souitaris, V. Spinouts from academic institutions: a literature review with suggestions for further research. J Technol Transfer 33, 225–247 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-006-9000-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-006-9000-4

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation