Abstract
This paper provides a comprehensive literature review of the phenomenon of spinouts from academic institutions. We systematically identified spinout papers in key management journals, categorised the literature and critically synthesised the findings. We present the findings of each literature stream in turn and also identify inconsistencies and directions for further research. We conclude that while the early literature has been mainly atheoretical and focused on describing the phenomenon, a core group of recent studies were theory-driven.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The main keywords we have used to screen the articles were: universit* start*, universit* spin*, academic spin*, academic start*, academic start*, entrepreneur* universit*, universit* commercialisation, universit* ntbf, academic* ntbf. The asterisk stands for finding all combinations of a word or word fragment. E.g. spin* finds spinouts as well as spinoffs.
References
Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., & Ray S. (2003). A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(1), 105–123
Autio, E. (2000). Growth of technology-based new firms. In: Sexton, D. L., & Landstrom, H. (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of entrepreneurship (pp. 329–347). Oxford: Blackwell
AUTM (Association of University Technology Managers) (2002). AUTM licensing survey. Northbrook, Ill: AUTM
Birley, S. (1985). The role of networks in the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(1), 107–117
Birley, S. (2002). Universities, academics, and spinout companies: Lessons from imperial. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 1(1), 1–21
Bozeman, B. (2000). Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory. Research Policy, 29(4–5), 627–655
Bray, M. J., & Lee, J. N. (2000). University revenues from technology transfer: licensing fees vs. equity positions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5/6), 385–392
Brown, W. S. (1985). A proposed mechanism for commercializing university technology. Technovation, 3(1), 19–25
Carayannis, E. G., Rogers, E. M., Kurihara, K., & Allbritton, M. M. (1998). High-technology spin-offs from government R&D laboratories and research universities. Technovation, 18(1), 1–11
Chrisman, J. J., Hynes, T., & Fraser, S. (1995). Faculty entrepreneurship and economic development: The case of the University of Calgary. Journal of Business Venturing, 10, 267–281
Clarysse, B., & Moray, N. (2004). A process study of entrepreneurial team formation: The case of a research-based spin-off. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(1), 55–79
Clarysse, B., Heirman, A., & Degroof, J. J. (2000). An Institutional and resource based explanation of growth patterns of research based spin-offs in Europe. In: Reynolds, P. D., Autio, E., Brush, C. G., Bygrave, W. D., Anigart, S., Sapienza, H. J., & Shaver, K. G. (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research (pp. 545–559). Babson College
Cooper, A. (1984). Contrasts in the role of incubator organizations in the founding of growth-oriented firms Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Wellesley, MA: Babson College
Dasgupta, P., & David, P. A. (1994). Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23(5), 487–521
Degroof, J. J., & Roberts, E. B. (2004). Overcoming weak entrepreneurial infrastructures for academic spin-off ventures. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(3–4), 327–352
Di Gregorio, D., & Shane, S. (2003). Why do some universities generate more startups than others?. Research Policy, 32(2), 209–227
Doutriaux, J. (1987). Growth pattern of academic entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(4), 285–297
Druilhe, C., & Garnsey, E. (2004). Do academic spin-outs differ and does it matter?. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(3–4), 269–285
Ensley, M. D., & Hmieleski, K. M. (2005). A comparative study of new venture top management team composition, dynamics and performance between university based start-ups and independent start-ups. Research Policy, 34(7), 1091–1105
Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R.C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313–330
European Commission (1996). The first action plan for innovation in Europe: Innovation for growth and employment, COM (96) 589
Feldman, M., Feller, I., Bercovitz, J., & Burton, R. (2002). Equity and the technology transfer strategies of American Research Universities. Management Science, 48(1), 105–121
Goldfarb, B., & Henrekson, M. (2003). Bottom-up versus top-down policies towards the commercialization of university intellectual property. Research Policy, 32(4), 639–658
Grandi, W., & Grimaldi, M. (2003). Exploring the networking characteristics of new venture founding teams. Small Business Economics, 21(4), 329–341
Harmon, B., Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., Elder, T., Leuthold, J., Parshall, J., Raghian, M., & Smith, D. (1997). Mapping the university technology transfer process. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(5), 423–434
Henrekson, M., & Rosenberg, N. (2001). Designing efficient institutions for science-based entrepreneurship: Lesson from the US and Sweden. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(3), 207–231
Hoang, H., & Antoncic, B. (2003). Network-based research in entrepreneurship. A critical review. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 165–187
Jensen, R., & Thursby, M. (2001). Proofs and prototypes for sale: The tale of university licensing. American Economic Review, 91(1), 240–259
Johansson, M., Jacob, M., & Hellstrom, T. (2005). The strength of strong ties: University spin-offs and the significance of historical relations. Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(3), 271–286
Klofsten, M., & Dylan, J. E. (2000). Comparing academic entrepreneurship in Europe—The Case of Sweden and Ireland. Small Business Economics, 14(4), 299–309
Krishnan, V., & Ulrich, K. (2001). Product development decisions: A review of the literature. Management Science, 47(1), 1–21
Lee, P., Lee, K., & Pennings, J. M. (2001). Internal Capabilities, external networks, and performance: A study on technology based ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 615–640
Lee, Y. S. (1996). Technology transfer and the research university: a search for the boundaries of university industry collaboration. Research Policy, 25(6), 843–863
Lindelöf P., & Löfsten H. (2004). Proximity as a resource base for competitive advantage: University-industry links for technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(3–4), 311–326
Link, A. N., & Scott J. T. (2005). Opening the ivory tower’s door: An analysis of the determinants of the formation of U.S. university spin-off companies. Research Policy, 34(7), 1106–1112
Lockett, A., Wright, M., & Franklin, S. (2003). Technology transfer and universities’ spinout strategies. Small Business Economics, 20, 185–200
Lockett, A., Siegel, D., Wright, M., & Ensley, M. (2005). The creation of spin-off firms at public research institutions: Managerial and policy implications. Research Policy, 34(7), 981–993
Lockett, A., Wright, M. (2005). Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies. Research Policy, 34(7), 1043–1057
Lowe, J. (1993). Commercialization of university research: A policy perspective. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 5(1), 27–37
MacDonald, S. (1987). British science parks: Reflections on the politics of high technology. R&D Management, 17(1), 25–37
Massey, D., Quintas, P., & Wield, D. (1992). High-tech fantasies: Science parks in society science and space. London: Routledge
Mazzoleni, R., & Nelson, R. (1998). The benefits and costs of strong patent protection: a contribution to the current debate. Research Policy, 27(3), 273–284
McQueen, D. H., & Wallmark, J. T. (1982). Spin-off companies from Chalmers University of Technology. Technovation, 1(4), 305–315
Meyer, M. (2003). Academic entrepreneurs or entrepreneurial academics? Research based ventures and public support mechanisms. R&D Management, 33(2), 107–115
Mian, S. A. (1997). Assessing and managing the university technology incubator: An integrative framework. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(4), 251–285
Miller, R., & Cote, M. (1987). Growing the next Silicon Valley. Massachusetts: Lexington Books
Monck, C. S. P., Porter, R. P., Quintas, P. R., & Storey, D. J. (1988). Science parks and the growth of high technology firms. Kent: Peat McLintock
Motohashi, K. (2005). University-industry collaborations in Japan: The role of new technology-based firms in transforming the National Innovation System. Research Policy, 34(5), 583–594
Mustar, P. (1997). Spin-off enterprises. How French academics create high-tech companies: The conditions for success or failure. Science and Public Policy, 24(1), 37–43
Ndonzuau, F. N., Pirnay, F., & Surlemont, B. (2002). A stage model of academic spin-off creation. Technovation, 22(5), 281–289
Nicolaou, N., & Birley, S. (2003a). Academic networks in a trichotomous categorisation of university spinouts. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 333–359
Nicolaou, N., & Birley, S. (2003b). Social networks in organizational emergence: The university spinout phenomenon. Management Science, 49(12), 1702–1726
O’Shea, R., Alle, T. J., Chevalier, A., & Roche, F. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities. Research Policy, 34(7), 994–1009
Olofson, C., & Wahlbin, C. (1984). Technology-based new ventures from technical universities: A Swedish case. Frontiers of entrepreneurship research. Wellesley, MA: Babson College
Perez, M. P., & Sanchez, A. M. (2003). The development of university spin-offs: Early dynamics of technology transfer and networking. Technovation, 23(10), 823–831
Phan, P. H., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2005). Science parks and incubators: Observations, synthesis and future research. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 165–182
Pirnay, F., Surlemont, B., & Nlemvo, F. (2003). Toward a typology of university spin-offs. Small Business Economics, 21(4), 355–369
Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. London: Free Press
Powers, J. B., & McDougall, P. P. (2005). University start-up formation and technology licensing with firms that go public: A resource-based view of academic entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(3), 291–311
Radosevich, R. (1995). A model for entrepreneurial spin-offs from public technology sources. International Journal of Technology Management, 10(7–8), 879–893
Rappert, B., Webster, A., & Charles, D. (1999). Making sense of diversity and reluctance: academic–industrial relations and intellectual property. Research Policy, 28(8), 873–890
Roberts, E. B. (1991a). Entrepreneurs in High Technology: Lessons from MIT and beyond. New York: Oxford University Press
Roberts, E. B. (1991b). The technological base of the new enterprise. Research Policy, 20(4), 283–298
Roberts, E. B., & Hauptman, O. (1986). The process of technology transfer to the new biomedical and pharmaceutical firm. Research Policy, 15(3), 107–119
Roberts, E. B., & Malone, D. E. (1996). Policies and structures for spinning out new companies from research and development organizations. R&D Management, 26(1), l7–48
Rogers, E. M. (1986). The role of the research university in the spin-off of high-technology companies. Technovation, 4(3), 169–181
Rogers, E. M., Takegami, S., & Yin, J. (2001). Lessons learned about technology transfer. Technovation, 21(4), 253–261
Rothaermel, F. T., & Thursby, M. (2005). Incubator firm failure or graduation?: The role of university linkages. Research Policy, 34(7), 1076–1090
Rothwell, R., & Dodgson, M. (1992). European technology policy evolution: Convergence towards SMEs and regional technology transfer. Technovation, 12(4), 223–238
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226
Shane, S. (2001). Technology regimes and new firm formation. Management Science, 47(9), 1173–1190
Shane, S. (2002a). Selling university technology: Patterns from MIT. Management Science, 48(1), 122–137
Shane S. (2002b). University technology transfer to entrepreneurial companies. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(6), 537–552
Shane, S., & Stuart, T. (2002). Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Science, 48(1), 154–170
Shane, S. (2004). Encouraging university entrepreneurship? The effect of the Bayh–Dole Act on university patenting in the United States. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(1), 127–151
Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., & Link, A. N. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the productivity of University Technology Transfer Offices: An exploratory study. Research Policy, 32(1), 27–48
Smilor, R. W., Gibson, D. V., & Dietrich, G. B. (1990). University spin-out companies: Technology start-ups from UT Austin. Journal of Business Venturing, 5(1), 63–76
Steffensen, M., Rogers, E., & Speakman, K. (2000). Spin-offs from research centers at a research university. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(1), 93–111
UNICO (2001). Annual Survey on University Technology Transfer Activities, NUBS
Van de Ven, A. H., Hudson, R., & Schroeder, D. (1984). Designing new business start-ups: Entrepreneurial, organizational, and ecological considerations. Journal of Management, 10(1), 87–107
Van Looy, B. V., Debackere, K., & Andries, P. (2003). Policies to stimulate regional innovation capabilities via university-industry collaboration: An analysis and an assessment. R&D Management, 33(2), 209–229
Vohora, A., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2004). Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies. Research Policy, 33(1), 147–175
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the helpful suggestions of the two anonymous reviewers and would like to thank Gerard George and Nicos Nicolaou for their comments on earlier drafts of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Djokovic, D., Souitaris, V. Spinouts from academic institutions: a literature review with suggestions for further research. J Technol Transfer 33, 225–247 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-006-9000-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-006-9000-4