Skip to main content
Log in

Optimality Conditions for Vector Optimization Problems with Difference of Convex Maps

  • Published:
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, by using the notion of strong subdifferential and epsilon-subdifferential, necessary optimality conditions are established firstly for an epsilon-weak Pareto minimal point and an epsilon-proper Pareto minimal point of a vector optimization problem, where its objective function and constraint set are denoted by using differences of two vector-valued maps, respectively. Then, by using the concept of approximate pseudo-dissipativity, sufficient optimality conditions are obtained. As an application of these results, sufficient and necessary optimality conditions are also given for an epsilon-weak Pareto minimal point and an epsilon-proper Pareto minimal point of a vector fractional mathematical programming.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Taa, A.: ϵ-subdifferentials of set-valued maps and ϵ-weak Pareto optimality for multiobjective optimization. Math. Methods Oper. Res. 62, 187–209 (2005)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu, J.C., Yokoyama, K.: ϵ-optimality and duality for fractional programming. Taiwan. J. Math. 3, 311–322 (1999)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, G.Y., Jahn, J.: Optimality conditions for set-valued optimization problems. Math. Methods Oper. Res. 48, 187–200 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Flores-Bazan, F., Oettli, W.: Simplified optimality conditions for minimizing the difference of vector-valued functions. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 108, 571–586 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Gadhi, N.: Optimality conditions for the difference of convex set-valued mappings. Positivity 9, 687–703 (2005)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Lin, L.J.: Optimization of set-valued functions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 186, 30–51 (1994)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Li, S.J., Yang, X.Q., Chen, G.Y.: Nonconvex vector optimization of set-valued mappings. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 283, 337–350 (2003)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Li, S.J., Chen, C.R.: High order optimality conditions for Henig efficient solutions in set-valued optimization. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 323, 1184–1200 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Li, S.J., Zhu, S.K., Li, X.B.: Second-order optimality conditions for strict efficiency of constrained set-valued optimization. J. Optim. Theory Appl. (2012). doi:10.1007/s10957-012-0076-8

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gadhi, N., Metrane, A.: Sufficient optimality condition for vector optimization problems under D.C. data. J. Glob. Optim. 28, 55–66 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Maghri, M.E., Laghdir, M.: Pareto subdifferential calculus for convex vector mappings and applications to vector optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 19, 1970–1994 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Bot, R.I., Hodrea, I.B., Wanka, G.: ϵ-optimality conditions for composed convex optimization problems. J. Approx. Theory 153, 108–121 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Durea, M., Dutta, J., Tammer, C.: Lagrange multipliers for ϵ-Pareto solutions in vector optimization with nonsolid cones in Banach spaces. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 145, 196–211 (2010)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Hiriart-Urruty, J.B.: From convex optimization to nonconvex optimization. In: Clarke, F.H., Demyanov, V.F., Giannessi, F. (eds.) Nonsmooth Optimization and Related Topics, pp. 219–239. Plenum, New York (1989)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Amahroq, T., Penot, J.P., Syam, A.: On the subdifferentiability of the difference of two functions and local minimization. Set-Valued Anal. 16(4), 413–427 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Bot, R.I., Nechita, D.: On the Dini–Hadamard subdifferential of the difference of two functions. J. Glob. Optim. 50, 485–502 (2011)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Laghdir, M.: Optimality conditions in DC constrained optimization. Acta Math. Vietnam. 30(2), 169–179 (2005)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Penot, J.P.: The directional subdifferential of the difference of two convex functions. J. Glob. Optim. 49, 505–519 (2011)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Gadhi, N., Laghdir, M., Metrane, A.: Optimality conditions for D.C. vector optimization problems under reverse convex constraints. J. Glob. Optim. 33, 527–540 (2005)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Zowe, J.: Subdifferentiability of convex functions with values in an ordered vector space. Math. Scand. 34, 69–83 (1974)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Penot, J.P.: Gap continuity of multimaps. Set-Valued Anal. 16(4), 429–442 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Baier, J., Jahn, J.: On subdifferentials of set-valued maps. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 100, 233–240 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number: 11171362) and the Natural Science Foundation Project of CQ CSTC (Grant number: cstc2012jjA00038). The authors thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions, which helped to improve the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. J. Li.

Additional information

Communicated by Radu Ioan Bot.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guo, X.L., Li, S.J. Optimality Conditions for Vector Optimization Problems with Difference of Convex Maps. J Optim Theory Appl 162, 821–844 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-013-0327-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-013-0327-3

Keywords

Navigation