Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Multimedia e-Learning and Self-Regulated Science Learning: a Study of Primary School Learners’ Experiences and Perceptions

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multimedia-supported e-learning is considered useful as it can offer an enjoyable independent learning experience to learners. However, the effectiveness of e-learning for self-regulated science learning is still inconclusive. This study aimed to explore primary school students’ perceptions and experiences of self-regulated science learning in a multimedia-supported e-learning environment. A total of 11 classes from grades 3 to 6 from four Hong Kong schools participated in this study. All e-learning lessons were observed, and 33 (3 from each class) were interviewed using cognitive walkthroughs of how they made use of the multimedia resources and system tools, scaffolds, or prompts to direct their own learning in each of the three self-regulated learning phases (forethought, performance, and reflection). Results revealed that the combined use of the discussion forum and statistics table seemed to facilitate the students’ diagnosis of their prior knowledge of natural phenomena in the forethought phase. In the performance phase, the students mostly enjoyed learning with the graphic data, animations, and/or simulation experiments. Some perceived the prompts or tools from the e-learning system as useful for operation and science learning. In the reflection phase, the students self-assessed their learning using quizzes with emoticons as positive feedback which seemed to increase their enthusiasm for learning science. However, not all students were able to effectively use the system tools or prompts, to keep focused self-discipline, or to achieve deeper science learning without the teacher’s guidance. Hence, this study suggests providing more opportunities for students’ exposure to e-learning resources, while at the same time assisting them in the use of digital tools or resources, in adjusting their learning strategies, and in internalizing scientific ideas and inquiry processes so as to ensure more effective self-regulated science learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akpinar, E. (2013). The use of interactive computer animations based on POE as a presentation tool in primary science teaching. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 1–11.

  • Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Kaynar, O., & Fine, A. (2007). The effects of need for cognition on Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 880–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, R., & Hadwin, A. F. (2005). Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition: Implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds. Instructional Science, 33(5–6), 367–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, S. A., Hoffmann, K., & Dawson, D. (2010). Not on the same page: Undergraduates’ information retrieval in electronic and print books. Journal of Academic of Librarianship, 36(6), 518–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumenfeld, P. C., Kempler, T. M., & Krajcik, J. S. (2006). In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences Motivation and cognitive engage- ment in learning environments (pp. 475–488). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boticki, I., Baksa, J., Seow, P., & Looi, C. K. (2015). Usage of a mobile social learning platform with virtual badges in a primary school. Computers in Education, 86, 120–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brusilovsky, P. (2003). Adaptive navigation support in educational hypermedia: The role of student knowledge level and the case for meta-adaptation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 487–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. L., Pan, P. R., Sung, Y. T., & Chang, K. E. (2013). Correcting misconceptions on electronics: Effects of a simulation-based learning environment backed by a conceptual change model. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 212–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J., & Kim, I. (2015). E-Textbook with lecturer-created quiz capabilities. International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, 10(5), 297–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, H. C., & Hung, C. M. (2015). Effects of the digital game-development approach on elementary school Students' learning motivation, problem solving, and learning achievement. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 472–487.

  • Cidral, W. A., Oliveira, T., Di Felice, M., & Aparicio, M. (2018). E-learning success determinants: Brazilian empirical study. Computers in Education, 122, 273–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. John Wiley & Sons.

  • Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2005). Using web-based pedagogical tools as scaffolds for self-regulated learning. Instructional Science, 33(5–6), 513–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, A. R., McNamara, K. O., Morrone, A. S., & Plaskoff, J. (2015). Improving learning with e-textbooks. In Paper presented at the proceedings of the 2015 48th Hawaii international conference on system sciences.

  • Education Bureau. (2014). The fourth strategy on information technology in education. Hong Kong: Hong Kong SAR Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Embong, Eklund, J., & Sinclair, K. (2000). An empirical appraisal of the effectiveness of adaptive interfaces for instructional systems. Educational Technology & Society, 3(4), 165–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flowers, A. A., Carroll, J. P., Green, G. T., & Larson, L. R. (2015). Using art to assess environmental education outcomes. Environmental Education Research, 21(6), 846–864.

  • Fouh, E., Breakiron, D. A., Hamouda, S., Farghally, M. F., & Shaffer, C. A. (2014). Exploring students learning behavior with an interactive etextbook in computer science courses. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 478–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furberg, A., & Dolonen, J. A. (2016). Teacher support in technology-based science learning. In E. Elstad (Ed.), Educational technology and polycontextual bridging (pp. 83–105). Rotterdam: SensePublishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ghaleb, F., Daoud, S., Hasnah, A., El-Seoud, S. A., & El-Sofany, H. (2006). E-learning model based on semantic web technology. International Journal of Computing and Information Sciences, 4(2), 63–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadwin, A. F., & Winne, P. H. (2001). CoNoteS2: A software tool for promoting self- regulation. Educational Research and Evaluation, 7(2–3), 313–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J. R., & Hannafin, M. J. (2001). Teaching and learning in digital environments: The resurgence of resource-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(3), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Tai, K. H., & Tsai, C. R. (2017). An exploration of students’ science learning interest related to their cognitive anxiety, cognitive load, self-confidence and learning progress using inquiry-based learning with an iPad. Research in Science Education, 47(6), 1193–1212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horne, S. V., Russell, J., & Schuh, K. L. (2016). The adoption of mark-up tools in an interactive e-textbook reader. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(3), 407–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, W.-M., & Tsai, C.-C. (2017). Exploring students’ conceptions of science learning via drawing: A cross-sectional analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 39(3), 274–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahnke, I., & Kumar, S. (2014). Digital didactical designs: Teachers’ integration of iPads for learning-centered processes. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 30(3), 81–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang, D. H., Yi, P., & Shin, I. S. (2016). Examining the effectiveness of digital textbook use on students’ learning outcomes in South Korea: A meta-analysis. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(1), 57–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, D. F. (2004). Self-regulated learning in web-based environments: Instructional tools designed to facilitate cognitive strategy use, metacognitive processing, and motivational beliefs. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(1-2), 139–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khamparia, A., & Pandey, B. (2017). Impact of interactive multimedia in E-learning technologies. pp 171–199.

  • Khan, A., Ahmad, F. H., & Malik, M. M. (2017). Use of digital game based learning and gamification in secondary school science: The effect on student engagement, learning and gender difference. Education and Information Technologies, 22(6), 2767–2804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning. New York: Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korbey, H. (2014). Can students ‘Go Deep’ with digital reading? Retrieved from http://www.2kqed.org/mindshift/2014/09/09/can-students-go-deep-with-digital-reading/. Accessed 18 May 2019

  • Kouis, D., & Konstantinou, N. (2014). Electronic textbooks advantages and challenges for the Hellenic higher education and publishing community. Library Review, 63(6/7), 531–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lan, Y. J., Sung, Y. T., & Chang, K. E. (2007). A mobile-devices-supported peer-assisted learning system for collaborative early EFL reading. Language, Learning and Technology, 11(3), 130–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehtinen, A., & Viiri, J. (2017). Guidance provided by teacher and simulation for inquiry-based learning: A case study. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(2), 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C., & Wharton, C. (1997). Cognitive walkthroughs. In Handbook of human-computer interaction, 2nd edn. pp 717–732.

  • Li, M. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Game-based learning in science education: A review of relevant research. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(6), 877–898.

  • Mahatody, T., Sagar, M., & Kolski, C. (2010). State of the art on the cognitive walkthrough method, its variants and evolutions. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 26(8), 741–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangen, A., Walgermo, B. R., & Brønnick, K. (2013). Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 61–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, F. G. (2012). Will massive open online courses change how we teach? Communications of the ACM, 55(8), 26–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2017). Using multimedia for e-learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(5), 403–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N. (2004). Sociocultural discourse analysis: Analysing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 137–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penuel, W. R., Roschelle, J., & Shechtman, N. (2007). Designing formative assessment software with teachers: An analysis of the co-design process. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 2(01), 51–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plass, J. L., Homer, B. D., & Hayward, E. (2009). Design factors for educationally effective animations and simulations. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 21(1), 31–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, P. L. (2010). Effectiveness of electronic textbooks with embedded activities on student learning. ERIC.

  • Rockinson- Szapkiw, A. J., Courduff, J., Carter, K., & Bennett, D. (2013). Electronic versus traditional print textbooks: A comparison study on the influence of university students’ learning. Computers and Education, 63, 259–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2008). Cross-cultural validation of self-regulated learning in Singapore. In O. S. Tan, D. M. McInerney, A. D. Liem, & A. Tan (Eds.), What the West can learn from the East: Asian Perspectives on the psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 245–266). New York: Information Age Publishing Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutten, N., van der Veen, J. T., & van Joolingen, W. R. (2015). Inquiry-based whole-class teaching with computer simulations in physics. International Journal of Science Education, 37(8), 1225–1245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandelowski, M. (2000). Focus on research methods: Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing and Health, 23, 334–340

  • Shamir, A., & Korat, O. (2015). Educational electronic books for supporting emergent literacy of kindergarteners at-risk for reading difficulties—What do we know so far? Computers in the Schools, 32(2), 105–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanley, L., Cary, M. S., Clarke, B., Guerreiro, M. A., & Thier, M. (2017). Instructors’ technology experience and iPad delivered intervention implementation: A mixed methods replication study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(4), 815–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Shneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2), 158–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shih, M., Feng, J., & Tsai, C. C. (2008). Research and trends in the field of e-learning from 2001 to 2005: A content analysis of cognitive studies in selected journals. Computers in Education, 51(2), 955–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E., & Lake, C. (2008). Effective programs in elementary mathematics: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 427–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smetana, L. K., & Bell, R. L. (2012). Computer simulations to support science instruction and learning: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 34(9), 1337–1370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • So, W. W. M. (2012). Creating a framework of a resource-based e-learning environment for science learning in primary classrooms. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 21(3), 317–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • So, W. M. W., Fok, W. P. A., Liu, W. F. M., & Ching, N. Y. F. (2015). Examining teachers’ TPACK in using e-learning resources in primary science lessons. In Y. S. Hsu (Ed.), Development of Science Teachers' TPACK (pp. 105–130). Singapore: Springer Singapore.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stec, M., Smith, C., & Jacox, E. (2019). Technology enhanced teaching and learning: Exploration of faculty adaptation to iPad delivered curriculum. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1–15.

  • Sun, J., Flores, J., & Tanguma, J. (2012). E-textbooks and students’ learning experiences. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 10(1), 63–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takacs, Z. K., Swart, E. K., & Bus, A. G. (2015). Benefits and pitfalls of multimedia and interactive features in technology-enhanced storybooks: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 698–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, C. C. (2004). Conceptions of learning science among high school students in Taiwan: A phenomenographic analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 26(14), 1733–1750.

  • Unterbruner, U., Hilberg, S., & Schiffl, I. (2016). Understanding groundwater–students' pre-conceptions and conceptual change by means of a theory-guided multimedia learning program. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 20(6), 2251–2266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., Erkens, G., & Brekelmans, M. (2013). Teacher interventions in a synchronous, co-located CSCL setting: Analyzing focus, means, and temporality. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1377–1386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhallen, M. J., & Bus, A. G. (2009). Video storybook reading as a remedy for vocabulary deficits: Outcomes and processes. Journal for Educational Research Online, 1(1), 117–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, T. H. (2011). Developing Web-based assessment strategies for facilitating junior high school students to perform self-regulated learning in an e-learning environment. Computers in Education, 57(2), 1801–1812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weng, C., Otanga, S., Weng, A., & Cox, J. (2018). Effects of interactivity in E-textbooks on 7th graders science learning and cognitive load. Computers in Education, 120, 172–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woody, W. D., Daniel, D. B., & Baker, C. A. (2010). E-books or textbooks: Students prefer textbooks. Computers in Education, 55(3), 945–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Moylan, A. R. (2009). Self-regulation: Where metacognition and motivation intersect. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 299–315). Routledge.

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Motivational sources and outcomes of self-regulated learning and performance. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 49–64). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by a grant from the Research Grants Council of the University Grants Committee of Hong Kong (grant number 18607515).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Education University of Hong Kong, 10 Lo Ping Rd, Tai Po, Hong Kong

    Winnie Wing Mui So, Yu Chen & Zhi Hong Wan

Authors
  1. Winnie Wing Mui So
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yu Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhi Hong Wan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Winnie Wing Mui So.

Ethics declarations

Winnie Wing Mui So has received research grants from the Research Grants Council of the University Grants Committee of Hong Kong. Yu Chen declares that she has no conflict of interest. Zhi Hong Wan declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

So, W.W., Chen, Y. & Wan, Z. Multimedia e-Learning and Self-Regulated Science Learning: a Study of Primary School Learners’ Experiences and Perceptions. J Sci Educ Technol 28, 508–522 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09782-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09782-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation