Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Secondary Students’ Stable and Unstable Optics Conceptions Using Contextualized Questions

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study focuses on elucidating and explaining reasons for the stability of and interrelationships between students’ conceptions about Light Propagation and Visibility of Objects using contextualized questions across 3 years of secondary schooling from Years 7 to 9. In a large-scale quantitative study involving 1,233 Korean students and 1,149 Singaporean students, data were analyzed from responses to the Light Propagation Diagnostic Instrument consisting of four pairs of items, each of which evaluated the same concept in two different problem situations. Findings show that only about 10–45 % of students could apply their conceptions of basic optics in contextualized problem situations giving rise to both stable and unstable alternative conceptions. Students’ understanding of Light Propagation concepts compared with Visibility of Objects concepts was more stable in different problem situations. The concepts of Light Propagation and Visibility of Objects were only moderately correlated. School grade was not a strong predictive variable, but students’ school achievement correlated strongly with their conceptual understanding in optics. The teaching and learning approach and education systems in the two countries may have had some influence on students’ conceptual understanding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abell KS, Lederman GN (eds) (2007) Handbook of research on science education. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson CW (2007) Perspective in science learning. In: Abell SK, Lederman NG (eds) Handbook of research on science education. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 3–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson B, Karrqvist C (1981) Light and its properties. In: Driver R, Squires A, Rushworth P, Wood-Robinson V (eds) Making sense of secondary science. Routledge Falmer, London, pp 41–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Birk JP, Kurtz MJ (1999) Effect of experience on retention and elimination of misconceptions about molecular structure and bonding. J Chem Educ 76:124–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brislin WR (1970) Back-translation for cross-cultural research. J Cross Cultural Psychol 1(3):185–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byun S-Y, Kim K–K (2010) Educational inequality in South Korea: the widening socioeconomic gap in student achievement. Res Sociol Educ 17:155–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang H-P, Chen J-Y, Guo C-J, Chen C–C, Chang C-Y, Tseng Y-T (2007) Investigating primary and secondary students’ learning of physics concepts in Taiwan. Int J Sci Educ 29(4):465–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clough EE, Driver R (1986) A study of consistency in the use of students’ conceptual frameworks across different task contexts. Sci Educ 70(4):473–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

  • Driver R, Guesne E, Tiberghien A (1985) Children’s ideas and the learning of science. In: Driver R et al (eds) Children’s ideas in science. Open University Press, Philadelphia, pp 10–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver R, Squires A, Rushworth P, Wood-Robinson V (1994) Making sense of secondary science: research into children’s ideas. Rutledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Duit R (2009) Bibliography: students’ and teachers’ conceptions and science education. http://www.ipn.uni-kiel.de/aktuell/stcse/stcse.html. Accessed 1 July 2012

  • Duit R, Treagust DF (1998) Learning in science—from behaviorism towards social constructivism and beyond. In: Fraser B, Tobin K (eds) International handbook of science education, part 1. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 3–25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fensham JP (2009) Real world contexts in PISA science: implications for context-based science education. J Res Sci Teach 46(8):884–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetherstonhaugh T, Treagust DF (1992) Students’ understanding of light and its properties: teaching to engender conceptual change. Sci Educ 76(6):653–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser BJ, Tobin K, McRobbie CJ (eds) (2012) Second international handbook of science education. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Galili I (1996) Students’ conceptual change in geometrical optics. Int J Sci Educ 18(7):847–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galili I, Hazan A (2000) Learner’s knowledge in optics: interpretation, structure and analysis. Int J Sci Educ 22(1):57–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubber P, Tytler R, Haskam F (2010) Teaching and learning about force with a representational focus: pedagogy and teacher changes. Res Sci Educ 40(1):5–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung W (1987) Understanding students’ understanding: the case of elementary optics. In: Novak JD (ed) Proceedings of second international seminar: misconceptions and educational strategies in science and mathematics, vol III. Cornell University, Ithaca, pp 268–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim SS (2010) 2009 assessment analysis of academic achievement: Regional differences and school characteristics. The 5th education curriculum and assessment policy forum, ORM 2010–2014. Korean Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation (KICE), Seoul

  • King D, Ritchie S (2012) Learning science through real-world contexts. In: Fraser BJ, Tobin K, McRobbie CJ (eds) Second international handbook of science education. Springer, New York, pp 69–79

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • La Rosa C, Mayer M, Patrizi P, Vicentini-Missoni M (1984) Commonsense knowledge in optics: preliminary results of an investigation into the properties of light. Eur J Sci Educ 6(4):387–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langley D, Ronen M, Eylon B-S (1997) Light propagation and visual patterns: preinstruction learners’ conceptions. J Res Sci Teach 34(4):399–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee H-M (1998) The impact of regional differences on secondary school students’ academic achievement. Ment Cultural Stud 21(3):109–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education (MOE) (2004) Science syllabus—primary. Curriculum Planning and Development Division, MOE, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education (MOE) (2007) Science syllabus—lower secondary. Curriculum Planning and Development Division, MOE, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education and Human Resource Development (MOE and HRD) (2007) Science and curriculum. MOE and HRD, Seoul

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychometric theory, 3rd edn. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Odom AL, Barrow LH (1995) Development and application of a two-tier diagnostic test measuring college biology students’ understanding of diffusion and osmosis after a course of instruction. J Res Sci Teach 32(1):45–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peat J (2001) Health science research: a handbook of quantitative methods. Allen and Unwin, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson RF, Treagust DF, Garnett P (1989) Development and application of a diagnostic instrument to evaluate grade 11 and 12 students’ concepts of covalent bonding and structure following a course of instruction. J Res Sci Teach 26:301–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramadas J, Driver R (1989) Aspects of secondary students’ ideas about light. Center for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education, University of Leeds, Leeds

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxena AB (1991) The understanding of the properties of light by students in India. Int J Sci Educ 13(3):283–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott P, Asoko H, Leach J (2007) Student conceptions and conceptual learning in science. In: Abell S, Lederman N (eds) Handbook of research on science education. Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 31–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro BL (1989) What children bring to light: giving high status to learners’ views and actions in science. Sci Educ 73(6):711–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelley NJ (1996) Towards a phenomenography of light and vision. Int J Sci Educ 18(7):837–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singley MK, Anderson JR (1989) The transfer of cognitive skill. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan DK-C, Treagust DF (1999) Evaluating students’ understanding of chemical bonding. School Sci Rev 81(294):75–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan KCD, Goh NK, Chia LS, Treagust DF (2002) Development and application of a two-tier multiple choice diagnostic instrument to assess high school students’ understanding of inorganic chemistry qualitative analysis. J Res Sci Teach 39(4):283–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao P-K, Gunstone RF (1999) The process of conceptual change in force and motion during computer-supported physics instruction. J Res Sci Teach 36(7):859–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treagust DF (1995) Diagnostic assessment of students’ science concepts. In: Glynn S, Duit R (eds) Learning science in the schools: research reforming practice. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 327–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Treagust DF (1988) The development and use of diagnostic instruments to evaluate students’ misconceptions in science. Int J Sci Educ 10:159–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treagust DF (2006) Diagnostic assessment in science as a means to improving teaching, learning and retention. UniServe science assessment symposium proceedings. http://science.uniserve.edu.au/pubs/procs/2006/treagust.pdf. Accessed 28 May 2013

  • Treagust DF, Chandrasegaran AL (2007) The Taiwan national science concept learning study in an international perspective. Int J Sci Educ 29(4):391–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treagust DF, Chiu M-H, Guo C-G (Eds) (2007) Taiwan National science concept learning study: a large scale assessment project using two-tier diagnostic tests. International Journal of Science Education (special issue) 29(4)

  • Tytler R (1998) The nature of students’ informal science conceptions. Int J Sci Educ 20(8):901–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tytler R, Peterson S (2004) From “try it and see” to strategic exploration: characterizing young children’s scientific reasoning. J Res Sci Teach 41(1):84–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • University of Cambridge International Examinations (CIE) (2009) Cambridge O level physics: syllabus code 5054. http://www.cie.org.uk/qualifications/academic/middlesec/olevel/overview. Accessed 28 May 2011

  • Wandersee JH, Mintzes JJ, Novak JD (1994) Research on alternative conceptions in science. In: Gabel DL (ed) Handbook of research on science teaching and learning. Macmillan, New York, pp 177–210

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hye-Eun Chu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chu, HE., Treagust, D.F. Secondary Students’ Stable and Unstable Optics Conceptions Using Contextualized Questions. J Sci Educ Technol 23, 238–251 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9472-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9472-6

Keywords

Navigation