Abstract
Attitudes toward science are an important aspect of students’ persistence in school science and interest in pursuing future science careers, but students’ attitudes typically decline over the course of formal schooling. This study examines relationships of students’ attitudes toward science with their perceptions of science as inclusive or non-religious, and their epistemological beliefs about epistemic authority and certainty. Data were collected using an online survey system among undergraduates at a large, public US university (n = 582). Data were prepared using a Rasch rating scale model and then analyzed using multiple-regression analysis. Gender and number of science and mathematics courses were included as control variables, followed by perceptions of science, then epistemological beliefs. Findings show that respondents have more positive attitudes when they perceive science to be inclusive of women and minorities, and when they perceive science to be incompatible with religion. Respondents also have more positive attitudes toward science when they believe scientific knowledge is uncertain, and when they believe knowledge derives from authority. Interpretations of these findings and implications for future research are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrich D (1978) A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika 43(4):561–573. doi:10.1007/bf02293814
Aschbacher PR, Li E, Roth EJ (2010) Is science me? High school students’ identities, participation and aspirations in science, engineering, and medicine. J Res Sci Teach 47(5):564–582. doi:10.1002/tea.20353
Basl J (2011) Effect of school on interest in natural sciences: a comparison of the Czech Republic, Germany, Finland, and Norway based on PISA 2006. Int J Sci Educ 33(1):145–157. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.518641
Beghetto RA (2007) Factors associated with middle and secondary students’ perceived science competence. J Res Sci Teach 44(6):800–814
Blalock CL, Lichtenstein MJ, Owen S, Pruski L, Marshall C, Toepperwein M (2008) In pursuit of validity: a comprehensive review of science attitude instruments 1935–2005. Int J Sci Educ 30(7):961–977. doi:10.1080/09500690701344578
Bøe MV (2012) Science choices in Norwegian upper secondary school: what matters? Sci Educ 96(1):1–20. doi:10.1002/sce.20461
Bond TG, Fox CM (2007) Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
Buck G, Cook K, Quigley C, Eastwood J, Lucas Y (2009) Profiles of urban, low SES, African American girls’ attitudes toward science: a sequential explanatory mixed methods study. J Mix Methods Res 3(4):386–410. doi:10.1177/1558689809341797
Calogero RM, Bardi A, Sutton RM (2009) A need basis for values: associations between the need for cognitive closure and value priorities. Personality Individ Differ 46(2):154–159. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.019
Cheung D (2009) Developing a scale to measure students’ attitudes toward chemistry lessons. Int J Sci Educ 31(16):2185–2203. doi:10.1080/09500690802189799
Chirumbolo A, Areni A, Sensales G (2004) Need for cognitive closure and politics: voting, political attitudes and attributional style. Int J Psychol 39(4):245–253. doi:10.1080/00207590444000005
Cobern WW (2000) The Thinking about Science Survey Instrument (TSSI)—SLCSP 151. Scientific Literacy and Cultural Studies Project, Kalamazoo, MI
Cobern WW, Loving CC (2002) Investigation of preservice elementary teachers’ thinking about science. J Res Sci Teach 39(10):1016–1031. doi:10.1002/tea.10052
Crocker L, Algina J (1986) Introduction to classical and modern test theory. CBS College Publishing, New York, NY
Deacon C, Hajek A (2011) Student perceptions of the value of physics laboratories. Int J Sci Educ 33(7):943–977. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.481682
Duell OK, Schommer-Aikins M (2001) Measures of people’s beliefs about knowledge and learning. Educ Psychol Rev 13(4):419–449. doi:10.1023/a:1011969931594
Eagly AH, Chaiken S (1993) The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers, Fort Worth, TX
Ellis S, Kruglanski AW (1992) Self as an epistemic authority: effects on experiential and instructional learning. Soc Cogn 10(4):357–375
Enman M, Lupart J (2000) Talented female students’ resistance to science: an exploratory study of post-secondary achievement motivation, persistence, and epistemological characteristics. High Abil Stud 11(2):161–178. doi:10.1080/13598130020001205
Forbes (2012) America’s top colleges (webpage). Retrieved 20 Dec 2012 from http://www.forbes.com/top-colleges/
Fulmer GW (2011) Epistemology and personality traits as predictors of scientific reasoning ability. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Orlando, FL
George R (2000) Measuring change in students’ attitudes toward science over time: an application of latent variable growth modeling. J Sci Educ Technol 9(3):213–225
Glynn SM, Brickman P, Armstrong N, Taasoobshirazi G (2011) Science Motivation Questionnaire II: validation with science majors and nonscience majors. J Res Sci Teach 48(10):1159–1176. doi:10.1002/tea.20442
Hazari Z, Tai RH, Sadler PM (2007) Gender differences in introductory university physics performance: the influence of high school physics preparation and affective factors. Sci Educ 91(6):847–876
Heath B, Lakshmanan A, Perlmutter A, Davis L (2010) Measuring the impact of professional development on science teaching: a review of survey, observation and interview protocols. Int J Res Method Educ 33(1):3–20. doi:10.1080/17437270902947304
Hogan K, Maglienti M (2001) Comparing the epistemological underpinnings of students’ and scientists’ reasoning about conclusions. J Res Sci Teach 38(6):663–687
House RJ, Hanges PJ, Javidan M, Dorfman PW, Gupta V (2004) Culture, leadership, and organizations: the GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
Jost JT, Glaser J, Kruglanski AW, Sulloway FJ (2003) Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychol Bull 129(3):339. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
Kolsto SD (2001) Scientific literacy for citizenship: tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Sci Educ 85(3):291–310
Kruglanski AW (1989) Lay epistemics and human knowledge: cognitive and motivational bases. Plenum Press, New York, NY
Kruglanski AW, Dechesne M, Orehek E, Pierro A (2009) Three decades of lay epistemics: the why, how, and who of knowledge formation. Eur Rev Soci Psychol 20(1):146–191. doi:10.1080/10463280902860037
Lederman NG (1999) Teachers’ understanding of the Nature of Science and classroom practice: factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. J Res Sci Teach 36(8):916–929
Lin H-s, Hong Z-R, Huang T-C (2012) The role of emotional factors in building public scientific literacy and engagement with science. Int J Sci Educ 34(1):25–42. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.551430
Linacre JM (2007) WINSTEPS (Version 3.61.2). Winsteps.com, Chicago
Liu S-Y, Lin C-S, Tsai C-C (2011) College students’ scientific epistemological views and thinking patterns in socioscientific decision making. Sci Educ 95(3):497–517. doi:10.1002/sce.20422
Liu X (2010) Using and developing measurement instruments in science education. Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, NC
Liu X (2012) Developing measurement instruments for science education research. In: Fraser BJ, Tobin KG, McRobbie CJ (eds) Second international handbook of science education. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 651–665
Machina K, Gokhale A (2010) Maintaining positive attitudes toward science and technology in first-year female undergraduates: peril and promise. Int J Sci Educ 32(4):523–540. doi:10.1080/09500690902792377
Maltese AV, Tai RH (2010) Eyeballs in the Fridge: sources of early interest in science. Int J Sci Educ 32(5):669–685. doi:10.1080/09500690902792385
Maltese AV, Tai RH (2011) Pipeline persistence: examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among U.S. students. Sci Educ 95(5):877–907. doi:10.1002/sce.20441
Masnick AM, Valenti SS, Cox BD, Osman CJ (2010) A multidimensional scaling analysis of students’ attitudes about science careers. Int J Sci Educ 32(5):653–667. doi:10.1080/09500690902759053
Osborne J, Simon S, Collins S (2003) Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications. Int J Sci Educ 25(9):1049. doi:10.1080/0950069032000032199
Petty RE, Cacioppo JT (1986a) Communication and persuasion: central and peripheral routes to attitude change. Springer, New York
Petty RE, Cacioppo JT (1986b) The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 19:123–205
Quiamzade A, Mugny G, Chatard A (2009) When teaching style matches students’ epistemic (in)dependence: the moderating effect of perceived epistemic gap. Eur J Psychol Educ 24(3):361–371. doi:10.1007/bf03174766
Rigby K, Densley TR (1985) Religiosity and attitude toward institutional authority among adolescents. J Soc Psychol 125(6):723
Sandoval WA (2005) Understanding students’ practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Sci Educ 89(4):634–656. doi:10.1002/sce.20065
Schauble L, Glaser R, Duschl RA, Schulze S, John J (1995) Students’ understanding of the objectives and procedures of experimentation in the science classroom. J Learn Sci 4(2):131–166. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0402_1
Schraw G, Bendixen LD, Dunkle ME (2002) Development and validation of the Epistemic Belief Inventory (EBI). In: Hofer BK, Pintrich PR (eds) Personal epistemology: the psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp 261–275
Shrigley RL (1990) Attitude and behavior are correlates. J Res Sci Teach 27(2):97–113
Shrigley RL, Koballa TR Jr (1992) A decade of attitude research based on Hovland’s learning theory model. Sci Educ 76(1):17–42
Singh K, Granville M, Dika S (2002) Mathematics and science achievement: effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. J Educ Res 95(6):323
Singh K, Chang M, Dika S (2005) Affective and motivational factors in engagement and achievement in science. Int J Learn 12(6):207–218
Stewart CO, Dickerson DL, Hotchkiss R (2009) Beliefs about science and news frames in audience evaluations of embryonic and adult stem cell research. Sci Commun 30(4):427–452. doi:10.1177/1075547008326931
Taconis R, Kessels U (2009) How choosing science depends on students’ individual fit to ‘Science Culture’. Int J Sci Educ 31(8):1115–1132. doi:10.1080/09500690802050876
Van Strien J, Bijker M, Brand-Gruwel S, Boshuizen E (2012) Measuring sophistication of epistemic beliefs using Rasch analysis. Paper presented at the international society of the learning sciences, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Webster DM, Kruglanski AW (1994) Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. J Pers Soc Psychol 67(6):1049–1062. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1049
Weinburgh M (1995) Gender differences in student attitudes toward science: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1970 to 1991. J Res Sci Teach 32(4):387–398. doi:10.1002/tea.3660320407
Zeineddin A, Abd-El-Khalick F (2010) Scientific reasoning and epistemological commitments: coordination of theory and evidence among college science students. J Res Sci Teach 47(9):1064–1093. doi:10.1002/tea.20368
Acknowledgments
Many thanks to David Treagust and Fouad Abd-el-Khalick for their feedback on an early draft, as well as the comments and suggestions provided by anonymous reviewers. Many thanks also to C. Ashley Fulmer (National University of Singapore) and Cheri Ostroff (University of South Australia) for their support of the data collection effort. Portions of this work were conducted while the author was employed by the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) and supported by the NSF’s Independent Research and Development program. Any findings or conclusions are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the position or policies of the NSF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fulmer, G.W. Undergraduates’ Attitudes Toward Science and Their Epistemological Beliefs: Positive Effects of Certainty and Authority Beliefs. J Sci Educ Technol 23, 198–206 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9463-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9463-7