Abstract
Central to our understanding of learning is the relationship between various tools and technologies and the structuring of disciplinary subject matter. One of the staples of early science education curriculum is the use of electrical circuit toolkits to engage students in broader discussions of energy. Traditionally, these concepts are introduced to youth using battery packs, insulated wire and light bulbs. However, there are affordances and limitations in the way this toolset highlights certain conceptual aspects while obscuring others, which we argue leads to common misconceptions about electrical circuitry. By contrast, we offer an alternative approach utilizing an e-textiles toolkit for developing understanding of electrical circuitry, testing the efficacy of this approach for learning in elective settings to pave the way for later classroom adoption. This study found that youth who engaged in e-textile design demonstrated significant gains in their ability to diagram a working circuit, as well as significant gains in their understanding of current flow, polarity and connections. The implications for rethinking our current toolkits for teaching conceptual understanding in science are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asoko H (1996) Developing scientific concepts in the primary classroom: teaching about electric circuits. In: Welford G, Osborne J, Scott P (eds) Research in science education in Europe. Falmer Press, London, pp 36–49
Berzowska J (2005) Electronic textiles: wearable computers, reactive fashion, and soft computation. Text J Cloth Cult 3(1):58–75
Buechley L (2010) Questioning invisibility. Computer 43(4):84–86
Buechley L, Hill B (2010) LilyPad in the wild: how hardware’s long tail is supporting new engineering and design communities. In: The proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on designing interactive systems
Buechley L, Eisenberg M, Catchen H, Crockett A (2008) The Lilypad arduino: using computational textiles to investigate engagement, aesthetics, and diversity in computer science education. In: The CHI 2008 proceedings, pp 423–432
Creswell JW (2009) Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications, Los Angeles, CA
Evans J (1978) Teaching electricity with batteries and bulbs. Phys Teach 16(1):15–22
Fredette N, Lochhead J (1980) Students’ conceptions of simple circuits. Phys Teach 18:194–198
Kafai Y, Peppler K (in press) Rethinking transparency in critical making with e-textiles. In: Boler M, Ratto M (eds) DIY citizenship. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
National Research Council (2012) A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
Osborne R (1980) A method for investigation of concept understanding in science. Eur J Sci Educ 2(3):311–321
Osborne R (1981) Children’s ideas about electric current. N Z Sci Teach 29:12–19
Osborne R (1983) Modifying children’s ideas about electric current. Res Sci Technol Educ 1(1):73–82
Osborne R, Tasker R, Schollum B (1981) Video: electric current. Working paper no 51, learning in science projects, Hamilton, New Zealand, SERA, University of Waikato
Osborne J, Black P, Smith M, Meadows J (1991) Primary SPACE project research report: electricity. Liverpool University Press, Liverpool
Papert S (1980) Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books, New York, NY
Peppler K, Glosson D (in press) Learning about circuitry with e-textiles in after-school settings. In: Buechley L, Peppler K, Eisenberg M, Kafai Y (eds) Textile messages: dispatches from the world of E-textiles and education. Peter Lang Publishing, New York, NY
Shepardson DP, Moje EB (1994) The nature of fourth graders’ understandings of electric circuits. Sci Educ 78(5):489–514
Shipstone D (1984) A study of children’s understanding of electricity in simple D.C. circuits. Eur J Sci Educ 6:59–87
Tasker R, Osborne R (1985) Science teaching and science learning. In: Osborne R, Freyberg P (eds) Learning in science: the implications of children’s science. Heinemann Education, Auckland, pp 15–27
Tiberghien A, Delacote G (1976) Manipulations et representations de circuits electriques simples chez des enfants de 7 a 12 ans. Review Francaise de Pedagogie 34:32–44
Turkle S, Papert S (1992) Epistemological pluralism and the revaluation of the concrete. J Math Behav 11(1):3–33
Ullah S, Khan P, Ullah N, Saleem S, Higgins H, Kwak KS (2009) A review of wireless body area networks for medical applications. Int J Commun Network Syst Sci 2(8):797–803
Acknowledgments
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0855886 awarded to Kylie A. Peppler. We also thank Creativity Lab team members and facilitators of the workshop: Alex Jacobs, Charlene Volk, Ben Zaitlen, as well as the staff and participants of the Boys and Girls Club.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peppler, K., Glosson, D. Stitching Circuits: Learning About Circuitry Through E-textile Materials. J Sci Educ Technol 22, 751–763 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9428-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9428-2