Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Online Periodic Table: A Cautionary Note

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was (a) to evaluate ten online periodic table sources for their accuracy and (b) to compare the types of information and links provided to users. Limited studies have been reported on online periodic table (Diener and Moore 2011; Slocum and Moore in J Chem Educ 86(10):1167, 2009). Chemistry students’ understanding of periodic table is vital for their success in chemistry, and the online periodic table has the potential to advance learners’ understanding of chemical elements and fundamental chemistry concepts (Brito et al. in J Res Sci Teach 42(1):84–111, 2005). The ten sites were compared for accuracy of data with the Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (HCP, Haynes in CRC handbook of chemistry and physics: a ready-reference book of chemical and physical data. CRC Press, Boca Raton 2012). The 10 sites are the most visited periodic table Web sites available. Four different elements, carbon, gold, argon, and plutonium, were selected for comparison, and 11 different attributes for each element were identified for evaluating accuracy. A wide variation of accuracy was found among the 10 periodic table sources. Chemicool was the most accurate information provider with 66.67 % accuracy when compared to the HCP. The 22 types of information including meaning of name and use in industry and society provided by these sites were, also, compared. WebElements, “Chemicool”, “Periodic Table Live”, and “the Photographic Periodic Table of the Elements” were the most information providers, providing 86.36 % of information among the 10 Web sites. “WebElements” provides the most links among the 10 Web sites. It was concluded that if an individual teacher or student desires only raw physical data from element, the Internet might not be the best choice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aksela M, Lundell J (2008) Computer-based molecular modeling: finnish school teachers’ experiences and views. Chem Educ Res Pract 9(1):301–308. doi:10.1039/b818464j

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ardac D, Akaygun S (2004) Effectiveness of multimedia-based instruction that emphasizes molecular representations on students’ understanding of chemical change. J Res Sci Teach 41(4):317–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks AJ, Bollom MS, Holmes JL, Jacobsen JJ, Kotz JC, Moore JW (2012) Periodic Table Live. Division of Chemical Education, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.chemeddl.org/resources/ptl/

  • Barnea N, Dori YJ (2000) Computerized molecular modeling: the new technology for enhancing model perception among chemistry educators and learners. Chem Educ Res Pract 1:109–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron L, Campbell J, Bransford O, Ferron O, Goin B, Goldman E et al (1992) The Jasper project: an exploration of issues in learning and instructional design. Educ Tech Res Dev 40(1):65–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentor Y (2012) ChemiealElements: an on-line interactive periodic table of the elements. Retrieved from http://www.chemicalelements.com

  • Bodzin AC, Park JP (2002) Using a nonrestrictive web-based forum to promote reflective discourse with preservice science teachers. Contemp Issues Technol Teach Educ 2(3):267–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolmgren I (1995) Presenting the periodic table with pictures. J Chem Educ 72:337–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourque DR, Carlson GR (1987) Hands-on versus computer simulation methods in chemistry. J Chem Educ 64(3):232–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bransford J, Brown A, Cocking R (1999) How people learn: brain, mind, experience and school. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretz SL (2001) Novak’s theory of education: human constructivism and meaningful learning. J Chem Educ 78:1107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brito A, Rodrı′guez MA, Niaz M (2005) A reconstruction of development of the periodic table based on history and philosophy of science and its implications for general chemistry textbooks. J Res Sci Teach 42(1):84–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell A (1989) Let us make the table periodic. J Chem Educ 66:739–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpi A (2001) Improvements in undergraduate science education using web-based instructional modules: the natural science pages. J Chem Educ 78(1):1709–1712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiappetta EL, Fillman DA (2007) Analysis of five high school biology textbooks used in the United States for inclusion of the nature of science. Int J Sci Educ 29:1847–1868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu MH, Wu HK (2009) The roles of multimedia in the teaching and learning of the triplet relationship in chemistry. In: Gilbert JK, Treagust D (eds) Multiple representations in chemical education. Springer, New York, pp 251–284

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford BA (2000) Embracing the essence of inquiry: new roles for science teachers. J Res Sci Teach 37(9):916–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dayah M (2012) Dynamic Periodic Table. Retrieved from http://www.ptable.com

  • Diener LM (2009) News from online: the periodic table of the elements. J Chem Educ 86(10):1163–1166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener L, Moore J (2011) It’s elemental: using the PTL to teach students about the elements. Sci Teacher. National Science Teachers Association. 2011. Retrieved 13 April 2012 from HighBeam Research: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-270896090.html

  • Donovan SM, Bransford JD (2005) How students learn: history, mathematics, and science in the classroom. National Academic Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Dori YJ, Sasson I (2008) Chemical understanding and graphing skills in an honors case-based computerized chemistry laboratory environment: the value of bidirectional visual and textual representations. J Res Sci Teach 45:219–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Editorial (2003) Editorial: turning the (periodic) tables. J Chem Educ 80(8):847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emsley J (2012) NetElements II. Retrieved from http://wwwjmg.ch.cam.ac.uk/resources/misc/weii/table.html

  • Forster S (2009) Methods of teaching chemistry. Global Media, Chandni Chowk

    Google Scholar 

  • Frailich M, Kesner M, Hofstein A (2009) Enhancing students’ understanding of the concept of chemical bonding by using activities provided on an interactive website. J Res Sci Teach 46(3):289–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon S (2012) The Periodic Table of Elements. Retrieved from http://education.jlab.org/faq/index.html

  • Gray T, Mann N, Whitby M (2012) The Photographic Periodic Table of the Elements. Wolfram Research. Retrieved from http://periodictable.com/

  • Grunthaner P (2012) AVS Reference Guide. National office of the American vacuum society. Retrieved from http://www.aip.org/avsguide/refguide/periodic.html

  • Handal G, Carlos M, Rogel E (1997) Linear multimedia benefits to enhance students’ ability to comprehend complex subjects. Educat Res Inform Center. ED43222I

  • Hartman KJ (1976) How i do it: an illustrated periodic table. J College Sci Teach 4:236–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwood WS, McMahon MM (1997) Effects of integrated video media on student achievement and attitudes in high school chemistry. J Res Sci Teach 34(6):617–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes WM (2012) CRC handbook of chemistry and physics: a ready-reference book of chemical and physical data. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill JR, Hannafin MJ (2001) Teaching and learning in digital environments: the resurgence of resource-based learning. Educ Tech Res Dev 49(3):37–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffer T, Radker J, Lord R (1992) Qualitative/quantitative study of the effective computer assisted-interactive video instruction: the hyperiodic table of elements. J Comput Math Sci Teach 1(1):3–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu D (2012) Chemicool. Retrieved from http://www.chemicool.com/

  • Husted R (2012) Periodic Table of the Elements: a resource for elementary, middle school, and high school students. Los Alamos National Laboratory's Chemistry Division. Retrieved from http://periodic.lanl.gov/index.shtml

  • Iiyoshi T, Hannafin MJ, Wang F (2005) Cognitive tools and student-centred learning: rethinking tools, functions and applications. Educ Media Internat 42(4):281–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim MC, Hannafin MJ (2004) Designing online learning environments to support scientific inquiry. Quart Rev Dist Educ 5(1):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim MC, Hannafin MJ, Bryan LA (2007) Technology-enhanced inquiry tools in science education: an emerging pedagogical framework for classroom practice. Sci Educ 91:1010–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunst H, Groot D, Latthe PM, Latthe M, Khan KS (2002) Accuracy of information on apparently credible websites: survey of common health topics. Brit J Med 324:581–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Land SM, Zembal-Saul C (2003) Scaffolding reflection and articulation of scientific explanations in a data-rich, project-based learning environments: an investigation of progress portfolio. Educ Tech Res Dev 51(4):65–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerman S (2001) A review of research perspectives on mathematics teacher education. In: Lin F, Cooney TJ (eds) Making sense of mathematics teacher education. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 33–52

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Linn RL (2003) Accountability: responsibility and reasonable expectations. Educat Res 32(7):3–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall JL (2000) A living periodic table. J Chem Educ 77:979–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1996) National science education standards. National Research Council, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2012) A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Park J (2010) Editorial: preparing teachers to use digital video in the science classroom. Contemp Issues Technol Teacher Educ 10(1):119–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitschmann LA (2001) Building sustainable collections of free third-party Web resources. Washington, DC: Digital Library Federation, Council on Library and Information Resources. Retrieved from www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub98/contents.html

  • Robertson M, Emsley J, Prescott A (2012) The VisualElements of Periodic Table. The chemistry societies network. Retrieved from http://www.rsc.org/chemsoc/visualelements/pages/pertable_fla.htm

  • Robinson J (2000) The paradigm changes-But do our students know that? J Coll Sci Tech 29:177–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson RT (1964) A rational periodic table. J Chem Educ 41:187–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanger MJ (2009) Computer animations of chemical processes at the molecular level. In: Pienta NJ, Cooper MM, Greenbowe TJ (eds) Chemists’ guide to effective teaching. Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, pp 198–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Scerri E (1998) How good is the quantum mechanical explanation of the periodic table? J Chem Educ 75:1384–1385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt H-J, Baumgärtner T, Eybe H (2003) Changing ideas about the periodic table of elements and students’ alternative concepts of isotopes and allotropes. J Res Sci Teach 40:257–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slocum LE, Moore JW (2009) PTL: excites students. J Chem Educ 86(10):1167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith AG (1997) Testing the surf: criteria for evaluating internet information resources. Public-Access Comput Syst Rev 8(3), Retrieved from http://info.lib.uh.edu/pr/v8/n3/smit8n3.html

  • Tsai C (2001) A review and discussion of epistemological commitments, metacognition, and critical thinking with suggestions on their enhancement in internet-assisted chemistry classrooms. J Chem Educ 78(7):970–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace RM (2002) The internet as a site for changing practice: the case of Ms. Owens. Res Sci Educ 32(4):465–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams M, Linn MC (2002) WISE inquiry in fifth grade biology. Res Sci Educ 32:415–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson VM, Jose TJ (2009) Using visualization techniques in chemistry teaching. In: Pienta NJ, Cooper MM, Greenbowe TJ (eds) Chemists’ guide to effective teaching. Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, pp 71–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Windschitl M (2002) Inquiry projects in science teacher education: what can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice? Sci Educ 87(1):112–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter M (2012) WebElements Periodic Table. Retrieved from http://www.webelements.com

  • Wolf G (2001) How do we evaluate web resources? Retrieved from https://www.msu.edu/~wolfegay/how%20to%20evaluate.htm

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Learning, Teaching, and Curriculum, MU Science Education Center, University of Missouri, 321 Townsend Hall, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA

    Kemal Izci & Lloyd H. Barrow

  2. Prairie Ridge Elementary School, 22405 Clear Greek Parkway, Shawnee, KS, 66226, USA

    Erica Thornhill

Authors
  1. Kemal Izci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lloyd H. Barrow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Erica Thornhill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kemal Izci.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Izci, K., Barrow, L.H. & Thornhill, E. Online Periodic Table: A Cautionary Note. J Sci Educ Technol 22, 402–417 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9402-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9402-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation