Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Can We Make Definite Categorization of Student Attitudes? A Rough Set Approach to Investigate Students’ Implicit Attitudinal Typologies Toward Living Things

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates the possibility of analyzing educational data using the theory of rough sets which is mostly employed in the fields of data analysis and data mining. Data were collected using an open-ended conceptual understanding test of the living things administered to first-year high school students. The responses of randomly selected 60 students among the participants were analyzed using rough set approach on the basis of “nine attitudinal typologies toward wildlife” defined by Kellert (1996). Student responses were tabulated to be used in rough sets and upper and lower approximation analyses were carried out. Students were found to display the characteristics of four out of nine typologies. Analyses revealed that some students who possessed characteristics of a certain typology may partially display the characteristics of other typologies and these typologies could be determined using rough set theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aktaş H, Cagman N (2005) Bulanık ve Yaklaşımlı Kümeler, Çankaya Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi. J Arts Sci 3:13–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth S, Boyes E, Paton R, Stanisstreet M (1995) Conservation of endangered species: what do children think? J Environ Educ Inf 14:229–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney EC, Mintzes JJ, Yen C-F (2005) Assessing knowledge, attitudes, and behavior toward charismatic megafauna: the case of dolphins. J Environ Educ 36:41–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjerke T, Reitan O, Kellert SR (1998) ‘Attitudes toward wolves in southeastern Norway. Soc Nat Resour 11:169–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonikowaski Z (1995) Algebraic structures of rough sets, rough sets, fuzzy sets and knowledge discovery. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Caro TM, Pelkey N, Grigione M (1994) Effects of conservation biology education on attitudes toward nature. Conserv Biol 8:846–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doignon JP, Falmagne JC (1985) Spaces for the assessment of knowledge. Int J Man-Mach Stud 23:175–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doignon JP, Falmagne JC (1999) Knowledge spaces. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Düntsch I, Gediga G (2001) A note on the correspondence among entail relations, rough set dependencies, and logical consequence. J Math Psychol 45:393–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly AH (1992) Uneven progress: social psychology and the study of attitudes. J Pers Soc Psychol 63:693–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falmagne JC, Doignon JP (1988) A markovian procedure for assessing the state of a system. J Math Psychol 32:232–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falmagne JC, Koppen M, Villano M, Doignon JP, Johannesen L (1990) Introduction to knowledge spaces: how to build, search and test them. Psychol Rev 97:201–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Manzanal R, Rogriguez-Barreiro L, Carrasquer J (2007) Evaluation of environmental attitudes: analysis and results of a scale applied to university students. Sci Educ 91:988–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frege G (1904) Grundgesetze der Arithmentik. In: Geach PT, Black M (eds) Selections from the philosophical writings of Gotlob Frege. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganter B, Wille R (1999) Formal concept analysis: mathematical foundations. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassanien AE (2003) Intelligent data analysis of breast cancer based on rough set theory. Int J Artif Intell Tools 12:465–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu T (2005) Research methods and data analysis procedures used by educational researchers. Int J Res Method Educ 28:109–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiashang J, Congxin W, Degang C (2005) The product structure of fuzzy rough sets on a group and the rough T—fuzzy group. Inf Sci 175(1–2):97–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kattmann U (2001) Aquatics, flyers, creepers and terrestrials-students’ conceptions of animal classifications. J Biol Educ 35:141–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellert SR (1985) American attitudes toward and knowledge of animals: an update. In: Fox M, Mickley L (eds) Advances in animal welfare science. Humane Society of the United States, Washington, DC, pp 177–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellert SR (1991) Japanese perceptions of wildlife. Conserv Biol 5:297–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellert SR (1993a) The biological basis for human values of nature. In: Kellert SR, Wilson EO (eds) The biophilia hypothesis. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 42–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellert SR (1993b) Attitudes, knowledge, and behavior toward wildlife among the industrial superpowers: United States, Japan, and Germany. J Soc Issues 49:53–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellert SR (1996) The value of life: biological diversity and human society. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellert SR, Berry JK (1980) Knowledge, affection and basic attitudes toward animals in American society. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC (2040-101-00-625-1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent RE (1994) Rough concept analysis, rough sets, fuzzy sets knowledge discovery. In: Ziarko WP, Alta B (eds) Proceeding of the international workshop on rough sets, knowledge, discovery. Springer, Canada, pp 248–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar R (1993) Fuzzy algebra I. Publ. Division, University of Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuroki N (1997) Rough ideals in semigroups. Inform Sci 100:139–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin TY, Cercone N (1997) Rough sets and data mining. Kluwer, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Loslever P, Lepoutre FX (2004) Analysis of objective and subjective data using fuzzy coding and multiple correspondence analysis: principle and example in a sitting posture study. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 5:425–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munakata Y (1998) Fundamentals of the new artificial intelligence: beyond traditional paradigms. Springer, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Narli S (in press) An alternative evaluation method for Likert type attitude scales: rough set data analysis. Sci Res Essays 5

  • Narli S, Ozcelik A (2008) On generalizing rough set theory via using a fitler. Int J Comput Math Sci 2–3:149–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Nings S, Ziarko WP, Hamilton J, Cercone N (1995) Using rough sets as tools for knowledge discovery. In: Fayyad UM, Uthurusamy R (eds) KDD’95 Proceedings first international conference on knowledge discovery data mining. AAAI, Montreal, Canada, pp 263–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Novotny J, Novotny M (1992) Notes on the algebraic approach to dependence in information systems. Fundamenta Informaticae 16:263–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak Z (1982) Rough sets. Int J Comput Inf Sci 11:341–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak Z (1991) Rough sets-theoretical aspect of reasoning about data. Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak Z (1995) Vagueness and uncertainty: a rough set perspective. Comput Intell 11:277–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak Z (1997) Sets, fuzzy sets and rough sets. http://grammars.grlmc.com/GRLMC/reports/rep29.doc. Accessed 15 February 2010

  • Pawlak Z (1998) Rough set theory and its applications to data analysis. Cybern Syst Int J 29:661–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak Z, Grzymala-Busse J, Slowinski R, Ziarko W (1995) Rough sets. Commun ACM 38:89–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polkowski L, Skowron A (1998a) Rough sets in knowledge discovery (vols. 1–2). In: Kacprzyk J (ed) Studies in fuzziness and soft computing series. Physica-Verlag/Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Polkowski L, Skowron A (1998b) Rough sets and current trends in computing. In: Goebel R, Siekmann J, Wahlster W (eds) Lecture notes in artificial intelligence series. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomykala J, Pomykala JA (1988) The stone algebra of rough sets, Bull. Polish Acad Sci Math 36:495–508

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepardson DP (2005) Student ideas: what is an environment? J Environ Educ 36:49–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefanutti L (2008) A characterization of the concept of independence in knowledge structures. J Math Psychol 52:207–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarski A (1930) Fundamentale begriffe der methodologie der deduktiven wissenschaften. Monatshefte fur Mathematik und Physik 37:361–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tunnicliffe SD, Reiss MJ (1999) Building a model: how do children see animals? J Biol Educ 33:142–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunnicliffe SD, Reiss MJ (2000) Building a model: how do children see plants? J Biol Educ 34:172–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiten W (1997) Psychology: themes and variations. Brooks/Cole Publishing, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Wille R (1982) Restructuring lattice theory: an approach based on hierarchies of concepts. In: Rival I (ed) Ordered sets. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 445–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Yorek N, Narli S (2009) Modeling of cognitive structure of uncertain scientific concepts using fuzzy-rough set and intuitionistic fuzzy sets: example of the life concept. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl Based Syst 17(5):371–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yorek N, Sahin M, Aydin H (2009) Are animals ‘more alive’ than plants? animistic-anthropocentric construction of life concept. Eurasia J Math Sci Technol Educ 5(4):369–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong N, Skowron A (2000) Rough sets in KDD: tutorial notes. Bull Int Rough Set Soc 4(1/2)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Secondary Science and Mathematics Education, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey

    Serkan Narli, Nurettin Yorek & Mehmet Sahin

  2. Department of Science Education, Dumlupinar University, Kutahya, Turkey

    Muhammet Usak

Authors
  1. Serkan Narli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nurettin Yorek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mehmet Sahin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Muhammet Usak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nurettin Yorek.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Narli, S., Yorek, N., Sahin, M. et al. Can We Make Definite Categorization of Student Attitudes? A Rough Set Approach to Investigate Students’ Implicit Attitudinal Typologies Toward Living Things. J Sci Educ Technol 19, 456–469 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9213-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9213-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation