Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Several CASE Lessons Can Improve Students’ Control of Variables Reasoning Scheme Ability

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study addressed one aspect of scientific reasoning, the control of variables reasoning scheme. We explored whether a short intervention aimed at accelerating this reasoning scheme by CASE lessons would improve students’ ability to apply this scheme in problems related to the biology curriculum. About 120 students from grade nine were assessed for their Piagetian cognitive level and were divided into two groups, control or intervention. A short intervention of three sessions took place in the intervention group only. Both groups were then instructed on the topic of enzymes according to the biology curriculum and undertook a final exam. The results showed that only 20% of the population acquired the Piagetian formal operations level, in line with previous findings. In addition, it was found that the short intervention had a significant effect on students’ ability to use the control of variables reasoning scheme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adey P (2005) Issues arising from the long-term evaluation of cognitive acceleration programs. Res Sci Educ 35:3–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adey P, Shayer M (1994) Really raising standards. Routledge, London

  • Adey P, Shayer M, Yates C (2001) Thinking science, vol 3. Nelson Thornes, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson CW (2007) Perspectives on science learning. In: Abell SK, Lederman NG (eds) Handbook of research on science education. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp 3–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Arons AB, Karplus R (1976) Implications of accumulating data on levels of intellectual development. Am J Phys 44:386

    Google Scholar 

  • Babai R (2008) Piagetian cognitive level and the tendency to use intuitive rules when solving comparison tasks (Manuscript submitted for publication)

  • Bullock M, Ziegler A (1999) Scientific reasoning: developmental and individual differences. In: Weinert FE, Schneider W (eds) Individual development from 3 to 12: findings from the Munich longitudinal study. Max Plank Institute for Psychological Research, Munich, pp 38–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Case R (1974) Structures and strictures: some functional limitations on the course of cognitive growth. Cognit Psychol 6:544–573. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(74)90025-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Klahr D (1999) All other things being equal: acquisition and transfer of the control of variables strategy. Child Dev 70:1098–1120. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duit R (2007) Students’ and teachers’ conceptions and science education: a bibliography, full version March 2007. Retrieved from http://www.ipn.uni-kiel.de/aktuell/stcse/stcse.html

  • Endler LC, Bond TG (2001) Cognitive development in a secondary science setting. Res Sci Educ 30:403–416. doi:10.1007/BF02461559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endler LC, Bond TG (2008) Changing science outcomes: cognitive acceleration in a US setting. Res Sci Educ 38:149–166. doi:10.1007/s11165-007-9042-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huppert J, Michal Lomask S, Lazarowitz R (2002) Computer simulations in the high school: students’ cognitive stages, science process skills and academic achievement in microbiology. Int J Sci Educ 24:803–821. doi:10.1080/09500690110049150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inhelder B, Piaget J (1958) The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Iqbal HM, Shayer M (2000) Accelerating the development of formal thinking in Pakistan secondary school pupils: achievement effects and professional development issues. J Res Sci Teach 37:259–274. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200003)37:3<259::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-W

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karplus R, Karplus E, Formisane M, Paulsen AC (1979) Proportional reasoning and control of variables in seven countries. In: Lochhead J, Clement J (eds) Cognitive process instruction, research on teaching thinking skills. Franklin Institute Press, Philadelphia, PA, pp 47–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn D, Garcia-Mila M, Zohar A, Andersen F (1995) Strategies of knowledge acquisition. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev 60:1–128 (Serial no. 245, no. 4)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson AE (1985) A review of research on formal reasoning and science teaching. J Res Sci Teach 22:569–617. doi:10.1002/tea.3660220702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson AE, Renner JW (1975) Piagetian theory and biology teaching. Am Biol Teach 37:336–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarowitz R (1992) High school students’ difficulties in biology concepts. J Biol Educ 26:215–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbano N (2003) The effects of a cognitive acceleration intervention programme on the performance of secondary school pupils in Malawi. Int J Sci Educ 25:71–87. doi:10.1080/09500690110110124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullis IVS, Martin MO, González EJ, Chrostowski SJ (2004) TIMSS 2003 international mathematics report: findings from IEA’s trends in international mathematics and science study at the eighth and fourth grades. Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1996) National science education standards. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget J, Inhelder B (1974) The child’s construction of quantities. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Schauble L (1996) The development of scientific reasoning in knowledge-rich contexts. Dev Psychol 32:102–109. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.32.1.102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shayer M, Adey P (1981) Towards a science of science teaching. Heinemann Educational Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Shayer M, Adey P (2002) Learning intelligence. Open University Press, Buckingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Shayer M, Wylam H (1978) The distribution of Piagetian stages of thinking in British middle and secondary school children II: 14–16-year-olds and sex differentials. Br J Educ Psychol 48:62–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Shayer M, Kuchemann DE, Wylam H (1976) The distribution of Piagetian stages of thinking in British middle and secondary school children. Br J Educ Psychol 46:164–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Shayer M, Demetriou A, Pervez M (1988) The structure and scaling of concrete operational thought: three studies in four countries. Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr 114:309–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Shayer M, Ginsburg D, Coe R (2007) Thirty years on—a large anti-Flynn effect? The Piagetian test volume & heaviness norms 1975–2003. Br J Educ Psychol 77:25–41. doi:10.1348/000709906X96987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shemesh M, Lazarowitz R (1988) The interactional effects of students’ cognitive levels and test characteristics on the performance of formal reasoning tasks. Res Sci Technol Educ 6:79–89. doi:10.1080/0263514880060107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shemesh M, Lazarowitz R (1989) Pupils’ reasoning skills and their mastery of biological concepts. J Biol Educ 23:59–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Wollman W (1977) Controlling variables: assessing levels of understanding. Sci Educ 61:371–383. doi:10.1002/sce.3730610312

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Science Education, The Constantiner School of Education, Tel Aviv University, 69978, Tel Aviv, Israel

    Reuven Babai & Tamar Levit-Dori

Authors
  1. Reuven Babai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tamar Levit-Dori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reuven Babai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Babai, R., Levit-Dori, T. Several CASE Lessons Can Improve Students’ Control of Variables Reasoning Scheme Ability. J Sci Educ Technol 18, 439–446 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9161-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9161-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation