Abstract
This paper is an invited adaptation of the IEEE Education Society Distinguished Lecture Approaches to Interactive Video Anchors in Problem-Based Science Learning. Interactive video anchors have a cognitive theory base, and they help to enlarge the context of learning with information-rich real-world situations. Carefully selected movie clips and custom-developed regular videos and virtual simulations have been successfully used as anchors in problem-based science learning. Examples discussed include a range of situations such as Indiana Jones tackling a trap, a teenager misrepresenting lead for gold, an agriculture inspection at the US border, counterintuitive events, analyzing a river ecosystem for pollution, and finding the cause of illness in a nineteenth century river city. Suggestions for teachers are provided.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aspy DN, Aspy CB, Quinby PM (1993) What doctors can teach teachers about problem-based learning. Educ Leadersh 50(7):22–25
Barrows HS, Tamblyn RM (1980) Problem-based learning: an approach to medical education. Springer Publishing Company, New York
Brophy SP (no date) Sequencing problem solving and hands-on activities: does it matter? Vanderbilt University, Nashville. http://www.designbasedresearch.org/reppubs/brophyquest.pdf
Butler R, Inrnan D, Lobb D (2005) Problem-based learning and the medical school: another case of the emperor’s new clothes? Adv Physiol Educ 29(1–4):194–196. doi:10.1152/advan.00032.2005
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1993) Anchored instruction and situated cognition revisited. Educ Technol 33:52–70
Dede C, Ketelhut DJ, Clarke J, Nelson B, Bowman C (2005) Students’ motivation and learning of science in a multi-user virtual environment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada
Delisle R (1997) How to use problem-based learning in the classroom. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria
Dewey J (1910) How we think. D. C. Heath, Lexington
Dewey J (1933) How we think: restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Heath, Boston
Flynn AE, Klein JD (2001) The influence of discussion groups in a case-based learning environment. Educ Technol Res Dev 49(3):71–86. doi:10.1007/BF02504916
Geist MJ (2004). Orchestrating classroom change to engage children in the process of scientific reasoning: challenges for teachers and strategies for success. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
Gragg CI (1940) Because wisdom can’t be told. Harv Alumni Bull 43:78–84 October 19
Hofwolt CA, Kumar DD, Johnston J, Carrison S, Altman JE (1992–1993) Hyperscience for middle school. (An interactive video). Vanderbilt University, Nashville
Hung D (2002) Situated cognition and problem-based learning: implications for learning and instruction with technology. J Interact Learn Res 13(4):393–415
Hur Y, Kim S (2007) Different outcomes of active and relective students in problem-based learning. Med Teach 29(1):18–21. doi:10.1080/01421590601045007
Johnstone AH (1997) And some fell on good ground. Univ Chem Educ 1(1):8–13
Kalayci N, Cohen MR (2003) Integrating problem solving with theme-based learning in the key learning community. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, St. Loius, Missouri
Kauffman DM (1998) Problem-based learning: using cases to teach about how to deal with ethical problems. NCEHR Commun 8(2). http://www.ncehr-cnerh.org/english/communique2/PBLearning.html
Kumar DD, Bristor VJ (1999) Integrating science and language arts through technology-based macrocontexts. Educ Rev 51(1):41–53. doi:10.1080/00131919997669
Kumar DD, Sherwood RD (2007) Effect of a problem based simulation on the conceptual understanding of undergraduate science education students. J Sci Educ Technol 16(3):239–246. doi:10.1007/s10956-007-9049-3
Mergendoller JR, Maxwell NL, Bellisimo Y (2006) The effectiveness of problem-based instruction: a comparative study of instructional methods and student characteristics. Interdiscip J Problem-Based Learn 1(2):49–69
Schmidt HG (1993) Foundations of problem-based learning: some explanatory notes. Med Educ 27:422–432
Schwartz DL, Brophy S, Lin X, Bransford JD (1999) Toward the development of flexibly adaptive instructional designs. In: Reigeluth C (ed) Instructional design theories and models, vol 2. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 183–213
Sharp DLM, Bransford JD, Goldman SR, Risko VJ, Kinzer CK, Vye NJ (1995) Dynamic visual support for story comprehension and mental model building by young at-risk children. Educ Technol Res Dev 43:25–42. doi:10.1007/BF02300489
Sherwood RD (2000) Final report: the scientist in action series: a generative approach to authentic scientific inquiry project (ESI-9350510). National Science Foundation, Arlington
Sherwood RD (2001). Problem based multimedia software for middle grades science: development issues and an initial field study. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, MO
Sherwood R, Kinzer C, Hasselbring T, Bransford J, Williams S, Goin L (1987a) New directions for videodiscs. Comput Teach 14(6):10–13
Sherwood R, Kinzer C, Hasselbring T, Bransford J (1987b) Macro-contexts for learning: initial findings and issues. Appl Cogn Psychol 1:93–108. doi:10.1002/acp.2350010203
Sherwood R, Kinzer C, Bransford J, Franks J (1987c) Some benefits of creating macro-contexts for science instruction: initial findings. J Res Sci Teach 24:417–435. doi:10.1002/tea.3660240505
Wang HCA, Thompson P, Shuler C (1998) Essential components of problem-based learning for the K-12 inquiry science instruction. CCMB School of Dentistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. http://www.usc.edu/hsc/dental/ccmb/usc-csp/esscomponents.htm
Whitehead AN (1929) The aims of education. Macmillan, NY
Acknowledgments
Thanks to Dr. Robert D. Sherwood, Dr. James W. Altschuld, Mr. Ron Persin, Ms. Lynn Laurenti, Ms. Lisa Mills and Ms. Bonnie May for thoughtful critiques and suggestions, and Mr. John Harwood for technical assistance. This paper is an adaptation of the presentation made in the IEEE Education Distinguished Lecture program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Credits
“The HyperScience”—Source: Hofwolt, C. A., Kumar, D. D., Johnston, J., Carrison, S., & Altman, J. E. (1992–93). Hyperscience for middle school. (An interactive video.) Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University. Used with permission.
“The Golden Statuette”—An uncopyrighted experimental work produced at Vanderbilt University in the early 1980’s by Dr. R. D. Sherwood. Used with permission.
“The River of Life”—Source: Sherwood, R.D. (2001). River of Life (Multimedia Program). Nashville, TN: Learning Technology Center, Vanderbilt University. Used with permission.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, D.D. Approaches to Interactive Video Anchors in Problem-based Science Learning. J Sci Educ Technol 19, 13–19 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9154-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9154-6