Abstract
Scratch-off immediate feedback assessment technique (IF-AT) forms and classroom response systems (clickers) can increase student engagement and interaction and help students prepare for exams by indicating the type and level of questions they will encounter. We used the IF-AT throughout the semester in three sections of a lower-division biology class; in two, students worked on IF-AT questions in small permanent groups, and in one, students alternated between IF-AT and clickers each week. At the end of the semester, students answered surveys about instant feedback techniques. Students appreciated prompt feedback on their understanding of course material, enjoyed the group interaction and opportunities to learn from each other, and continued to have positive perceptions of instant feedback activities and to take them seriously throughout the semester. While appreciating the versatility of clicker questions, we find that the ease of use, low cost, effectiveness, and improved classroom climate of the IF-AT method are particularly commendable.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angelo TA, Cross KP (1993) Classroom assessment techniques. Jossey-Bass, Inc., San Francisco
Bangert-Drowns RL, Kulik CC, Kulik JA, Morgan M (1991) The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Rev Educ Res 67:601–607
Barab S, Squire K (2004) Design-based research: putting a stake in the ground. J Learn Sci 13:1–14
Barber M, Njus D (2007) Clicker evolution: seeking intelligent design. Cell Biol Educ—Life Sci Educ 6:1–8
Brown AL (1992) Design experiments: theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. J Learn Sci 2:141–178
Caldwell JE (2007) Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips. Cell Biol Educ—Life Sci Educ 6:9–20
Carbone E, Greenberg J (1998) Teaching large classes: unpacking the problem and responding creatively. In: Kaplan M (ed) To improve the academy 17. New Forums Press and The Professional and Organizational Development Network in Higher Education, Stillwater, OK, pp 311–326
Chickering A, Gamson Z (1987) Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education, AAHE Bulletin, 3–7 March
Collins A (1992) Toward a design science of education. In: Scanlon E, O’Shea T (eds) New directions in educational technology. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 15–22
Cotner S, Baepler P, Kellerman A (2008) Scratch this!: the IF-AT as a technique for stimulating group discussion and exposing misconceptions. J Coll Sci Teach
Cox AJ, Junkin WF (2002) Enhanced student learning in the introductory physics laboratory. Phys Educ 37:37–44
Crouch CH, Mazur E (2001) Peer instruction: ten years of experience and results. Am J Phys 69:970–977
DiBattista D, Mitterer JO, Gosse L (2004) Acceptance by undergraduates of the immediate feedback assessment technique for multiple-choice testing. Teach Higher Educ 9:17–28
Draper SW, Brown MI (2004) Increased interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system. J Comput Assisted Learn 20:81–94
Epstein ML, Brosvic GM (2002) Students prefer the immediate feedback assessment technique. Psychol Rep 90:1136–1138
Epstein ML, Lazarus AD, Calvano TB, Matthews KA, Hendel RA, Epstein BB, Brosvic GM (2002) Immediate feedback assessment technique promotes learning and corrects inaccurate first responses. Psychol Rec 52:187–201
Fink LD (2003) Creating significant learning experiences: an integrated approach to designing college courses. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Higgins R, Hartley P, Skelton A (2002) The conscientious consumer: reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning. Stud Higher Educ 27:53–64
Michaelson LK, Knight AB, Fink LD (2004) Team-based learning: a transformative use of small groups in college teaching. Stylus, Sterling, VA
Pascarella E, Terenzini P (1991) How college affects students: findings and insights from twenty years of research. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Sandoval WA, Bell P (2004) Design-based research methods for studying learning in context: introduction. Educ Psychol 39:199–201
Slavin R (1991) Synthesis of research on cooperative learning. Educ Leadersh 48:71–82
Walker JD, Cotner S, Baepler P, Decker M. A delicate balance: Integrating active learning into a large lecture course. Forthcoming in Cell Biol Educ—Life Sci Educ (in press)
Wiggins G (1998) Educative assessment: designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA
Wood WB (2004) Clickers: A teaching gimmick that works. Dev Cell 7:796–798
Wulff DH, Nyquist JD, Abbott RD (1987) Students’ perceptions of large classes. In: Weimer M (ed) New directions for teaching and learning 32. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by a grant from the Archibald Bush Foundation to the University of Minnesota and a matching grant from the College of Biological Sciences. We thank Dr. Mark Decker, who co-taught in Course A and provided helpful suggestions on effective use of the IF-AT method. We also thank Dr. Rogene Schnell, instructional technology specialist in the College of Biological Sciences, who set up the clicker system, trained the instructor in its use, and helped with clicker distribution and data management for Course C. A final thanks to Anne Kellerman and Christina Yi for data analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cotner, S.H., Fall, B.A., Wick, S.M. et al. Rapid Feedback Assessment Methods: Can We Improve Engagement and Preparation for Exams in Large-enrollment Courses?. J Sci Educ Technol 17, 437–443 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9112-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9112-8