Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Factors Affecting Junior High School Students' Interest in Physics

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We report the results of a study on students' interest in physics at the end of their compulsory schooling in Israel carried out in the framework of the ROSE Project. Factors studied were their opinions about science classes, their out-of-school experiences in physics, and their attitudes toward science and technology. Students' overall interest in physics was “neutral” (neither positive nor negative), with boys showing a higher interest than girls. We found a strong correlation between students' “neutral” interest in physics and their negative opinions about science classes. These findings raise serious questions about the implementation of changes made in the Israeli science curriculum in primary and junior high school, especially if the goal is to prepare the young generation for life in a scientific-technological era. A more in-depth analysis of the results led us to formulate curricular, behavioral, and organizational changes needed to reach this goal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldridge, J., Fraser, B., Taylor, P., and Chen, C. (2000). Constructivist learning environments in a cross-national study in Taiwan and Australia. International Journal of Science Education 22: 37–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (1990). Science for all Americans, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M., and Doran, R. (1975). From an awareness of scientific data to concerns of mankind: Strategies for affective instruction in science. Science Education 59: 539–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordt, M., DeBroucker, P., Read, C., Harris, S., and Zhang, Y. (2001). Determinants of science and technology skills: Overview of the study. Education Quarterly Review, Statistics Canada 1: 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catsambis, S. (1995). Gender, race, ethnicity, and science education in middle grades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 32: 243–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of European Communities (2001). The Concrete Future Objectives of Education Systems: Final Report from the Commission (COM 2001/59).

  • Craig, J., and Ayres, D. (1988). Does primary science affect girls’ and boys’ interest in secondary science? School Science Review 69: 417–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearing, R. (1996). Review of Qualifications for 16–19 Year Olds, Schools Curriculum and Assessment Authority, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekkers, J., and DeLaeter, J. (2001). Enrolments trends in school science education in Australia. International Journal of Science Education 23: 487–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, D., and Kim, H. (1999). Constructivist Learning Environments in Science Classes in Korea. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of AERA, Montreal, Canada.

  • Francis, L., and Greer, J. (1999). Measuring attitudes towards science among secondary school students: The affective domain. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 35: 877– 896.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedler, Y., and Tamir, P. (1990). Sex differences in science education in Israel: An analysis of 15 years of research. Research in Science & Technological Education 8: 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, P. (1974). Sex differences in achievements, attitudes and personality of science students: A review. Paper presented at the Fifth Annual Meeting of the Australian Science Education Research Association.

  • Gardner, P. (1975). Attitudes to science: A review. Studies in Science Education 2: 1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, P. (1985). Students’ attitudes to science and technology: An international overview. In Lehrke, M., Hoffman, L., and Gardner, P. (Eds.), Interests in Science and Technology Education, Kiel, 12th IPN Symposium, IPN, Schriftenreihe 102, pp. 15–34.

  • Gardner, P. (1998). The development of males’ and females’ interests in science and technology. In Hoffman, L., Krapp, A., Renninger, K., and Baumert, J. (Eds.), Interest and Learning, Proceedings of the Second Conference on Interest and Gender, Kiel, IPN, pp. 41–57.

  • Gardner, P., and Tamir, P. (1989a). Interest in Biology. Part I: A multidimensional construct. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 26: 409–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, P., and Tamir, P. (1989b). Interest in Biology. Part II: Relationship with the enrollment intentions of Israeli senior high school biology students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 26: 425–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garg, K., and Gupta, B. (2003). Decline in science education in India: A case study at +2 and undergraduate level. Current Science 84: 1198–1201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goto, M. (2001). ‘Japan,’ in International Bureau for Education, Science Education for Contemporary Society: Problems, Issues and Dilemmas, Geneva, IBE, Unesco, pp. 31–38.

  • Graber, W. (1993). Pupils’ interest in chemistry and chemistry lessons. In Proceedings of the International Conference Science Education in Developing Countries: From Theory to Practice, Jerusalem, Israel, p. 201.

  • Haussler, P. (1987). Measuring students’ interest in physics: Design and results of a cross-sectional study in the Federal Republic of Germany. International Journal of Science Education 9: 79–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haussler, P., and Hoffman, L. (2000). An intervention study to enhance girls’ interest, self-concept, and achievement in physics classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39: 870– 888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendley, D., Parkinson, J., Stables, A., and Tanner, H. (1995). Gender differences in pupil attitudes to the national curriculum foundation subjects of English, mathematics, science and technology in Key Stage 3 in South Wales. Educational Studies 21: 85–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidi, S., and Andersen, V. (1992). Situational interest and its impact on reading and expository writing. In Renninger, K., and Hidi, S. (Eds.), The Role of Interest in Learning and Development, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 215–238.

  • Hoffman, L. (2002). Promoting girls’ interest and achievement in physics classes for beginners. Learning and Instruction 12: 447–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howes, E. (2002). Connecting Girls and Science: Constructivism, Feminism and Science Education Reform, Teachers College Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G., Howe, A., and Rua, M. (2000). Gender differences in students’ experiences, interests, and attitudes towards science and scientists. Science Education 84: 180–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juuti, K., Lavonen, J., Uitto, A., Byman, R., and Meisalo, V. (2004). Students’ reasons to choose or reject physics. Paper presented at the GIREP Conference, Ostrava, Czech Republic.

  • Kahle, J., and Lakes, M. (1983). The myth of equality in science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 20: 131–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahle, J., and Meece, J. (1994). Research on gender issues in the classroom. In Gabel, D. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning, Macmillan, New York, pp. 542–557.

  • Kattman, U., Duit, R., Gropengieβer, H., and Komorek, M. (1997). The model of educational reconstruction. A model for science education research and development. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften 3: 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijnse, P. (1995). ‘Developmental research’ as a way to an empirical based ‘didactical structure’ of science. Science Education 79: 189–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockheed, E., Thorpe, M., Brooks-Gun, J., Casserly, P., and McAlloon, A. (1985). Sex and Ethnic Differences in Middle School Mathematics Science and Computer Science: What Do We Know? Report submitted to the Ford Foundation, Education Testing Service, Princeton, New Jersey.

  • Lord, T. (1997). A comparison between traditional and constructivist teaching in college biology. Innovative Higher Education 21: 197–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, T. (2004). Choosing physical science courses: The importance of cultural and social capital in the enrolment decisions of high achieving students. Paper presented at the XI IOSTE Symposium, Lublin, Poland.

  • Menis, J. (1983). Attitudes towards chemistry as compared with those towards mathematics among tenth grade pupils (aged 15) in high level secondary schools in Israel. Research in Science and Technological Education 1: 185–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • NAEP [National Assessment of Educational Progress] (1983). Third National Mathematics Assessment: Results, Trends and Issues, NAEP Report No. 13-MA-01. Education Testing Service, Princeton, New Jersey.

  • National Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching for the 21st Century (2000). Before it’s too late, US Department of Education, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation (2002). Science and Engineering Indicators 2002, online at http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/seind02/c0/c0s1.htm (accessed March 4, 2004).

  • Oh, P. S., and Yager, R. (2004). Development of constructivist science classrooms and changes in student attitudes toward science learning. Science Education International 15: 105– 113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormerod, M., and Duckworth, D. (1975). Pupils’ Attitudes to Science, Slough, National Foundation for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J., and Collins, S. (2000). Pupils’ and Parents’ Views of the School Science Curriculum, King’s College, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J., Simon, S., and Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education 25: 1049–1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Publishers’ Association/Education Publishers Council (2003). UK School-Market dataset: A level entries 1995–2002, online at: http://www.statisticsforbusiness.co.uk/epcdata (accessed April 15, 2004).

  • Schibeci, R. (1984). Attitudes to science: An update. Studies in Science Education 11: 26–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiner, C., and Sjøberg, S. (2004). Sowing the Seeds of ROSE. Background, Rationale, Questionnaire Development and Data Collection for ROSE (The Relevance of Science Education)—A Comparative Study of Students’ Views of Science and Science Education (Acta Didactica 4/2004), Department of Teacher Education and School Development, University of Oslo, Norway.

  • Seker, H. (2005). The effects of using history of science on students’ interest in learning science. Paper presented at the 5th Biannual Conference of ESERA, Barcelona, Spain.

  • Selim, M., and Shrigley, R. (1983). The group-dynamics approach: A socio-psychological approach for testing the effect of discovery and expository teaching on the science achievement and attitude of young Egyptian students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 20: 213–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shemesh, M. (1990). Gender related differences in reasoning skills and learning interests of junior high school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 27: 27–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepardson, D., and Pizzini, E. (1993). A comparison of student perceptions of science activities within three instructional approaches. School Science and Mathematics 93: 127– 131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, R., and Tamir, P. (1973). Research on teaching in the national science. In Travers, R. (Ed.), Second Handbook of Research on Teaching, Rand McNally, Chicago.

  • Simpson, R., Koballa, T., Jr., Oliver, J., and Crawley, F., III (1994). Research on the affective dimension of science learning. In Gabel, D. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning, Macmillan, New York, pp. 211–234.

  • Simpson, R., and Oliver, J. (1990). A summary of major influences on attitude toward and achievement in science among adolescent students. Science Education 74: 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjoberg, L. (1983). Interest, achievement and vocational choice. European Journal of Science Education 5: 299–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjoberg, S. (2000a). Interesting all children in ‘science for all.’ In: Millar, R., Leach, J., and Osborne, J. (Eds.), Improving Science Education, Open University Press, Buckingham, pp. 165–186.

  • Sjoberg, S. (2000b). Science and Scientists: The SAS Study, online at http://folk.uio.no/sveinsj/SASweb.htm (accessed April 23, 2004).

  • Sjoberg, S. (2002). Science for the children? Department of Teacher Education and School Department, University of Oslo.

  • Sjoberg, S., Schreiner, C., and Stefansson, K. (2004). The voice of the learners. International perspectives on S&T based on the ROSE project. In Proceedings of the XIth Symposium of IOSTE: Science and Technology Education for a Diverse World—Dilemmas, Needs and Partnerships, Lublin, Poland, pp. 43–44.

  • Smithers, A., and Robinson, P. (1988). The Growth of Mixed A-Levels, Department of Education, University of Manchester.

  • Solbes, J., and Vilches, A. (1997). STS interactions and the teaching of physics and chemistry. Science Education 81: 377– 386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, J., and Aikenhead, G. (Eds.) (1994). STS Education: International Perspectives on Reform, Teachers College Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spall, K., Barrett, S., Stanisstreet, M., Dickson, D., and Boyes, E. (2003). Undergraduates’ views about biology and physics. Research in Science and Technological Education 21: 193– 208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg, M., Dini, M., and Li, E. (1994). Decreasing course content improves student comprehension of science and attitudes toward science among adolescent students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 31: 679–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tai, C.-C., and Tuan, H.-L. (2005). Investigating the impact of inquiry vs. textbook instruction on 8th graders’ motivation towards learning science. Paper presented at the 5th Biannual Conference of ESERA, Barcelona, Spain.

  • Tamir, P. (1988). Gender differences in high school science in Israel. British Educational Research Journal 14: 127–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamir, P., Arzi, A., and Zloto, D. (1974). Attitudes of Israeli high school students towards physics. Science Education 58: 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamir, P., Levine, T., Lewy, A., Chen, D., and Zuzovsky, R. (1988). Science Teaching in Israel in the Eighties, Israel Science Teaching Center, Hebrew University, Jerusalem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomorrow 98 (1992). Report from the Commission on Science and Technological Education, Ministry of Education, Jerusalem.

  • Universities and Colleges Admissions Service (2003). Statistical Enquiry Service, online at http://www.ucas.co.uk/figures/enq (accessed April 15, 2004).

  • U.S. Department of Education (1997). Findings from the condition of education 1997: No. 11: Women in mathematics and science, NCES Publication No. 97-982, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

  • Weinburgh, M. (1995). Gender differences in student attitudes toward science: A meta-analysis of the literature from 1970 to 1991. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 32: 387– 398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitten, B., Foster, S., and Duncombe, M. (2003). What works for women in undergraduate physics? Physics Today 56: 46–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolnough, B. (1994a). Effective Science Teaching, Open University Press, Buckingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolnough, B. (1994b). Why students choose physics, or reject it. Physics Education 29: 368–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Ricardo Trumper

    Present address: Kibbutz Hahoterim, Doar Na Hof Hacarmel, 30870, Israel

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Science and Science Education, Haifa University, Mount Carmel, Haifa, 31905, Israel

    Ricardo Trumper

Authors
  1. Ricardo Trumper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ricardo Trumper.

Additional information

ROSE (The Relevance of Science Education) is an international project with about 40 participating countries. ROSE is organized by Svein Sjoberg and Camilla Schreiner at The University of Oslo and is supported by the Research Council of Norway. Reports and details are available at http://www.ils.uio.no/english/rose/.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trumper, R. Factors Affecting Junior High School Students' Interest in Physics. J Sci Educ Technol 15, 47–58 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-006-0355-6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-006-0355-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation