Skip to main content
Log in

Implicit shift scheduling with multiple breaks and work stretch duration restrictions

  • Published:
Journal of Scheduling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper considers a shift scheduling problem that includes different forms of flexibility in terms of shift starting times, break lengths and break placement. Two particular forms are studied: fractionable breaks and work stretch duration restrictions. Unlike standard breaks, fractionable breaks are not required to be attributed as a whole. They can be divided into fractions of breaks under some conditions. The distribution of breaks within a shift is done with respect to work stretch duration restrictions to ensure a correct mix of periods of work and rest. Two implicit models are proposed. They extend previous work on implicit modeling of break placement to incorporate the concepts of fractionable breaks and work stretch duration restrictions. In this context, we show the merits of using the so-called forward and backward constraints to model work stretch duration restrictions. We also introduce a new formulation of the forward and backward constraints and demonstrate that it considerably reduces the density of the constraint matrix of the two proposed models. Finally, we study the impact of fractionable breaks and work stretch duration restrictions and show that, for some instances, the use of these concepts considerably reduces the workforce size when compared to other traditional approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Addou, I., & Soumis, F. (2007). Bechtold–Jacobs generalized model for shift scheduling with extraordinary overlap. Annals of Operations Research, 155(1), 177–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aykin, T. (1996). Optimal shift scheduling with multiple break windows. Management Science, 42, 591–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aykin, T. (1998). A composite branch and cut algorithm for optimal shift scheduling with multiple breaks and break windows. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 49, 603–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aykin, T. (2000). A comparative evaluation of modeling approaches to the labor shift scheduling problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 125, 381–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, J. (1985). Integrated days off and shift personnel scheduling. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 9, 395–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, J., & Fields, J. (1985). Personnel scheduling with flexshift models. Journal of Operations Management, 5, 327–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, K. R. (1976). Workforce allocation in cyclic scheduling problems: A survey. Operational Research Quarterly, 27, 155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bard, J. F., Binici, C., & deSilva, A. H. (2003). Staff scheduling at the United States Postal Service. Computers & Operations Research, 30, 745–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartholdi, J. J. (1981). A guaranteed-accuracy round-off algorithm for cyclic scheduling and set covering. Operations Research, 29, 501–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechtold, S. E., & Jacobs, L. W. (1990). Implicit modeling of flexible break assignments in optimal shift scheduling. Management Science, 36, 1339–1351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechtold, S. E., & Jacobs, L. W. (1993). Labor utilization effects of labor scheduling flexibility alternatives in a tour scheduling environment. Decision Sciences, 24, 148–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechtold, S. E., & Jacobs, L. W. (1996). The equivalence of general set-covering and implicit integer programming formulations for shift scheduling. Naval Research Logistics, 43, 233–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brusco, M. J., & Jacobs, L. W. (1995). Cost analysis of alternative formulations for personnel scheduling in continuously operating organisations. European Journal of Operational Research, 86, 249–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brusco, M. J., & Jacobs, L. W. (2000). Optimal models for meal-break and start-time flexibility in continuous tour scheduling. Management Science, 46, 1630–1641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çezik, T., & Günlük, O. (2004). Reformulating linear programs with transportation constraints with applications to workforce scheduling. Naval Research Logistics, 51, 275–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dantzig, G. B. (1954). A comment on Edie’s traffic delays at toll booths. Operations Research, 2, 339–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desaulniers, G., & Hickman, M. (2007). Public transit. In G. Laporte & C. Barnhart (Eds.), Handbooks in operations research and management science, transportation (Vol. 14, pp. 69–127). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaballa, A., & Pearce, W. (1979). Telephone sales manpower planning at Quantas. Interfaces, 9, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, W. B., & Berry, W. L. (1976). Heuristic methods for telephone operator shift scheduling: an experimental analysis. Management Science, 22, 1372–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keith, E. G. (1979). Operator scheduling. AIIE Transactions, 11, 37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moondra, S. L. (1976). An L.P. model for workforce scheduling in banks. Journal of Bank Research, 6, 299–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rekik, M. Cordeau, J.-F. Soumis, F. (2004). Using Benders decomposition to implicitly model tour scheduling. Annals of Operations Research, 128, 111–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rekik, M., Cordeau, J.-F., & Soumis, F. (2008). Solution approaches to large shift scheduling problems. RAIRO Operations Research, 42, 229–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segal, M. (1974). The operator scheduling problem: a network flow approach. Operations Research, 22, 808–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, G. M. (1995). Improved implicit optimal modeling of the labor shift scheduling problem. Management Science, 41, 595–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-François Cordeau.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rekik, M., Cordeau, JF. & Soumis, F. Implicit shift scheduling with multiple breaks and work stretch duration restrictions. J Sched 13, 49–75 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10951-009-0114-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10951-009-0114-z

Keywords

Navigation