Abstract
Afghanistan is located at the collision boundary of the Indian, Eurasian and Arabian plates and, therefore, lies in a seismically active region. Few probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) studies have been carried out for Afghanistan, which present only peak ground acceleration (PGA) values. This study presents PGA and spectral acceleration (SA) values for 0.2 and 1.0 s for return periods of 475, 975 and 2475 years. The study adopts the Cornell (Bull Seismol Soc Am 58(5):1583–1606, 1968), McGuire (1976) approach for the PSHA and is based on an updated and homogenized earthquake catalogue consisting of 29,097 events greater than magnitude 4.0. Two declustering models, two seismic source models and four ground-motion prediction equations for shallow and deep earthquakes are used in this study. The PSHA results are combined using a logic tree approach with a total of 16 branches. The PGA and SA values for the different provinces of Afghanistan are obtained. The results are also shown as contour maps. The PGA values range from 0.06 to 0.66 g, 0.09 to 0.82 g and 0.13 to 1.10 g for return periods of 475, 975 and 2475 years, respectively. The PSHA yields higher PGA values for the Badakhshan, Kunduz Takhar and Kabul provinces, which lie in the northeastern part of country where active sources of the Hindukush and Pamir ranges are located. The hazard values obtained in this study are observed to be generally consistent with the study of Zhang et al. (Ann Geofis 42(6):1167–1190, 1999). In addition, a comparison of the current study with the hazard maps of the bordering countries generally shows consistent results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akkar S, Bommer JJ (2010) Empirical equations for the prediction of PGA, PGV, and spectral accelerations in Europe, the Mediterranean region, and the Middle East. Seismol Res Lett 81(2):195–206
Ambraseys NN, Bilham R (2003) Earthquakes in Afghanistan. Seismol Res Lett 74(2):107–123
Boore DM, Atkinson GM (2008) Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s. Earthquake Spectra 24(1):99–138
Boore DM, Stewart JP, Seyhan E, Atkinson GM (2014) NGA-West 2 equations for predicting PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA for shallow crustal earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra 30(3):1057–1085
Boyd OS, Mueller CS, Rukstales KS (2007) Preliminary probabilistic seismic hazard map for Afghanistan: U.S. Geological Survey open-file report 2007-1137
Bozorgnia Y, Abrahamson NA, Atik LA, Ancheta TD, Atkinson GM, Baker JW, Baltay A, Boore DM, Campbell KW, Chiou BSJ, Darragh R, Day S, Donahue J, Graves RW, Gregor N, Hanks T, Idriss IM, Kamai R, Kishida T, Kottke A, Mahin SA, Rezaeian S, Rowshandel B, Seyhan E, Shahi S, Shantz T, Silva W, Spudich P, Stewart JP, Watson-Lamprey J, Wooddell K, Youngs R (2014) NGA-West 2 research project. Earthquake Spectra 30(4):973–987
Building Code of Pakistan (2007) Seismic provisions, Ministry of Housing, Govt of Pakistan
Cornell CA (1968) Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 58(5):1583–1606
Danciu L, Woessner J (2014) Pseudo probabilistic seismic hazard sources for Vrancea deep seismicity. Second European conference on earthquake engineering and engineering seismology, 2ECEES, 24–29 August, Turkey
Danciu L, Kale Ö, Akkar S (2016) The 2014 earthquake model of middle east region: ground motion model and uncertainties. Bull Earthq Eng 16:3497–3533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9989-1
Gardner J, Knopoff L (1974) Is the sequence of earthquakes in Southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian? Bul Seismol Soc Am 64(5):1363–1367
Gülen L. et al (2014) Earthquake model of the Middle East (EMME) project: active faults and seismic sources second European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology, 2ECEES, 24–29 August 2014, Istanbul, Turkey
Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1956) Magnitude and energy of earthquakes. Ann Geofis 9:1–15
International Seismological Centre On-line bulletin (2017) International Seismological Centre, Thatcham. http://www.isc.ac.uk. Accessed 13 March 2017
Iyengar R, Chadha R, Balaji RK, Raghukanth S (2010) Development of probabilistic seismic hazard map of India. The National Disaster Management Authority 86
Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice Hall
Lin P-S, Lee C-T (2008) Ground-motion attenuation relationships for subduction zone earthquakes in northeastern Taiwan. Bull Seismol Soc Am 98:220–240
McGuire RK (1976) FORTRAN computer program for seismic risk analysis. United States Geological Survey. Open file report, 76-6768.
Menon A, Lai CG, Macchi G (2004) Seismic hazard assessment of the historical site of Jam in Afghanistan and stability analysis of the minaret. J Earthq Eng 8(01):251–294
Menon A, Ornthammarath T, Corigliano M, Lai CG (2009) Probabilistic seismic hazard macrozonation of Tamil Nadu southern India. Bull Seismol Soc Am 100(03):1320–1341
Moinfar AA, Naderzedeh A, Nabavi MH (2012) New Iranian seismic hazard zoning map for new edition of seismic code and its comparison neighboring countries. 15th World conference on earthquake engineering, Lisbon, Portugal.
National Earthquake Information Center Online bulletin (2017). National Earthquake Information Center, Colorado. http://www.usgs.gov/earthquakes. Accessed 8 Nov 2018
Ordaz M, Martineli F, Aguilar A, Arboleda J, Meletti C, D’Amico V (2015) CRISIS 2015V3.2 program to calculate seismic hazard. Instituto de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México
Quittmeyer R, Jacob K (1979) Historical and modern seismicity of Pakistan, Afghanistan, northwestern India, and southeastern Iran. Bull Seismol Soc Am 69(3):773–823
Reasenberg P (1985) Second-order moment of central California seismicity, 1969–1982. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth 90(B7):5479–5495
Ruleman CA, Crone AJ, Machette MN, Haller KM, Rukstales KS (2007) Map and database of probable and possible Quaternary faults in Afghanistan: U.S. Geological Survey open-file report 2007-1103, pp 1–39, 1 plate
Tinti S, Mulargia F (1985) Completeness analysis of a seismic catalog. Ann Geophys 03(03):407–414
Waseem M, Lai CG, Spacone E (2018) Seismic hazard assessment of northern Pakistan. Nat Hazards 90(2):563–580
Weichert HD (1980) Estimation of the earthquake recurrence parameters for unequal periods for different magnitudes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 70(4):1337–1346
Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84(4):974–1002
Wikipedia (2017) October 2015 Hindu Kush earthquake. In Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Retrieved October 11, 2017, from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=October_2015_Hindu_Kush_earthquake&oldid=803432029
Youngs RR, Chiou S-J, Silva W, Humphrey J (1997) Strong ground motion attenuation relationships for subduction zone earthquakes. Seismol Res Lett 68(1):58–73
Zare M, Amini H, Yazdi P, Sesetyan K, Demircioglu MB, Kalafat D, Erdik M, Giardini D, Khan MA, Tsereteli N (2014) Recent developments of the Middle East catalog. J Seismol 18(4):749–772
Zhang P, Yang ZX, Gupta HK, Bhatia SC, Shedlock KM (1999) Global seismic hazard assessment program (GSHAP) in continental Asia. Ann Geofis 42(6):1167–1190
Acknowledgements
The facilities provided by the National Centre of Excellence in Geology, University of Peshawar, to carry out this study and the numerical code provided by an EMME colleague are greatly acknowledged. The authors are also thankful to the reviewer of the manuscript for the constructive suggestions and comments that greatly helped improve the overall quality of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Waseem, M., Lateef, A., Ahmad, I. et al. Seismic hazard assessment of Afghanistan. J Seismol 23, 217–242 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-018-9802-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-018-9802-5