Skip to main content
Log in

Factors controlling high-frequency radiation from extended ruptures

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Seismology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Small-scale slip heterogeneity or variations in rupture velocity on the fault plane are often invoked to explain the high-frequency radiation from earthquakes. This view has no theoretical basis, which follows, for example, from the representation integral of elasticity, an exact solution for the radiated wave field. The Fourier transform, applied to the integral, shows that the seismic spectrum is fully controlled by that of the source time function, while the distribution of final slip and rupture acceleration/deceleration only contribute to directivity. This inference is corroborated by the precise numerical computation of the full radiated field from the representation integral. We compare calculated radiation from four finite-fault models: (1) uniform slip function with low slip velocity, (2) slip function spatially modulated by a sinusoidal function, (3) slip function spatially modulated by a sinusoidal function with random roughness added, and (4) uniform slip function with high slip velocity. The addition of “asperities,” both regular and irregular, does not cause any systematic increase in the spectral level of high-frequency radiation, except for the creation of maxima due to constructive interference. On the other hand, an increase in the maximum rate of slip on the fault leads to highly amplified high frequencies, in accordance with the prediction on the basis of a simple point-source treatment of the fault. Hence, computations show that the temporal rate of slip, not the spatial heterogeneity on faults, is the predominant factor forming the high-frequency radiation and thus controlling the velocity and acceleration of the resulting ground motions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  • Aki K, Richards PG (1980) Quantitative Seismology, W. H. Freeman and Company

  • Anderson JG, Richards PG (1975) Comparison of strong ground motion from several dislocation models. Geophys J R Astron Soc 42:347–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beresnev IA (2001) What we can and cannot learn about earthquake sources from the spectra of seismic waves. Bull Seism Soc Am 91:397--400

  • Beresnev IA (2003) Uncertainties in finite-fault slip inversions: to what extent to believe? (a critical review). Bull Seism Soc Am 93:2445–2458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beresnev IA (2017) Simulation of near-fault high-frequency ground motions from the representation theorem (in review)

  • Beresnev IA, Atkinson GM (1997) Modeling finite-fault radiation from the ω n spectrum. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 93, 67–84

  • Beresnev IA, Atkinson GM (1998) Stochastic finite-fault modeling of ground motions from the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake. I. Validation on rock sites. Bull Seism Soc Am 88:1392–1401

    Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM, Joyner WB (1978) The influence of rupture incoherence on seismic directivity. Bull Seism Soc Am 68:283–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunham EM, Belanger D, Cong L, Kozdon JE (2011) Earthquake ruptures with strongly rate-weakening friction and off-fault plasticity, part 2: Nonplanar faults. Bull Seism Soc Am 101:2308–2322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haskell NA (1964) Total energy and energy spectral density of elastic wave radiation from propagating faults. Bull Seism Soc Am 54:1811–1841

    Google Scholar 

  • Kame N, Uchida K (2008) Seismic radiation from dynamic coalescence, and the reconstruction of dynamic source parameters on a planar fault. Geophys J Int 174:696–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madariaga R (1977) High-frequency radiation from crack (stress drop) models of earthquake faulting. Geophys J R Astron Soc 51:625–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madariaga R (1983) High frequency radiation from dynamic earthquake fault models. Ann Geophys 1:17–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohnaka M (1973) A physical understanding of the earthquake source mechanism. J Phys Earth 21:39–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi Z, Day SM (2013) Rupture dynamics and ground motion from 3-D rough-fault simulations. J Geophys Res 118:1122–1141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somerville P, Irikura K, Graves R, Sawada S, Wald D, Abrahamson N, Iwasaki Y, Kagawa T, Smith N, Kowada A (1999) Characterizing crustal earthquake slip models for the prediction of strong ground motion. Seism Res Lett 70:59–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seism Soc Am 84:974–1002

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The paper benefited from comments and suggestions of four anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Igor A. Beresnev.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beresnev, I.A. Factors controlling high-frequency radiation from extended ruptures. J Seismol 21, 1277–1284 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-017-9660-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-017-9660-6

Keywords

Navigation