Skip to main content
Log in

Variation of human perceptiveness of earthquakes during seismic sequences

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Seismology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes the variation of the human perception of earthquakes under the peculiar condition of seismic sequence occurrence. To this aim, we chose and have analyzed four seismic sequences that reflect the most common models of seismicity occurrence in the Italian territory. Our data always refer to the epicentral area, so that the contribution of the epicentral distance to the earthquake sensitiveness is considered constant. To search for recurrent behavior of people in the perception of earthquakes, we crossed seismological data to sensitivity data coming from the archives of the Italian Civil Protection. In each sequence, we individuate a number of “indicators”, such as the rate between felt and not-felt events and the minimum magnitude for which 100% of the events are felt. Such indicators are proportional to the energy released by the sequence and can be particularly affected by the time protraction of the sequence, and/or by the different familiarity with the seismic phenomenon, and/or by the intensity of the emotional impact of a seismic crisis. The observed trends of sensitiveness show a significant variation of the people perceptivity within the sequence development. From the analysis of the dataset, one can distinguish the variation of perceptivity due to emotional factors from those due to physical factors. An important observation, which is confirmed by a statistical analysis, is that the source depth does not affect the perceptiveness of earthquakes. Finally, we find important differences between on-sequence and off-sequence human perceptiveness that are connected with the different levels of alert.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Castello B, Selvaggi G, Chiarabba C, Amato A (2005) CSI Catalogo della sismicità italiana 1981–2002, versione 1.1. INGV-CNT. http://www.ingv.it/CSI//. Cited 25 Sep 2006

  • Celsi R, Wolfinbarger M, Wald D (2005) The effects of earthquakes measurement concepts and magnitude anchoring on individuals’ perceptions of earthquake risk. Earthq Spectra 21(4):987–1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dengler LA, Dewey JW (1998) An intensity survey of households by the Northridge, California, earthquake of 17 January 1994. Bull Seismol Soc Am 88:441–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Maro R, Tertulliani A (1990) The relation between intensity and magnitude for Italian earthquakes. Pure Appl Geophys 132(4):711–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel A (1994) Implications of felt area–magnitude relations for earthquake scaling and the average frequency of perceptible ground motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84:462–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman DE, Gierke HE (1961) Effects of shock and vibration on man. In: Harris CM, Crede CE (eds) Shock and vibration handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • INGV (2002–2003) Centro Nazionale Terremoti, Centro Dati e Informazione sui Terremoti http://www.ingv.it/~roma/reti/rms/bollettino/index.php. Cited 20 Sep 2006

  • Maruyama S, Kwon Y, Morimoto K (2001) Seismic intensity and mental stress after the great Hanshin-Awaji earthquake. Environ Health Prev Med 6:165–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musson RMW (2006) On the perceptibility of earthquakes. J Seismol 10:157–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peronaci F (1939) Limite di sensibilità umana alle accelerazioni sismiche orizzontali. Pubbl Ist Naz Geofis CNR 15:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw R, Shiwaku K, Kobayashi H, Kobayashi M (2004) Linking experience, education, perception and earthquake preparedness. Disaster Prev Manag 13:39–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibol MS, Bollinger GA, Birch JB (1987) Estimation of magnitudes in Central and Eastern North America using intensity and felt area. Bull Seismol Soc Am 77(5):1635–1654

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieberg A (1930) Geologie der Erdbeben. Handbuch der Geophysic, Tabb. 2–3, Berlin, Germany

  • Slovic P (1987) Perception of risk. Science 236:280–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souriau A (2006) Quantifying felt events: a joint analysis of intensities, accelerations and dominant frequencies. J Seismol 10:23–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strack F, Mussweiler T (1997) Explaining the enigmatic anchoring effect: mechanisms of selective accessibility. J Pers Soc Psychol 73:437–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood HO, Neumann F (1931) Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale of 1931. Bull Seismol Soc Am 21:277–283

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luigi Cucci.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cucci, L., Tertulliani, A. Variation of human perceptiveness of earthquakes during seismic sequences. J Seismol 11, 205–219 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-007-9048-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-007-9048-0

Keywords

Navigation