Skip to main content
Log in

The Religious and Social Principles of Patients’ Rights in Holy Books (Avesta, Torah, Bible, and Quran) and in Traditional Medicine

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Religion and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Health protection and promotion in healthy people and restoring patients’ health have been the most important themes in medicine and health throughout our history. Therefore, discussion of different aspects of patients’ rights includes implementation of these objectives by the medical community, including physicians, nurses, pharmacists, etc., and the people in charge of health affairs. The principal objective of our research is the study of medical ideology and the approaches of our ancestors in relation to different aspects of patients’ rights. To study the different ideologies of traditional medicine in relation to patients’ rights, appropriate data were extracted from the original resources of traditional medicine and from religious books. By means of library research we studied these resources in addition to electronic versions of the Alhavi book (by Rhazes), the Kamel-al-Sanaah (by Ahvazi), the Canon of Medicine (by Avicenna), the Zakhireye Khawrazmshahi (by Jorjani), the Avesta, the Torah, the Bible, the Quran, and many other resources, and, finally, after searching, gathering, and encoding the findings, analyzed them qualitatively for thematic content. The holy Avesta book clearly insists on the competence of physicians and setting the appointment fee in accordance with peoples’ income. The Old Testament (holy Torah) warned government officials who did not observe patients’ rights. In the four gospels (holy Bible) the importance of treatment and taking care of the patient is stressed. After the emergence of Islam, medical students, before beginning the principal courses, had to study Islamic jurisprudence, ethics, logic sciences, natural sciences, geometry, astrology, calculus, and similar courses so that after purifying their soul they could enter the saintly profession of physicians. The holy Quran refers to saving the life of a human irrespective of social class, race, and religion, and insists on exemption of patients from physical activity, including the physical aspects of prayer. In these resources, some warnings are offered in relation to fake drugs, the lack of awareness of some physicians, the need for complete preparedness of medical society, and the need to manufacture appropriate drugs and offer a suitable medical service. This information is to familiarize medical and health authorities and persons receiving health services. According to the evidence available about traditional medicine, there was no specific difference between public and professional ethics, public and professional rights, or rights and ethics—ethics were no different from rights nor rights from ethics. So ethics are similar to the soul in the body of rights, and rights are similar to the litter of ethics, and they have developed in parallel with each other. Traditional medicine is community-based and preservation of the health of healthy people is given priority over the treatment of patients; there is insistence that “health rights” has wider scope than “patients’ rights”. It can be stated that health rights in Iran both before and after the emergence of Islam have been based on guidance from divine religions, observation of humanist ethics, passing suitable courses in the basic sciences, and an introduction to the practical piety of our ancestors, in addition to the syllabus of medical and health education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. “O Maker of the material world, thou Holy One! If a worshiper of Mazda want to practice the art of healing, on whom shall he first prove his skill? On worshipers of Mazda or on worshipers of the Daevas? On Zoroastrians or on idolaters. Ahura Mazda answered: On worshipers of the Daevas shall he first prove himself, rather than on worshipers of Mazda. If he treat with the knife for the third time a worshiper of the Daevas and he die, he is unfit forever and ever. 'Let him therefore never attend any worshiper of Mazda; let him never treat with the knife, nor wound him with the knife. If he shall ever treat with the knife any worshiper of Mazda, and wound him with the knife, he shall pay for his wound the penalty for willful murder. But if for the third time he treat with the knife a worshiper of the Daevas and he recover; then he is fit forever and ever. He may henceforth at his will attend worshipers of Mazda; he may at his will treat with the knife worshipers of Mazda, and heal them with the knife”.

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank the valuable guidance of Dr. Curtis Hart, Editor-in-Chief, Journal of Religion and Health. And Dr. Mahmoud Abbasi (Ph.D), head of Iranian Research Center for Ethics and Law in Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hossein Hatami.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hatami, H., Hatami, M. & Hatami, N. The Religious and Social Principles of Patients’ Rights in Holy Books (Avesta, Torah, Bible, and Quran) and in Traditional Medicine. J Relig Health 52, 223–234 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-012-9619-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-012-9619-4

Keywords

Navigation