Abstract
Deterrence theory describes a process of offender decision making that consists of two linkages—one in which official sanctions and other information affect a would-be offender’s perceptions about the risks of criminal conduct, and another in which such perceptions influence the decision whether or not to offend. Decades worth of empirical research has concentrated virtually exclusively on this latter linkage, and in so doing, has produced an incomplete account of the deterrence process. This article develops a model of how perceptions of sanction certainty are modified in response to an individual’s involvement in criminal activity and the consequences (if any) therefrom. Implications of the model are tested with data from a multi-wave, panel survey of 1,530 high school students from the southeastern U.S. Key findings include: the manner in which new information affects perceived certainty depends on the level of perceived certainty before the new information is received, and the extent of peer offending was one of the most influential factors in determining change in perceived sanction certainty over time.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R. Akers (1998) Social Learning and Social Structure: A General Theory of Crime and Deviance Northeastern University Press Boston
J. Andenaes (1974) Punishment and Deterrence University of Michigan Press Ann Arbor
Beccaria, C. (1963). On Crimes and Punishments (H. Paolucci, Trans). Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill. (Original work published 1764)
M. Block V. Gerety (1995) ArticleTitleSome experimental evidence on differences between student and prisoner reactions to monetary penalties and risk J. Legal Stud. 24 123–138
G.S. Bridges J. A. Stone (1986) ArticleTitleEffects of criminal punishment on perceived threat of punishment: Toward an understanding of specific deterrence J. Res. Crime Delinq. 23 207–239
H. Cameron (1964) The Booster and the Snitch: Department Store Shoplifting Free Press New York, NY
S. H. Decker R. T. Wright (1994) Burglars on the Job: Streetlife and Residential Break-ins Northeastern University Press Boston
M. Geerken W. Gove (1975) ArticleTitleDeterrence: Some theoretical considerations Law soc. 9 497–513
J. P. Gibbs (1975) Crime, Punishment, and Deterrence Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co, Amsterdam The Netherlands
H. Grasmick R. J. Bursik SuffixJr. (1990) ArticleTitleConscience, significant others, and rational choice: Extending the deterrence model Law Soc. Rev. 24 837–861
R. Homel (1988) Policing and Punishing the Drinking Driver: A Study of General and Specific Deterrence Springer-Verlag New York
J. Horney I. H. Marshall (1992) ArticleTitleRisk perceptions among serious offenders: The role of crime and punishment Criminology 30 575–592
Lochner, L. (2003). Individual Perceptions of the Criminal Justice System. Nat. Bureau Econ. Res., working paper # 9474.
D. Matza (1964) Delinquency and Drift Wiley New York
S. L. Miller L. Iovanni (1994) ArticleTitleDeterminants of perceived risk of formal sanction for courtship violence Justice Quarterly 11 281–312
W. W. Minor J. P. Harry (1982) ArticleTitleDeterrent and experiential effects in perceptual deterrence research: A replication and extension J. Res. Crime Delinq. 19 190–203
D. Nagin (1998) Criminal deterrence research at the outset of the twenty-first century M. Tonry (Eds) Crime and Justice: A Rev. of Research, Vol. 23 University of Chicago Press Chicago
J. Parker H. Grasmick (1979) ArticleTitleLinking actual and perceived certainty of punishment Criminology 17 366–379
R. Paternoster (1989) ArticleTitleAbsolute and restrictive deterrence in a panel of youth: explaining the onset, persistence/desistance, and frequency of delinquent offending Social Problems 36 289–309
R. Paternoster (1987) ArticleTitleThe deterrent effect of the perceived certainty and severity of punishment: A review of the evidence and issues Justice Quarterly 4 173–217
R. Paternoster L. E. Saltzman G. P. Waldo T. G. Chiricos (1985) ArticleTitleAssessment of risk and behavioral experience: an exploratory study of change Criminology 23 417–433
R. Paternoster A. R. Piquero (1995) ArticleTitleReconceptualizing deterrence: An empirical test of personal and vicarious experiences J. Res. Crime Delinq. 32 251–286
I. Pilliavin C. Thornton R. Gartner R. Matsueda (1986) ArticleTitleCrime, deterrence, and rational choice Am. Sociol. Rev. 51 101–119
A. R. Piquero R. Paternoster (1998) ArticleTitleAn application of Stafford and Warr’s reconceptualization of deterrence to drinking and driving J. Res. Crime Delinq. 35 3–39
A.R. Piquero G. Pogarsky (2002) ArticleTitleBeyond Stafford and Warr’s reconceptualization of deterrence: Personal and vicarious experiences, impulsivity, and offending behavior J. Res. Crime Delinq. 39 153–186
G. Pogarsky (2002) ArticleTitleIdentifying deterrable offenders: Implications for research on deterrence Justice Quarterly 19 701–720
G. Pogarsky A. R. Piquero (2003) ArticleTitleCan punishment encourage offending? Investigating the “resetting” effect J. Res. Crime Delinq. 40 92–117
L. E. Saltzman R. Paternoster G. P. Waldo T. G. Chiricos (1982) ArticleTitleDeterrent and experiential effects: the problem of causal order in perceptual deterrence research J. Res. Crime Delinq. 19 172–189
M. Scheider (2001) ArticleTitleDeterrence and the base rate fallacy: An examination of perceived certainty Justice Quarterly 18 63–86
N. Shover (1996) Great Pretenders: Pursuits and Careers of Persistent Thieves Westview Press Boulder, CO
M. Stafford M. Warr (1993) ArticleTitleA reconceptualization of general and specific deterrence J. Res. Crime Delinq. 30 123–135
C. R. Tittle (1980) Sanctions and Social Deviance Praeger New York
B. R. E. Wright A. Caspi T. E. Moffitt R. Paternoster (2004) ArticleTitleDoes the perceived risk of punishment deter criminally-prone individuals? Rational choice, self-control, and crime J. Res. Crime Delinq. 41 180–213
F. E. Zimring G. J. Hawkins (1973) Deterrence: The Legal Threat In Crime Control University of Chicago Chicago
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pogarsky, G., Piquero, A.R. & Paternoster, R. Modeling Change in Perceptions about Sanction Threats: The Neglected Linkage in Deterrence Theory. J Quant Criminol 20, 343–369 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-004-5868-z
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-004-5868-z