Abstract
Owing to the limitations of linguistic modes to portray aptly L2 learners’ metaphors of language learning experience, growing attention has been paid to taking advantage of other modes like visual ones to ameliorate this concern. Hence, the present study sought to explore images and metaphors Iranian EFL learners may have in mind about the essence of English language as a foreign learning. To this end, Iranian EFL learners’ verbal and non-verbal forms of metaphorical depiction were examined. One intact class, including intermediate male and female learners (n = 11) at a non-profit language institute was selected randomly. The data were collected through both verbal (a single-item questionnaire) and non-verbal (drawings) tools. The learners’ drawings and written descriptions were examined so as to both tap into their mental representations of what ‘English learning’ means to them and get closer insights into the learners’ belief system. The study’s conceptual framework was mainly built on Oxford et al.’s (System 26:3–50, 1998) perspectives on education and Vygotsky’s (Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes, Harvard University Press, 1978) Socio-cultural theory (SCT) of learning. The multimodal analysis of the metaphors evidenced that the learners’ verbal and visual metaphorical representations shared the common perspectives towards English learning. Additionally, the extracted metaphorical concepts disclosed the learners’ positive attitudes, enthusiasm, and desire for English learning. Results unveiled that most of the visual and verbal metaphorical depictions portray language learning as a joyful, dynamic and discovery individual process. The study ends with presenting some implications and offering some avenues for further research.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Adami, E., & Kress, G. (2014). Introduction: Multimodality, meaning making, and the issue of “text.” Text and Talk, 34(3), 231–237. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2014-0007
Ahkemoglu, H. (2011). A Study on Metaphorical Perceptions of EFL Learners Regarding Foreign Language Teacher. Master Thesis, Unpublished. Adana: University of Cukurova .
Akbari, M. (2013). Metaphors about EFL teachers’ roles: A case of Iranian non-English-major students. International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies (IJ-ELTS), 1(2), 1–14.
Alizadeh, I. (2018). Exploring language learners’ perception of the effectiveness of an English Language Teaching (ELT) program in Iran. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1553652
Anderson, C. (1984). Peirce on metaphor. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 20(4), 453–468.
Askarzadeh Torghabeh, R., Elahi, M., & Khanalipour, S. (2009). Examining Iranian EFL learners’ and teachers’ beliefs about teachers through metaphor analysis. The Iranian EFL Journal, 5, 115–138.
Assadi Aidinlou, N., Farjami, F., & Rezaee Javidan, A. (2014). Iranian high school students’ beliefs about language learners: A qualitative study. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(3–1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020301.13
Baleghizadeh, S., & Karamzade, T. (2017). Iranian EFL learners’ perceptions of various language activities in an ideal English class. MEXTESOL Journal, 14(1), 1–15.
Bessette, H., & Paris, N. (2020). Using visual and textual metaphors to explore teachers’ professional roles and identities. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 43(2), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2019.1611759
Birdsell, B. J. (2017). The role of images in ELT (English Language Teaching) textbooks: A case for visual metaphors. Hirosaki University Journal of Liberal Arts Development and Practices, 1, 9–18.
Block, D. (1992). Metaphors we teach and learn by. Prospect, 7(3), 42–55.
Boers, F. (2013). Cognitive Linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary: Assessment and integration. Language Teaching, 46(2), 208–224. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000450
Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (2008). From empirical findings to pedagogical practice. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp. 375–394). De Gruyter Mouton.
Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (2012). Experimental and intervention studies on formulaic sequences in a second language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 83–110. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190512000050
Cameron, L., & Maslen, R. (2010). Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities. Equinox.
Cameron, L., & Low, G. (1999). Metaphor. Language Teaching, 33, 77–96.
Chandler, D. (2007). Semiotics: The basics. Routledge.
Dickmeyer, N. (1989). Metaphor, model, and theory in education research. Teachers College Record, 9(2), 151–160.
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2008a). Learner beliefs and language learning. Asian EFL Journal, 10(4), 7–25.
Ellis, R. (2008b). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
Erarslan, A., & Asmali, M. (2017). From students’ perspectives: EFL learners’ metaphors about English instructors in Turkey. Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(2), 419–442. https://doi.org/10.19171/uefad.368844
Even, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh University Press.
Fang, S. U. (2015). College EFL learners' metaphorical perceptions of English learning. Journal of Asia TEFL, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2015.12.3.3.61.
Farías, M., & Veliz, L. (2016). EFL students’ metaphorical conceptualizations of language learning. Trabalhos em Lingüística Aplicada, 55(3), 833e850. https://doi.org/10.1590/010318135146185751.
Farías, M., & Véliz, L. (2019). Multimodal texts in Chilean English teaching education: Experiences from educators and pre-service teachers. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 21(2), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v21n2.75172.
Farjami, H. (2012). EFL learners’ metaphors and images about foreign language learning. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching (SSLLT), 2(1), 93–109.
Fazilatfar, A., Rayati Damavandi, R., Harsij Sani, R., & Heirati, J. (2015). Learners’ belief changes about language learning. International Journal of English Language Education, 3(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijele.v3i1.6654
Forceville, C. J., & Urios-Aparisi, E. (Eds). (2009). Multimodal metaphor. Mouton De Gruyter.
Genç, G. (2017). Turkish EFL learners’ metaphorical conceptualizations of language learning. International Journal of Language Academy, 5(6), 284–285. https://doi.org/10.18033/ijla.3689
Gibbs, R. W. (2011). Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory. Discourse Processes, 48(8), 529–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2011.606103
Golfam, A., & Nahavandi, M. (2021). Using multimodal conceptual metaphors in EFL Classroom to enhance listening and speaking skills. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 13(28), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.22034/ELT.2021.46516.2404.
Hager, P. (2008). Learning and metaphors. Medical Teacher, 30, 679–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590802148899
Halliday, M. R. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of languae and meaning. University Park Press.
Iedema, R. (2003). Multimodality, resemiotization: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice. Visual Communication, 2(1), 29–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357203002001751
Ishiki, N. (2011). Trajectories of English learning: Through the use and analysis of EFL students’ metaphors. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on humanities and social sciences, 2 April, 2011 (pp. 1–11). Faculty of Liberal Arts, Prince of Songkla University.
Jensen, D. F. N. (2006). Metaphors as a bridge to understanding educational and social contexts. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 36–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500104
Jewitt, C. (2009). An Introduction to multimodality. In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (pp. 14–27). Routledge.
Khattak, Z. I., Usman, M., Khan, R., Abbasi, G., & Ahmad, A. (2011). Evaluation of the effectiveness of English language teaching in English language institutes in Mardan. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1635–1638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.344
Kheovichai, B. (2015). Metaphor in business English. Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences Studies., 15(1), 93–130.
Khoshnevisan, B. (2019). Spilling the beans on understanding English idioms using multimodality: An idiom acquisition technique for Iranian language learners. International Journal of Language, Translation and Intercultural Communication, 8, 128–143. https://doi.org/10.12681/ijltic.20281.
Kramsch, C. (2003). Metaphor and the subjective construction of beliefs. In P. Kalaja, & A. M. F. Barcelos (Eds.), Beliefs about SLA (pp. 109–128). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4751-0_5.
Krashen, S. D. (1987). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon.
Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.
Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2002). Colour as a semiotic mode: Notes for a grammar of colour. Visual Communication, 1(3), 343–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/147035720200100306
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980a). Metaphors we live by. The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980b). Conceptual metaphor in everyday language. The Journal of Philosophy, 77(8), 453–486. https://doi.org/10.2307/2025464
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. The University of Chicago Press.
Lantolf, J. P. (2006). Sociocultural theory and L2: State of the art. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 67–109. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060037
McEwan, A. E. (2007). Do metaphors matter in higher education? Journal of College and Character, 8(2), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.2202/1940-1639.1166
McGrath, I. (2006). Teachers’ and learners’ images for coursebooks. ELT Journal, 60(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci104
Munby, H. (1986). Metaphor in the thinking of teachers: An exploratory study. Curriculum Studies, 18, 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027860180209
Nam, H. J. (2010). Reflections on conceptual metaphor and pedagogical implications. Issues in EFL, 8(1), 145–162.
Oxford, R. L., Tomlinson, S., Barcelos, A., Harrington, C., Lavine, R. Z., & Saleh, A. (1998). Clashing metaphors about classroom teachers: Toward a systematic typology for the language teaching field. System, 26, 3–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00071-7
Palinkašević, R. D. (2021). English language learning from the perspective of students—Pre-service preschool teachers. Teaching Innovations, 34(1), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.5937/inovacije2101135P
Parvaresh, V. (2008). Metaphorical conceptualizations of an adult EFL learner: Where old concepts are impregnable. Novitas-ROYAL, 2(2), 154–161.
Pishghadam, R. & Pourali, S. (2011). Metaphorical analysis of Iranian MA university students’ beliefs: A qualitative study. Higher Education Studies, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v1n1p27.
Pishghadam, R., Askarzadeh Torghabe, R., & Navari, S. (2009). Metaphor analysis of teachers’ beliefs and conceptions of language teaching and learning in Iranian high schools and language institutes: A qualitative study. Iranian EFL Journal, 4, 6–40.
Pishghadam, R., Hosseini Fatemi, A., Askarzadeh Torghabeh, R., & Navari, S. (2011). Qualitative metaphor analysis and language learning opportunities. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics (IJAL), 14(1), 77–108.
Razmjoo, S. A., & Riazi, A. M. (2006). On the teaching methodology of Shiraz EFL institutes. Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities of Shiraz University, 23(1), 58–70.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Roth, W. M., & Lawless, D. (2002). Scientific investigations, metaphorical gestures, and the emergence of abstract scientific concepts. Learning and Instruction, 12(3), 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00023-8
Saban, A., Koçbeker, B. N., & Saban, A. (2006). Öğretmen adaylarının öğretmen kavramına ilişkin algılarının metafor analizi yoluyla incelenmesi [An investigation of the concept of teacher among prospective teachers through metaphor analysis]. Kuram Ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 6(2), 461–522. https://doi.org/10.26468/trakyasobed.486994
Soodmand Afshar, H., & Ghasemi, Z. (2017). EFL teachers’ beliefs and their actual classroom practices: Any difference? Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies, 9(2), 173–208. https://doi.org/10.22111/ijals.2017.3547.
Steen, J. G. (2011). The contemporary theory of metaphor - now new and improved. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 26–64. https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.9.1.03ste
Van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing social semiotics. Routledge.
Veliz, L., & Véliz-Campos, M. (2019). A socio-semiotic analysis of latino migrants’ metaphorical conceptualizations of language learning. Journal of latinos and education, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348431.2019.1630285.
Veresov, N. (2010). Introducing cultural historical theory: Main concepts and principles of genetic research methodology. Journal of Cultural-Historical Psychology, 8, 83–90.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. MIT Press.
Xiong, H., Li, L., & Qu, Y. (2015). Exploring EFL teachers’ cognitive models through metaphor analysis. SAGE Open, 5(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015608900
Zhang, X. (2016). Examining English language teachers through metaphorical analysis. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(8), 1659–1664. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0608.20.
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This study was approved by the Ethical Board of Iranian English language Institutions.
Consent to participate
All participants provided written informed consent and they were fully understood the study purpose.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, L., Naserpour, A., Rezai, A. et al. Exploring EFL Learners’ Metaphorical Conceptions of Language Learning: A Multimodal Analysis. J Psycholinguist Res 51, 323–339 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-022-09842-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-022-09842-2