Abstract
The present research aimed to investigate how field-dependent and field-independent learners perceived and processed information when they were engaged in an implicit foreign language learning task and to explore differences between them in this regard. The majority of studies in the pertinent literature have adopted quantitative methods to date. The present study, however, employed three qualitative data collection techniques, namely retrospective think-aloud method, tests of episodic memory and interviews, to gain a better understanding of field-dependent and field- independent learners’ strategies and performance in different stages of information processing. Twelve Iranian field-independent and field-dependent intermediate language learners participated in this study. The results showed that the field-independent learners were more efficient in directing their attentional resources in the sensory-memory stage and encoding and storing new information in their working memory. Hence, they recalled and retrieved the information from their short- and long-term memory more efficiently. Some educational implications are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abraham, R. G. (1985). Field independence/dependence and the teaching of grammar. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 689–702. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586671.
Adegoke, B. A. (2011). Effect of indirect teacher influence on dependent-prone students' learning outcomes in secondary school mathematics. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 9(1), 283–308. https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v9i23.1438.
Akbari, R., Jafar, S. R., & Asadi, A. (2006). Who can guess better? The relationship between word class and learners’ style. Teaching English Language and Literature Society of Iran, 1(1), 1–2.
Altun, A., & Cakan, M. (2006). Undergraduate students’ academic achievement, field dependent/independent cognitive styles and attitude toward computers. Educational Technology and Society, 9(1), 289–297.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C., & Razavieh, A. (2010). Introduction to research in education. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning.
Boers, F., Demecheleer, M., He, L., Deconinck, J., Stengers, H., & Eyckmans, J. (2017). Typographic enhancement of multiword units in second language text. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 448–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12141.
Carter, E. F. (1988). The relationship of field dependent/independent cognitive style to Spanish language achievement and proficiency: A preliminary report. The Modern Language Journal, 72(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1988.tb04163.x.
Cassidy, S. (2004). Learning styles: An overview of theories, models, and measures. Educational Psychology, 24(4), 419–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341042000228834.
Chapelle, C. A., & Heift, T. (2009). Individual learner differences in CALL: The field independence/dependence (FID) construct. CALICO Journal, 26(2), 246–266. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v26i2.246-266.
Chapelle, C., & Roberts, C. (1986). Ambiguity tolerance and field independence as predictors of proficiency in English as a second language. Language Learning, 36(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1986.tb00367.x.
Chen, S. Y., & Macredie, R. D. (2002). Cognitive styles and hypermedia navigation: Development of a learning model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10023.
Corno, L. (2008). On teaching adaptively. Educational Psychologist, 43, 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520802178466.
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 11, 671–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5371(72)80001-x.
Dabaghi, A., & Goharimehr, N. (2011). The relationship between learning styles of field-dependence/independence and integrative/discrete point methods of grammar teaching. World Journal of English Language, 1(2), p79. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v1n2p79.
Davis, J. K., & Cochran, K. F. (1982). Toward an information processing analysis of field-independence. In: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
Davis, J. K., & Cochran, K. F. (1989). An information processing view of field dependence-independence. Early Child Development and Care, 43, 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/0300443890430110.
Dawson-Brew, E. (2010). The relative effect of field dependent and field independent learning styles on the academic performance of undergraduate students of the University of Cape Coast, Ghana. Retrieved November 25 2017, from https://www.faqs.org/periodicals/201009/2087472301.html
Durrant, P., & Schmitt, N. (2010). Adult learners’ retention of collocations from exposure. Second Language Research, 26(2), 163–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658309349431.
Dyer, J. E., & Osborne, E. W. (1996). Effects of teaching approach on achievement of agricultural education students with varying learning style. Journal of Agricultural Education, 3, 43–51. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.1996.03043.
Ghonsooly, B., & Eghtesadee, A. R. (2006). Role of cognitive style of field-dependence/independence in using metacognitive and cognitive reading strategies by a group of skilled and novice Iranian students of English literature. The Asian EFL Journal, 8(4), 119–150.
Goodenough, D. R. (1976). The role of individual differences in field dependence as a factor in learning and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 83(4), 675–694. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.83.4.675.
Griffiths, R., & Sheen, R. (1992). Disembedded figures in the landscape: A reappraisal of L2 research on field dependence/independence. Applied Linguistics, 13, 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/13.2.133.
Guisande, M. A., Páramo, M. F., Tinajero, C., & Almeida, L. S. (2007). Field dependence-independence (FDI) cognitive style: An analysis of attentional functioning. Psicothema, 19(4), 572–577.
Hansen, J., & Stansfield, C. (1981). The Relationship of field dependent-independent cognitive styles to foreign language achievement. Language Learning, 31(2), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1981.tb01389.x.
Hernández, T. A. (2018). Input flooding. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0073.
Hill, J. (2000). Revising priorities: From grammatical failure to collocational success. In M. Lewis (Ed.), Teaching collocations: Further developments in the lexical approach (pp. 47–69). Hove: Language Teaching Publications.
Huang, J., & Chao, L. (2000). Field dependence versus field independence of students with and without learning disabilities. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 90(1), 343–346. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.2000.90.1.343.
Jia, S., Zhang, Q., & Li, S. (2014). Field dependence–independence modulates the efficiency of filtering out irrelevant information in a visual working memory task. Neuroscience, 278, 136–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.07.075.
Johnson, J., Prior, S., & Artuso, M. (2000). Field dependence as a factor in second language communicative production. Language Learning, 50(3), 529–567. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00137.
Jonassen, D. H., & Grabowski, B. (1993). Individual differences and instruction. New York: Allen & Bacon.
Jonassen, D. H., & Grabowski, B. L. (2012). Handbook of individual differences, learning, and instruction. New York: Routledge.
Jones, S. (1993). Cognitive learning styles: Does awareness help? A review of selected literature. Language Awareness, 2(4), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.1993.9959834.
Krueger, R. A. (1994). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Lang, A. (1995). Defining audio/video redundancy from a limited-capacity information processing perspective. Communication Research, 22(1), 86–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365095022001004.
Lewis, M. (1993). The lexical approach. Hove: Language Teaching Publications.
Lewis, M. (2000). Language in the lexical approach. In M. Lewis (Ed.), Teaching collocation: Further developments in the lexical approach (pp. 155–184). London: Language Teaching Publications.
Liu, M., & Reed, W. M. (1995). The relationship between the learning strategies and learning styles in a hypermedia environment. Computers in Human Behaviour, 10(4), 419–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/0747-5632(94)90038-8.
Mancy, R., & Reid, N. (2004). Aspects of cognitive style and programming. In Proceedings of the sixteenth annual workshop of the psychology of programming interest group (pp. 1–9).
Nesselhaulf, N. (2003). The use of collocations by advanced learners of English and some implications for teaching. Applied Linguistics, 24(2), 223–242. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.2.223.
Niroomand, S. M., & Rostampour, M. (2014). The impact of field dependence/independence cognitive styles and gender differences on lexical knowledge: the case of Iranian academic EFL learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(10), 2173–2179. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.4.10.2173-2179.
Öztina, S. (2009). Effects of input flood and negative evidence on learning of make/do collocations: A study with seventh grade Turkish EFL students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Anadolu University Institute of Educational Sciences, Eskisehir, Turkey.
Pithers, R. T. (2002). Cognitive learning style: a review of the field dependent field independent approach. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 54(1), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820200200191.
Pulido, D. (2004). The relationship between text comprehension and second language incidental vocabulary acquisition: A matter of topic familiarity? Language Learning, 54(3), 469–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00415.x.
Rajagopalan, J., Modi, S., Kumar, P., Khushu, S., & Mandal, M. K. (2015). Differential neural activation for camouflage detection task in field-independent and field-dependent individuals: Evidence from fMRI. Journal of Biosciences, 40(5), 909–919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-015-9568-7.
Rashtchi, M., & Yousefi, L. M. (2017). Reading input flooding versus listening input flooding: Can they boost speaking skill? Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 5(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1515/jolace-2017-0003.
Rassaei and Karbor. (2012). The effects of three types of attention drawing techniques on the acquisition of English collocations. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 1, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsll.2012.117.
Rassaei, E. (2015). Recasts, field dependence/independence cognitive style, and L2 development. Language Teaching Research, 19(4), 499–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814541713.
Raven, M. R., Cano, J., Garton, B. L., & Shelhamer, V. (1993). A comparison of learning styles, teaching styles, and personality types of preservice Montana and Ohio agriculture teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 34(2), 40–49.
Saracho, O. (2003). Matching teachers' and students' cognitive styles. Early Child Development and Care, 173(2–3), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430303097.
Scardamalia, M. (1977). Information processing capacity and the problem of horizontal decalage: A demonstration using combinatorial reasoning tasks. Child Development, 48(1), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.2307/1128877.
Shan, L., & Niannian, Z. (2006). The influence of cognitive style and reading strategies on English reading: an empirical study. CELEA Journal, 29(3), 56–63.
Spiro, R. J., & Tirre, W. C. (1980). Individual differences in schema utilization during discourse processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(2), 204–208. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.72.2.204.
Stansfield, C., & Hansen, J. (1983). Field Dependence-Independence as a variable in second language cloze test performance. TESOL Quarterly, 17(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586422.
Szudarski, P., & Carter, R. (2016). The role of input flood and input enhancement in EFL learners' acquisition of collocations. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 26(2), 245–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12092.
Tang, J. (2009). Cognitive style has an effect on learning strategy. Journal of Hubei Radio and Television University., 29(2), 129–130.
Tinajero, C., Castelo, A., Guisande, A., & Páramo, F. (2011). Adaptive teaching and field dependence-independence: Instructional implications. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 43(3), 497–510.
Tinajero, C., Lemos, S. M., Araújo, M., Ferraces, M. J., & Páramo, M. F. (2012). Cognitive style and learning strategies as factors which affect academic achievement of Brazilian university students. Psicologia, 25(1), 105–113.
Tinajero, C., & Páramo, M. F. (1997). Field dependence-independence and academic achievement: a re-examination of their relationship. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(2), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1997.tb01237.x.
Tinajero, C., & Páramo, M. F. (1998). Field dependence-independence cognitive style and academic achievement: A review of research and theory. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 13(2), 227–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03173091.
Van Den Haak, M., De Jong, M., & Jan Schellens, P. (2003). Retrospective vs. concurrent think-aloud protocols: testing the usability of an online library catalogue. Behaviour and Information Technology, 22(5), 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/0044929031000.
Wang, P. (2012). Teaching and learning English verb tenses in a Taiwanese University. English Linguistics Research, 1(1), p18. https://doi.org/10.5430/elr.v1n1p18.
Witkin, H. A., & Goodenough, D. R. (1981). Cognitive styles: Essence and origins. New York: International Universities Press.
Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field dependent and field independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47, 1–64. https://doi.org/10.2307/1169967.
Witkin, H. A., Oltman, P. K., Raskin, E., & Karp, S. A. (1971). A manual for the embedded figures test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.
Wooldridge, B., & Haimes-Bartolf, M. (2006). The field dependence/field independence learning styles: Implications for adult student diversity, outcomes assessment and accountability. Learning styles and learning, 237–257.
Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Wyss, R. (2002). Field independent/dependent learning styles and L2 acquisition. Journal of ELT, 49, 125–128.
Yousefi, M. (2011). Cognitive style and EFL learners’ listening comprehension ability. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics IJAL, 1(1), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v1i1.100.
Zhang, L. F., & Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of intellectual styles. Mahwah, New Jersey, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Zhou, J., Zhou, C., Li, J., & Zhang, M. (2015). Cognitive style modulates conscious but not unconscious thought: Comparing the deliberation-without-attention effect in analytics and wholists. Consciousness and Cognition, 36, 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.05.018.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (The Education and Research Committee of Abadan Faculty of Petroleum Engineering + reference number: 9731646) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mahvelati, E.H. Field-Dependent/Field-Independent Learners’ Information Processing Behavior in an Implicit Learning Task: Evidence from Iranian EFL Learners. J Psycholinguist Res 49, 955–973 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09712-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09712-9