Skip to main content
Log in

Computational Models of the Representation of Bangla Compound Words in the Mental Lexicon

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we aim to model the organization and processing of Bangla compound words in the mental lexicon. Our objective is to determine whether the mental lexicon access a Bangla compound word as a whole or decomposes the whole word into its constituent morphemes and then recognize them accordingly. To address this issue, we adopted two different strategies. First, we conduct a cross-modal priming experiment over a number of native speakers. Analysis of reaction time (RT) and error rates indicates that in general, Bangla compound words are accessed via partial decomposition process. That is some word follows full-listing mode of representation and some words follow the decomposition route of representation. Next, based on the collected RT data we have developed a computational model that can explain the processing phenomena of the access and representation of Bangla compound words. In order to achieve this, we first explored the individual roles of head word position, morphological complexity, orthographic transparency and semantic compositionality between the constituents and the whole compound word. Accordingly, we have developed a complexity based model by combining these features together. To a large extent we have successfully explained the possible processing phenomena of most of the Bangla compound words. Our proposed model shows an accuracy of around 83 %.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The corpus is collected from www.nltr.org.

  2. pAna also means “get” or “achieve” (2nd person, honorific, simple present) and “beetle leaf”; chhADA also means “to leave”, “to release” and “to start”.

References

  • Ambati, B., Dulam, G. R., Husain, S., & Indurkhya, B. (2009). Effect of jumbling the order of letters in a word on reading ability for Indian languages: An eye-tracking study. In N. A. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31th annual conference of the cognitive science society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.

  • Andrews, S. (1986). Morphological influence on lexical access: Lexical or non-lexical effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 726–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentin, S., & Feldman, L. B. (1990). The contribution of morphological and semantic relatedness to repetition priming at short and long lags: Evidence from Hebrew. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42, 693–711.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bodner, G. E., & Masson, M. E. J. (1997). Masked repetition priming of words and nonwords: Evidence for a nonlexical basis for priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 268–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, D. (1980). Lexical representation of derivational relation. In Juncture (pp. 37–55). Saratoga, CA: Anma Libri.

  • Butterworth, B. (1983). Lexical representation, language production (Vol. 2). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., & Romani, C. (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 28, 297–332.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drews, E., & Zwitserlood, P. (1995). Morphological and orthographic similarity in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1098–1116.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fabb, N. (1984). Syntactic affixation. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, MIT.

  • Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 680–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R., Forster, K. I., & Deutsch, A. (1997). What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 829–856.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grainger, J., Cole, P., & Segui, J. (1991). Masked morphological priming in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 370–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarema, G., Busson, C., Nikolova, R., Tsapkini, K., & Libben, G. (1999). Processing compounds: A cross-linguistic study. Brain and Language, 68(1), 362–369.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Juhasz, B. J., Starr, M. S., Inhoff, A. W., & Placke, L. (2003). The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: Evidence from naming, lexical decisions and eye fixations. British Journal of Psychology, 94(2), 223–244.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Katamba, F. (1993). Morphology. London: The Macmillan Press Ltd.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuperman, V., Bertram, R., & Baayen, R.H. (2008). Morphological dynamics in compound processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23 (7–8), 1089–1132.

  • Libben, G. (1998). Semantic transparency in the processing of compounds: Consequences for representation, processing, and impairment. Brain and Language, 61(1), 30–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lieber, R. (1983). Argument linking and compounding in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 14(2), 251–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieber, R., & Baayen, H. (1993). Verbal prefixes in Dutch: A study in lexical conceptual structure. In Yearbook of Morphology 1993 (pp. 51–78). Springer, Berlin.

  • MacKay, D. G. (1978). Derivational rules and the internal lexicon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 61–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marelli, M., Crepaldi, D., & Luzzatti, C. (2009). Head position and the mental representation of nominal compounds a constituent priming study in Italian. The Mental Lexicon, 4(3), 430–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (1997). Dissociating types of mental computation. Nature, 387, 592–594.

  • Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (1998). Rules, representations, and the English past tense. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 428–435.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Zhou, X. (1999). Abstractness, allomorphy, and lexical architecture. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 321–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milin, P., Kuperman, V., Kostic, A., & Baayen, R. H. (2009). Paradigms bit by bit: An information theoretic approach to the processing of paradigmatic structure in inflection and derivation. Analogy in Grammar: Form and Acquisition, 214–252.

  • Pulvermüller, F. (2002). The Neuroscience of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, P. S. (1997). Bengali language handbook. Kolkata: Bangla Akademi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeper, T., & Siegel, M. E. A. (1978). A lexical transformation for verbal compound. Linguistic Inquiry., 9(2), 199–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, P. (1998). Bangla rupatattver bhumika. Bahubacan, 1(1), 81–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, P., & Basu, G. (1994). Bhasa-jijnasa. Kolkata: Vidyasagar Pustak Mandir.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selkirk, E. O. (1983). The Syntax of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S. (1993). Bhasar Itivritta. Kolkata: Ananda Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S., & Sen, S. K. (1994). Bangalir Bhasa. Kolkata: Bangla Akademi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spoart, R. (1985). On deriving the Lexicon. Ph.D. dissertation.

  • Stolz, J. A., & Feldman, L. B. (1995). The role of orthographic and semantic transparency of the base morpheme in morphological processing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M. (1988). A morphological decomposition model of lexical access. Linguistics, 26, 657–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M. (2004). Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 745–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M., & Ardasinski, S. (2006). Obligatory decomposition in reading prefixed words. The Mental Lexicon, 1(2), 183–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefix words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 638–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E., Schacter D. L., & Heather A. (1982). Priming effects in word fragment completion are independent of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 8(4), 336–342.

  • Van Zandt, T.(2002). Analysis of response time distributions. In J. Wixted & H. Pashler (Eds.), Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology. New York: Wiley.

  • Van Zandt, T.(2002). Analysis of response time distributions. In J. Wixted & H. Pashler (Eds.), Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology. New York: Wiley.

  • Williams, E. (1981). On the notions “lexically related” and “head of a word”. Linguistic Inquiry, 12(2), 245–274.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tirthankar Dasgupta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dasgupta, T., Sinha, M. & Basu, A. Computational Models of the Representation of Bangla Compound Words in the Mental Lexicon. J Psycholinguist Res 45, 833–855 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-015-9367-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-015-9367-1

Keywords

Navigation