Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analysis of a Chinese Phonetic Compound Database: Implications for Orthographic Processing

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The complexity of Chinese orthography has hindered the progress of research in Chinese to the same level of sophistication of that in alphabetic languages such as English. Also, there has been no publicly available resource concerning the decomposition of Chinese characters, which is essential in any attempt to model the cognitive processes of Chinese character recognition. Here we report our construction and analysis of a Chinese lexical database containing the most frequent phonetic compounds decomposed into semantic and phonetic radicals according to Chinese etymology. Each radical was further decomposed into basic stroke patterns according to a Chinese transcription system, Cangjie (Chu, 1979 Laboratory of chu Bong-Foo Retrieved August 25, 2004, from http://www.cbflabs.com/). Other information such as pronunciation and character frequency were also incorporated. We examine the distribution of different types of character, the information skew in phonetic compounds, the relations between subcharacter orthographic units and the pronunciation of the entire character, and the processing implications of these phenomena in terms of universal psycholinguistic principles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chen J.Y., Chen T.M., Dell G.S. (2002). Word-form encoding in Mandarin Chinese as assessed by the implicit priming task. Journal of Memory and Language 46:751–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen M.J., Young Y.F. (1989). Reading Chinese: A holistic or piecemeal process?. In: Bennett a.F., McConkey K.M. (eds) Cognition in Individual and social Contexts. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y.P., Allport D.A., Marshall J.C. (1996). What are the functional orthographic units in Chinese word recognition: the stroke or the stroke pattern? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology 49:1024–1043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen M.H., Chater N. (2001). Connectionist psycholinguistics: Capturing the empirical data. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5:82–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, B. (1979). Laboratory of Chu Bong-Foo. Retrieved Aug. 25, 2004, from http://www.cbflabs.com.

  • Collins A.F., Ellis A.W. (1992). Phonological priming of lexical retrieval in speech production. British Journal of Psychology 83:375–388

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cutler A. (1986). “Forbear” is a homophone: Lexical prosody does not constrain lexical access. Language and Speech 29:201–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler A., Chen H.C. (1997). Lexical tone in Cantonese spoken-word processing. Perception & Psychophysics 59:165–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumay N., Benraiss A., Barriol B., Colin C., Radeau M., Besson M. (2001). Behavioral and electrophysiological study of phonological priming between bisyllabic spoken words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 13:121–143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman L.B., Siok W.W.T. (1999). Semantic radicals in phonetic compounds: implications for visual character recognition in Chinese. In: Wang J., Inhoff A., Chen H. (eds) Reading chinese script. Erlbaum, London, pp. 19–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Fendrich R., Gazzaniga M.S. (1989). Evidence of foveal splitting in a commissurotomy patient. Neuropsychologia 34:637–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fendrich R., Wessinger C.M., Gazzaniga M.S. (1996). Nasotemporal overlap at the retinal vertical meridian–Investigations with a callosotomy patient. Neuropsychologia 34:637–646

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harbaugh, R. (1996). Chinese characters and culture. Retrieved Aug. 25, 2004, from http://www. zhongwen.com/.

  • Hoosain R. (1991). Psycholinguistic implications for linguistic relativity: a case study of Chinese. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Houghton G., Glasspool D., Shallice T. (1994). Spelling and serial recall: insights from a competitive queuing model. In: Brown G.D.A., Ellis N.C. (eds) Handbook of spelling: theory, process and intervention. John Wiley, Chichester, UK, pp. 365–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, J. H., & Shillcock, R. (2004). Connectionist modelling of Chinese character pronunciation based on foveal splitting. In Proceedings of the Twenty Sixth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Hsiao, J. H., & Shillcock, R. (2005). Differences of split and non-split architectures emerged from modelling Chinese character pronunciation. In Proceedings of the Twenty Seventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Huang, S. K. (1995). Frequency counts of BIG-5 Chinese characters appeared on Usenet newsgroups during 1993–1994. Retrieved March 16, 2004, from http://www.geocities.com/hao510/charfreq/.

  • Huang Z., Hu J.Z. (1990). The comprehensive study of chinese words. Middle China Normal University Press, Wu Han

    Google Scholar 

  • Hue C.W. (1992). Recognition processes in character naming. In: Chen H.C., Tzeng O.J.L. (eds) Language processing in chinese. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 93–107

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y., Kang J.S. (1993). Analysis of phonetics of the ideophonetic characters in Modern Chinese. In: Chen Y. (eds) Information analysis of usage of characters in modern Chinese. Shanghai Education Publisher, Shanghai, pp. 84–98 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu I.M., Wu J.T., Chou T.L. (1996). Encoding operation and transcoding as the major loci of the frequency effect. Cognition 59:149–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mandarin Promotion Council, Ministry of Education, R.O.C. (2000). Dictionary of Chinese Variants. Retrieved Sept. 25th, 2004, from http://140.111.1.40/.

  • Marcus G.F. (1996). Why do children say “breaked”? Current Directions in Psychological Science 5:81–85

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland J.L., Rumelhart D.E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part I An account of basic findings. Psychological Review 88:375–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monsell S., Hirsh K.W. (1998). Competitor priming in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 24:1495–1520

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris D.G., McQueen J.M., Cutler A. (2002). Bias effects in facilitatory phonological priming. Memory & Cognition 30:399–411

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Regan J.K. (1990). Eye movements and reading. In: Kowler E. (eds) Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 395–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti C.A., Tan L.H. (1999). The constituency model of Chinese word identification. In: Wang J., Inhoff A., Chen H. (eds) Reading chinese script. Erlbaum, London, pp. 115–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti C.A., Zhang S. (1991). Phonological processes in reading Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 17:633–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti C.A., Zhang S. (1995). Very early phonological activation in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21:24–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plaut D.C., McClelland J.L., Seidenberg M.S., Patterson K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review 103:56–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Radeau M., Morais J., Segui J. (1995). Phonological priming between monosyllabic spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21:1297–1311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Repp B.H., Lin H. (1990). Integration of segmental and tonal information in speech perception: a cross-linguistic study. Journal of Phonetics 18:481–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidenberg M.S. (1985). The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems. Cognition 19:1–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shillcock R., Ellison T.M., Monaghan P. (2000). Eye-fixation behavior, lexical storage, and visual word recognition in a split processing model. Psychological Review 107: 824–851

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shillcock, R., Kirby, S., McDonald, S., & Brew, C. (submitted). Exploring systematicity in the mental lexicon.

  • Shillcock R.C., Monaghan P. (2001). The computational exploration of visual word recognition in a split model. Neural Computation 13:1171–1198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slowiaczek L.M., McQueen J.M., Soltano E.G., Lynch M. (2000). Phonological representations in prelexical speech processing: evidence from form-based priming. Journal of Memory & Language 43:530–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sperry R.W. (1968). Apposition of visual half-fields after section of neocortical commissures. Anatomical Record 160:498–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinks J.A., Liu Y., Perfetti C.A., Tan L.H. (2000). Reading Chinese characters for meaning: the role of phonological information. Cognition 76:B1–B11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taft M., Chen H.C. (1992). Judging homophony in Chinese: the influence of tones. In: Chen H.C., Tzeng O.J.L. (eds) Language processing in Chinese. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft M., Zhu X. (1999). Positional specificity of radicals in chinese character recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 40:498–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor I., Taylor M.M. (1983). The psychology of reading. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai J.L., McConkie G.W. (2003). Where do Chinese readers send their eyes?. In: Hyona J., Radach R., Deubel H. (eds) The Mind’s eyes: cognitive and applied aspects of eye movements. North-Holland /Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp 159–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Lancker D., Fromkin V.A. (1973). Hemispheric specialization for pitch and tone: Evidence from Thai. Journal of Phonetics 1:101–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Lancker D., Fromkin V.A. (1978). Cerebral dominance for pitch contrasts in tone language speakers and in musically untrained and trained English speakers. Journal of Phonetics 6:19–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Xin Hua Dictionary. (1979). Shanghai: Shang Wu Press.

  • Xing H., Shu H., Li P. (2002). A self-organizing connectionist model of character acquisition in Chinese. In: Gray W., Schunn C. (eds) Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y. (1994). Production and perception of coarticulated tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95:2240–2253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y. (2001). Sources of tonal variations in connected speech. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 17:1–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang H.M., McConkie G.W. (1999). Reading Chinese: some basic eye movement characteristics. In: Wang J., Inhoff A., Chen H.C. (eds) Reading Chinese script: a cognitive analysis. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., pp 207–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu B.L., Cao H.Q. (1992a). A new exploration on the effect of stroke number in the identification of Chinese characters. Acta Psychologica Sinica 24:120–126 (in Chinese, with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu B.L., Cao H.Q. (1992b). The effect of the stroke-number disposition on Chinese character recognition. Psychological Science 4:5–10 (in Chinese, with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y. & Chen, T. (1716). Kangxi Dictionary (1716). Japan: Tongwen Bookstore version

  • Zhou X., Marslen-Wilson W. (1999). Sublexical processing in reading Chinese. In: Wang J., Inhoff A., Chen H. (eds) Reading chinese script. Erlbaum, London, pp. 37–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Y. G. (1978). Xiandai hanzihong shengpangde biaoyin gongneng wenti [To what degree are the “phonetics” of present-day Chinese characters still phonetic?]. Zhongguo Yuwenm, 146, 172–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zipf G.K. (1932). Selective studies and the principle of relative frequency in language. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science & Engineering, University of California San Diego, San Diego, USA

    Janet Hui-wen Hsiao

  2. School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

    Richard Shillcock

Authors
  1. Janet Hui-wen Hsiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Richard Shillcock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janet Hui-wen Hsiao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hsiao, J.Hw., Shillcock, R. Analysis of a Chinese Phonetic Compound Database: Implications for Orthographic Processing. J Psycholinguist Res 35, 405–426 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-006-9022-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-006-9022-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation