Abstract
The effect of word frequency on the processing of monomorphemic vs. inflected words was investigated in a morphologically relatively limited language, Swedish, with two participant groups: early Finnish–Swedish bilinguals and Swedish monolinguals. The visual lexical decision results of the monolinguals suggest morphological decomposition with low-frequency inflected nouns, while with medium- and high-frequency inflections, full-form processing was apparently employed. The bilinguals demonstrated a similar pattern. The results suggest that morpheme-based recognition is employed even in a morphologically limited language when the inflectional forms occur rarely. With more frequent inflectional forms, full-form representations have developed for both mono- and bilingual speakers. In a comparable study employing a morphologically rich language, Finnish, Lehtonen and Laine (2003, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6, 213–225) observed full-form access only at the high-frequency range and only for monolinguals. These differences suggest that besides word frequency and language background, the morphological richness of a language affects the processing mode employed with polymorphemic words
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahlsén E. (1994). Cognitive morphology in Swedish: Studies with normals and aphasics. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 17:61–73
Alegre M., Gordon P. (1999). Frequency effects and the representational status of regular inflections. Journal of Memory and Language 40:41–61
Bertram, R. (2000). Morphology in the Mind. Word Processing in Finnish and Dutch. PhD Dissertation, University of Turku. [Published as Turun yliopiston julkaisuja. Annales Universitatis Turkuensis. Series B, Part 235. Humaniora. Painosalama Oy.]
Bertram R., Baayen R.H., Schreuder R. (2000). Effects of family size for derived and inflected words. Journal of Memory and Language, 42:390–405
Butterworth B. (1983). Lexical representation. In: Butterworth B (eds). Language Production 2. Academic Press, London, pp. 257–294
Caramazza A., Laudanna A., Romani C. (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition 28:297–332
Chincotta D., Hyönä J., Underwood G. (1997). Eye fixations, speech rate and bilingual digit span: numeral reading indexes fluency not word length. Acta Psychologica 97:253–275
Frauenfelder U., Schreuder R. (1992). Constraining psycholinguistic models of morphological processing and representation: The role of productivity. In: Booij G., van Merle J (eds). Yearbook of morphology 1991. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 165–183
Karlsson F. (1983). Suomen kielen äänne-ja muotorakenne [The Phonological and Morphological Structure of Finnish]. WSOY, Juva
Laine M., Niemi J., Koivuselkä-Sallinen P., Hyönä J. (1995). Morphological processing of polymorphemic nouns in a highly inflecting language. Cognitive Neuropsychology 12:457–502
Laine, M., & Virtanen, P. (1999). WordMill Lexical Search Program. Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Turku
Lehtonen M., Laine M. (2003). How word frequency affects morphological processing in monolinguals and bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 6:213–225
Lehtonen, M., Laine, M., Niemi, J., Niska, H., & Wande, E. (2003). Processing inflectional forms in a morphologically limited language: evidence from mono- and bilingual speakers. The Cognitive Neuroscience of Individual Differences – New Perspectives(pp. 197–209). Hanse Studies. Hanse-Wissenschaftskolleg.
Luzzatti C., Mondini S., Semenza C. (2001). Lexical representation and processing of morphologically complex words: Evidence from the reading performance of an Italian agrammatic patient. Brain and Language 79:345–359
Niemi J., Laine M., Tuominen J. (1994). Cognitive morphology in Finnish: Foundations of a new model. Language and Cognitive Processes 3:423–446
Pinker S. (1999). Words and Rules, The Ingredients of Language. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London
Portin M., Laine M. (2001). Processing cost associated with inflectional morphology in bilingual speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 4:55–62
Schreuder R., Baayen R.H. (1995). Modelling morphological processing. In: Feldman L.B (eds). Morphological Aspects of Language Processing. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 131–154
Schreuder R., Baayen R.H. (1997). How complex simplex words can be. Journal of Memory and Language 37:118–139
Taft M. (1994). Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes 9:271–294
Taft M., Forster K. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 14:638–647
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This study was financially supported by a grant (#20010) from the Joint Committee of the Nordic Social Science Research Councils (NOS-S). We are grateful for Jonna Kortelahti- Brunnsteiner for recruitment and testing of part of the bilingual participants
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lehtonen, M., Niska, H., Wande, E. et al. Recognition of Inflected Words in a Morphologically Limited Language: Frequency Effects in Monolinguals and Bilinguals. J Psycholinguist Res 35, 121–146 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-005-9008-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-005-9008-1