Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Impact of Teen Court on Rural Adolescents: Improved Social Relationships, Psychological Functioning, and School Experiences

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The Journal of Primary Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Teen Court is a prevention program aimed at diverting first time juvenile offenders from the traditional juvenile justice system and reintegrating them into the community. Few studies have examined if Teen Court impacts adolescent functioning. We examined how Teen Court participation impacted psychosocial functioning, social relationships, and school experiences in a sample of 392 rural Teen Court participants relative to two comparison samples, one from the same county as Teen Court (n = 4276) and one from a neighboring county (n = 3584). We found that Teen Court has the potential to decrease internalizing symptoms, externalizing behavior, violent behavior, parent-adolescent conflict, and delinquent friends, and increase self-esteem and school satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agodino, R., & Dynarski, M. (2004). Are experiments the only option? A look at dropout prevention programs. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(1), 180–194. doi:10.1162/003465304323023741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atav, S., & Spencer, G. A. (2002). Health risk behaviors among adolescents attending rural, suburban, and urban schools: A comparative study. Family and Community Health, 17(12), 53–64. Retrieved from http://vb3lk7eb4t.scholar.serialssolutions.com.libproxy.lib.unc.edu.

  • Austin, P. C. (2009). Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Statistics in Medicine, 28, 3083–3107.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bagwell, C. L., & Schmidt, M. E. (2011). Friendships in Childhood and Adolescence. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, G. L., & Richman, J. M. (2008). The School Success Profile. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, G. L., Rose, R. A., & Bowen, N. K. (2005). The Reliability and Validity of the School Success Profile. Philadelphia, PA: Xlibris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bright, C. L., Young, D. W., Bessaha, M. L., & Falls, B. J. (2015). Perceptions and outcomes following teen court involvement. Social Work Research, 39(3), 135–146. doi:10.1093/swr/svv018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butts, J. A., & Buck, J. (2000). Teen Courts: A focus on research. The office of Juvenile justice and delinquency prevention. Retrieved from http://www.urban.org/pdfs/teencourtsfocus.pdf.

  • Cook, T. D., Shadish, W. R., & Wong, V. C. (2008). Three conditions under which experiments and observational studies produce comparable causal estimates: New findings from within-study comparisons. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27(4), 724–750. doi:10.1002/pam.20375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. D., & Steiner, P. M. (2009). Some empirically viable alternatives to the randomized experiment. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 28(1), 165–166. doi:10.1002/pam.20408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, C. B. R., Smokowski, P. R., Barbee, J., Bower, M., & Barefoot, S. (2015). Restorative justice programming in Teen Court: A path to improved interpersonal relationships and psychological functioning for high risk rural youth. Journal of Rural Mental Health, 40(1), 15–30. doi:10.1037/rmh0000042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, M. E. (2007). Youth cases for youth courts: A guide to the typical offenses handled by youth courts. Chicago, IL.: American Bar Association. Retrieved from http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/migrated/publiced/youthcases_youthcourts.authcheckdam.pdf.

  • Garrison, A. H. (2001). An evaluation of a Delaware Teen Court. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 52, 11–22. doi:10.1111/j.1755-6988.2001.tb00044.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gase, L. N., Kuo, T., Lai, E. S., Stoll, M. A., & Ponce, N. A. (2016). The impact of two Los Angeles county teen courts on youth recidivism: Comparing two informal probation programs. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 12, 1-5–1-126. doi:10.1007/s11292-016-9255-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glazerman, S., Levy, D. M., & Myers, D. (2003). Nonexperimental versus experimental estimates of earnings impacts. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 289(1), 63–93. doi:10.1177/0002716203254879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godwin, T. M. (2000). National youth court guidelines. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of justice. Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

  • Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. The Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549–576. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, S., & Fraser, M. W. (2015). Propensity Score Analysis: Statistical Methods and Applications (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harder, V. S., Stuart, E. A., & Anthony, J. C. (2010). Propensity score techniques and the assessment of measured covariate balance to test causal associations in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 15(3), 234–249. doi:10.1037/a0019623.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, P., Maupin, J. R., & Mays, G. L. (2000). Are Teen Courts an answer to our juvenile delinquency problems? Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 51, 27–36. doi:10.1111/j.1755-6988.2000.tb00030.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of Delinquency. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imbens, G. W., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2009). Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(1), 5–86. doi:10.1257/jel.47.1.5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juvenile Law Center. (2011). Diversion: Juvenile and criminal justice. Retrieved from http://www.jlc.org/current-initiatives/minimizing-court-and-systems-involvement/diversion.

  • Laible, D. J., Carlo, G., & Roesch, S. C. (2004). Pathways to self-esteem in late adolescence: The role of parent and peer attachment, empathy, and social behaviours. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 703–716. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2004.05.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LoGalbo, A. P. (1998). Is Teen Court a Fair and Effective Juvenile Crime Diversion Program?. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, New College.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, M. (1999). Satisfaction with youth court proceedings: A follow-up analysis of Colonie (N.Y.) youth court. In American Society of Criminology Annual Conference, Toronto, ON.

  • Millings, A., Buck, R., Montgomery, A., Spears, M., & Stallard, P. (2012). School connectedness, peer attachment, and self-esteem as predictors of adolescent depression. Journal of Adolescence, 35(4), 1061–1067. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.02.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Minor, K. I., Wells, J. B., Soderstrom, I. R., Bingham, R., & Williamson, D. (1999). Sentence completion and recidivism among juveniles referred to Teen Courts. Crime and Delinquency, 45, 467–480. doi:10.1177/0011128799045004004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, A. (2004). Teen Court referral, sentencing, and subsequent recidivism: Two proportional hazards models and a little speculation. Crime and Delinquency, 50, 615–635. doi:10.1177/0011128703261616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, J. L. (1997). Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data. London, England: Chapman & Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, J. A., Shumow, L., & Kackar, H. (2007). Adolescents’ participation in service activities and its impact on academic, behavioral, and civic outcomes. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 127–140. doi:10.1007/s10964-006-9119-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, Y., & Zuckerman, S. (2005). The effect of Medicaid payment generosity on access and use among beneficiaries. Health Services Research, 40(3), 723–744. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00382.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, H. N., & Sickmund, M. (2006). Juvenile offenders and victims: 2006 national report. U.S. Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Retrieved from http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/nr2006/downloads/NR2006.pdf.

  • Stevenson, H. C. (1998). Raising safe villages: Cultural-ecological factors that influence the emotional adjustment of adolescents. Journal of Black Psychology, 24(1), 44–59. doi:10.1177/00957984980241004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stickle, W. P., Connell, N. M., Wilson, D. M., & Gottfredson, D. (2008). An experimental evaluation of Teen Courts. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 4(2), 137–163. doi:10.1007/s11292-008-9050-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sund, A. M., & Wichstrom, L. (2002). Insecure attachment as a risk factor for future depressive symptoms in early adolescence. Journal of American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 41(12), 1478–1485. doi:10.1097/00004583-200212000-00020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Justice. (2013). Juvenile Arrests 2011. Office of Justice Programs. National Report Series. Retrieved from http://www.ojjdp.gov/pubs/244476.pdf.

  • U.S. Department of Justice, Office for Victims of Crime, Office of Justice Programs. (2001). Rural victim assistance: A victim/witness guide for rural prosecutors (NCJ No. 21106).

  • Weisz, V., Lott, R. C., & Thai, N. D. (2002). A Teen Court evaluation with a therapeutic jurisprudence perspective. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 20(4), 381–392. doi:10.1002/bsl.499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, J., Minor, J., & Fox, J. (1998). An Evaluation of Kentucky’s 1997–98 Teen Court Program. Richmond, KY: Eastern Kentucky University, Center for Criminal Justice Education and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilde, T. E., & Hollister, R. (2007). How close is close enough? Evaluating propensity score matching using data from a class size reduction experiment. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26(3), 455–477. doi:10.1002/pam.20262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witherspoon, D., Schotland, M., Way, N., & Hughes, D. (2009). Connecting the dots: How connectedness to multiple contexts influences the psychological and academic adjustment of urban youth. Applied Developmental Science, 13(4), 199–216. doi:10.1080/10888690903288755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yates, M., & Youniss, J. (1996). A developmental perspective on community service in adolescence. Social Development, 5(1), 85–111. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.1996.tb00073.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youth Justice Board for England and Wales. (2004). National evaluation of the restorative justice in schools programme. Retrieved from http://www.restorativejustice.org.uk/resource/national_Evaluation_of_the_restorative_justice_in_schools_programme.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding for this research was provided through a cooperative agreement with the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (5 U01 CE001948-03) and from the National Institute of Justice (NIJ-2014-3878).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul R. Smokowski.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interstes including affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Ethical Approval

The study was approved by the UNC Chapel Hill Institutional Review Board.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Human and Animal Rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later ammendments of comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Smokowski, P.R., Rose, R.A., Evans, C.B.R. et al. The Impact of Teen Court on Rural Adolescents: Improved Social Relationships, Psychological Functioning, and School Experiences. J Primary Prevent 38, 447–464 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-017-0470-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-017-0470-y

Keywords

Navigation