Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Physical Environment and Crime and Misconduct in Kentucky Schools

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Primary Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Drawing upon ecological theories of crime control, aspects of the physical environment such as building design, street layout, and land use are thought to indicate territoriality and natural surveillance, thereby affecting the ability of residents to supervise and intervene in crime. To date, ecological models have been tested primarily at community levels of analysis (i.e., neighborhood, block). In contrast, this paper tests the applicability of this theoretical approach to crime in school settings. More specifically, we estimate random-intercept models using survey data from 3682 7th-grade students and 1351 teachers, nested within 65 Kentucky schools linked to school-level measures of the physical environment to determine how they affect various measures of school-based crime and misconduct.

 Editors’ Strategic Implications:How one measures school violence may have profound effects on what contributing causal factors are identified and strategies for prevention are developed. Student reports of school violence appear linked to more normative daily behaviors, whereas teacher reports–though limited to officially observed behaviors–are typically more serious. Thus, measurement implications abound. Nevertheless, territoriality, surveillance, and a sense of order, particularly in the immediate school context more so than the larger community context, appear linked to school violence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Angel, S. (1968). Discouraging crime through city planning. Berkeley, CA: University of California: Center for Planning and Development Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleyard, D. (1981). Livable streets. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astor, R. A., & Meyer, H. A. (2001). The conceptualization of violence-prone school subcontexts: Is the sum of the parts greater than the whole? Urban Education, 36, 374–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astor, R. A., Meyer, H. A., & Behre, W. J. (1999). Unowned places and times: Maps and interviews about violence in high schools. American Educational Research Journal, 36, 3–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astor, R. A., Meyer, H. A., & Pitner, R. O. (2001). Elementary and middle school students’ perceptions of violence-prone school sub-contexts. The Elementary School Journal, 101, 511–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, A., Davis, G. E., & Aiello, J. R. (1978). Crowding and neighborhood mediation of urban density. Journal of Population, 1, 266–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellair, P. E. (2000). Informal surveillance and street crime: A complex relationship. Criminology, 38, 137–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brantingham, P. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (1993). Nodes, paths, and edges: Considerations on the complexity of crime and the physical environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brantingham, P. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (1982). Mobility, notoriety, and crime: A study of crime patterns in urban nodal points. Journal of Environmental Systems, 11, 89–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brantingham, P. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (1981). Environmental criminology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B., & Altman, I. (1981). Territoriality and residential crime: A conceptual framework. In P. J. Brantingham & P. L. Brantingham (Eds.), Environmental criminology (pp. 55–76). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B., & Altman, I. (1983). Territoriality, defensible space, and residential burglary: An environmental analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 203–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bursik, R., & Grasmick, H. (1993). Neighborhoods and crime. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cisneros, H. G. (1995). Defensible space: Deterring crime and building community. Washington, DC: Department of Housing and Urban Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowe, T. (2000). Crime prevention through environmental design: Applications of architectural design and space management concepts (2nd ed.). Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowe, T. D. (1999). Designing safer schools. School Safety, Fall, 9–13.

  • Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, P. G., & Kimble, C. E. (1997). Community organizing, environmental change, and neighborhood crime. Crime and Delinquency, 4, 493–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, B., & Nasar, J. L. (1995). Fear spots in relation to microlevel physical cues: Exploring the overlooked. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32, 214–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, B., & Nasar, J. L. (1992). Fear of crime in relation to three exterior site features: Prospect, refuge, and escape. Environment and Behavior, 24, 35–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, F., & Mangione, T. (1986). A three-pronged effort to reduce crime and fear of crime: The Hartford Experiment. In D. Rosenbaum (Ed.), Community crime prevention (pp. 87–108). Newbury Park CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, F., McCalla, M. E., & Mangione, T. (1979). Reducing residential crime and fear: The Hartford Neighborhood Crime Prevention Program. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, D. C., & Gottfredson, G. D. (2002). Quality of school-based prevention programs: Results from a national survey. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 39, 3–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, G. G., & Gottfredson, D. (1985). Victimization in schools. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, S., Rohe, W., & Williams, J. (1982). Safety in urban neighborhoods: A comparison of physical characteristics and informal territorial control in high and low crime neighborhoods. Population and Environment, 5, 141–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of the American city. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz, E., Koons, B., & Taylor, R. (1998). Land use, physical deterioration, resident-based control, and calls for service on urban streetblocks. Justice Quarterly, 15, 21–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ley, D., & Cybriwsky, R. (1974). The spatial ecology of stripped cars. Environment and Behavior, 6, 53–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mawby, R. I. (1977). Defensible space: A theoretical and empirical appraisal. Urban Studies, 14, 169–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merry, S. E. (1981). Defensible space undefended: Social factors in crime control through environmental design. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 16, 397–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, O. (1972). Defensible space: Crime prevention through urban design. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, O. (1995). Defensible space: A new physical planning tool for urban revitalization. Journal of the American Planning Association, 61, 149–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, O. (1996). Creating defensible space. Washington DC, U.S.: Department of Housing and Urban Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, O., & Franck, K. A. (1982). The effects of building size on personal crime and fear of crime. Population and Environment, 4, 203–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roncek, D., & Faggiani, D. (1985). High schools and crime: A replication. Sociological Quarterly, 26, 491–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roncek, D., & LoBosco, A. (1983). The effect of high schools on crime in their neighborhood. Social Science Quarterly, 64, 598–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roncek, D., & Maier, P. (1991). Bars, blocks and crimes revisited: Linking the theory of routine activities to the empiricism of ‘hot spots’. Criminology, 9, 725–753.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roncek, D. W., & Pravatiner, M. A. (1989). Additional evidence that taverns enhance nearby crime. Sociology and Social Research, 73, 185–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samia Mair, J., & Mair, M. (2003). Violence prevention and control through environmental modifications.Annual Review of Public Health, 24, 209–225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., & Groves, W. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 774–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1999). Systematic social observation of public spaces: A new look at disorder in urban neighborhoods. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 603–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. J. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918–924.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, M., Marschall, M., Roch, C., & Teske, P. (1999). Heuristics, low information rationality, and choosing public goods: Broken windows as shortcuts to information about school performance. Urban Affairs Review, 34, 729–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, L. W., Gottfredson, D., MacKenzie, D., Eck, J., Reuter, P., & Bushway, S. (1997). Preventing crime: What works, what doesn’t, what’s promising. Washington, DC, U.S.: Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skogan, W. (1990). Disorder and decline: Crime and the spiral of decay in American communities. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. R., Glave Fraze, S., & Davison, E. L. (2000). Furthering the integration of routine activity and social disorganization theories: Small units of analysis and the study of street robbery as a diffusion process. Criminology, 38, 489–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speer, P. W., Gorman, D. M., Labouvie, E. W., & Ontkush, M. (1998). Violent crime and alcohol availability: Relationships in an urban community. Journal of Public Health Policy, 19, 303–338.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. B. (2001). Breaking away from broken windows: Baltimore neighborhoods and the nationwide fight against crime, grime, fear, and decline. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. B. (1987). Toward an environmental psychology of disorder. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 951–986). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. B. (1988). Human territorial functioning. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. B., & Brower, S. (1985). Home and near-home territories. In I. Altman, & I. C. Werner (Eds.), Human behavior and environment: Current theory and research, Vol. 8: Home environments I (pp. 83–122). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. B., Gottfredson, S. D., & Brower, S. (1981). Territorial cognitions and social climate in urban neighborhoods. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 2, 289–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. B., Gottfredson, S. D., & Brower, S. (1984). Block crime and fear: Local social ties and territorial functioning. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 21, 303–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toby, J. (1994). Everyday school violence: How disorder fuels it. American Educator, 17(4), 4–9, 44–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallis, A., & Ford, D. (1980). Crime prevention through environmental design: The demonstration in Broward County, Florida. Executive summary. Washington, DC, U.S.: Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westinghouse Electric (1977a). Crime prevention through environmental design. CPTED program manual, Vol. 1: Planning and implementation manual. Arlington, VA :Westinghouse Electric.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westinghouse Electric (1977b). Crime prevention through environmental design. CPTED program manual, Vol. 2: CPTED strategies and directives manual. Arlington, VA :Westinghouse Electric.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, G. F. (1990). Neighborhood permeability and burglary rates. Justice Quarterly, 7, 57–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, P., Quisenberry, N., Cabrera, D. T., & Jones, S. (2004). Busy places and broken windows? Towards defining the role of physical structure and process in community crime models. The Sociological Quarterly, 45, 185–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J., & Kelling, G. (1982). Broken windows. The Atlantic Monthly, March, 29–38.

  • Wood, E. (1961). Housing design: A social theory. New York: Citizens’ Housing and Planning Council of New York, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by grants (DA-11317 and DA-05312) from the National Institute of Drug Abuse. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Atlanta, GA, November 2001.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, USA

    Pamela Wilcox

  2. University of Kentucky, Lexington, USA

    Michelle Campbell Augustine & Richard R. Clayton

  3. Department of Criminal Justice, University of Cincinnati, 600 Dyer Hall, P.O. Box 210389, Cincinnati, OH, 45221-0389, USA

    Pamela Wilcox

Authors
  1. Pamela Wilcox
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michelle Campbell Augustine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Richard R. Clayton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pamela Wilcox.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilcox, P., Augustine, M.C. & Clayton, R.R. Physical Environment and Crime and Misconduct in Kentucky Schools. J Primary Prevent 27, 293–313 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-006-0034-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-006-0034-z

KEY WORDS:

Search

Navigation