Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Readiness for Change Predicts Outcomes of Functional Rehabilitation Following Motor Vehicle Accident

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction Previous research has found pre-treatment motivational readiness to engage in pain self-management to be associated with completion of a rehabilitation program. This preliminary study examined this relationship, as well as the ability of pre-treatment readiness to change to predict clinical decisions of post-treatment functional work capacity. Methods The sample consisted of 106 individuals involved in a tertiary functional rehabilitation program for motor vehicle accident (MVA) survivors. The Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI) and Pain Stages of Change Questionnaire (PSOCQ) were completed prior to treatment. Results Hierarchical logistic regression analyses revealed that PSOCQ profile scores (P = 0.008), including higher individual PSOCQ contemplation (OR = 5.30; P = 0.017) and action (OR = 5.16; P = 0.049) scores, significantly increased the likelihood of completing the functional rehabilitation program. Clinical decisions about functional work capacity were predicted by MPI profile scores (P = 0.001), and this model was significantly improved by the addition of PSOCQ scores (P = 0.037). Lower MPI interference (OR = 5.41; P = 0.002), and higher MPI affective distress (OR = 2.81; P = 0.010), MPI support (OR = 1.72; P = 0.027), and PSOCQ action (OR = 5.35; P = 0.038) scores were significant predictors of clinicians’ decisions regarding functional work capacity in the final model that identified 88% of those judged capable of returning to work and 63% of those who were judged not capable of returning to work. Conclusions This preliminary study suggests that readiness to self-manage pain is an important predictor of both completion of functional rehabilitation program and clinicians’ decisions regarding functional work capacity after an MVA. The latter outcome appears to be more complex, influenced both by motivational readiness to engage in pain self-management and cognitive-behavioral adaptation to pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gatchel RJ, Okifuji A. Evidence-based scientific data documenting the treatment and cost effectiveness of comprehensive pain programs for chronic nonmalignant pain. J Pain. 2006;7:779–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Turk DC. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of treatment for patients with chronic pain. Clin J Pain. 2002;18:355–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vendrig AA, van Akkerveeken PF, McWhorter KR. Results of a multimodal treatment program for patients with chronic symptoms after a whiplash injury of the neck. Spine. 2000;25:238–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sullivan MJL, Adams H, Rhodenizer T, Stanish WD. A psychosocial risk factor–targeted intervention for the prevention of chronic pain and disability following whiplash injury. Phys Ther. 2006;86:8–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Turk DC, Rudy TE. Neglected factors in chronic pain treatment outcome studies—referral patterns, failure to enter treatment, and attrition. Pain. 1990;43:7–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Turk DC, Rudy TE. Neglected factors in chronic pain treatment outcome studies—relapse, noncompliance, and adherence enhancement. Pain. 1991;44:5–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Proctor TJ, Mayer TG, Theodore B, Gatchel RJ. Failure to complete a functional restoration program for chronic musculoskeletal disorders: a prospective 1-year outcome study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:1509–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fishbain DA, Rosomoff HL, Goldberg M, Cutler R, Abdel-Moty E, Khalil TM, Rosomoff RS. The prediction of return to the workplace after multidisciplinary pain center treatment. Clin J Pain. 1993;9:3–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sullivan MJL, Feuerstein M, Gatchel R, Linton SJ, Pransky G. Integrating psychosocial and behavioral interventions to achieve optimal rehabilitation outcomes. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15:475–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Carosella AM, Jeffrey M, Lackner JM, Feuerstein M. Factors associated with early discharge from a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program for chronic low back pain. Pain. 1994;57:69–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Baltov P, Cote J, Truchon M, Erhmann Feldman D. Psychosocial and socio-demographic factors associated with outcomes for patients undergoing rehabilitation for chronic whiplash associated disorders: a pilot study. Dis Rehabil. 2008;30:1947–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Olsson I, Bunketorp O, Carlsson SG, Styf J. Prediction of outcome in whiplash-associated disorders using West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory. Clin J Pain. 2002;18:238–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Adams H, Ellis T, Stanish WD, Sullivan MJL. Psychosocial factors related to return to work following rehabilitation of whiplash injuries. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17:305–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gun RT, Osti OL, O’Riordan A, Mpelasoka F, Eckerwall CGM, Smyth JF. Risk factors for prolonged disability after whiplash injury: a prospective study. Spine. 2005;30:386–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sullivan MJL, Ward LC, Tripp D, French DJ, Adams H, Stanish WD. Secondary prevention of work disability: community-based psychosocial intervention for musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15:377–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. King SA, Snow BR. Factors for predicting premature termination from a multidisciplinary inpatient chronic pain program. Pain. 1989;39:281–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Richmond RL, Carmody TP. Dropout from treatment for chronic low back pain. Prof Psychol Res Pract. 1999;30:51–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. The transtheoretical approach: towards a systematic eclectic framework. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones Irwin; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jensen MP, Nielson WR, Kerns RD. Toward the development of a motivational model of pain self-management. J Pain. 2003;4:477–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kerns RD, Habib S. A critical review of the pain readiness to change model. J Pain. 2004;5:357–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kerns RD, Rosenberg R, Jamison RN, Caudill MA, Haythornthwaite J. Readiness to adopt a self-management approach to chronic pain: the Pain Stages of Change Questionnaire (PSOCQ). Pain. 1997;72:227–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kerns RD, Rosenberg R. Predicting responses to self-management treatments for chronic pain: application of the pain stages of change model. Pain. 2000;84:49–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Biller N, Arnstein P, Caudill MA, Federman CW, Guberman C. Predicting completion of a cognitive-behavioral pain management program by initial measures of a chronic pain patient’s readiness for change. Clin J Pain. 2000;16:352–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gersh E, Arnold C, Gibson SJ. The relationship between the readiness for change and clinical outcomes in response to multidisciplinary pain management. Pain Med. 2011;12:165–172.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lechner DE, Jackson JR, Roth DL, Straaton KV. Reliability and validity of a newly developed test of physical work performance. J Occup Med. 1994;36(9):997–1004.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tuckwell NL, Straker L, Barrett TE. Test retest reliability on nine tasks of the physical work performance evaluation. Work. 2002;19:243–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Durand MJ, Loisel P, Poitras S, Mercier R, Stock SR, Lemaire J. The interrater reliability of a functional capacity evaluation: the physical work performance evaluation. J Occup Rehabil. 2004;14:119–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kerns RD, Turk DC, Rudy TE. The West Haven-Yale multidimensional pain inventory (WHYMPI). Pain. 1985;23:345–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bernstein I, Jaremko M, Hinkley B. On the West Haven-Yale multidimensional pain inventory. Spine. 1995;20:956–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Jensen MP, Nielson WR, Romano JM, Hill ML, Turner JA. Further evaluation of the pain stages of change questionnaire: is the transtheoretical model of change useful for patients with chronic pain? Pain. 2000;86:255–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Jensen M. Enhancing motivation to change in pain treatment. In: Turk DC, Gatchel RJ, editors. Psychological approaches to pain management: a practitioner’s handbook. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2002. p. 71–93.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: preparing people for change. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Michaelson P, Sjolander P, Johansson H. Factors predicting pain reduction in chronic back and neck pain after multimodal treatment. Clin J Pain. 2004;20(6):447–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Vlayen JWS, de Jong J, Leeuw M, Crombez G. Fear reduction in chronic pain: graded exposure in vivo with behavioral experiments. In: Asmundson GJG, Vlaeyen WS, Crombez G, editors. Understanding and treating fear of pain. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004. p. 313–43.

    Google Scholar 

  35. McCracken LM. Learning to live with the pain: acceptance of pain predicts adjustment in persons with chronic pain. Pain. 1998;74:21–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kerns RD, Otis JD, Wise EA. Treating families of chronic pain patients: application of a cognitive-behavioral transactional model. In: Turk DC, Gatchel RJ, editors. Psychological approaches to pain management: a practitioner’s handbook. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2002. p. 256–75.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sullivan MJL, Adams H, Horan S, Maher D, Boland D, Gross R. The role of perceived injustice in the experience of chronic pain: scale development and validation. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18:249–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Jensen MP, Nielson WR, Turner JA, Romano JM, Hill ML. Changes in readiness to self-manage pain are associated with improvement in multidisciplinary pain treatment and pain coping. Pain. 2004;111:84–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Clinical Health Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada

    Gregg A. Tkachuk

  2. FIT for Active Living Program, Saskatoon City Hospital, Saskatoon, Canada

    John K. Marshall & Annalyn C. Mercado

  3. Chronic Pain Centre, Saskatoon Health Region, Saskatoon, Canada

    Bruce McMurtry

  4. Rehabilitation and Geriatric Services, Saskatoon Health Region, Saskatoon, Canada

    Fern Stockdale-Winder

Authors
  1. Gregg A. Tkachuk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John K. Marshall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Annalyn C. Mercado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bruce McMurtry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Fern Stockdale-Winder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregg A. Tkachuk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tkachuk, G.A., Marshall, J.K., Mercado, A.C. et al. Readiness for Change Predicts Outcomes of Functional Rehabilitation Following Motor Vehicle Accident. J Occup Rehabil 22, 97–104 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-011-9324-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-011-9324-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation