Skip to main content
Log in

Discriminating Between Individuals with and without Musculoskeletal Disorders of the Upper Extremity by Means of Items Related to Computer Keyboard Use

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction Identifying postures and behaviors during keyboard use that can discriminate between individuals with and without musculoskeletal disorders of the upper extremity (MSD-UE) is important for developing intervention strategies. This study explores the ability of models built from items of the Keyboard-Personal Computer Style instrument (K-PeCS) to discriminate between subjects who have MSD-UE and those who do not. Methods Forty-two subjects, 21 with diagnosed MSD-UE (cases) and 21 without MSD-UE (controls), were videotaped while using their keyboards at their onsite computer workstations. These video clips were rated using the K-PeCS. The K-PeCS items were used to generate models to discriminate between cases and controls using Classification and Regression Tree (CART) methods. Results Two CART models were generated; one that could accurately discriminate between cases and controls when the cases had any diagnosis of MSD-UE (69% accuracy) and one that could accurately discriminate between cases and controls when the cases had neck-related MSD-UE (93% accuracy). Both models had the same single item, “neck flexion angle greater than 20°”. In both models, subjects who did not have a neck flexion angle of greater than 20° were accurately identified as controls. Conclusions The K-PeCS item “neck flexion greater than 20°” can discriminate between subjects with and without MSD-UE. Further research with a larger sample is needed to develop models that have greater accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gerr F, Marcus M, Ensor C, Kleinbaum D, Cohen S, Edwards A, et al. A prospective study of computer users: I. Study design and incidence of musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders. Am J Ind Med. 2002;41:221–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wahlstrom J. Ergonomics musculoskeletal disorders and computer work. Occup Med. 2005;55:168–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Szeto GP, Straker L, Raine S. A field comparison of neck and shoulder postures in symptomatic and asymptomatic office workers. Appl Ergon. 2002;33:75–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Marcus M, Gerr F, Monteilh C, Ortiz DJ, Gentry E, Cohen S, et al. A prospective study of computer users: II. Postural risk factors for musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders. Am J Ind Med. 2002;41:236–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Faucett J, Rempel DM. VDT-related musculoskeletal symptoms: interactions between work posture and psychosocial work factors. Am J Ind Med. 1994;26:597–612.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hunting W, Laubli T, Grandjean E. Postural and visual loads at VDT workplaces. I. Constrained postures. Ergonomics. 1981;24:917–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pascarelli EF, Kella JJ. Soft-tissue injuries related to use of the computer keyboard. J Occup Med. 1993;35:522–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rose MJ. Keyboard operating posture and actuation force: implications for muscle over-use. Appl Ergon. 1991;22:198–203.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rempel DM, Keir PJ, Smutz P, Hargens A. Effects of static fingertip loading on carpal tunnel pressure. J Orthop Res. 1997;15:422–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Feuerstein M, Armstrong T, Hickey P, Lincoln A. Computer keyboard force and upper extremity symptoms. J Occup Environ Med. 1997;39:1144–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Li G, Buckle P. Current techniques for assessing physical exposure to work-related musculoskeletal risks, with emphasis on posture-based methods. Ergonomics. 1999;42:674–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Baker NA, Cham R, Cidboy E, Cook J, Redfern M. Kinematics of the fingers and hands during computer keyboard use. Clin Biomech. 2007;22:34–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Marklin RW, Monroe JF. Quantitative biomechanical analysis of wrist motion in bone-trimming jobs in the meat packing industry. Ergonomics. 1998;41(2):227–37.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sommerich CM, Marras WS, Parnianpour M. A quantitative description of typing biomechanics. J Occup Rehabil. 1996;6:33–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Spielholz P, Silverstein BA, Morgan M, Checkoway H, Kaufman J. Comparison of self-report, video observation and direct measurement methods for upper extremity musculoskeletal disorder physical risk factors. Ergonomics. 2001;44:588–613.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Colombini D. An observational method for classifying exposure to repetitive movements of the upper limbs. Ergonomics. 1998;41:1261–89.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. James CP, Harburn KL, Kramer JF. Cumulative trauma disorders in the upper extremities: reliability of the postural and repetitive risk-factors index. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:860–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Keyserling WM, Stetson DS, Silverstein BA, Brouwer ML. A checklist for evaluating ergonomic risk factors associated with upper extremity cumulative trauma disorders. Ergonomics. 1993;36:807–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Latko WA, Armstrong TJ, Foulke JA, Herrin GD, Rabourn RA, Ulin SS. Development and evaluation of an observational method for assessing repetition in hand tasks. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1997;58:278–85.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lueder R. A proposed RULA for computer users. Proceedings of the Ergonomics Summer Workshop, UC Berkeley Center for Occupational & Environmental Health Continuing Education Program; 1996.

  21. McAtamney L, Corlett EN. RULA: A survey method for investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. Appl Ergon. 1993;24:91–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Moore JS, Garg A. The strain index: a proposed method to analyze jobs for risk of distal upper extremity disorders. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1995;56:443–58.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Baker NA, Redfern M. Developing an observational instrument to evaluate personal computer keyboarding style. Appl Ergon. 2005;36:345–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Baker NA, Cook J, Redfern M. Rater reliability and criterion validity of the Keyboard Personal Computer Style instrument (K-PeCS). Appl Ergon. (in press).

  25. Baker NA, Redfern M. Measuring computer style: the frequency and distribution of computer keyboard behaviors. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society; 2006. p. 1351–3.

  26. Sluiter JK, Rest KM, Frings-Dresen MHW. Criteria document for evaluation the work-relatedness of upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2001;27(Suppl 1):1–102.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yassi A. Repetitive strain injuries. Lancet 1997;349:943–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Nathan PA, Keniston RC, Myers LD, Meadows KD. Obesity as a risk factor for slowing of sensory conduction of the median nerve industry. J Occup Med. 1992;34(4):379–83.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Werner RA, Franzblau A, Albers JW, Armstrong TJ. Influence of body mass index and work activity on the prevalence of median mononeuropathy at the wrist. Occup Environ Med. 1997;54(4):268–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Martin BJ, Armstrong T, Foulke JA, Natarajan S, Klinenberg E, Serina E, et al. Keyboard reaction force and finger flexor electomyograms during computer keyboard work. Hum Factors. 1996;38:654–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Salford Systems. CART for Windows: Users guide. Salford Systems; 2002.

  32. Wilkinson L. Tree structured data analysis: AID, CHAID, and CART. Sawtooth/SYSTAT Joint Software Conference. 1992. http://www.spss.com/research/wilkinson/Publications/c&rtrees.pdf. Accessed 29 Dec 2007.

  33. Weiss SM, Kulikowski CA. Computer systems that learn. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publisher Inc.; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Davis RE, Elder K. Application of Classification and Regression Trees: Selection of avalanche activity indices and Mammoth Mountain. International Snow Science Workshop. 1994. http://www.avalanche.org/~moonstone/issw94%27.htm. Accessed 27 Dec 2007.

  35. Lewis RJ. An introduction to Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis. 2000 Annual Meeting of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. 2000. http://www.saem.org/download/lewis1.pdf. Accessed 27 Dec 2007.

  36. Myers J, Muller GM. Managerial application of multivariate analysis in marketing. Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Yohannes Y, Hoddinott J. Classification and Regression Trees: An introduction. International Food Policy Research Institute. 1999. http://www.ifpri.org/themes/mp18/techguid/tg03.pdf. Accessed 27 Dec 2007.

  38. Dillard E, Luchette FA, Sears BW, Norton J, Schermer CR, Reed RL, et al. Clinician versus mathematical statistical models: which is better at predicting an abnormal chest radiograph finding in injured patients? Am J Emerg Med. 2007;25(7):823–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Palmer KT, Smedley J. Work relatedness of chronic neck pain with physical findings—a systematic review. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2007;33:165–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Szeto GP, Straker LM, O’Sullivan PB. A comparison of symptomatic and asymptomatic office workers performing monotonous keyboard work-1: neck and shoulder muscle recruitment patterns. Man Ther. 2005;10(4):270–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Chaffin DB, Andersson GBJ, Martin BJ. Occupational biomechanics. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Psihogios JP, Sommerich CM, Mirka GA, Moon SD. A field evaluation of monitor placement effects in VDT users. Appl Ergon. 2001;32:313–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Turville KL, Psihogios JP, Ulmer TR, Mirka GA. The effects of video display terminal height on the operator: a comparison of the 15 degree and 40 degree recommendations. Appl Ergon. 1998;29:239–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Shin P, Venon H, Sessle BJ, Hu JW. Neck muscle length modulates nocioceptive reflex evoked by noxious irritant application to rat neck tissues. Exp Brain Res. 2005;163:314–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the support of Grant #K01 OH007826 from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, and the University of Pittsburgh Central Research Development Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nancy A. Baker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baker, N.A., Sussman, N.B. & Redfern, M.S. Discriminating Between Individuals with and without Musculoskeletal Disorders of the Upper Extremity by Means of Items Related to Computer Keyboard Use. J Occup Rehabil 18, 157–165 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-008-9127-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-008-9127-2

Keywords

Navigation