Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A New Method Based for Diagnosis of Breast Cancer Cells from Microscopic Images: DWEE—JHT

  • Transactional Processing Systems
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In these days, there are many various diseases, whose diagnosis is very hardly. Breast cancer is one of these type diseases. In this paper, accuracy diagnosis of normal, benign, and malign breast cancer cell were found by combining mean success rates Jensen Shannon, Hellinger, and Triangle measure which connected with each other. In this article, an diagnostic method based on feature extraction Discrete Wavelet Entropy Energy (DWEE) and Jensen Shannon, Hellinger, Triangle Measure (JHT) Classifier for diagnosis of breast cancer. This diagnosis method is called as DWEE—JHT this paper. With this diagnosis method have found optimal feature subset using discrete wavelet transform feature extraction. Then these convenient features are given to Jensen Shannon, Hellinger, Triangle Measure (JHT) classifier. Then, between classifiers which are Jensen Shannon, Hellinger, and triangle distance have been validated the measures via relationships. Afterwards, breast cancer cells are classified using Jensen Shannon, Hellinger, and Triangle distance. Mean success rate of 16 feature vector with Jensen Shannon classifier is found % 97.81. Mean success rate of 16 feature vector with Hellinger classifier is found % 97.75. Mean success rate of 16 feature vector with Triangle classifier is found % 97.87. By averaging of results obtained from these 3 classifiers are found as 97.81 % average of accuracy diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ferlay, J., Autier, P., Boniol, M., Heanue, M., Colombet, M., and Boyle, P., Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe. Annals of oncology 18(3):581–592, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Roder, D., Houssami, N., Farshid, G., Gill, G., and Luke Downey, P., Population screening and intensity of screening are associated with reduced breast cancer mortality: Evidence of efficacy of mammography screening in Australia, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 108(3):409–416, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. American Cancer Society, “Global cancer facts and figures, ”. American Cancer Society, Inc, Atlanta, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schnitt SJ, Guidi AJ. Pathology of invasive breast cancer. In Diseases of the Breast (2nd edn), HarrisJR, LippmanME, MorrowM, OsborneCK (eds). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, 2004; 541–584.3

  5. Page DL. Special types of invasive breast cancer, with clinical implications. Am J Surg Pathol 2003; 27: 922–925. Birdwell, R., Bandodkar, P., & Ikeda, D., “Computer-aided detection with screening mammography in a university hospital settings, ” Radiology, 236,451–457, 2005.

  6. Jemal, A., Bray, F., Center, M. M., Ferlay, J., Ward, E., and Forman, D., Global cancer statistics, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians 61(2):69–90, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. Ding and H.C. Peng, “Minimum redundancy feature selection from microarray gene expression data,” Proc. Second IEEE Computational Systems Bioinformatics Conf. pp. 523–528, 2003.

  8. Petushi, S., Garcia, F. U., Haber, M. M., Katsinis, C., & Tozeren, A.“Large-scale computations on histology images reveal grade-differentiating parameters for breast cancer.” BMC Medical Imaging 6.1. 2006.

  9. Lee, Kyoung-Mi, and William Nick Street. "An adaptive resource-allocating network for automated detection, segmentation, and classification of breast cancer nuclei topic area: image processing and recognition." Neural Networks, IEEE Transactions on 14.3 (2003): 680–687.

  10. Weigelt, B., Horlings, H. M., Kreike, B., Hayes, M. M., Hauptmann, M., Wessels, L. F. A., … & Peterse, J. L. “Refinement of breast cancer classification by molecular characterization of histological special types.” The Journal of pathology (2008): 141–150.

  11. Weigelt, B., et al., Refinement of breast cancer classification by molecular characterization of histological special types. The Journal of pathology 216(2):141–150, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hwang, Hae-Gil, et al. “Classification of breast tissue images based on wavelet transform using discriminant analysis, neural network and SVM.” Enterprise networking and Computing in Healthcare Industry, 2005. HEALTHCOM 2005. Proceedings of 7th International Workshop on. IEEE, 2005.

  13. Jain, Anil K., and Farshid Farrokhnia. “Unsupervised texture segmentation using Gabor filters.” Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1990. Conference Proceedings., IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 1990.

  14. Issac Niwas, S., et al. “Log-gabor wavelets based breast carcinoma classification using least square support vector machine.” Imaging Systems and Techniques 2011 I.E. International Conference on. IEEE, 2011.

  15. Arivazhagan, S., and Ganesan, L., Texture classification using wavelet transform. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 24:1513–1521, 2003.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Avci, D., “A New Method Based on Adaptive Discrete Wavelet Entropy Energy and Neural Network Classifier (ADWEENN) for Recognition of Urine Cells from Microscopic Images Independent of Rotation and Scaling.”. Journal of medical systems 38.2:1–9, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Avci, E., Turkoglu, I., and Poyraz, M., Intelligent target recognition based on wavelet packet neural network. Experts Systems with Applications 175–182, 2005.

  18. Niwas, S. Issac, P. Palanisamy, and K. Sujathan. “Wavelet based feature extraction method for breast cancer cytology images.” Industrial Electronics & Applications (ISIEA), 2010 I.E. Symposium on. IEEE, 2010.

  19. S. Mabrouk, J. Malek and R. Tourki, 2005: Cytological image wavelet-texture-based feature extraction: 3rd International Conference on Systems, Signals & Devises, pp: 341–346.

  20. Tuceryan M and Jain AK (1993) Texture analysis, handbook of pattern recognition and computer vision, World Scientific, 235–276.

  21. Sengur, A., Turkoglu, I., and Cevdet Ince, M., Wavelet packet neural networks for texture classification. Expert systems with applications 32(2):527–533, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Conners, R. W., and Harlow, C. A., A theoretical comparison of texture algorithms. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2:204–222, 1980.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Teuner, A., Pichler, O., and Hosticka, B. J., Unsupervised texture segmentation of images using tuned matched Gabor filters. IEEE trans. Image Processing 6(4):863–870, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chang, T., and Kuo, C. C. J., Texture analysis and classification with tree-structured wavelet transform. IEEE trans. Image Processing 2:429–441, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Laine, A., and Fan, J., Texture classification by wavelet packet signatures. IEEE Trans, Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 15(11):1186–1191, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Unser, M., Texture classification and segmentation using wavelet frames. IEEE Trans. Image Processing 4:1549–1560, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pun C and Lee M (2003) Log-Polar Wavelet Energy Signatures for Rotation and Scale Invariant Texture Classification, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 25, No.5.

  28. Arivazhagan, S., and Ganesan, L., Texture classification using wavelet transform. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 24:1513–1521, 2003.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Sung-Hyuk Cha, “Comprehensive survey on distance/Similarity measures between probability density functions,” International journal of mathematical models and methods in applied sciences, 2007.

  30. Topsøe, F., Some inequalities for information divergence and related measures of discrimination. IEEE Trans. Information Theory 44(4):1602–1609, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Krstovski, K., Smith, D. A., Wallach, H. M., & McGregor, A.,” Efficient nearest-neighbor search in the probability simplex,” In Proceedings of Conference on the Theory of Information Retrieval (p.22). ACM, 2013.

  32. Krstovski, Kriste, et al. “Efficient nearest-neighbor search in the probability simplex.” Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on the Theory of Information Retrieval. ACM, 2013.

  33. Lee, Chang-Hwan, Fernando Gutierrez, and Dejing Dou., “Calculating feature weights in naive bayes with Kullback–Leibler measure,” Data Mining (ICDM), IEEE 11th International Conference on. IEEE, 2011.

  34. García, J. A., Fdez-Valdivia, J., Rodriguez-Sanchez, R., & Fdez-Vidal, X. R., “Performance of the Kullback–Leibler information gain for predicting image fidelity,” In Pattern Recognition, Proceedings. 16th International Conference on Vol. 3, pp. 843–848, IEEE., 2002.

  35. Weszka, J. S., Dyer, C. R., and Rosenfeld, A., A comparative study of texture measures for terrain classification. IEEE Trans. System Man Cybernat. SMC-6(4):269–286, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Davis, L. S., Johns, S. A., and Aggarwal, J. K., Texture analysis using generalized co-occurrence matrices. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. PAMI-1:251–259, 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Manjunath, B. S., and Ma, W. Y., Texture features for browsing and retrieval of image data. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 18(8):927–842, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wu, W. R., and Wei, S. C., Rotation and gray scale transform invariant texture classification using spiral resampling, sub band decomposition and hidden Markov model. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 5(10):1423–1433, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Pun, C., and Lee, M., Extraction of shift invariantwavelet features for classification of images with different sizes. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 26(9):1228–1233, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Akin, M., Comparison of wavelet transform and FFT methods in the analysis of EEG signals. Journal of Medical Systems 26(3):241–247, 2002.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. Eminaga, O., “Linkage of Data from Diverse Data Sources (LDS): A Data Combination Model Provides Clinical Data of Corresponding Specimens in Biobanking Information System.”. Journal of medical systems 37(5):1–12, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Naghibi, S., Teshnehlab, M., and Shoorehdeli, M. A., Breast cancer classification based on advanced multi-dimensional fuzzy neural network. Journal of medical systems 36(5):2713–2720, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wang, S.-T., Construct an Optimal Triage Prediction Model: A Case Study of the Emergency Department of a Teaching Hospital in Taiwan. Journal of medical systems 37.5:1–11, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hsu, Wen-Shin, and Jiann-I, P., “The Secure Authorization Model for Healthcare Information System.”. Journal of medical systems 37.5:1–5, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Goker, R., and Imran, T., “Classification of Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy Data Acquired Through Scanning Electromyography with Machine Learning Algorithms.”. Journal of medical systems 36.5:2705–2711, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Aytac Korkmaz, S. Eren E. “Cancer detection in mammograms estimating feature weights via Kullback–Leibler measure” Image and Signal Processing (CISP), 2013 6th International Congress on. Vol. 2. IEEE, 2013.

  47. Ozcıft A. Gulten A. “A Robust Multi-Class Feature Selection Strategy Based on Rotation Forest Ensemble Algorithm for Diagnosis of Erythemato-Squamous Diseases.” Journal of medical systems (2012)

  48. Chikh, M. A., Saidi, M., and Settouti, N., Diagnosis of diabetes diseases using an artificial immune recognition system2 (AIRS2) with fuzzy k-nearest neighbor. Journal of medical systems 36.5:2721–2729, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Abibullaev, B., and Seo, H. D., A new QRS detection method using wavelets and artificial neural networks. Journal of medical systems 35.4:692–691, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electrical-Electronic Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Firat University, 23100, Elazığ, Turkey

    S. Aytac Korkmaz & M. Poyraz

Authors
  1. S. Aytac Korkmaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Poyraz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Aytac Korkmaz.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Transactional Processing Systems

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Korkmaz, S.A., Poyraz, M. A New Method Based for Diagnosis of Breast Cancer Cells from Microscopic Images: DWEE—JHT. J Med Syst 38, 92 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-014-0092-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-014-0092-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation