Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Variability of Subspecialty-Specific Anesthesia-Controlled Times at Two Academic Institutions

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Realistic scheduling of operating room cases decreases costs, optimizes utilization and improves staff and patient satisfaction. Currently limited data exists to establish anesthesia-controlled time benchmarks based on specific subspecialty service. In this multicenter retrospective analysis of cases performed during a 53 month period at two large multispecialty academic institutions, data were retrieved from the perioperative information systems at each center. Both induction and emergence times were calculated. We then determined mean and median anesthesia controlled times based on each subspecialty service and compared them to previously published anesthesia-controlled time data. We obtained data on 104,184 cases at hospital A, and 122,560 cases at Hospital B. For all specialties at hospital A and hospital B, median induction time was 16.0 min and 17.0 min, emergence time was 14.0 and 8.0 min, and total anesthesia controlled time was 31.0 min and 27.0 min respectively. There was considerable variability among different surgical specialties deviating from the previously established 30 min benchmark. Subspecialties with lower total anesthesia controlled times in both centers were pain, general surgery, gynecology, plastic surgery and urology. Subspecialties with higher total anesthesia controlled times in both centers included cardiac surgery, neurosurgery, transplant and vascular. Cardiac surgery had the highest total time of 60 min and 50 min at Hospital A and B respectively. Individual specialty-specific anesthesia controlled times should be used for case scheduling and to benchmark anesthesia performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dexter, F. E. R., Bayman, E. O., and Ledolter, J., Estimating surgical case durations and making comparisons among facilities: Identifying facilities with lower anesthesia professional fees. Anesth. Analg. 116(5):1103–1115, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dexter, F., Ledolter, J., Tiwari, V., and Epstein, R. H., Value of a scheduled duration quantified in terms of equivalent numbers of historical cases. Anesth. Analg. 117(1):205–210, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Harders, M., Malangoni, M. A., Weight, S., and Sidhu, T., Improving operating room efficiency through process redesign. Surgery 140(4):509–514, 2006. discussion 14–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Eijkemans, M. J., van Houdenhoven, M., Nguyen, T., Boersma, E., Steyerberg, E. W., and Kazemier, G., Predicting the unpredictable: a new prediction model for operating room times using individual characteristics and the surgeon’s estimate. Anesthesiology 112(1):41–49, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Strum, D. P. V. L., and May, J. H., Surgical subspecialty block utilization and capacity planning: A minimal cost analysis model. Anesthesiology 90(4):1176–1185, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Overdyk, F. J., Harvey, S. C., Fishman, R. L., and Shippey, F., Successful strategies for improving operating room efficiency at academic institutions. Anesth. Analg. 86(4):896–906, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ehrenwerth, J., Escobar, A., Davis, E. A., Watrous, G. A., Fisch, G. S., Kain, Z. N., et al., Can the attending anesthesiologist accurately predict the duration of anesthesia induction? Anesth. Analg. 103(4):938–940, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zafar, S. U., Khan, F. A., and Khan, M., Standardization of anaesthesia ready time and reasons of delay in induction of anaesthesia. J. Pak. Med. Assoc. 56(3):112–115, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kougias, P., Tiwari, V., Barshes, N. R., Bechara, C. F., Lowery, B., Pisimisis, G., et al., Modeling anesthetic times. Predictors and implications for short-term outcomes. J. Surg. Res. 180(1):1–7, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dexter, F., Coffin, S., and Tinker, J. H., Decreases in anesthesia-controlled time cannot permit one additional surgical operation to be reliably scheduled during the workday. Anesth. Analg. 81(6):1263–1268, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Glossary of times used for scheduling and monitoring of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. AORN J. 66(4):601–606, 1997.

  12. Mazzei, W. J., Operating room start times and turnover times in a university hospital. J. Clin. Anesth. 6(5):405–408, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Donham, R. T., Defining measurable OR-PR scheduling, efficiency, and utilization data elements: The Association of Anesthesia Clinical Directors procedural times glossary. Int. Anesthesiol. Clin. 36(1):15–29, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dufek, S., Gaucher, E., Gialanella, J., Kratochwill, E., Learned, D., Sonda, P., et al., The total quality process applied to the operating rooms and other clinical processes. Surgery 113(3):255–259, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kanich, D. G., and Byrd, J. R., How to increase efficiency in the operating room. Surg Clin N Am 76(1):161–173, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wright, I. H., Kooperberg, C., Bonar, B. A., and Bashein, G., Statistical modeling to predict elective surgery time. Comparison with a computer scheduling system and surgeon-provided estimates. Anesthesiology 85(6):1235–1245, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kwok, A. C., Funk, L. M., Baltaga, R., Lipsitz, S. R., Merry, A. F., Dziekan, G., et al., Implementation of the World Health Organization surgical safety checklist, including introduction of pulse oximetry, in a resource-limited setting. Ann. Surg. 257(4):633–639, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Haynes, A. B., Weiser, T. G., Berry, W. R., Lipsitz, S. R., Breizat, A. H., Dellinger, E. P., et al., A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N. Engl. J. Med. 360(5):491–499, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Urman, R. D., Sarin, P., Mitani, A., Philip, B., and Eappen, S., Presence of anesthesia resident trainees in day surgery unit has mixed effects on operating room efficiency measures. Ochsner J 12(1):25–29, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Davis, E. A., Escobar, A., Ehrenwerth, J., Watrous, G. A., Fisch, G. S., Kain, Z. N., et al., Resident teaching versus the operating room schedule: An independent observer-based study of 1558 cases. Anesth. Analg. 103(4):932–937, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Eappen, S., Flanagan, H., and Bhattacharyya, N., Introduction of anesthesia resident trainees to the operating room does not lead to changes in anesthesia-controlled times for efficiency measures. Anesthesiology 101(5):1210–1214, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Broussard, D. M., and Couch, M. C., Anesthesia preparation time is not affected by the experience level of the resident involved during his/her first month of adult cardiac surgery. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 25(5):766–769, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Unpublished Data. Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine. Brigham and Women’s Hospital: Boston MA.

  24. Raad, I. I., Hohn, D. C., Gilbreath, B. J., Suleiman, N., Hill, L. A., Bruso, P. A., et al., Prevention of central venous catheter-related infections by using maximal sterile barrier precautions during insertion. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 15(4 Pt 1):231–238, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Overby, D. W., Kohn, G. P., Colton, K. J., Stavas, J. M., Dixon, R. G., Passannante, A., et al., Central venous line placement prior to gastric bypass improves operating room efficiency. ISRN Surg. 2012:816871, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mariano, E. R., Chu, L. F., Peinado, C. R., and Mazzei, W. J., Anesthesia-controlled time and turnover time for ambulatory upper extremity surgery performed with regional versus general anesthesia. J. Clin. Anesth. 21(4):253–257, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Financial Support

None.

Meetings at Which Work has Been Previously Presented

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Harvard Medical School/Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

    Bhavani Shankar Kodali, K. Dennie Kim, Hugh Flanagan & Richard D. Urman

  2. Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA

    Jesse M. Ehrenfeld

  3. Department of Anesthesia, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA

    Richard D. Urman

Authors
  1. Bhavani Shankar Kodali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. Dennie Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hugh Flanagan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jesse M. Ehrenfeld
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Richard D. Urman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard D. Urman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kodali, B.S., Kim, K.D., Flanagan, H. et al. Variability of Subspecialty-Specific Anesthesia-Controlled Times at Two Academic Institutions. J Med Syst 38, 11 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-014-0011-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-014-0011-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation