Abstract
This study examined total factor productivity of dialysis facilities in Greece over a 12-year period, using nationally representative panel data. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) was used to compute Malmquist productivity indices, which were decomposed into technical efficiency change and technological change. The sample consisted of 73 dialysis facilities operating throughout the entire study period (1993–2004), corresponding to 97.3% and 58.9% of all facilities in the first and last study years respectively. Production variables were nursing staff and dialysis machines (inputs) and dialysis sessions (output). The DEA model was input-oriented allowing for constant returns to scale (CRS). Technical efficiency change was decomposed into scale efficiency change and variable returns to scale (VRS) “pure” technical efficiency change. Mean overall efficiency, throughout the study years, ranged from 39.6 to 63.1% with an all-time average of 56.7%, and only 2–4% of the facilities were fully efficient in each study year. Productivity indices indicated year-by-year progress or regress up to 5%, but the efficiency and technological components differed, in some cases, by as much as 30%. Although interesting subperiod effects were observed, conclusions could not be generalized for the entire study period due to alternating trends. We suggest that preliminary insight to productivity in this sector has been obtained, but particular subperiods must be isolated and further investigated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kontodimopoulos, N., Niakas, D., and Mylonakis, J., A socio-economic evaluation of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in Greece. Int. J. Healthc. Technol. Manage. 6:296–306, 2005.
Kontodimopoulos, N., and Niakas, D., Efficiency measurement of hemodialysis units in Greece with data envelopment analysis. Health Policy 71:195–204, 2005.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., and Rhodes, E., Measuring efficiency of decision-making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 3:429–444, 1978.
Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., and Cooper, W. W., Models for estimating technical and scale efficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manage. Sci. 30:1078–1092, 1984.
Giuffrida, A., and Gravelle, H., Measuring performance in primary care: Econometric analysis and DEA. Appl. Econ. 33:163–175, 2001.
Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., Thanassoulis, E., and Zanakis, S. H., DEA and its use in different countries. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 154:337–344, 2004.
Bowlin, W. F., Measuring performance: An introduction to data envelopment analysis (DEA). J. Cost Anal. 3:3–27, 1998.
Hollingsworth, B., Dawson, P., and Maniadakis, N., Efficiency measurement of health care: A review of non-parametric methods and applications. Health Care Manage. Sci. 2:161–172, 1999.
Hollingsworth, B., Non-parametric and parametric applications measuring efficiency in health care. Health Care Manage. Sci. 6:203–218, 2003.
Ozgen, H., and Ozcan, Y., A national study of efficiency for dialysis centers: An examination of market competition and facility characteristics for production of multiple dialysis outputs. Health Serv. Res. 37:711–732, 2002.
Gerard, K., and Roderick, P., Comparison of apparent efficiency of haemodialysis satellite units in England and Wales using data envelopment analysis. Int. J. Technol. Assess.19:533–539,2003.
Caves, D. W., Christensen, L. R., and Diewert, W. E., The econometric theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output and productivity. Econometrica 50:1393–1414, 1982.
Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lindgren, B., and Roos, P., Productivity changes in Swedish pharmacies 1980–1989: A non-parametric Malmquist approach. J. Prod. Anal. 3:85–101, 1992.
Farrell, M. J., The measurement of productive efficiency. J. R. Stat. Soc., Series A:252–281, 1957.
Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M., and Zhang, Z., Productivity growth, technical progress and efficiency change in industrialized countries. Am. Econ. Rev. 84:66–83, 1994.
Diewert, W. E., Fisher ideal output, input and productivity indexes revisited. J. Prod. Anal. 3:211–248, 1992.
Balk, B. M., Malmquist productivity indexes and Fisher ideal indexes: Comment. Econ. J. 103:680–682, 1993.
Grosskopf, S., Some remarks on productivity and its decompositions. J. Prod. Anal. 20:459–474, 2003.
Tambour, M., The impact of health care policy initiatives on productivity. Health Econ. 6:57–70, 1997.
Linna, M., Measuring hospital cost efficiency with panel data models. Health Econ. 7:415–427, 1998.
Giuffrida, A., Productivity and efficiency changes in primary care: A Malmquist index approach. Health Care Manage. Sci. 2:11–26, 1999.
Sommersguter-Reichmann, M., The impact of the Austrian hospital financing reform on hospital productivity: Empirical evidence on efficiency and technology changes using a non-parametric input-based Malmquist approach. Health Care Manage. Sci. 3:309–321, 2000.
Staat, M., The efficiency of treatment strategies of general practitioners—A Malmquist index approach. Eur. J. Health Econ. 4:232–238, 2003.
Ozgen, H., and Ozcan, Y., Longitudinal analysis of efficiency in multiple output dialysis markets. Health Care Manage. Sci. 7:253–261, 2004.
Smith, P., Model misspecification in data envelopment analysis. Ann. Oper. Res. 73:233–252, 1997.
Held, P. J., and Pauly, M. V., Competition and efficiency in the end stage renal disease program. J. Health Econ. 2:95–118, 1983.
Charnes, A., Clark, T., Cooper, W. W., and Golany, B., A development study of data envelopment analysis in measuring the efficiency of maintenance units in U. S. Air Forces. Ann. Oper. Res. 2:95–112, 1985.
Torgersen, A. M., Forsund, F. R., and Kittlesen, S. A., Slack-adjusted efficiency measures and ranking of efficient units. J. Prod. Anal. 7:379–398, 1996.
Scheel's DEA Website. Retrieved March 19, 2005, from http://www.wiso.uni-dortmund.de/lsfg/or/scheel/ems/
Andersen, P., and Petersen, N. C., A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Manage. Sci. 39:1261–1264, 1993.
Banker, R. D., and Chang, H., Evaluating the superefficiency procedure in data envelopment analysis for outlier identification and for ranking efficient units. Working Paper, University of Texas at Dallas, 2000.
Ioannidis, G., Papadaki, O., and Tsakiris, D., Statistical and epidemiological data of the renal replacement therapy in Greece 1986–2000. Report of the Hellenic Renal Registry (in Greek). Hell. Nephrol. 14:525–548, 2002.
Griffiths, R. I., Powe, N. R., Gaskin, D. J., Anderson, G. F., de Lissovoy, G. V., and Whelton, P. K., The production of dialysis by for-profit versus not-for-profit freestanding renal dialysis facilities. Health Serv. Res. 29:473–487, 1994.
Tountas, Y., Karnaki, P., and Pavi, E., Reforming the reform: The Greek national health system in transition. Health Policy 62:15–29, 2002.
Thanassoulis, E., Boussofiane, A., and Dyson, R. G., Exploring output quality targets in the provision of perinatal care in England using data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 80:588–607, 1995.
Cheng, Y. S., and Lo, D., Firm size, technical efficiency and productivity growth in Chinese industry. Working Paper, University of London, 2004.
Nin, A., Arndt, C., and Preckel, P. V., Is agricultural productivity in developing countries really shrinking? New evidence using a modified nonparametric approach. J. Dev. Econ. 71:395–415, 2003.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. G. Ioannidis and Ms. O. Papadaki of the Hellenic Board of Registry Coordination and Control of RRT for kindly providing us with the extremely large amount of data required for this study and for assisting in its interpretation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kontodimopoulos, N., Niakas, D. A 12-year Analysis of Malmquist Total Factor Productivity in Dialysis Facilities. J Med Syst 30, 333–342 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-005-9005-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-005-9005-9