Skip to main content
Log in

Unstable Embodiments: A Phenomenological Interpretation of Patient Satisfaction with Treatment Outcome

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Humanities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many patients experience aspects of treatment and care as dehumanizing because the body is considered separate from the self and its life context. An attempt to transcend viewing persons in dualistic terms is posed by phenomenologists who focus not on “the body” as such but on what it means to be “embodied.” In this paper, we review the relevance of the phenomenology of the body for health care and report the results of comparing Sally Gadow’s phenomenological insights about body-self unity with a qualitative analysis of patients’ accounts of satisfaction with the outcome of hand surgery. We illustrate the ways in which our findings were and were not congruent with Gadow’s conceptualization of embodiment and highlight aspects that are ambiguous. We conclude that the body-self dialectical relationship should be recast as a body-self-society trialectic and discuss the implications of this new conceptualization for clinical practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See Leder, “Medicine and Paradigms of Embodiment” (1984); Plager, “Hermeneutic Phenomenology”; and Turner, Regulating Bodies, 151–173. All subsequent references to Leder’s work appear in the text.

  2. See Leonard, “A Heideggerian Phenomenological Perspective.”

  3. See Lupton, “The Social Construction of Medicine and the Body”; and Nettleton and Watson, “The Body in Everyday Life.”

  4. Baron, “An Introduction to Medical Phenomenology.”

  5. See Baron and Leonard.

  6. Cited by Nettleton and Watson.

  7. See, for instance Turner, Regulating Bodies; Radley, “Health Psychology, Embodiment and the Question of Vulnerability”; and Diprose, The Bodies of Women, 102--130.

  8. Gadow, “Body and Self: A Dialectic.” All subsequent references to this work appear in the text. See also Charmaz, “The Body, Identity and Self.”

  9. Charmaz.

  10. See Hudak, “Understanding the Meaning of Satisfaction with Treatment Outcome” and “Testing a New Theory of Patient Satisfaction with Treatment Outcome.”

  11. In addition to Gadow’s “Body and Self,” readers desiring further detail are referred to Berthold-Bond’s Hegel’s Grand Synthesis, 81--91.

  12. Kestenbaum, The Humanity of the Ill.

  13. See also Berg and Gadow, “Toward More Human Meanings of Aging,” 86.

  14. Levin and Solomon, “The Discursive Formation of the Body in the History of Medicine.”

  15. See Hudak, “Understanding the Meaning of Satisfaction.”

  16. See Freund, “The Expressive Body”; Frank, “For a Sociology of the Body”; and Turner, “Recent Developments in the Theory of the Body.”

  17. See Harris, “The Symptomatology of Abnormal Appearance,” and Vamos, “Body Image in Rheumatoid Arthritis.”

  18. Fleischman, “I am …, I have…, I suffer from,” 6.

  19. Brown, “Out on a Limb.”

  20. Verdan, “The Hand in Art,” 128.

  21. Freund, 460.

  22. See Feldman.

  23. See Williams, “Is Anybody There?” and “Beyond Meaning, Discourse and the Empirical World.”

  24. Waldby, “Biomedicine, Tissue Transfer and Intercorporeality,” 241.

References

  • R. J. Baron, “An Introduction to Medical Phenomenology: I Can’t Hear You While I’m Listening.” Annals of Internal Medicine 103 (1985): 606–611.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • G. Berg, and S. Gadow, “Toward More Human Meanings of Aging: Ideals and Images From Philosophy and Art.” In S. F. Spicker, K. M. Woodward, and D. D. van Tassel (eds.) Aging and the Elderly: Humanistic Perspectives in Gerontology (New York: Humanities Press), 86.

  • Berthold-Bond, Hegel’s Grand Synthesis: A Study of Being, Thought, and History (New York: Harper, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • P. W. Brown, “Out on a Limb.” The Journal of Hand Surgery (1998): 1–2.

  • K. Charmaz, “The Body, Identity and Self: Adapting to Impairment.” The Sociological Quarterly 36 (1995): 657–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Diprose, The Bodies of Women: Ethics, Embodiment and Sexual Difference (London and New York: Routledge, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Feldman, http://www.uri.edu/summer/cuba/cpl%20475%20syllabus.pdf (accessed 2004).

  • S. Fleischman, “I am …, I have …, I suffer from …: A Linguist Reflects on the Language of Illness and Disease.” Journal of Medical Humanities 20 (March 1999): 3–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. W. Frank, “For a Sociology of the Body: An Analytical Review.” In B. S. Turner, M. Featherstone, M. Hepworth (eds.) The Body: Social Process and Cultural Theory (London: Sage, 1991), 36–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. E. S. Freund, “The Expressive Body: A Common Ground for the Sociology of Emotions and Health and Illness.” Sociology of Health and Illness 12(4): 452–477.

  • S. Gadow, “Body and Self: A Dialectic.” The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 5(3): 172–185.

  • D. L. Harris, “The Symptomatology of Abnormal Appearance: An Anecdotal Survey.” British Journal of Plastic Surgery 35 (1981): 312–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. L. Hudak, P. McKeever, and J. G. Wright, “Understanding the Meaning of Satisfaction with Treatment.” Medical Care 42 (2004): 718–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. L. Hudak, S. Hogg-Johnson, C. Bombardier, P. D. McKeever, and J. G. Wright, “Testing a New Theory of Patient Satisfaction with Treatment Outcome.” Medical Care 42 (2004): 726–739.

    Google Scholar 

  • V. Kestenbaum, The Humanity of the Ill: Phenomenological Perspectives (Knoxville: U of Tennessee Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Leder, “Medicine and Paradigms of Embodiment.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 9 (1984): 29–43.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • D. Leder, “A Tale of Two Bodies: The Cartesian Corpse and the Lived Body.” In D. Leder (ed.) The Body in Medical Thought and Practice (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992), 17–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • V. W. Leonard, “A Heideggerian Phenomenological Perspective on the Concept of Person.” In P. Benner (ed.) Interpretive Phenomenology: Embodiment, Caring and Ethics in Health and Illness (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994), 43–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. M. Levin, and G. F. Solomon. “The Discursive Formation of the Body in the History of Medicine.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15 (1990): 515–537.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • D. Lupton, “The Social Construction of Medicine and the Body.” In G. Albrecht, R. Fitzpatrick, and S. Scrimshaw (eds.) Handbook of Social Studies in Health and Medicine (London: Sage Publications, 2000), 50–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Maxwell, Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Merleau-Ponty, Phenomenology of Perception. Trans. C Smith (London: Routledge, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Nettleton and J. Watson. “The Body in Everyday Life: An Introduction.” In S. Nettleton and J. Watson (eds.) The Body in Everyday Life (New York: Routledge, 1998), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. A. Plager, “Hermeneutic Phenomenology: A Methodology for Family Health and Health Promotions Study in Nursing.” In P. Benner (ed.) Interpretive Phenomenology: Embodiment, Caring and Ethics in Health and Illness (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994), 65–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Radley, “Health Psychology, Embodiment and the Question of Vulnerability.” Journal of Health Psychology 5 (2000): 297–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. S. Turner, “The History of the Changing Concepts of Health and Illness: Outline of a General Model of Illness Categories.” In G. Albrecht, R. Fitzpatrick, and S. Scrimshaw (eds.) Handbook of Social Studies in Health and Medicine (London: Sage Publications, 2000), 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. S. Turner, “Recent Developments in the Theory of the Body.” In B. S. Turner, M. Featherstone, and M. Hepworth (eds.) The Body: Social Process and Cultural Theory (London: Sage, 1991), 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. S. Turner, Regulating Bodies: Essays in Medical Sociology (London and New York: Routledge, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Vamos, “Body Image in Rheumatoid Arthritis: The Relevance of Hand Appearance to Desire for Surgery.” British Journal of Medical Psychology 63 (1990): 267–277.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • C. E. Verdan, “The Hand in Art.” Journal of Hand Therapy (July–September 1990): 129–132.

  • C. Waldby, “Biomedicine, Tissue Transfer and Intercorporeality.” Feminist Theory 3 (2002): 239–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Weiss, Body Images: Embodiment as Intercorporeality (London and New York: Routledge, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • S. J. Williams, “Beyond Meaning, Discourse and the Empirical World: Critical Realist Reflections on Health.” Social Theory & Health 1 (2003): 42–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. J. Williams, “Is Anybody There? Critical Realism, Chronic Illness and the Disability Debate.” Sociology of Health & Illness 21 (1999): 787–819.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the anonymous reviewers of this manuscript for their insightful comments and the study participants for their thoughtful reflections on embodiment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pamela L. Hudak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hudak, P.L., McKeever, P. & Wright, J.G. Unstable Embodiments: A Phenomenological Interpretation of Patient Satisfaction with Treatment Outcome. J Med Humanit 28, 31–44 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-006-9027-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-006-9027-4

Keywords

Navigation