Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Use of Three-Dimensional Basement Membrane Cultures to Model Oncogene-Induced Changes in Mammary Epithelial Morphogenesis

  • Published:
Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of breast carcinomas involves a complex set of phenotypic alterations in breast epithelial cells and the surrounding microenvironment. While traditional transformation assays provide models for investigating certain aspects of the cellular processes associated with tumor initiation and progression, they do not model alterations in tissue architecture that are critically involved in tumor development. In this review, we provide examples of how three-dimensional (3D) cell culture models can be utilized to dissect the pathways involved in the development of mammary epithelial structures and to elucidate the mechanisms responsible for oncogene-induced phenotypic alterations in epithelial behavior and architecture. Many normal mammary epithelial cell lines undergo a stereotypic morphogenetic process when grown in the presence of exogenous matrix proteins. This 3D morphogenesis culminates in the formation of well-organized, polarized spheroids, and/or tubules that are highly reminiscent of normal glandular architecture. In contrast, transformed cell lines isolated from mammary tumors exhibit significant deviations from normal epithelial behavior in 3D culture. We describe the use of 3D models as a method for both reconstructing and deconstructing the cell biological and biochemical events involved in mammary neoplasia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Roskelley CD, Bissell MJ. The dominance of the microenvironment in breast and ovarian cancer. Semin Cancer Biol 2002;12:97–104.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 2000;100:57–70.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Albertson DG. Profiling breast cancer by array CGH. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2003;78:289–98.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kopelovich L, Crowell JA, Fay JR. The epigenome as a target for cancer chemoprevention. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95:1747–57.

    Google Scholar 

  5. O’Connell P. Genetic and cytogenetic analyses of breast cancer yield different perspectives of a complex disease. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2003;78:347–57.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Coradini D, Daidone MG. Biomolecular prognostic factors in breast cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2004;16:49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Emerman JT, Pitelka DR. Maintenance and induction of morphological differentiation in dissociated mammary epithelium on floating collagen membranes. In Vitro 1977;13:316–28.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lee EY, Parry G, Bissell MJ. Modulation of secreted proteins of mouse mammary epithelial cells by the collagenous substrata. J Cell Biol 1984;98:146–55.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hoffman MP, Kibbey MC, Letterio JJ, Kleinman HK. Role of laminin-1 and TGF-beta 3 in acinar differentiation of a human submandibular gland cell line (HSG). J Cell Sci 1996;109(Pt 8):2013–21.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Barcellos-Hoff MH, Aggeler J, Ram TG, Bissell MJ. Functional differentiation and alveolar morphogenesis of primary mammary cultures on reconstituted basement membrane. Development 1989;105:223–35.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Blatchford DR, Quarrie LH, Tonner E, McCarthy C, Flint DJ, Wilde CJ. Influence of microenvironment on mammary epithelial cell survival in primary culture. J Cell Physiol 1999;181:304–11.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fridrich MJ. Studing cancer in 3 dimension. JAMA 2003;290:1977–79.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Debnath J, Muthuswamy SK, Brugge JS. Morphogenesis and oncogenesis of MCF-10A mammary epithelial acini grown in three-dimensional basement membrane cultures. Methods 2003;30:256–68.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Debnath J, Mills KR, Collins NL, Reginato MJ, Muthuswamy SK, Brugge JS. The role of apoptosis in creating and maintaining luminal space within normal and oncogene-expressing mammary acini. Cell 2002;111:29–40.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mills KR, Reginato M, Debnath J, Queenan B, Brugge JS. Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is required for induction of autophagy during lumen formation in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:3438–43.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hurley WL, Blatchford DR, Hendry KA, Wilde CJ. Extracellular matrix and mouse mammary cell function: Comparison of substrata in culture. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 1994;30A:529–38.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Birchmeier W, Brinkmann V, Niemann C, Meiners S, DiCesare S, Naundorf H, et al. Role of HGF/SF and c-Met in morphogenesis and metastasis of epithelial cells. Ciba Found Symp 1997;212:230–40; discussion 40–6.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Petersen OW, Ronnov-Jessen L, Howlett AR, Bissell MJ. Interaction with basement membrane serves to rapidly distinguish growth and differentiation pattern of normal and malignant human breast epithelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:9064–8.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zutter MM, Santoro SA, Staatz WD, Tsung YL. Re-expression of the alpha 2 beta 1 integrin abrogates the malignant phenotype of breast carcinoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995;92:7411–5.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Weaver VM, Howlett AR, Langton-Webster B, Petersen OW, Bissell MJ. The development of a functionally relevant cell culture model of progressive human breast cancer. Semin Cancer Biol 1995;6:175–84.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wang F, Weaver VM, Petersen OW, Larabell CA, Dedhar S, Briand P, et al. Reciprocal interactions between beta1-integrin and epidermal growth factor receptor in three-dimensional basement membrane breast cultures: A different perspective in epithelial biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:14821–6.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wang F, Hansen RK, Radisky D, Yoneda T, Barcellos-Hoff MH, Petersen OW, et al. Phenotypic reversion or death of cancer cells by altering signaling pathways in three-dimensional contexts. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:1494–503.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Birchmeier W, Behrens J. Cadherin expression in carcinomas: role in the formation of cell junctions and the prevention of invasiveness. Biochim Biophys Acta 1994;1198:11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shackney SE, Silverman JF. Molecular evolutionary patterns in breast cancer. Adv Anat Pathol 2003;10:278–90.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Meiners S, Brinkmann V, Naundorf H, Birchmeier W. Role of morphogenetic factors in metastasis of mammary carcinoma cells. Oncogene 1998;16:9–20.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hirschi KK, Xu CE, Tsukamoto T, Sager R. Gap junction genes Cx26 and Cx43 individually suppress the cancer phenotype of human mammary carcinoma cells and restore differentiation potential. Cell Growth Differ 1996;7:861–70.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Niemann C, Brinkmann V, Spitzer E, Hartmann G, Sachs M, Naundorf H, et al. Reconstitution of mammary gland development in vitro: requirement of c-met and c-erbB2 signaling for branching and alveolar morphogenesis. J Cell Biol 1998;143:533–45.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Schedin PJ, Eckel-Mahan KL, McDaniel SM, Prescott JD, Brodsky KS, Tentler JJ, et al. ESX induces transformation and functional epithelial to mesenchymal transition in MCF-12A mammary epithelial cells. Oncogene 2004;23:1766–79.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Villalobos M, Aranda M, Nunez MI, Becerra D, Olea N, Ruiz de Almodovar M, et al. Interaction between ionizing radiation, estrogens and antiestrogens in the modification of tumor microenvironment in estrogen dependent multicellular spheroids. Acta Oncol 1995;34:413–7.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Soriano JV, Uyttendaele H, Kitajewski J, Montesano R. Expression of an activated Notch4(int-3) oncoprotein disrupts morphogenesis and induces an invasive phenotype in mammary epithelial cells in vitro. Int J Cancer 2000;86:652–9.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hovey RC, Trott JF, Vonderhaar BK. Establishing a framework for the functional mammary gland: from endocrinology to morphology. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2002;7:17–38.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Muthuswamy SK, Li D, Lelievre S, Bissell MJ, Brugge JS. ErbB2, but not ErbB1, reinitiates proliferation and induces luminal repopulation in epithelial acini. Nat Cell Biol 2001;3:785–92.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hynes NE, Stern DF. The biology of erbB-2/neu/HER-2 and its role in cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta 1994;1198:165–84.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Harari D, Yarden Y. Molecular mechanisms underlying ErbB2/HER2 action in breast cancer. Oncogene 2000;19:6102–14.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Janda E, Litos G, Grunert S, Downward J, Beug H. Oncogenic Ras/Her-2 mediate hyperproliferation of polarized epithelial cells in 3D cultures and rapid tumor growth via the PI3K pathway. Oncogene 2002;21:5148–59.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kacinski BM, Scata KA, Carter D, Yee LD, Sapi E, King BL, et al. FMS (CSF-1 receptor) and CSF-1 transcripts and protein are expressed by human breast carcinomas in vivo and in vitro. Oncogene 1991;6:941–52.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wrobel CN, Debnath J, Lin E, Beausoleil S, Roussel MF, Brugge JS. Autocrine CSF-1R activation promotes Src-dependent disruption of mammary epithelial architecture. J Cell Biol 2004;165:263–73.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Gallahan D, Callahan R. The mouse mammary tumor associated gene INT3 is a unique member of the NOTCH gene family (NOTCH4). Oncogene 1997;14:1883–90.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Jhappan C, Gallahan D, Stahle C, Chu E, Smith GH, Merlino G, et al. Expression of an activated Notch-related int-3 transgene interferes with cell differentiation and induces neoplastic transformation in mammary and salivary glands. Genes Dev 1992;6:345–55.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bellacosa A, de Feo D, Godwin AK, Bell DW, Cheng JQ, Altomare DA, et al. Molecular alterations of the AKT2 oncogene in ovarian and breast carcinomas. Int J Cancer 1995;64:280–5.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Debnath J, Walker SJ, Brugge JS. Akt activation disrupts mammary acinar architecture and enhances proliferation in an mTOR-dependent manner. J Cell Biol 2003;163:315–26.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Schwertfeger KL, Richert MM, Anderson SM. Mammary gland involution is delayed by activated Akt in transgenic mice. Mol Endocrinol 2001;15:867–81.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Hutchinson JN, Jin J, Cardiff RD, Woodgett JR, Muller WJ. Activation of Akt-1 (PKB-alpha) can accelerate ErbB-2-mediated mammary tumorigenesis but suppresses tumor invasion. Cancer Res 2004;64:3171–8.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Liu H, Radisky DC, Wang F, Bissell MJ. Polarity and proliferation are controlled by distinct signaling pathways downstream of PI3-kinase in breast epithelial tumor cells. J Cell Biol 2004;164:603–12.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Dati C, Muraca R, Tazartes O, Antoniotti S, Perroteau I, Giai M, et al. c-erbB-2 and ras expression levels in breast cancer are correlated and show a co-operative association with unfavorable clinical outcome. Int J Cancer 1991;47:833–8.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Oft M, Peli J, Rudaz C, Schwarz H, Beug H, Reichmann E. TGF-beta1 and Ha-Ras collaborate in modulating the phenotypic plasticity and invasiveness of epithelial tumor cells. Gene Dev 1996;10:2462–77.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Zajchowski DA, Bartholdi MF, Gong Y, Webster L, Liu HL, Munishkin A, et al. Identification of gene expression profiles that predict the aggressive behavior of breast cancer cells. Cancer Res 2001;61:5168–78.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Gee JM, Barroso AF, Ellis IO, Robertson JF, Nicholson RI. Biological and clinical associations of c-jun activation in human breast cancer. Int J Cancer 2000;89:177–86.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Fialka I, Schwarz H, Reichmann E, Oft M, Busslinger M, Beug H. The estrogen-dependent c-JunER protein causes a reversible loss of mammary epithelial cell polarity involving a destabilization of adherens junctions. J Cell Biol 1996;132:1115–32.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Eger A, Stockinger A, Park J, Langkopf E, Mikula M, Gotzmann J, et al. beta-Catenin and TGFbeta signalling cooperate to maintain a mesenchymal phenotype after FosER-induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Oncogene 2004;23:2672–80.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Feldman RJ, Sementchenko VI, Watson DK. The epithelial-specific Ets factors occupy a unique position in defining epithelial proliferation, differentiation and carcinogenesis. Anticancer Res 2003;23:2125–31.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Chotteau-Lelievre A, Montesano R, Soriano J, Soulie P, Desbiens X, de Launoit Y. PEA3 transcription factors are expressed in tissues undergoing branching morphogenesis and promote formation of duct-like structures by mammary epithelial cells in vitro. Dev Biol 2003;259:241–57.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Prescott JD, Koto KS, Singh M, Gutierrez-Hartmann A. The ETS transcription factor ESE-1 transforms MCF-12A human mammary epithelial cells via a novel cytoplasmic mechanism. Mol Cell Biol 2004;24:5548–64.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Bartkova J, Lukas J, Muller H, Lutzhoft D, Strauss M, Bartek J. Cyclin D1 protein expression and function in human breast cancer. Int J Cancer 1994;57:353–61.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Gillett C, Fantl V, Smith R, Fisher C, Bartek J, Dickson C, et al. Amplification and overexpression of cyclin D1 in breast cancer detected by immunohistochemical staining. Cancer Res 1994;54:1812–7.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Munger K, Basile JR, Duensing S, Eichten A, Gonzalez SL, Grace M, et al. Biological activities and molecular targets of the human papillomavirus E7 oncoprotein. Oncogene 2001;20:7888–98.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Spancake KM, Anderson CB, Weaver VM, Matsunami N, Bissell MJ, White RL. E7-transduced human breast epithelial cells show partial differentiation in three-dimensional culture. Cancer Res 1999;59:6042–5.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Humphreys RC, Krajewska M, Krnacik S, Jaeger R, Weiher H, Krajewski S, et al. Apoptosis in the terminal endbud of the murine mammary gland: A mechanism of ductal morphogenesis. Development 1996;122:4013–22.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Jager R, Herzer U, Schenkel J, Weiher H. Overexpression of Bcl-2 inhibits alveolar cell apoptosis during involution and accelerates c-myc-induced tumorigenesis of the mammary gland in transgenic mice. Oncogene 1997;15:1787–95.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Thiery JP. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and pathologies. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2003;15:740–6.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Soriano JV, Orci L, Montesano R. TGF-beta1 induces morphogenesis of branching cords by cloned mammary epithelial cells at subpicomolar concentrations. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1996;220:879–85.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Jechlinger M, Grunert S, Beug H. Mechanisms in epithelial plasticity and metastasis: insights from 3D cultures and expression profiling. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2002;7:415–32.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Seton-Rogers SE, Brugge JS. ErbB2 and TGF-beta: A cooperative role in mammary tumor progression? Cell Cycle 2004;3:597–600.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Seton-Rogers SE, Lu Y, Hines LM, Koundinya M, LaBaer J, Muthuswamy SK, et al. Cooperation of the ErbB2 receptor and transforming growth factor beta in induction of migration and invasion in mammary epithelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004;101:1257–62.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Ueda Y, Wang S, Dumont N, Yi JY, Koh Y, Arteaga CL. Overexpression of HER2 (erbB2) in human breast epithelial cells unmasks transforming growth factor beta-induced cell motility. J Biol Chem 2004;279:24505–13.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Muraoka RS, Koh Y, Roebuck LR, Sanders ME, Brantley-Sieders D, Gorska AE, et al. Increased malignancy of Neu-induced mammary tumors overexpressing active transforming growth factor beta1. Mol Cell Biol 2003;23:8691–703.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Siegel PM, Shu W, Cardiff RD, Muller WJ, Massague J. Transforming growth factor beta signaling impairs Neu-induced mammary tumorigenesis while promoting pulmonary metastasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:8430–5.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Irminger-Finger I, Soriano JV, Vaudan G, Montesano R, Sappino AP. In vitro repression of Brca1-associated RING domain gene, Bard1, induces phenotypic changes in mammary epithelial cells. J Cell Biol 1998;143:1329–39.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Moody SE, Sarkisian CJ, Hahn KT, Gunther EJ, Pickup S, Dugan KD, et al. Conditional activation of Neu in the mammary epithelium of transgenic mice results in reversible pulmonary metastasis. Cancer Cell 2002;2:451–61.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Rosfjord EC, Dickson RB. Growth factors, apoptosis, and survival of mammary epithelial cells. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 1999;4:229–37.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Schmeichel KL, Weaver VM, Bissell MJ. Structural cues from the tissue microenvironment are essential determinants of the human mammary epithelial cell phenotype. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 1998;3:201–13.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB, van de Rijn M, Jeffrey SS, Rees CA, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 2000;406:747–52.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Yaswen P, Stampfer MR. Epigenetic changes accompanying human mammary epithelial cell immortalization. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2001;6:223–34.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Yaswen P, Stampfer MR. Molecular changes accompanying senescence and immortalization of cultured human mammary epithelial cells. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2002;34:1382–94.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Dontu G, Abdallah WM, Foley JM, Jackson KW, Clarke MF, Kawamura MJ, et al. In vitro propagation and transcriptional profiling of human mammary stem/progenitor cells. Genes Dev 2003;17:1253–70.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Gudjonsson T, Villadsen R, Nielsen HL, Ronnov-Jessen L, Bissell MJ, Petersen OW. Isolation, immortalization, and characterization of a human breast epithelial cell line with stem cell properties. Gene Dev 2002;16:693–706.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Gudjonsson T, Ronnov-Jessen L, Villadsen R, Rank F, Bissell MJ, Petersen OW. Normal and tumor-derived myoepithelial cells differ in their ability to interact with luminal breast epithelial cells for polarity and basement membrane deposition. J Cell Sci 2002;115:39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Zangani D, Darcy KM, Masso-Welch PA, Bellamy ES, Desole MS, Ip MM. Multiple differentiation pathways of rat mammary stromal cells in vitro: acquisition of a fibroblast, adipocyte or endothelial phenotype is dependent on hormonal and extracellular matrix stimulation. Differentiation 1999;64:91–101.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Darcy KM, Zangani D, Shea-Eaton W, Shoemaker SF, Lee PP, Mead LH, et al. Mammary fibroblasts stimulate growth, alveolar morphogenesis, and functional differentiation of normal rat mammary epithelial cells. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 2000;36:578–92.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Voronov E, Shouval DS, Krelin Y, Cagnano E, Benharroch D, Iwakura Y, et al. IL-1 is required for tumor invasiveness and angiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:2645–50.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Sameni M, Dosescu J, Moin K, Sloane BF. Functional imaging of proteolysis: Stromal and inflammatory cells increase tumor proteolysis. Mol Imag 2003;2:159–75.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Noel A, Munaut C, Boulvain A, Calberg-Bacq CM, Lambert CA, Nusgens B, et al. Modulation of collagen and fibronectin synthesis in fibroblasts by normal and malignant cells. J Cell Biochem 1992;48:150–61.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Zhang HZ, Bennett JM, Smith KT, Sunil N, Haslam SZ. Estrogen mediates mammary epithelial cell proliferation in serum-free culture indirectly via mammary stroma-derived hepatocyte growth factor. Endocrinology 2002;143:3427–34.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Kuperwasser C, Chavarria T, Wu M, Magrane G, Gray JW, Carey L, et al. Reconstruction of functionally normal and malignant human breast tissues in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:4966–71.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

    Kenna R. Mills Shaw, Carolyn N. Wrobel & Joan S. Brugge

  2. Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, 02115

    Joan S. Brugge

Authors
  1. Kenna R. Mills Shaw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carolyn N. Wrobel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Joan S. Brugge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joan S. Brugge.

Additional information

These authors contributed equally to this review.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shaw, K.R.M., Wrobel, C.N. & Brugge, J.S. Use of Three-Dimensional Basement Membrane Cultures to Model Oncogene-Induced Changes in Mammary Epithelial Morphogenesis. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 9, 297–310 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10911-004-1402-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10911-004-1402-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation