Abstract
Under suitable assumptions, the dynamic behaviour of a chemical reaction network is governed by an autonomous set of polynomial ordinary differential equations over continuous variables representing the concentrations of the reactant species. It is known that two networks may possess the same governing mass-action dynamics despite disparate network structure. To date, however, there has only been limited work exploiting this phenomenon even for the cases where one network possesses known dynamics while the other does not. In this paper, we bring these known results into a broader unified theory which we call conjugate chemical reaction network theory. We present a theorem which gives conditions under which two networks with different governing mass-action dynamics may exhibit the same qualitative dynamics and use it to extend the scope of the well-known theory of weakly reversible systems.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bamberger A., Billette E.: C R Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. 319(12), 1257 (1994)
Feinberg M.: Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 132(4), 311 (1995)
Pachter L., Sturmfels B.: Algebraic Statistics for Computational Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)
Sontag E.: IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr. 46(7), 1028 (2001)
Feinberg M.: Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 49, 187 (1974)
Horn F.: Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 49, 172 (1972)
Horn F., Jackson R.: Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 47, 81 (1972)
Siegel D., Chen Y.F.: Can. Appl. Math. Q. 2, 413 (1994)
Siegel D., MacLean D.: J. Math. Chem. 27, 89 (2000)
Vol’pert A.I., Hudjaev S.I.: Analysis in Classes of Discontinuous Functions and Equations of Mathematical Physics. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands (1985)
Craciun G., Feinberg M.: SIAM J. Appl. Math. 65(5), 1526 (2005)
Craciun G., Feinberg M.: SIAM J. Appl. Math. 66(4), 1321 (2006)
G. Craciun, C. Pantea, in Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS) (2010)
Schlosser P.M., Feinberg M.: Chem. Eng. Sci. 49(11), 1749 (1994)
Anderson D.: SIAM J. Appl. Math. 68(5), 1464 (2008)
Anderson D., Shiu A.: SIAM J. Appl. Math. 70(6), 1840 (2010)
Craciun G., Dickenstein A., Shiu A., Sturmfels B.: J. Symb. Comput. 44(11), 1551 (2009)
G. Craciun, F. Nazarov, C. Pantea, available at arXiv:1010.3050v1
Craciun G., Pantea C.: J. Math Chem. 44(1), 244 (2008)
Craciun G., Pantea C., Rempala G.: Comput. Biol. Chem. 33(5), 361 (2009)
Szederkényi G.: J. Math. Chem. 47, 551–568 (2010)
G. Szederkényi, K. M. Hangos, available at arXiv:1010.4477.
Szederkényi G., Hangos K.M., Péni T: MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem 65(2), 309 (2011)
Averbukh E.D.: Automat. Remote Contr. 55(12), 1723 (1994)
Krambeck F.J.: Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 38, 317 (1970)
MacLean, D., Master’s Thesis, University of Waterloo (1998)
Perko L.: Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems. Springer, Berlin (1993)
Wiggins S.: Introduction to Applied Nonlinear Dynamical Systems and Chaos. Springer, Berlin (1990)
Feinberg M., Horn F.: Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 66, 83 (1977)
Erdi P., Toth J.: Mathematical Models of Chemical Reactions. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1989)
Szederkényi G.: J. Math. Chem. 45, 1172 (2009)
Hill A.V: J. Physiol 40(4), 389 (2010)
Angeli D., Leenheer P., Sontag E.: Math. Biosci. 210(2), 598 (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johnston, M.D., Siegel, D. Linear conjugacy of chemical reaction networks. J Math Chem 49, 1263–1282 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10910-011-9817-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10910-011-9817-4