Skip to main content
Log in

Fluctuation free multivariate integration based logarithmic HDMR in multivariate function representation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper focuses on the Logarithmic High Dimensional Model Representation (Logarithmic HDMR) method which is a divide–and–conquer algorithm developed for multivariate function representation in terms of less-variate functions to reduce both the mathematical and the computational complexities. The main purpose of this work is to bypass the evaluation of N–tuple integrations appearing in Logarithmic HDMR by using the features of a new theorem named as Fluctuationlessness Approximation Theorem. This theorem can be used to evaluate the complicated integral structures of any scientific problem whose values can not be easily obtained analytically and it brings an approximation to the values of these integrals with the help of the matrix representation of functions. The Fluctuation Free Multivariate Integration Based Logarithmic HDMR method gives us the ability of reducing the complexity of the scientific problems of chemistry, physics, mathematics and engineering. A number of numerical implementations are also given at the end of the paper to show the performance of this new method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. I.M. Sobol, Sensitivity estimates for nonlinear mathematical models. Math. Modell. Comput. Exp. (MMCE), 1, 4.407 (1993)

  2. Rabitz H., Alıcs Ö.: General foundations of high dimensional model representations. J. Math. Chem. 25, 197–233 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Alıcs Ö., Rabitz H.: Efficient implementation of high dimensional model representations. J. Math. Chem. 29, 127–142 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li G., Rosenthal C., Rabitz H.: High dimensional model representations. J. Math. Chem. A 105, 7765–7777 (2001)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Demiralp M.: High dimensional model representation and its application varieties. Math. Res. 9, 146–159 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ziehn T., Tomlin A.S.: A global sensitivity study of sulfur chemistry in a premixed methane flame model using HDMR. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 40, 742–753 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ziehn T., Tomlin A.S.: GUI-HDMR—A software tool for global sensitivity analysis of complex models. Environ. Modell. Softw. 24, 775–785 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sridharan J., Chen T.: Modeling multiple input switching of CMOS gates in DSM technology using HDMR. Proc. Des. Autom. Test Eur. 1–3, 624–629 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rao B.N., Chowdhury R.: Probabilistic analysis using high dimensional model representation and fast fourier transform. Int. J. Comput. Methods Eng. Sci. Mech. 9, 342–357 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chowdhury R., Rao B.N.: Hybrid high dimensional model representation for reliability analysis. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 198, 753–765 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gomez M.C., Tchijov V., Leon F., Aguilar A.: A tool to improve the execution time of air quality models. Environ. Modell. Softw. 23, 27–34 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Banerjee I., Ierapetritou M.G.: Design optimization under parameter uncertainty for general black-box models. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res 41, 6687–6697 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Banerjee I., Ierapetritou M.G.: Parametric process synthesis for general nonlinear models. Comput. Chem. Eng. 27, 1499–1512 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Banerjee I., Ierapetritou M.G.: Model independent parametric decision making. Ann. Oper. Res. 132, 135–155 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shan S., Wang G.G.: Survey of modeling and optimization strategies to solve high-dimensional design problems with computationally-expensive black-box functions. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 41, 219–241 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tunga M.A., Demiralp M.: A factorized high dimensional model representation on the partitioned random discrete data. Appl. Num. Anal. Comp. Math. 1, 231–241 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tunga M.A., Demiralp M.: A factorized high dimensional model representation on the nodes of a finite hyperprismatic regular grid. Appl. Math. Comput. 164, 865–883 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Demiralp, Logarithmic High Dimensional Model Representation, 6th WSEAS International Conference on Mathematics (MATH’06), May 27–29 (İstanbul, Turkey, 2006), pp. 157–161

  19. M. Demiralp, A New Fluctuation Expansion Based Method for the Univariate Numerical Integration Under Gaussian Weights, WSEAS-2005 Proceedings, WSEAS 8-th International Conference on Applied Mathematics, 16–18 December (Tenerife, Spain, 2005), pp. 68–73

  20. M. Demiralp, Convergence issues in the Gaussian weighted multidimensional fluctuation expansion for the univariate numerical Integration. WSEAS Tracsaction Math. 4, 486–492

  21. M. Demiralp, Fluctuationlessness Theorem to Approximate Univariate Functions Matrix Representations (submitted)

  22. Altnbaak S.U., Demiralp M.: Solutions to linear matrix ordinary differential equations via minimal, regular, and excessive space extension based universalization: convergence and error estimates for truncation approximants in the homogeneous case with premultiplying polynomial coefficient matrix. J. Math. Chem. 48(2), 266 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Altnbaak S.U., Demiralp M.: Solutions to linear matrix ordinary differential equations via minimal, regular, and excessive space extension based universalization: perturbative matrix splines, convergence and error estimate issues for polynomial coefficients in the homogeneous case. J. Math. Chem. 48(2), 253 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. B. Tunga, M. Demiralp, The influence of the support functions on the quality of enhanced multivariance product representation, J. Math. Chem. (in press). doi:10.1007/s10910-010-9714-2 (2010)

  25. Tunga B., Demiralp M.: Constancy maximization based weight optimization in high dimensional model representation. Numer. Algorithms 52(3), 435–459 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Demiralp M.: Fluctuationlessness theorem to approximate multivariate functions’ matrix representations. WSEAS Trans. Math. 8, 258–297 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  27. A. Gil, J. Segura, N.M. Temme, Gauss quadrature, Numerical Methods for Special Functions, SIAM (2007)

  28. William H., Flannery B.P., Teukolsky S.A., Vetterling W.T.: Gaussian Quadratures and Orthogonal Polynomials, Numerical Recipes in C. 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  29. W. Oevel, F. Postel, S. Wehmeier, J. Gerhard, The MuPAD Tutorial, Springer, 2000

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Burcu Tunga.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tunga, B., Demiralp, M. Fluctuation free multivariate integration based logarithmic HDMR in multivariate function representation. J Math Chem 49, 894–909 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10910-010-9786-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10910-010-9786-z

Keywords

Navigation